HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast > Atlanta


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2041  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2009, 8:52 PM
Free Free is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 67
I saw this article in the Charlotte Business Journal about Charlotte's plans for a streetcar in the center of the Queen City and it just made me wish the Peachtree Corridor's plan for a streetcar could please, please gain more momentum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2042  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2009, 2:50 AM
NativeAtlantan's Avatar
NativeAtlantan NativeAtlantan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 400
I would be in support, too, if they weren't planning to use overhead wires....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2043  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2009, 3:39 AM
Andrea Andrea is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,912
.

Last edited by Andrea; Jan 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2044  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2009, 2:16 AM
cabasse's Avatar
cabasse cabasse is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ἀταλάντη
Posts: 4,395
beltline tours

as a subscriber to the beltline mail list, i got an email a few weeks back about new beltline tours on friday and saturday mornings for the next couple of months. i plan on trying to make one of them, camera in tow of course, and was wondering if anyone else might be interesting in going as well. it's been 5 years since i last saw some of you and it'd be pretty neat to meet again sometime, maybe even have a mini-forum-meet of sorts.

here's the link:
http://www.beltline.org/GetInvolved/TourtheBeltLine/tabid/1746/Default.aspx
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2045  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2009, 7:53 PM
jew4life4948's Avatar
jew4life4948 jew4life4948 is offline
Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Atlanta/Chicago
Posts: 435
Stimulus Funds Roads Over Transit Three-to-One

By CHRISTOPHER CONKEY

Some Democrats and interest groups protested that the economic-stimulus proposal unveiled by the House Tuesday doesn't allocate enough funding for transportation projects, setting the stage for a heated debate in the weeks ahead.

The House bill would provide about $43 billion for roads, transit and airport projects, well below the $53 billion recommended by House Transportation Committee Chairman James Oberstar (D., Minn.). Many House members had figured the transportation component of the bill would exceed $85 billion, as the price tag of the overall package swelled to $825 billion in recent weeks.

Some members of the House transportation committee objected to the proposed level of investment during a Democratic caucus session Thursday, and several members later spoke out during a committee meeting. Highways and Transit Subcommittee Chairman Peter DeFazio (D., Ore.) suggested the committee draft a letter or resolution to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi objecting to the transport section of the stimulus bill.

Rep. Oberstar suggested the committee "mobilize those practitioners of infrastructure" at a hearing next week to demonstrate the need to increase spending levels on shovel-ready projects. "Then I think we make the move on the House leadership and the incoming Obama administration," he said.

President-elect Barack Obama has pushed for an economic-stimulus package to help jump-start the economy, which has slid into recession. He had pledged to set aside funding for infrastructure projects, both to help cash-strapped local governments create jobs and to bolster the country's aging transportation networks.

Special-interest groups from labor unions to businesses also voiced objections. Environmental groups criticized the proposed spending for mass-transit systems and intercity rail projects, which was about $7 billion less than Mr. Oberstar had recommended. They have argued that expansion of mass-transit systems could help ease problems posed by climate change, congestion and oil consumption.

Critics noted that the stimulus bill would spend three dollars on highways for every one dollar spent on mass-transit systems. When hearings begin next week, environmental groups said, they would push to lower that ratio or even put funding for transit on an equal footing with highways.

About the only interest group in the transportation world that seemed satisfied Thursday was one representing highway users. About $30 billion of the roughly $43 billion directly provided for roads, transit and aviation would be set aside for highway projects. Intercity rail would get about $1 billion, compared with the $5 billion recommended by Mr. Oberstar. Airports would get about $3 billion, a little more than half of what Mr. Oberstar requested.

"Why is transit continuing to take a back seat to highways?" asked Kevin Sheys, a lawyer who represents commuter rail and transit agencies. "The disproportionate amount of highway spending could cut against a lot of things they're trying to do on energy efficiency."

Write to Christopher Conkey at [email protected]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123205843724587333.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
__________________
www.eastlakeview.tumblr.com
Cities / Pop Culture / Fashion / Music / Photography


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2046  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2009, 8:51 PM
Andrea Andrea is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,912
.

Last edited by Andrea; Jan 26, 2009 at 6:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2047  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2009, 10:41 AM
Andrea Andrea is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,912
.

