HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6481  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2008, 10:00 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,605
Since you brought it up Stenar, I've been in the Little America a couple of times recently for Sunday brunch and was impressed with the makeover. I was going to say something about it in a previous post, but had my hands full with the adsurdity of The Grand being somehow sub-par.

I think the lack of a 1000 room plus hotel adj. to the Palace is a bit fishy. I do wonder sometimes if there are not deals in place for now, to keep the occupancy rate at a consistant high downtown. However, there seems to be no end to the smaller 250 room properties going up, which really doesn't address the problem of a convention specific hotel. Perhaps the Outdoor Retailers will start to exert some pressure on the city, as they did with the second expansion of the Salt Palace. I know they are complaining about the less than advantageous exibition space in the Energy Solutions Arena during this current convention. We really need that adj. hotel, not only for the additional rooms, but especially for an additional 50,000-plus sq. ft. in exhibition space, and convenient amenities the hotel would provide, right at the convention's ground zero.
     
     
  #6482  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2008, 10:15 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
there seems to be no end to the smaller 250 room properties going up, which really doesn't address the problem of a convention specific hotel. Perhaps the Outdoor Retailers will start to exert some pressure on the city, as they did with the second expansion of the Salt Palace. I know they are complaining about the less than advantageous exibition space in the Energy Solutions Arena during this current convention. We really need that adj. hotel, not only for the additional rooms, but especially for an additional 50,000-plus sq. ft. in exhibition space, and convenient amenities the hotel would provide, right at the convention's ground zero.
In all honesty, what could the City do? the only thing that I can think of are perhaps relax parking requirements or use the RDA to help fund some of the infrastructure. They could also try to remove or lower the hotel tax, but that is a county wide tax that is already called for over the next 20 years (soccer anyone?). Other than that, there really has to be a developer interested in doing it. I know that some have talked about it, but the fact that we have yet to see anything other than that, tells me no one in the industry is interested in building these types of hotels right now, at least not in SLC.

The proliferation of smaller hotels and motels are really doing a diservice to downtown because they are at best maintaing the current market saturation and at worse lowering the occupancy rates which lessens the demand for such a hotel. Perhaps the most important thing the City could do is to really limit the smaller hotel/motels on the periphery of downtown.

The shear number of these small hotels makes it incredible difficult for major conferences and conventions. I heard outdoor retailers has to reserve rooms at 39 plus hotels for each convention they have here. One of the major draws about moving that convention to LV or Denver is that they could reduce that number to 4 or 5.
     
     
  #6483  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2008, 10:32 PM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
I think the city and convention bureau need to more aggresviely market the city to a hotel developer. From a business standpoint, I don't see why one would not jump in quickly to get a large hotel developed. With occupancy rate so high here and the conventions screaming for a new one, then you would think that they would be chomping at the bit to get one built. Hurry and get one built and stop the building of the 250 room crap hotels that seem to be breeding like rabbits around the area.
     
     
  #6484  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2008, 10:59 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Mac View Post
I think the city and convention bureau need to more aggresviely market the city to a hotel developer. From a business standpoint, I don't see why one would not jump in quickly to get a large hotel developed. With occupancy rate so high here and the conventions screaming for a new one, then you would think that they would be chomping at the bit to get one built. Hurry and get one built and stop the building of the 250 room crap hotels that seem to be breeding like rabbits around the area.
There are a number of landowners interested in developing a large hotel on their property, there is just not the capital to do it at this point. With the economy the way it is and construction costs skyrocketing, the large investors (mutual funds, 401k managers, etc.) are holding investment money back. Even if a project is entitled and permitted, they are having to get more investment money to cover the cost of construction. This is why so many projects are stalled, not just locally but nationally as well. Until this money is free or there are alternate forms of financing, a large hotel project is not going to happen. The alternate forms of financing can relax investors fears somewhat, but there are a lot of criteria that need to be addressed prior to committing money to such a project. I say be patient, it will happen, but the large investors need to feel reassured that they will not take a loss. With the RDA having a lot of money already committed (222, Marmalade, Sure appliance site, and past projects still being paid back, like the delta center, gateway, salt palace, etc) in downtown, it is not likely that funding will be increased for additional projects of this magnitude.
     
