HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 3:02 PM
adam adam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Downtown Hamilton
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by FairHamilton View Post
I thought your previous post was ignorant until I read this one. It takes the cake.

Attitudes/comments like that frighten me. Please go back to 1975.
1975 was before I was born so that's going to be a tough one!

He made mention that his wife was too attractive to go downtown Hamilton. This is absurd. There are over 20,000 MAC students, many of which go downtown on a regular basis. They seem to manage just fine. I'm willing to bet many of them are of equal or greater attractiveness as Rousseau's wife (I've never met the poor lady)

I guess city life and all its "inconveniences" aren't for everyone. Stay in the boonies but don't complain. We have to share this city with everyone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 3:23 PM
BCTed BCTed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I'd like to say rousseau's true colours come out - offended by people who aren't insanely rich?? give me a break. how arrogant.
north americans are the richest people to ever walk the face of the earth. We're spoiled little brats who want to brush aside the working class on down out of view in order to create this false sense of commanding wealth and superiority in society.
The places I referred to in my travels are all normal middle class (on a world level) areas - Bogota and Veracruz were fabulous cities. I could easily move there in a heartbeat. Heck, we even had some white suburban shopping types that attended these trips with us and they enjoyed those cities immensely.
Rousseau simply dismisses anywhere not here as being dirt poor.
Like some of you, he needs to get out of pretentious, stuck-up Stratford and see the real world.
"Offended by people who aren't insanely rich"?? I don't think that rousseau suggested anything of the sort.

He stated that:
- people are not somehow more genuine or better simply by virtue of living in poverty
- there are a large number of lowlifes in downtown Hamilton

I agree with both of these statements.

Your fancy travels to poorer places are not relevant. The fact that you enjoyed your time in these places does not make the people in Gore Park any less sketchy.

What also seems sketchy to me is your logic. Let me try to encapsulate your line of reasoning. Please tell me if I have misunderstood:
Many of the people in Gore Park that others believe to be dirtbags are poor. You have seen virtuous and "genuine" poor people in your travels. Therefore, the people in Gore Park are not dirtbags.

Crazy!

You also seem to think that people who are from Burlington, Oakville, et cetera, and lead relatively comfortable lives are somehow lesser for it. Are they bad people for making a buck? Why do you think this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 3:49 PM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I'd like to say rousseau's true colours come out - offended by people who aren't insanely rich?? give me a break. how arrogant.
The constant need to call rubbish rubbish with you is tiresome. Here's the situation: you're offended by people from Oakville and Burlington, and I'm offended by your idea that poverty is virtuous and genuine. You mentioned the Dominican and Cuba, and insinuated that they were virtuous and genuine by comparison with "suburban wastelands" such as Oakville and Burlington. That's ridiculous nonsense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 4:03 PM
adam adam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Downtown Hamilton
Posts: 1,231
Gore Park is a beautiful area of downtown Hamilton. There is a fantastic fountain and a great canopy of trees there. You can sit on the park benches and watch the city. But it isn't for everyone, some people just aren't compatible with urban living.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 4:53 PM
highwater highwater is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,555
I am a woman. I go downtown frequently and have never had a problem. I don't doubt your wife's experience Rousseau, but you shouldn't generalize about downtown based on one individual's experience, and I certainly don't need you to ride in on your white charger and pretend that you're the only one in this discussion who is standing up for us poor, defenseless women.

Also, I'm quite sickened by those of you who are blaming the 'sketchy' denizens of Gore Park for the state of downtown. They are a SYMPTOM, not a CAUSE. I lived in Toronto for 10 years and there are no more 'sketchy' people in Hamilton than there are in Toronto, it's just that their numbers aren't diluted by more the more well-heeled. Again, this is not the fault of the 'sketchy' people scaring away all the fine, upstanding, drop-dead gorgeous citizens, but rather the fact that there are relatively few white-collar jobs, and the sort of retail and entertainment options that would attract a wider cross section of people.