Last edited by Andrea; Jan 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2048  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2009, 3:55 PM
Rail Claimore's Avatar
Rail Claimore Rail Claimore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrea View Post
Had an appointment in Alpharetta yesterday and was pleasantly surprised at how well MARTA works out that way. Trip summary: A 10 minute walk to the bus stop; the bus was within 7 minutes of being on schedule. A 5 minute ride to the train station and transfer to rail. Train arrived within 5 minutes. About a 20 minute ride to North Springs, transfer to Route 140. From there it was a pleasant 20 minute ride to North Point Mall, and the bus dropped me within a mile of my destination. An hour and a half overall, which is not bad for $1.75!

Oh, and I did not realize the bus gets to use the emergency lane along GA 400 - that really speeds things up.
I noticed the shoulders marked as such last time I was in Atlanta driving along 400, with those lane-marking reflectors along the side.
__________________
So am I supposed to sign something here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2049  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2009, 6:08 PM
Andrea Andrea is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,912
.

Last edited by Andrea; Jan 26, 2009 at 6:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2050  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2009, 7:54 PM
plorenc's Avatar
plorenc plorenc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 216
House Republicans may be laying groundwork for state takeover of MARTA

Quote:
There’s more evidence of a very large shake-up in Georgia’s network — some would say maze — of transportation agencies.

We’ve reported that Gov. Sonny Perdue is very hot on the idea, and has named it as a price for his support of a statewide sales tax to address congestion.

House Majority Leader Jerry Keen has suggested blowing up the state transportation board as we know it. Similar ideas have popped up in the Senate. Check out S.B. 40 proposed by President pro tem Tommie Williams (R-Lyons), Jeff Mullis (R-Chickamauga), Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock) and Doug Stoner (D-Smyrna).

It would allow the Legislature to decide what projects are too important to be handled by the state Department of Transportation.

But wait. There’s more.

In the list of House committee assignments that came out late last week, two small changes went largely unnoticed.

State Rep. Larry O’Neal (R-Bonaire), confidante of Gov. Sonny Perdue, was returned to the joint MARTA oversight committee known as MARTOC. House Rules Chairman Earl Ehrhart (R-Powder Springs), a close friend of Speaker Glen Richardson, was assigned to the same committee for the first time.

Asked what the appointment of two heavy-hitters signifies, MARTOC chairman Jill Chambers (R-Atlanta) replied, “Leadership support of my initiatives.”

Any initiative in particular? “Consolidation of the state-created transportation agencies under a single umbrella,” Chambers said. For instance, the absorption of MARTA into the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority — or some other state acronym.

MARTA, technically a creation of the Legislature, has pleaded for more state funding. The transit system, which covers DeKalb and Fulton counties, was $43 million in the red as of last summer.

“In order to get state funding, the state has to have more control,” the chairman said. Or in this case, total control. Other regional transportation authorities — bus systems in Clayton and Cobb, for instance — could be wrapped into this single system as well.

How quickly? Not this calendar year, Chambers said. Maybe next.
If this actually happens, I wonder what it could mean for the future of MARTA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2051  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2009, 8:21 PM
jew4life4948's Avatar
jew4life4948 jew4life4948 is offline
Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Atlanta/Chicago
Posts: 435
Similar talk in Massachusetts : State Senate would create transportation superagency

__________________
www.eastlakeview.tumblr.com
Cities / Pop Culture / Fashion / Music / Photography


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2052  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2009, 2:56 AM
Andrea Andrea is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,912
.

Last edited by Andrea; Jan 26, 2009 at 6:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2053  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 4:10 AM
jew4life4948's Avatar
jew4life4948 jew4life4948 is offline
Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Atlanta/Chicago
Posts: 435
GDOT, AMTRAK throw wrench in Beltline plans

http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2009/01/26/gdot-amtrak-throw-wrench-in-beltline-plans/

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about the Beltline, the 22-mile loop of parks, trails and transit proposed to circle Atlanta, it’s that surprises are to be expected. And some interesting developments are afoot with the $2.8-billion project.

If you recall, Atlanta Beltline Inc. — the nonprofit agency in charge of planning and implementing the project — finalized its purchase of a 66-acre piece of property in October owned by Gwinnett County developer Wayne Mason and his son Keith, an Atlanta attorney. The Mason property included land and transit right-of-way. The $66 million purchase riled city watchdogs not only for the ultimate payout to the Masons — nearly 300 percent what father and son originally paid for the land in 2004 — but also the deal ABI cut with a private partner group it needed to buy out if it wanted to use tax-exempt bonds to finalize the purchase before a Halloween deadline. That’s background, and for all intents and purposes, irrelevant for the moment.
Beltline leaders hoped to complete planning the area, implement transit, and sell off excess land to developers. They would then re-invest the windfall from those sales back into the overall project. But before it could do anything with the property, it first had to abandon the transit right-of-way. That humdrum process is conducted by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board and largely involves just some time for public comment and a shuffling of papers. It was supposed to be a walk in the park.