     
  #6485  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 12:58 AM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,131
W hotel

Let's not forget that there are preliminary plans for a W hotel on the block south of the Delta Center!
     
     
  #6486  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 2:42 AM
ski_steve ski_steve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 467
Carolyn Tanner Irish Humanities Building
The University of Utah

August 2008



Im guessing it will be done by the time school starts in 2 weeks.


I think it needs some more color though.






-Pictures from the U of U Humanities Department

Last edited by ski_steve; Aug 14, 2008 at 2:56 AM.
     
     
  #6487  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 4:06 AM
RFPCME RFPCME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 555
RDA strapped????

Quote:
Originally Posted by cololi View Post
There are a number of landowners interested in developing a large hotel on their property, there is just not the capital to do it at this point. With the economy the way it is and construction costs skyrocketing, the large investors (mutual funds, 401k managers, etc.) are holding investment money back. Even if a project is entitled and permitted, they are having to get more investment money to cover the cost of construction. This is why so many projects are stalled, not just locally but nationally as well. Until this money is free or there are alternate forms of financing, a large hotel project is not going to happen. The alternate forms of financing can relax investors fears somewhat, but there are a lot of criteria that need to be addressed prior to committing money to such a project. I say be patient, it will happen, but the large investors need to feel reassured that they will not take a loss. With the RDA having a lot of money already committed (222, Marmalade, Sure appliance site, and past projects still being paid back, like the delta center, gateway, salt palace, etc) in downtown, it is not likely that funding will be increased for additional projects of this magnitude.
Cololi: Very interesting post. Your insight into the RDA is especially intriguing.
     
     
  #6488  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 6:07 AM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Let's not forget that there are preliminary plans for a W hotel on the block south of the Delta Center!

Is that still a go? Haven't heard anything about the W Hotel in a while.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #6489  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 8:11 AM
TANGELD_SLC's Avatar
TANGELD_SLC TANGELD_SLC is offline
The World Is Welcome Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 883
Quote:
Originally Posted by utahboozer View Post
TANGELD SLC:

I am interested in knowing about your sig. Where did you get the figure of SLC's population? Are you counting the North Valley area entirely? Just wanna know

The city's official population greatly understates its economic drawing power. When a state capital's population is officially 180,000 or so, it certainly seems very podunk to "numbers people."
WELCOME Utahboozer! I got my numbers from the Salt Lake MSA development forum. We were having a discussion about an outsider's perception of Salt Lake and some of us just started adding cities to Salt Lake for the heck of it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UV4EVER View Post
Salt Lake City 180,651
North Salt Lake 12,628 (Davis Co, I know)
South Salt Lake 21,547
Murray 45,732
Holladay 25,527
Cottonwood Heights city 35,351
West Valley City 122,374
Taylorsville 58,620
Unincorporated SLCo 56,000


Greater Salt Lake City 558,430
The metro population is the population for the Wasatch front.

you ought to go check out the forum if you havent yet.
__________________
Espavo!

Plyg, Metrosexual, & AVENian
     
     
  #6490  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 8:29 AM
TANGELD_SLC's Avatar
TANGELD_SLC TANGELD_SLC is offline
The World Is Welcome Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 883
Not that location

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post
I still like this location for a 1000 room convention hotel, but how can we solve the parking problem? There is plenty of room for pickup and drop-off, however, where would these cars go after dropping off the hotel patrons? how many spaces are beneath the Salt Palace Convention Center? Could those be used for the hotel while other convention visitors use the "Park Place" block? I think TRAX will sure help when it finally reaches the Salt Lake City International Airport. Any ideas?



I've always wanted a revolving restaurant in Salt Lake City!



Central Downtown Location:



At least by building a tall hotel, there is no worry about leasing the space. Actually, this is the perfect opportunity to build tall!