I also grew up in Oakville and don't need anyone to get offended on my behalf. The denizens of the leafy neighbourhoods of East Oakville where we lived are by and large first class snobs and shockingly materialistic. My husband was working in Oakville when we were deciding where to live. We chose Hamilton over Oakville because Oakville is no longer a sane place to raise children. We have never regretted our decision.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 5:14 PM
FairHamilton FairHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam View Post
1975 was before I was born so that's going to be a tough one!

He made mention that his wife was too attractive to go downtown Hamilton. This is absurd. There are over 20,000 MAC students, many of which go downtown on a regular basis. They seem to manage just fine. I'm willing to bet many of them are of equal or greater attractiveness as Rousseau's wife (I've never met the poor lady)

I guess city life and all its "inconveniences" aren't for everyone. Stay in the boonies but don't complain. We have to share this city with everyone.
1975, that's where the attitude displayed by that post belongs. Tell me, what was the purpose of asking rosseau what his wife was wearing? I'd be interested in knowing?
__________________
The jobs, stupid!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 6:34 PM
FRM FRM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam View Post
Gore Park is a beautiful area of downtown Hamilton. There is a fantastic fountain and a great canopy of trees there. You can sit on the park benches and watch the city. But it isn't for everyone, some people just aren't compatible with urban living.
I remember they were suppose to upgrade/repair the fountain a while back, has that been done already or not? And if that is the upgraded version, someone certainly didn't do a good job on it, most of the time i see it (which is practically everyday) the water jets don't seem to be flowing smoothly and it's covered with rust.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 6:39 PM
FRM FRM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I'd like to say rousseau's true colours come out - offended by people who aren't insanely rich?? give me a break. how arrogant.
north americans are the richest people to ever walk the face of the earth. We're spoiled little brats who want to brush aside the working class on down out of view in order to create this false sense of commanding wealth and superiority in society.
The places I referred to in my travels are all normal middle class (on a world level) areas - Bogota and Veracruz were fabulous cities. I could easily move there in a heartbeat. Heck, we even had some white suburban shopping types that attended these trips with us and they enjoyed those cities immensely.
Rousseau simply dismisses anywhere not here as being dirt poor.
Like some of you, he needs to get out of pretentious, stuck-up Stratford and see the real world.
No one is advocating that in this thread, get that into your head please.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #329  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 6:39 PM
Millstone Millstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Port Colborne, ON
Posts: 889
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRM View Post
I remember they were suppose to upgrade/repair the fountain a while back, has that been done already or not? And if that is the upgraded version, someone certainly didn't do a good job on it, most of the time i see it (which is practically everyday) the water jets don't seem to be flowing smoothly and it's covered with rust.
Yes, that means it's been properly Hamiltonified.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #330  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 7:09 PM
adam adam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Downtown Hamilton
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by FairHamilton View Post
1975, that's where the attitude displayed by that post belongs. Tell me, what was the purpose of asking rosseau what his wife was wearing? I'd be interested in knowing?
If you go into an urban area where there is a mix of different upper/middle/lower classes you can expect to attract attention from the "have-nots" if you are dressed in expensive clothes. they will ask you for change, maybe ask for food, maybe just say "hi" because they live in a different world than you.

if this is bothersome to you, then stay away from any urban areas!

i was just downtown riding my bike to doing some errands, and saw a group of girls from McMaster enjoying themselves and doing some shopping. my friends and i did the same when i was going to McMaster. Hamilton downtown is a great little urban area, and you don't have to fight the crowds of downtown Toronto. People are also a lot friendlier. if the suburbs is the right place for you, great! but don't put down the city i live in just because it forces you to interact with your fellow human beings, because i'll take it personally.

Last edited by adam; Oct 19, 2008 at 7:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #331  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 7:20 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
I'll happily take being asked for change politely instead of this:

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/520100

Those of you who prefer your 'sketchiness' to come wrapped in nice clothes, hot cars and clean-shaven faces can move to TO (oh yea, and a few bullets each week). Enjoy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #332  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 7:53 PM
BCTed BCTed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I'll happily take being asked for change politely instead of this:

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/520100

Those of you who prefer your 'sketchiness' to come wrapped in nice clothes, hot cars and clean-shaven faces can move to TO (oh yea, and a few bullets each week). Enjoy.
What a poopshow of a discussion. You are deflecting the Gore Park "sketch" factor by pointing out shots that were fired in Toronto.