Looks like that’s not turning out to be the case. An eleventh-hour move by the state Department of Transportation and AMTRAK has potentially thrown a wrench in the Beltline. And why those two odd entities decided to hold hands and insert themselves into the conversation — this late in the party — is making folks scratch their heads.

Late last year, the city asked Norfolk-Southern, the rail and shipping company who had still had control of the rail line, to formally abandon the property. The process was supposed to be complete on Jan. 22. But according to a source with close knowledge of the abandonment process and a helluva letter Mayor Shirley Franklin wrote to U.S. Congressman John Lewis seeking his assistance, GDOT filed an out-of-the-blue motion with the U.S. Surface Transportation Board to halt the abandonment process. According to the mayor’s letter, GDOT “enlisted the help of AMTRAK, which on January 21st took the brazen action of using its federal status to initiate condemnation proceedings on the corridor.”

In other words, GDOT and AMTRAK have put the brakes on a vital piece of the Beltline — and for the time being, put the project’s future in limbo.
“I am dismayed and alarmed by these actions, which not only jeopardize BeltLine transit, but also our ability to compete for federal funds,” Franklin wrote.

Some gems from the mayor’s letter to Lewis:
“For a state agency (GDOT) to now flip-flop and at the last minute attempt to derail a well thought out and partially implemented plan is truly appalling. Sadly, from what I have witnessed over the years, GDOT’s actions are consistent with its past behavior, and it is this behavior that has caused Georgia and Atlanta to lose out on millions in federal funding.” (Yee-owsza!)

“Simply put, because of GDOT’s boorish behavior and AMTRAK’s willingness to play along, the future of the city of Atlanta is at stake.” (Yoo-aye!)

“I grew up near the railroads in Philadelphia, and I know the value and important of commuter rail in the life of a city. I am also an advocate of cooperation and collaboration to do what is best for the public. Time and again as the BeltLine has faced judicial, legislative and other challenges, grassroots Atlantans have risen up to ensure that the BeltLine vision moves forward. We have invested far too much in the BeltLine, and have seen too much growth and investment for it to be stymied by the actions of a state agency that does not have a viable plan or funding for commuter rail or the Northeast BeltLine Corridor, let alone funding for projects to which it has already committed.” (Getting Philly! Getting Philly! Knocking GDOT’s broken-ness and lack of viable plans! State agencies — they’re just like us!)

The city, ABI, and the Atlanta Development Authority — ABI’s parent entity — are fighting the motions on several grounds. They say AMTRAK has other options available to it that are more in line with its future plans for intercity transit, that GDOT and AMTRAK lack funding to support their actions, and this move endangers millions of dollars and countless hours already invested in the Beltline. Franklin’s letter is a gem, so I’ve decided to post it here for your reading pleasure. Here’s the Beltline’s legal reply to GDOT’s move. In so many words: Deny GDOT’s motion.

So why is AMTRAK getting involved? According to a filing by the federal transit agency’s lawyers sent to the Surface Transportation Board:
the BeltLine Segment that NS seeks to abandon is a critical link in the rail route that would be used by Amtrak trains (including Amtrak’s New York-Atlanta-New Orleans Crescent) and future high speed rail passenger trains to access the proposed Multimodal Passenger Terminal in Atlanta. There are no viable alternate routes. The August 21 letter from the Atlanta Regional Commission included in the NS Notice (pp. 36-37) correctly states that, if the BeltLine Segment were abandoned, passenger train service into downtown Atlanta would have to operate via an alternate route (the “Trunk Line Route”) over “the combined Norfolk Southern/CSX trunk line on the west side of the city … an active rail corridor that is already heavily utilized by freight traffic.”

Ironically, abandonment of the Belt Line Segment would thwart the development of intercity corridor and high speed rail service through Atlanta at the very moment when Congress has decided that expanding such services is a national priority.

Oh yeah, sure, blame Obama! (kidding, AMTRAK!)