The exterior could have a similar treatment as this Venus' Flower Basket (a deep-sea sponge):


Actually, now that I think of it, that design might not do too well in the winter.
I LOVE the idea of a supertall hotel being built and I think we could fill it without a problem and keep it filled. It would also help us with our bid for the 2022 Olympics IF we bid again.

HOWEVER, I really don't like the location of the tower. I think it would encroach too much on Temple Square and Capitol Hill. I think it should be placed as far south-west as possible. I like the sponge pattern and I think it would be beautiful in the wintertime, actually.

I favor the sore-thumb skyline type rather than the plateau type, so it wouldn't bother me in the least to have the hotel be that tall, just not in that location.
__________________
Espavo!

Plyg, Metrosexual, & AVENian
     
     
  #6491  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 10:46 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,605
Sugar House project gets conditional OK

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,700250706,00.html


media.bonnint

Thursday, August 14, 2008 — The start-and-stop demolition/construction project on the corner of 2100 South and Highland Drive in Sugar House can get started again.
The Salt Lake City Planning Commission unanimously voted Wednesday to grant conditional approval for the 4 1/2-acre residential, retail and office development proposed by Craig Mecham, allowing construction to begin.

...Much of the hourlong discussion about the project Wednesday focused on its potential negative impacts on traffic in Sugar House.

As part of the conditional approval, the developer was instructed to work with the city's traffic officials to mitigate that impact.

The commission also required that Mecham live up to his commitment to obtain Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification for the project.

The approved plans call for construction of two side-by-side buildings — a seven-story office structure and an eight-story residential building — with street-level retail and three levels of underground parking containing 491 stalls...


Sugar House development gets green light after 2 1/2-year fight

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_10196926

As soon as this fall - but more likely next spring - construction crews could begin erecting a side-by-side seven-story office building and eight-story condo tower over the 4 1/2 -acre crater, along with street level shops and three levels of underground parking for nearly 500 vehicles.
"Time to get out the golden shovel," project architect John Hammond told Mecham moments after the vote. "It's like springtime."

.

Last edited by delts145; Aug 14, 2008 at 3:06 PM.
     
     
  #6492  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 11:55 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,605
Rent in S.L. County leaps by 9.2 percent


http://www.sltrib.com/ci_10194804



..rents in Salt Lake County grew by 9.2 percent over the past year - the largest 12-month increase in more than a decade - mainly because of high demand for lower-priced units, making them not so affordable anymore. .

.
     
     
  #6493  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 2:36 PM
NYC Rick NYC Rick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 387
I am much more interested in which of the following interests you more...

I read so two different views expressed consistently in this latest convention hotel thread.

Do not take it personally.

1) Gee...it would be great to see a truly tall high-rise finally get built.

2) Salt Lake City needs a convention hotel dedicated to that point.

I mean which is more important to you?

The second seems to be the secondary concept. That is the way I read it anyway.

Look I love High-rise construction and have since I was a kid. With no plans on that hotel being built yet, what is the fascination building tall for the sake of SLC height? Building beautiful is a much cooler concept.

Most really tall hotels in NYC look like dogs...yet they are very tall. Also the circular hotel in some images is used up.

Once again, how many conventions does SLC get a year? As someone wrote, I have seen Salt Lake City lose conventions because the hotel was too far away. How many conventions do you think are lost this way?

Finally, has anyone ever seen a truly tall (newer) hotel (The older designs from the 40's do not count because they are spectacular in many instances...neither do odd LV designs which are spectacular but truly would only work there) that just looks fantastic?
     
     
  #6494  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 3:03 PM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by TANGELD_SLC View Post
I LOVE the idea of a supertall hotel being built and I think we could fill it without a problem and keep it filled. It would also help us with our bid for the 2022 Olympics IF we bid again.

HOWEVER, I really don't like the location of the tower. I think it would encroach too much on Temple Square and Capitol Hill. I think it should be placed as far south-west as possible. I like the sponge pattern and I think it would be beautiful in the wintertime, actually.