The fact that someone pulled a gun trigger in Toronto does not lessen the sketchiness of Gore Park.

Besides that, it is not as if shootings are a part of everyday life for residents of Toronto. It is not as if everyone just walks around watching bullets flying by. People can walk around freely without the expectation of ever being caught in crossfire. And it is not as if shootings are an altogether foreign thing in Hamilton. And the homicide rates for the two cities are pretty compable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #333  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 8:14 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCTed View Post
What a poopshow of a discussion. You are deflecting the Gore Park "sketch" factor by pointing out shots that were fired in Toronto.

The fact that someone pulled a gun trigger in Toronto does not lessen the sketchiness of Gore Park.

Besides that, it is not as if shootings are a part of everyday life for residents of Toronto. It is not as if everyone just walks around watching bullets flying by. People can walk around freely without the expectation of ever being caught in crossfire. And it is not as if shootings are an altogether foreign thing in Hamilton. And the homicide rates for the two cities are pretty compable.
Do me a favour and follow the TO media for the next month. Count how many times you hear of a shooting in that city. Better yet, just go back over the past month. More shootings in one weekend than we'll see in a year or two here.
You're right - this is a poopshow. Especially when people choose to post 'poop' all the time with no clue about what they're talking about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #334  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 8:35 PM
BCTed BCTed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
Do me a favour and follow the TO media for the next month. Count how many times you hear of a shooting in that city. Better yet, just go back over the past month. More shootings in one weekend than we'll see in a year or two here.
You're right - this is a poopshow. Especially when people choose to post 'poop' all the time with no clue about what they're talking about.
One Toronto weekend = two Hamilton years?? As usual, you are wildly exaggerating.

You do me a favour and have a look at this StatCan report and tell me how you interpret it (particularly the table entitled "Firearm-related violent crime for selected offences by census metropolitan area, 2006"):

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/080220/d080220b.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #335  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 8:59 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
I apologize for my mistake.
According to that graph Toronto had the same number of violent gun-related crimes in 2006 as Hamilton would have in 9 years.
The number of people affected in TO in 1 year is the same as would be affected in Hamilton in 20 years.
You can go and enjoy that...I'll stay here and enjoy "spare some change?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #336  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 9:29 PM
BCTed BCTed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I apologize for my mistake.
According to that graph Toronto had the same number of violent gun-related crimes in 2006 as Hamilton would have in 9 years.
The number of people affected in TO in 1 year is the same as would be affected in Hamilton in 20 years.
You can go and enjoy that...I'll stay here and enjoy "spare some change?"
You obviously and intentionally failed to index these numbers by population.

The relative per-100,000 rates:
- Toronto's firearm-related homicide rate is about 50% higher than that of Hamilton
- Toronto's firearm-related robbery rate is about 15% higher than that of Hamilton
- Toronto's rate of firearm-related violent crime victims is about 100% higher than that of Hamilton, BUT you can infer (using the "% of total violent crime" column) that the total rate of violent crime victims (firearm and non-firearm related) is quite similar.

So let's forget about guns for a moment and concentrate on all crimes. This link displays total crime statistics for last year:
http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/080717/d080717b.htm

If you look at the table "Crime rates for selected offences by census metropolitan area", you will see that Hamilton's total rate of criminal code offences is higher than that of Toronto, as is Hamilton's violent offence rate.

