Quote:
Originally Posted by cololi
Overall I like the Bridges project. Decent location, above average site design, major improvement to the area, but the architecture doesn't do much for me. I don't like the stone arch with the brick, not enough releif between materials and they just don't seem to mix well. I also don't like the roof line. It seems like a more significant demarcation of roof and wall would have really improved the building. What's up with the bricked in windows? I think the designer was trying to make it cutting edge but wanted to use traditional materials and the result was kind of schizophrenic.
|
Yeah, the overall design is OK, and certainly an improvement for the area, but seems a little contrived. I actually like the cheaper northern end of the building much more than the south side which has all of the brick and stone:
The brick above the stucco is a bit wierd, and the old-worldy looking stone doesn't jive well with the modern lines in the rest of the building. You can't see it very well in this picture, but the blue seamed metal roof is just awful and doesn't match anything else on the building.
The location is good (close to DT and Gateway), but at the same time the location kinda sucks. You can walk to Gateway, but not without crossing the freight tracks. (The site is sandwiched between I-15, an active rail yard and the rapidly declining Citifront apartments to the north):
It would be nice if they could landscape the area I've shown in green, but I'm pretty sure it belongs to the railroad, and will remain a barren field. If you've ever riden FrontRunner past the site you get a feel for how close they are to the tracks and how unfriendly the area around the site really looks.
Does anybody know what these are priced at? I could see them selling well if they were priced below 225K, sort of a low-price alternative to the rest of downtown, but I think they'd have a hard time selling them for over 300K given their location.