Here are some questions: Why would GDOT, which as a member of the Transit Planning Board, signed off on said agency’s regional transportation vision called Concept3, which included the Beltline, only now speak up? The Concept3 plan, if you recall, included commuter rail, but it was the Atlanta-Griffin line and Brain Train — which don’t run near Piedmont Park, where the Beltline property is located. (Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t the commuter rail in the plan originate from the long-in-the-works downtown train terminal proposed for “The Gulch” near Philips Arena?) And why does AMTRAK, which already operates heavy-rail trains that run out of the Brookwood station, have any interest in service on tracks that would pass residential properties and possibly enrage nearby homeowners?

What makes this even more interesting is the fact that GDOT owns a vital piece of Beltline transit right-of-way in the project’s Southwest quadrant. The state agency and the city have reportedly been in talks for two years about a land swap. Is GDOT trying to gain some leverage in a future discussion about the land? Or about another piece of city property?

Some insiders are questioning the dates listed on the legal filings I linked to above. We’ll get into those issues later. I made a call to AMTRAK about their condemnation but was sent to voicemail. The GDOT spokesman more familiar with the abandonment process would be able to comment in the morning.
But as they say, “sunlight is the best disinfectant.” Here are some of the details. Please chime in if you have any thoughts. We’ll report on it more tomorrow.
__________________
www.eastlakeview.tumblr.com
Cities / Pop Culture / Fashion / Music / Photography


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2054  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 5:44 AM
SAV SAV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 164
Why are they doing this. It almost seems like they are trying to protect atl from rail
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2055  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 5:54 AM
Fiorenza's Avatar
Fiorenza Fiorenza is offline
Reliable Source
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,551
Wow, that old crook Wayne Mason looks like a winner on steriods and the City of Atlanta looks like they wasted $66 million.
__________________
Taze Me, Bro!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2056  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 6:03 AM
Fiorenza's Avatar
Fiorenza Fiorenza is offline
Reliable Source
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,551
delete
__________________
Taze Me, Bro!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2057  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 6:39 AM
plorenc's Avatar
plorenc plorenc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 216
The state of Georgia baffles me. How is their constant hostility to Atlanta benefiting anyone?

I just don't understand it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2058  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 2:47 PM
ATLaffinity ATLaffinity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 872
amtrak couldn't run a lemonade stand. it's laughable to read about future high speed rail they are planning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2059  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 3:55 PM
Curious Atlantan Curious Atlantan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 243
Sorry this is probably not related to the discussion, but I need to reply to this:
Anywhere in the world were railways are run properly, they receive substantial funding from the government. I am not so sure anybody could do a reasonable job with the amount of Amtrak was receiving in the US. This looks to me like a Republican strategy: undefund Amtrak then blame them for the poor service to cut their funding even more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLaffinity View Post
amtrak couldn't run a lemonade stand. it's laughable to read about future high speed rail they are planning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2060  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 6:02 PM
jew4life4948's Avatar
jew4life4948 jew4life4948 is offline
Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Atlanta/Chicago
Posts: 435
City Includes Streetcar On Wish List For Federal Economic Stimulus Package

As part of a funding request focused on transit, road and sidewalk improvements and green energy projects, the City of Atlanta included the Peachtree Corridor Streetcar system to be considered for President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus package. Projects with the highest chance of being included in the package are projects that can be started within three months and completed within two years, according to federal officials.

Thanks to the work already conducted over the last few years by the City through its Connect Atlanta plan and by the Peachtree Corridor Partnership, the Downtown-Midtown routes of the Peachtree Corridor system fit the bill.

“The Downtown circulatory loop between the King Center and Centennial Park and the Downtown-Midtown route have been reviewed and modified and cost estimates were updated within the last year,” said Heather Alhadeff, Assistant Director in the City’s Transportation Planning Department. “Construction would take place in the existing street right-of-way where noise and environmental impacts will not be increased, allowing it to meet the stimulus package’s timeline criteria.”

With economic and environmental benefits, the Peachtree Streetcar is a good fit for the stimulus package that is being nicknamed the "Green New Deal." At a cost of $121,000,000, the proposed Streetcar system for Downtown and Midtown will create more than 1,000 green jobs.

“The Peachtree Streetcar is a critical solution to creating a green, sustainable city,” said Mandy Schmitt, Atlanta’s Director of Sustainability. “It will make trading off the car for walking and cycling a viable solution for Atlanta’s residents and commuters.”
__________________
www.eastlakeview.tumblr.com
Cities / Pop Culture / Fashion / Music / Photography


Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast > Atlanta
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.