A higher percentage of Toronto's violent crimes involve guns, but Hamilton has a higher total violent crime rate. That just means that the poor folk in Gore Park can't afford guns and instead use knives or broomsticks to do the dirty work, while the shi-shi criminals in Toronto can afford designer Glocks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #337  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 11:45 PM
FairHamilton FairHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I'll happily take being asked for change politely instead of this:

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/520100

Those of you who prefer your 'sketchiness' to come wrapped in nice clothes, hot cars and clean-shaven faces can move to TO (oh yea, and a few bullets each week). Enjoy.
Yeah, 905ers have long been a problem in the Toronto Entertainment district. Can't keep them out though.
__________________
The jobs, stupid!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #338  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 11:51 PM
HackD HackD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCTed View Post
You obviously and intentionally failed to index these numbers by population.

The relative per-100,000 rates:
- Toronto's firearm-related homicide rate is about 50% higher than that of Hamilton
- Toronto's firearm-related robbery rate is about 15% higher than that of Hamilton
- Toronto's rate of firearm-related violent crime victims is about 100% higher than that of Hamilton, BUT you can infer (using the "% of total violent crime" column) that the total rate of violent crime victims (firearm and non-firearm related) is quite similar.

...

A higher percentage of Toronto's violent crimes involve guns, but Hamilton has a higher total violent crime rate. That just means that the poor folk in Gore Park can't afford guns and instead use knives or broomsticks to do the dirty work, while the shi-shi criminals in Toronto can afford designer Glocks.
Apples and Oranges. It isn't Homeless that are popping a cap in another Homeless's (or for that matter any other citizen) ass, but the youth gangs and those wrapped up in the drug trade - the 'Homies' - they are involved in the gun play. In that respect, yes, you are right - fists, knives or clubs is probably where it is at in terms of violence in Hamilton. Stats will tend to reflect that overall.

In that respect, Hamilton has it better overall than Toronto, which has a two-fer for problems when it comes to an indigent poor population and a now well established gang-banger culture.

The Homeless aren't likely to be carrying - and the sketchy crack addict type is just as much going to trade any Glock in for a biggie-sized baggie of his favorite fix.

Whatever the reason - Gore Park does have a problem with the wrong crowd loitering, and it does drag the immediate area down in terms of attractability to the casual visitor, and tourist alike, sticking around for long. I think that much can be said objectively.

PS, can we all just get along?
/rodney king
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #339  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 11:53 PM
emge's Avatar
emge emge is offline
Needs more coffee...
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by highwater View Post
I am a woman. I go downtown frequently and have never had a problem. I don't doubt your wife's experience Rousseau, but you shouldn't generalize about downtown based on one individual's experience, and I certainly don't need you to ride in on your white charger and pretend that you're the only one in this discussion who is standing up for us poor, defenseless women.
Right on, highwater. (I am another female and a former resident of Toronto). Have I encountered unpleasantness downtown? Sure. In downtown Toronto, St. Catharines, Buffalo, Hamilton, Philadelphia, and any other downtown I have visited. Hamilton's no different in that regard, and I certainly don't feel any less safe walking around here than anywhere else.

Does any individual encounter bother me? Nah.. it really not too bad. But I don't make a point of going to sit in Gore Park to encounter the same kind of thing six or seven times in one hour.

I love Hamilton, much more than Toronto - rough edges and all. I live here, and I don't plan on moving. But Gore Park is not fine as-is. It is a far stretch to say Gore Park is a desirable hangout for any meaningful cross-section of the population. That is particularly shameful, as it was noted this is the center of downtown. And unless intentional action is taken to change that, nothing will happen, and people who see that as one of the first things in Hamilton (and don't bother to check out Flar's photo tours or actually walk around the downtown themselves ) will continue to form their impression of Hamilton based on that.

It's not an issue of cultivating a "boring" downtown like a wealthy bedroom community would have, kicking the poor to the periphery, or saying the rich automatically bring with them better character to a downtown. I grew up lower middle-class. I've met many spoilt, selfish rich and have worked my way through university and grad school solely to get a good job. I've met tons of hardworking "poor" and I am friends with many. I respect them far more than the Mac or Mohawk kids with an undeclared major and no plans to grow up until they're thirty-five. (Of course, those are the extreme examples).

