HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive


    Waterview Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2621  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2009, 4:38 PM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,128
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/business/04chicago.html?pagewanted=all

Quote:
February 4, 2009
Two Chicago Towers Fall Victim to Scarce Financing
By ROBERT SHAROFF

CHICAGO — Back in 2006, at the height of the real estate boom, two projects here stood out as harbingers of a bright future for residential development.

The first and most significant was the Spire, a twisting lakefront condominium tower designed by the renowned Spanish architect Santiago Calatrava. At 150 stories, it was to be the tallest building in North America. (The current tallest, the Sears Tower, is also in Chicago.) The developer of the Spire is Garrett Kelleher of Shelbourne Development, a firm with offices in Chicago and Dublin as well as several other cities.

The second project was Waterview Tower, a 90-story mixed-use hotel and condominium building in the Loop, the central business district. It also was to be among the 10 tallest buildings in the city. The developer is Teng & Associates, a local firm.

Both projects got off to fast starts in terms of sales and construction, but both have now ground to a halt amid the many mechanics’ liens filed by subcontractors as the developers struggle to find additional financing.

At the padlocked lakefront site of the Spire, a seven-story-deep hole is ringed with 34 massive caissons that go down to bedrock.

The Waterview site on Wacker Drive, meanwhile, is even more unsettling. Workers had completed the first 26 floors of the building before they stopped work for good late last summer.

Taken together, the two are the most visible signs of the financing squeeze that has all but paralyzed the real estate market here over the last six months.

“If I’d known in July of 2006 that the world would be where it is today, I would have done a lot of things differently,” Mr. Kelleher said.

Both Mr. Kelleher and Teng ran into trouble because of a practice that, while unconventional, had become more accepted in the later years of the boom. In their haste to start building, the developers used money from their own pockets to finance the early stages of construction rather than go through the lengthy process of securing a traditional construction loan. The expectation was that further financing would easily be obtained at a later date.

Jim Loewenberg, a co-chief executive of the Magellan Development Group, the developer of the multibuilding Lakeshore East mixed-use residential project directly across the Chicago River from the Spire, said neither Mr. Kelleher nor Teng & Associates necessarily did anything wrong.

“I think that developers inherently are risk-takers and in many cases begin their projects before every t is crossed and every i is dotted,” he said. “So they lead themselves down a path, and sometimes it works out wonderfully and sometimes it doesn’t.”

Mr. Kelleher said: “It was about getting started. I needed to demonstrate that I was committed to the project.”

So far, Mr. Kelleher has invested about $250 million in the Spire; $180 million was cash from his own holdings and $70 million was in the form of two loans from the Anglo Irish Bank in Dublin.

When construction started, the plan, while aggressive, made sense. Total condominium sales were estimated at $3.4 billion, against total costs of $2.3 billion.

The project initially did well, selling just over 30 percent of its 1,194 units in the first eight months, at prices ranging from $750,000 to just under $40 million. The latter — for the 10,000-square-foot penthouse — is the highest price ever paid for a condominium in downtown Chicago. The contracts extend until the fourth quarter of 2013, and deposits are held in escrow until then.

Also significant was the fact that more than half of the sales were to individuals or entities outside the United States. “We launched in January” of 2008, Mr. Kelleher said, “and went to Beijing, Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai, London and a number of other markets.”

In late September, Mr. Kelleher announced the penthouse sale — to Ty Warner, founder of the company that makes Beanie Baby toys. Since then, “things have slowed down,” he said.

Mr. Kelleher estimates it will take about $1.75 billion to complete the Spire and says he has had conversations with numerous financial institutions, both in the United States and around the world, over the last 18 months. “There’s no financing available to build the Spire today,” said Mr. Kelleher. “It’s a matter of waiting. And that’s what the plan is.”

Specifically, Mr. Kelleher is waiting for next fall, when the city will learn whether it will be the site of the 2016 Olympics. “If Chicago lands the Olympics, it will certainly be a boost to the local economy,” Mr. Kelleher said.

The situation is similar at Waterview Tower. Executives at Teng & Associates declined numerous requests for interviews, but reports about the project’s troubles circulated widely last fall.

The $500 million mixed-use project began construction using internal financing from Teng and a $20 million bridge loan issued by the Chicago-based LaSalle Bank, which is now a division of Bank of America.

The plan called for 200 hotel condominium units as well as 233 residential condominiums on its upper floors. About 40 percent of the hotel units and 67 percent of the residential condominiums were sold, the latter for an average of $800 a square foot.

