Quote:
Originally Posted by CPVLIVE
According to the Brookings Institute:
Denver - "Looking forward, Colorado’s Front Range is projected to
grow by nearly 70 percent to reach a population of 6.3 million
residents by 2040."
Salt Lake - "Looking forward, the Wasatch Front may add another 1.5
million people to reach a population of nearly 3.7 million by
2040."
|
As you can see I edited my thoughts while continuing to write. If the Front Range is in reality connected from Fort Collins to Pueblo, then sure 6.3 million is possible.
As far as the Wasatch Front prediction I don't agree, The Wasatch Front will continue at it's current pace of the past eight to ten years, and even accelerate. The Wasatch has outstripped most census predictions in the past by quite a distance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northernlad
I really have a hard time understanding why some local forumers are so infatuated with the Wasatch adding thousands of more people when we have so many pressing issues that need to be addressed and fixed before we add thousands and upwards of a million people. Can any of you imagine what our air quality will be like with another say 50,000 or 500,000 people crammed along the valley from Ogden to Provo? probably not. Where is our water going to come from? How much worse will our very evident homeless problem downtown become? Will we be able to count on our fingers how many days we have clear views of the mountains because of murky stagnant air obstructing our views?
Not to mention everything we consider quality of life attributes which will decrease with so many people.
|
Perhaps it would be more appropriate for a very small number of certain people to ask why they themselves are so over-the-top infatuated with certain areas, yet on the record have nothing good to say about their own 'supposed' home. That for me is extremely hard to understand.
The Wasatch Front will continue to be in the top three growth regions of the country. And yes , we will continue to be rated at the top of business and endless long lists of prestigious publications. And yes again, we will continue to be at the forefront of economic growth, medical and technical growth, highway, TOD's, and mass-transit build-up. etc.
And Wow, I guess unless someone has been playing Rip VanWinkle, they would realize that automobile's and all other forms of transit and manufacturing are changing their mode of fuel usage and byproduct output at an astounding rate. "Golly Geez Dorthy, do ya think that the loco yoco's, might actually reverse many of the outmoded methods of the past?"
IMO, it would be both hilarious and very telling of anyone, that they would extol the current virtues of our mythical forever and ever big-brother CSA, or any CSA of 4,5,6 million or more, yet our own CSA of 4 million will be a future 'Armageddon.' As if the local citizens have no capability to meet and overcome the challenges which face all growing metros. How interesting that the most prestigious publications of our time keep putting The Wasatch Front at the top handful of the many 'Positive Can Do Lists.'
I travel to Western Colorado and Denver a lot more than five times a year. That general area is among my five favorite in the U.S., so unlike some, there is no axe to grind on my part. This 'forever and ever and alway's will be' is laughable. Fifteen or more years ago, I would have agreed that Downtown Denver feels much larger, but definately not any more. I'm used to far bigger cities than Denver, and in my opinion both the Wasatch and Metro Las Vegas will catch up with and pass Metro Denver in population over the next thirty years. But, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.