But downtown... who do businesses want? Who has the money to spend, and who do they want to attract? The rich ones, (unless you own a Tim Hortons or a Money Mart, perhaps) (Attracting artists and those who bring a positive impact without necessarily spending money is a bit of a different issue). The term "dilution" was used here. If you want revitalization, the proportions of people downtown cannot and will not stay the same.

I agree with those who would raise their kids in Hamilton, just the way it is, instead of a suburb. I'd rather my kids see the reality of hard work and that human nature isn't perfect, than to "safely" grow up enmeshed in materialism and status.

But the "character" of Gore Park has obvious problems.

The drugs need to stop - absolutely, increase police patrols and light the heck out of the place.

The unemployed by choice need to get off their heinies. I have little compassion for those simply unwilling to work and loiter in a public place.

And yes, we need to be aware and compassionate to the mentally ill, the injured, the disabled, the young mothers without support, and the rest who would be there no matter what -- of course, all people need respect, they need help if possible getting back on their feet and dignity no matter what their status.

However, it is not a fine thing when Gore Park is a gathering place primarily for those with nowhere else to spend their time and no money to pour into the economy, and to suggest that everyone else needs to ignore that fact and immediately feel comfortable there is silly. Its not easy for anyone to feel comfortable when encountering people who ask them for money, proposition them, harass them, try to sell them drugs, or cause noise. Even if it doesn't particularly bother you, most people won't spend time where they know they will encounter these things several times in an hour, and dismissing that type of thinking as unenlightened is unrealistic.

Last edited by emge; Oct 20, 2008 at 12:08 AM. Reason: grammar and clarity :)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #340  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2008, 12:10 AM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam View Post
if the suburbs is the right place for you, great! but don't put down the city i live in just because it forces you to interact with your fellow human beings, because i'll take it personally.
I suppose sexual and physical harrassment is a form of interaction with your fellow human beings, true enough. And it is certainly true that women on the receiving end are forced to endure such interaction, they don't have much of a choice about it, save for getting the hell away from it. Which is what we did.

It's quaint that you take my umbrage so personally. You probably aren't interested, but my wife took the harrassment personally, too.

Self-protection for women 101: my wife does not have an assertive bearing about her when she walks down the street, and she looks as if she could be easily intimidated. Unfortunately for her, this invites harrassment. To the lowlife on this thread who finds my wife's predicament "ridiculous," no, she does not dress provocatively. Shame on you for asking. Welcome to the 21st century.

Do all women experience harrassment in Gore Park every time they go there alone? I never said that, though I admit it may have looked like I was suggesting that. I should have worded my tirade more concisely. Is there a chance that women might be harrassed in the parking lot of Slimeridge Mall or downtown Borington? I'm sure there is. Would you send your 14-year-old cousin from Italy by herself down the length of King Street from James to Wellington on a solitary walk at 11:00 pm? Didn't think so. During the daytime? She'd probably be okay, though there's a good chance she'd get leering looks and inappropriate comments and experience some sort of intimidation.

To the clearly clueless to whom it needs to be spelled out: Not "Got a loony?" from the Dickensian deprived who are so beloved of RTF, but "Oh, you're hot. Where you going? Hey, where you going? Wanna be my friend? Phuck you, bitch!" If she's made of stern stuff, fine. If she finds it psychologically oppressive, then that's that. For the record, my wife experienced much worse, including direct physical intimidation. No, I'm not going to go into details.

News flash I: I love urban areas. It is very possible to absolutely adore urban areas but not like Gore Park in its present state at all, and wish to see changes. Kudos to those who are working toward making practical changes.

News flash II: I lived in Taiwan for six years, ipso facto I have lived an exponentially more urban experience than any of you if we're talking population densities. That is, unless you lived in Tokyo or Bangladesh. Yeah, I live in Stratford now, but I've seen my share of urban horrors all over the world. Seen dead people on the street, even. Sorry to disappoint you, RTF. I'm guessing that with my intolerably divergent opinion on the state of Gore Park I should have been a lifelong resident of a postwar subdivision on the outskirts of Waterdown.

Oh, sorry...Wankerdown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:17 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.