“Waterview had some of the best prices out there in terms of what you actually got, and sold very well,” said James Kinney, president of Rubloff Residential Properties, a large downtown brokerage firm.

Last April, Teng announced that the Export-Import Bank of China would be providing the $400 million needed to complete the project. The loan was facilitated by Beijing Construction, a Chinese firm that was expected to take over as the building’s general contractor. The deal, however, eventually fell apart.

“It’s not really too hard to determine why the bank got cold feet,” said Zac Henson, chief executive of Beijing Construction’s United States division. “The economic news over the summer got worse and worse and never really got better.”

According to Mr. Henson, the bank has yet to formally cancel the loan, but he conceded that at the moment the bank’s appetite for the project was “questionable.”

Steven DeGraff, a lawyer who specializes in real estate workouts, says there are few good options in the current environment. “It may be cheaper to tear it down,” he said, “or it may be cheaper just to leave it in its current state.”


In the meantime, there are many more condominiums in the pipeline in Chicago.

The city added 4,600 new condo units in the downtown area in 2008, with another 4,700 units scheduled to be completed this year. The rate at which these new units are being occupied is lagging, however.

“Absorption last year was terrible — probably around 1,000 units,” said Gail Lissner, vice president of the Chicago-based Appraisal Research Counselors, which tracks downtown condo sales. “It’s going to take some time to work through this inventory.”

The upside, she adds, is that only 500 new units are expected in 2010 and fewer than that in the following years. “Any project that is not out of the ground now is going to have a very difficult time getting financing,” she said.

Prices, meanwhile, are down anywhere from 5 to 25 percent, depending on location and amenities. “The more generic, the more negotiable,” Mr. Kinney said. “If you want a two-bedroom two-bathroom plain-vanilla condo in downtown Chicago, I can get you a very good deal.”

Last edited by Steely Dan; Feb 4, 2009 at 5:14 PM.
     
     
  #2622  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2009, 7:39 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 13,016
Dear God.

Does anyone else feel like they're being stabbed in the heart while reading this? The thought of demolishing the base as a 'reasonable' option makes me want to heave.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
     
     
  #2623  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2009, 7:57 PM
Kamuix's Avatar
Kamuix Kamuix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 158
Kind of reminds me of Metropolitan Life Building in new york back in like 1934
     
     
  #2624  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2009, 8:45 PM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Dear God.

Does anyone else feel like they're being stabbed in the heart while reading this? The thought of demolishing the base as a 'reasonable' option makes me want to heave.
Keep in mind, that's just the opinion of a real estate lawyer who is as far as I can tell in no way related to the development.
     
     
  #2625  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2009, 9:56 PM
chi-arch chi-arch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch.G, Ch.G View Post
Keep in mind, that's just the opinion of a real estate lawyer who is as far as I can tell in no way related to the development.
"Or it may be cheaper just to leave it in it's current state"

I'm sorry, just what is he saying with that comment?, cheaper than what?, current state for how long? What a dork.
     
     
  #2626  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 12:59 AM
jjk1103 jjk1103 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 878
..............how long can the structural elements remain exposed before there is serious damage ?
     
     
  #2627  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 1:33 AM
Stratosphere's Avatar
Stratosphere Stratosphere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 1,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk1103 View Post
..............how long can the structural elements remain exposed before there is serious damage ?
Well, the Ryugyong Hotel was on hold for 16 years. Now they are working on it again.

     
     
  #2628  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 6:33 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,927
Yes, but there is evidence that the Ryugyong Hotel had shoddy concrete to begin with. The cladding is being done as a cosmetic thing to improve the image of Pyongyang. The whole environment in North Korea is so weird and surreal. The closest thing I can compare it to is "1984" - the image of a strong and healthy country is more important than the reality.

At Waterview, the concrete shouldn't suffer too much damage in the immediate future if the site is secured properly. At some point, the concrete will need to be painted or otherwise sealed to preserve it for future construction. I hope the city will step in with the money to do this, in the interest of helping this project meet fruition at some point in the future.

The other alternative is wrapping it in plastic, like at Staybridge Suites.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
     
     
  #2629  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 5:12 PM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,672
Or, they or a 3rd party could skin, open & operate the completed garage sections, to generate some revenue...
     
     
  #2630  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 5:23 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrabbit View Post
Or, they or a 3rd party could skin, open & operate the completed garage sections, to generate some revenue...
the tower crane would have to be removed for that. remember, it goes directly through the ramp floors.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #2631  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 7:16 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,927
Yes, and to safely remove the tower crane a few more floors will need to be poured.

