HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2161  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2008, 6:14 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,038
so the lobby is what?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2162  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2008, 6:49 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
The lobby is 2 floors, you'll understand once it's open and you can see it.
I believe someone posted the floorplan at one stage, I don't have it anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2163  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2008, 2:28 AM
MistyMountainHop's Avatar
MistyMountainHop MistyMountainHop is offline
I worship Led Zeppelin
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
So... we shouldn't all head to Shangri-la expecting the fun of a musical chairs game?
Damn, I was hoping for that too.
__________________
Bill: Be excellent to each other.
Ted: Party on, dudes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2164  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:16 PM
deagleman deagleman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
I'm really not sure what is up with that photo, but I can assure you, having toured some of the units, they are pretty high quality. I'm only talking about the live-work suites, which are the only ones to complete so far - and in my opinion, they are up there with any product in Vancouver, with the possible exception of Aspac's buildings. And yeah, as you mention, you can expect the estate units will be even nicer.

Here are a few more photos that at least do the units some justice as opposed to the crappy screenshots from above.


How did my image end up on image shack!

Anywho, if you want to see some detailed pics I took of 2 units on the 36 and 40th floor check out my flickr sets.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/32687612@N05/sets/72157609860444495/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/32687612@N05/sets/72157609925756146/

And heres a pic of the Shangy I took this weekend.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2165  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:19 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,698
^I hosted it on imageshack to share.

Thanks for the pics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2166  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:23 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
Nice Image. I wonder how much longer this thread has to live, Shangri-La days are almost over. Also with Woodwards and even Fairmont nearing completion we need a new tower going up. I can't wait for Hotel Georgia to start going vertical (of course the RC as well, fingers crossed).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2167  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:30 PM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Thanks for the set deagleman. Anyways, I am not impressed with the quality of the rooms demanding such a high premium price.

For instance:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/32687612@N05/3055710954/in/set-72157609860444495/

The brown tile is dreadful, the light dangling so low to the vanity sinks is dangerous, and the overall color scheme is 70s esque. I've seen better bathroom treatments in middle class homes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2168  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:37 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
I must say i was expecting more from the Shangri-La in interior quality and design. It seems very minimal. Maybe because of the wealth of the buyers they are expecting them to rip apart the interiors and hire their own professional designers?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2169  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 10:12 PM
deagleman deagleman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
Thanks for the set deagleman. Anyways, I am not impressed with the quality of the rooms demanding such a high premium price.

For instance:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/32687612@N05/3055710954/in/set-72157609860444495/

The brown tile is dreadful, the light dangling so low to the vanity sinks is dangerous, and the overall color scheme is 70s esque. I've seen better bathroom treatments in middle class homes.
I agree. I was especially disappointed with the flooring. Its not even real wood. However, the one that irks me the most is that the building is nowhere near polished. Residents and owners are still up in arms trying to get things fixed that should have been done when they received their keys.

Now, I know that you can't get anything in perfect condition, but I still expected that the flooring would at least have been finished and all the building junk would have been removed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2170  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 11:34 PM
MapleLeaf's Avatar
MapleLeaf MapleLeaf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berlin
Posts: 145
The interior looks like in some middle class hotels I´ve stayed at. There´s nothing special, nothing pompous I would condos of these prices expect to have.

But, the people who can afford such an amount of money might also be able to send in their own designers and staff...still the windows are ugly...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2171  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 12:06 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
The lobby is 2 floors, you'll understand once it's open and you can see it.
I believe someone posted the floorplan at one stage, I don't have it anymore.
i mean its level 1 - floors 1 &2 and level 2 is floor3 etc...
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2172  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 5:52 PM
androo3's Avatar
androo3 androo3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Nice Image. I wonder how much longer this thread has to live, Shangri-La days are almost over. Also with Woodwards and even Fairmont nearing completion we need a new tower going up. I can't wait for Hotel Georgia to start going vertical (of course the RC as well, fingers crossed).
Well I would say that the thread should stay up until that Construction Crane (Window Washer) comes down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2173  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 6:20 PM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,450
^Ya, or until the base is finished/fully occupied. Whichever comes later.

I want to check out that area up the stairway and the VAG component whenever they get finished. And of course we need some people to post pics of those areas in here for those forumers who can't see it in person.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2174  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 8:52 PM
sono65 sono65 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 164
So since those squares don't light up, does that mean we will not be seeing any kind of cool lighting feature from this building? My understanding was that they had to take down the "S" logo from the fins at the top which I was assuming would light up. Which I then thought only left the squares which we were hinted at before had some kind of other purpose that was lighting related. Anyways it would be a shame for our tallest building in the city to go up and not have anything in the night sky saying, " I'm here!" Instead it might just end up looking like another bland condo...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2175  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 8:55 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
I don't need to say anything........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2176  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:03 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
what the fuck was the reasoning behind them having to take the "S" down????
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2177  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:09 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
There was never an S to take down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2178  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:11 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
There was never an S to take down.
oh, but in the renderings there was the S at the top. so I assumed they would be putting signage up there

Last edited by osirisboy; Dec 12, 2008 at 11:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2179  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:13 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
What about just a simple lighting effect that runs along the top of the fins? That way it would not be intrusive to the penthouse owner and will display its height at night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2180  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:54 PM
AlexYVR's Avatar
AlexYVR AlexYVR is offline
In Love With YVRthing
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago:Vancouver
Posts: 441
Light pollution is definitely the way to let the world know we're a super-number-one-top-tier-world-class city.
__________________
WWJJD?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:53 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.