I favor the sore-thumb skyline type rather than the plateau type, so it wouldn't bother me in the least to have the hotel be that tall, just not in that location.
For a large hotel to be useful to SLC at this point, it has to be next to the Salt Palace.

As for encroaching on Temple Square, the LDS church has already done that. My mother pointed out many years ago that the LDS church itself built most of the bldgs that block the view of the temple and they're building more of them now with the City Creek Center. Having a tall hotel near the Salt Palace isn't going to encroach on Temple Square any more than all of the other tall bldgs around it that already block its view.
     
     
  #6495  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 3:17 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,605
Agreed Stenar, also Rick I agree with many of your points.

Regarding having a large hotel next to the Palace, for the extra rooms is not the only reason, but just one of many. As has been mentioned, it is now becoming critical for the larger conventions to have Palace adj. amenities such as exibition space, grand ballrooms, and a large number of meeting rooms which are next to or within a very short walking distance from the main exibition. There are a myriad of high tech amenities, that are exibit specific, which the Energy Solutions Arena is not ideally suited for. Even though the Salt Palace has been proclaimed by the industry to be one of the nations premiere facitlities for conventions, and has almost 700,000 square feet of exibition space, with it's 2nd go around of additions, "it has already become too crowded in dealing with the mega conventions." Yes emphatically, there is an ample list of mega conventions, which would come to Salt Lake because of it's now famous ski resort's, which are unparalleled in proximity to a major airport and convention center.

Last edited by delts145; Aug 14, 2008 at 5:25 PM.
     
     
  #6496  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 3:32 PM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC Rick View Post
I read so two different views expressed consistently in this latest convention hotel thread.

Do not take it personally.

1) Gee...it would be great to see a truly tall high-rise finally get built.

2) Salt Lake City needs a convention hotel dedicated to that point.

I mean which is more important to you?

The second seems to be the secondary concept. That is the way I read it anyway.

Look I love High-rise construction and have since I was a kid. With no plans on that hotel being built yet, what is the fascination building tall for the sake of SLC height? Building beautiful is a much cooler concept.

Most really tall hotels in NYC look like dogs...yet they are very tall. Also the circular hotel in some images is used up.

Once again, how many conventions does SLC get a year? As someone wrote, I have seen Salt Lake City lose conventions because the hotel was too far away. How many conventions do you think are lost this way?

Finally, has anyone ever seen a truly tall (newer) hotel (The older designs from the 40's do not count because they are spectacular in many instances...neither do odd LV designs which are spectacular but truly would only work there) that just looks fantastic?
I agree that I don't want a tall building just for a tall building's sake. The 222 bldg on Main seems like it'll probably be pretty ugly. So, I'm not too excited about it. (Even though it's not an example of a super tall bldg at only 22 stories, it'd still be ugly if it were 60 stories. Maybe uglier as its ugliness would really stick out at 60 stories.) I lived in NYC for a couple of years and there are a lot of really ugly tall bldgs there. So, I definitely don't think SLC just needs a tall blds just to have one, even if it's ugly.


I was searching the web and found this:

In 2006, the Salt Lake Convention and Visitors Bureau:
Saw the completion of the expanded Salt Palace convention center.
Booked 574,661 hotel room nights.
Booked 31 citywide conventions.
Accommodated 295,300 convention delegates.
Saw $323,807,512 in total spending on hotel, restaurant, retail, entertainment and local transportation by Utah visitors

Some recent news items:
The Salt Lake Convention & Visitors Bureau recently won the bid to host the Fraternal Order of Police's 2011 convention, beating out Boston in the process.
The police association meets every two years, and the 2011 citywide convention is expected to draw 5,000 to 7,000 attendees, generate 16,000 room nights and have an economic impact on Salt Lake of $6 million during the August 12-20 meeting, the bureau said.