There are so many parties that still have a stake in this that the status quo is untenable. The crane company will want their crane back, the city will not want an unfinished building crumbling away, the buyers will want their units (although I assume most have asked for their deposit back), the city will also want the sidewalks re-opened, etc.

Because of this I think that money will come from somewhere to bring the project to a logical stopping point, pouring the extra two floors (or pouring something temporary) to remove the crane, doing some kind of finishing (painting, cladding, etc) and potentially operating the garage.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
     
     
  #2632  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 7:39 PM
chi-arch chi-arch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 266
To further complicate the garage issue and bringing this aspect of the project on line, is the fact that many of the parking spaces are under contract as well. Teng would essentially have to abandon the project and return any outstanding deposits before proceeding to move to this next step. The parking also is only up to 12 with the hotel floors above that to the current 26th floor. Certainly, this is an option, but complicated and would probably preclude ever seeing a tower on this building.
     
     
  #2633  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 7:56 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,423
I don't believe that "the only way to get the crane out is to build up 3 floors". We are human beings and very ingenious, it seems to me that there is nothing preventing us from finding a different way to get it out. I'm sure they could just demolish some of the half completely pillars on the edge and then stick a dereck up there and just pull the crane out...
     
     
  #2634  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 8:23 PM
Mojava Mojava is offline
c h i c a g o
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by chi-arch View Post
To further complicate the garage issue and bringing this aspect of the project on line, is the fact that many of the parking spaces are under contract as well. Teng would essentially have to abandon the project and return any outstanding deposits before proceeding to move to this next step. The parking also is only up to 12 with the hotel floors above that to the current 26th floor. Certainly, this is an option, but complicated and would probably preclude ever seeing a tower on this building.
I'm sure that the public garage (hotel and pay per use) is seperated from the deeded spots (condo owners). This is probably just by floor numbers but I understand what you're getting at.
     
     
  #2635  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 8:52 PM
Brian.'s Avatar
Brian. Brian. is offline
mmmmkay
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
I don't believe that "the only way to get the crane out is to build up 3 floors". We are human beings and very ingenious, it seems to me that there is nothing preventing us from finding a different way to get it out. I'm sure they could just demolish some of the half completely pillars on the edge and then stick a dereck up there and just pull the crane out...
And to prove that you are correct I will show you what us humans could do to get that crane down to the ground.

     
     
  #2636  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2009, 1:47 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ Exactly. I don't buy the simplified "crane is stuck" business either. It might be stuck, but the reasons are probably more complicated (as in contracts or liquidity etc.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
At Waterview, the concrete shouldn't suffer too much damage in the immediate future if the site is secured properly. At some point, the concrete will need to be painted or otherwise sealed to preserve it for future construction. I hope the city will step in with the money to do this, in the interest of helping this project meet fruition at some point in the future.

The other alternative is wrapping it in plastic, like at Staybridge Suites.
I presume you know all of this because you have looked closely at the concrete mix design of this particular project?
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
     
     
  #2637  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2009, 10:20 AM
Mehow Mehow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
I don't believe that "the only way to get the crane out is to build up 3 floors". We are human beings and very ingenious, it seems to me that there is nothing preventing us from finding a different way to get it out. I'm sure they could just demolish some of the half completely pillars on the edge and then stick a dereck up there and just pull the crane out...
If Central crane needed that rig on another project,it would be down by now.
     
     
  #2638  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2009, 7:33 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I hope the city will step in with the money to do this, in the interest of helping this project meet fruition at some point in the future.
The city of Chicago won't spend one god damned dime of my money to "help" Teng or any other inept developer with their luxury condominium projects. . . you must be living in some sort of fantasy land to think that would ever happen. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
     
     
  #2639  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2009, 8:01 PM
Rilestone75's Avatar
Rilestone75 Rilestone75 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mehow View Post
If Central crane needed that rig on another project,it would be down by now.
Central Crane may be keeping that crane there because it is FREE money. There is currently no wear & tear on it and they have probably "weatherized" it somehow, so they are just collecting (if they are able to collect) $$$ each month as stated previously on this thread.
     
     
  #2640  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2009, 8:37 PM
lawfin lawfin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
The city of Chicago won't spend one god damned dime of my money to "help" Teng or any other inept developer with their luxury condominium projects. . . you must be living in some sort of fantasy land to think that would ever happen. . .

. . .
Hear, Hear....

though they do aid in some instance with TIF's do they not....prior to construction

I am unclear on TIFS
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.