HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2009, 6:43 AM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,732
Historical Populations: Decades in Canada's Top 3, Top 5, and Top 10

The number of decades that each city was among Canada's top 3, top 5 and top 10 largest cities by population, 1851-2001.

__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2009, 12:17 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
If you went by year and slightly stretched the definition you could have included Thunder Bay.

Thunder Bay: We were bigger than Calgary and Edmonton for about a year in the 1910s!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2009, 3:06 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,518
shows how young this country is looking at those graphs

Last edited by 1ajs; Jan 20, 2009 at 3:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2009, 4:09 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
If you went by year and slightly stretched the definition you could have included Thunder Bay.
Yeah well he didn't. Tough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2009, 11:13 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
shows how young this country is looking at those graphs
Well Quebec is about 400 years old, so it should have been listed as being one fo the top three for 36 decades.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2009, 11:33 PM
J-MAN's Avatar
J-MAN J-MAN is offline
high expectations
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Winnipeg
Posts: 556
depends what you consider old.. the Egyptian cities where thousands of years old so compared to that they are pretty young..

especially since there are people alive today around 100 years old...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 3:40 AM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
Well Quebec is about 400 years old, so it should have been listed as being one fo the top three for 36 decades.
"The number of decades that each city was among Canada's top 3, top 5 and top 10 largest cities by population, 1851-2001."

Even that's technically incorrect, since Canada has only existed since 1867. It would be interesting to trace it further back, westward expansion had only made it to Ontario in those days. Only a short time before 1851, Toronto was rivaled by places like Kingston and Niagara-On-The-Lake.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 6:19 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,032
Did you check the figures for St.John's NL? It may have been close to Saint John NB.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 3:32 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-MAN View Post
depends what you consider old.. the Egyptian cities where thousands of years old so compared to that they are pretty young..

especially since there are people alive today around 100 years old...
Geez... you’re comparing us to places that are among the oldest continuously-inhabited settlements on Earth! Even Rome can’t hold a candle to that!

Not saying that this is your case, but the old “we’re a young country, we don’t have much history” is usually a bit of a Canadian cop-out to justify not knowing anything about it.

Many if not most cities in Europe were founded just a few hundred years before places in Canada like Quebec City, Trois-Rivières, Montreal and St. John’s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 3:57 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Architype View Post
Did you check the figures for St.John's NL? It may have been close to Saint John NB.
I don't have the figures for St. John's, but I suspect that it might have made the top 5 in the mid 1800s.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 4:05 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
I don't have the figures for St. John's, but I suspect that it might have made the top 5 in the mid 1800s.
Too bad it wasn't part of Canada back then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 4:12 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
Too bad it wasn't part of Canada back then.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 6:52 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
Too bad it wasn't part of Canada back then.
That's why it wasn't included in my original data.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 6:53 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,183
did trois rivieres ever place in the top 10?
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 6:57 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
did trois rivieres ever place in the top 10?
Perhaps if we went back before 1850. Ontario was just getting going in the first half of the 19th C. I should track down that information sometime.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 7:03 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,969
cool charts...winnipeg was in the top 5 for 7 decades....wow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2009, 8:50 PM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
I don't have the figures for St. John's, but I suspect that it might have made the top 5 in the mid 1800s.
There are figures, but they are hard to find, but it would have been larger than Toronto at one time, and close to the population of Saint John NB, perhaps around the same time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
Too bad it wasn't part of Canada back then.
Canada wasn't even a country then (until.... you know when). The western provinces weren't there either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
That's why it wasn't included in my original data.
I knew that but thought I'd mention it anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2009, 2:38 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,732
Based on some rough data, St. John's would have made the top ten 6 times, but wouldn't have cracked the top 5.

Also, in the first chart there is a mistake, Saint John should only have been in the top five three times.


Although Trois-Rivières is an old settlement, it had under 10,000 people before 1900.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2009, 3:52 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post


Although Trois-Rivières is an old settlement, it had under 10,000 people before 1900.
Calgary had less than 5,000 people in 1901.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2009, 4:19 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Calgary had less than 5,000 people in 1901.
There were dozens of towns larger than Calgary in 1901 (it was 57th largest in Canada at the time)


Here is the list of 11th to 30th place in 1901. I have not verified this data, but it looks about right. Thunder Bay did not exist in 1900, and populations weren't listed for Fort William and Port Arthur-->I suspect they had a couple thousand each at the time.


Vancouver BC 26100
Victoria BC 20800
Kingston ON 18000
Brantford ON 15700
Windsor ON 12000
Charlottetown PE 11400
Guelph ON 10600
St. Thomas ON 10400
Sherbrooke QB 10100
Trois-Rivières QB 10000
Belleville ON 9900
Sydney NS 9900
Peterborough ON 9700
Stratford ON 9500
Moncton NB 9000
Woodstock ON 8800
Brockville ON 8800
Sarnia ON 8200
Owen Sound ON 7500
Galt ON 7500
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:25 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.