The Salt Lake Convention & Visitors Bureau's convention sales team recently confirmed the booking of YMCA's 2010 annual convention.
Salt Lake edged Nashville to bring an estimated 6,000 attendees and 10,575 room nights in mid-July.
The convention will be at the Salt Palace and is projected to have an economic impact of more than $5.2 million.
The convention is a forum for inspiration, education and networking among YMCAs. Representation will include staff and volunteers from 2,600 U.S. YMCAs and a delegation from approximately 25 other countries.


And an article from March 2007:

Convention sales rose 16% in '06

By Jenifer K. Nii
Deseret Morning News

It was a year of record numbers, an expanded facility and unprecedented returns. But there's still work to do.
The Salt Lake Convention & Visitors Bureau reported Thursday that its sales topped $330 million in 2006, and that it set records in the number of conventions and meeting delegates in Salt Lake last year. The 2006 sales results were 16 percent ahead of 2005 and well ahead of the $298 million reported during the 2002 Olympic year, according to the bureau report.
"We saw incredible growth in the transient room tax (revenues)," said Scott Beck, the bureau's president. "To see that transient room tax for the year eclipse the Olympic year by such a significant dollar amount is the most positive aspect of 2006."
In addition, Beck said, the 295,300 convention delegates that came to Utah in 2006 set a new record. Many of them came as part of the Outdoor Retailer trade shows, which this year held its show in the expanded Salt Palace.
"The fact that we can now host larger conventions, you know, the proof is in the pudding," Beck said.
He attributed the year's results to "incredible synergy" between the bureau and the rest of the hospitality/tourism community, including the state and travel partner Delta Air Lines.
"We're not the only ones marketing Salt Lake as a destination," Beck said. Ski resorts do their part, as do hoteliers and the state's tourism office.
"For the third year in a row, the state is also spending significant dollars marketing the state," Beck said. "That is so important to us. As weird as it sounds, when we try to convince someone to some to Salt Lake, versus Seattle or Denver or San Antonio, we first have to convince them to come to Utah. So that branding by the state, and the incredible value that has for us, and the fact that it's being done at such a high level ... those are all things that are helping us look forward with great energy and high expectations. People are beginning to understand that we are different than they might expect."
And the money isn't just flowing and growing in Salt Lake, Beck said. The largest growth in the hotel industry was in the outlying areas — the south and west valleys, according to the Rocky Mountain Lodging Report.
"Which means that hoteliers in the south valley can be excited about what's going on at the Salt Palace or downtown," Beck said. "We call it compression: when downtown Salt Lake is full, it pushes people to the outlying areas. And that's at the basis of the importance of the convention center."
Despite the massive Rotary International convention this summer, Beck said it's likely 2007 won't be another record-setting year for the bureau. However, he said, 2008 and 2009 are already looking "incredibly strong," based on advance bookings.
Looking ahead, the bureau has launched a multi-pronged growth strategy. The top objective, according to Beck, is a sales redeployment strategy focused on filling the expanded Salt Palace.
"The construction of this building was faster and well ahead of our ability to change our sales deployment to reflect the current size of the building we have," Beck said.
The Salt Palace is now 694,000 square feet, putting Salt Lake in the top 10 percent of convention facilities in the United States, Beck said.
A second leg of the bureau's growth agenda is a shifting of resources toward online marketing, Beck said, which is quickly becoming the method of choice by individuals and groups to research and book travel.
Third, the bureau will continue its efforts to dispel misconceptions about Utah and what it has to offer, Beck said. And what it has to offer, he said, is a metropolitan city at smaller-town costs. Where hotel rooms in New York City run hundreds of dollars a night right now, Beck said hotels in Utah can be had for a fraction of that.
"We have all the elements of an incredible city," he said. "They're all here: the restaurant scene, the night life, the incredible natural environment and activities. We have incredible hotels, a great convention center. Add to that the value component, and it bodes very well for us moving forward."
One thing that isn't a concern: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' massive redevelopment project, right across the street from the Salt Palace.
"This is the honest truth: it was much more of a liability for us having that mall empty with nothing in it than it is being torn down in preparation for something bigger," Beck said. With The Gateway now just a block from the Salt Palace's expanded west entrance on 300 West, and the development of a unique shopping neighborhood on 300 South, Beck said there's still plenty for visitors to do.
"These are all things that make us very excited about the future," he said. "Construction is difficult to deal with, but the long-term view is that there's a $1.2 billion investment being made in downtown Salt Lake."
     
     
  #6497  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 4:00 PM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
A list of conventions in SLC this year:

A list of conventions in SLC this year:
CONVENTION CALENDAR

OUTDOOR RETAILER WINTER MARKET
January 23-26
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 15,000)

WESTERN HUNTING & CONSERVATION EXPO
February 6-9
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 10,000)

ASSOCIATION OF BIOMOLECULAR RESOURCE FACILITIES
February 9-12
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 1,200)

International Technology Education Association
Feb. 21-22
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 2,200)

Society for Mining Metallurgy & Exploration
Feb. 24-27
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 4,000)

American Medical Directors Association
Mar. 6-8
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 1,600)

American Youth Soccer Organization
Mar. 6-9
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 1,100)

Novell "Brain Share"
Mar. 16-21
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 7,000)

Mary Kay, Inc.
Mar. 27-28
South Towne Expo Center
(Est. Attendance: 2,000)

ForeverGreen
Apr. 3-5
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 1,000)

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Apr. 10-12
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 18,000)

Devine Racing of Salt Lake City
Apr. 17-18
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 19,500)

American Association of Occupational Health Nurses
Apr. 29-May 1
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 2,000)

National Association of Fleet Administrators
May 2-6
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 1,800)

Society of Gastroenterology Nurses & Associates
May 14-21
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 1,800)

Alpaca Owners and Breeders Association
May 21-25
South Town Expo Center
(Est. Attendance: 1,000)

Zrii
May 22-24
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 4,000)

North American Benthological Society
May 25-29
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 1,000)

ASSOCIATED FOOD STORES
June 11-13
Salt Palace
(Est. Attendance: 6,000)

ASHRAE, INC.
June 21-24
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 1,000)

EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH IN AMERICA
June 29 - July 4
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 7,000)

USA VOLLEYBALL
July 1-10
South Towne Expo Center
(Estimated Attendance: 13,000)

WOMEN OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
July 10-13
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 2,500)

SENIOR SOFTBALL WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS
July 14-15
Cottonwood Complex
(Estimated Attendance: 1,500)

STAMPIN' UP
July 30 - August 1
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 17,700)

OUTDOOR RETAILER SUMMER MARKET August 8-11
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 22,000)

SENDOUTCARDS
August 14-16
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 1,000)

MELALEUCA
August 20-23
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 8,000)

USANA
August 28-30
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 10,000)

AGEL ENTERPRISES
September 5-6
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 3,000)

INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (IEEE)
September 8-10
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 1,200)

AST DEW TOUR
September 11-14
EnergySolutions Arena
(Estimated Attendance: 7,500)
Utah Sports Commission event

MONAVIE
September 18-20
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 3,000)

AMERICAN RAILWAY ENGINEERING & MAINTENANCE-OF-WAY ASSOCIATION
September 21-24 Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 2,400)

MAX INTERNATIONAL
September 26-28
Salt Palace
(Estimated Attendance: 4,000)
     
     
  #6498  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 4:26 PM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stenar View Post
I agree that I don't want a tall building just for a tall building's sake. The 222 bldg on Main seems like it'll probably be pretty ugly. So, I'm not too excited about it. (Even though it's not an example of a super tall bldg at only 22 stories, it'd still be ugly if it were 60 stories. Maybe uglier as its ugliness would really stick out at 60 stories.) I lived in NYC for a couple of years and there are a lot of really ugly tall bldgs there. So, I definitely don't think SLC just needs a tall blds just to have one, even if it's ugly.
Don't be mislead by the renderings of 222. The finished building will look a lot nicer. This building is designed by SOM (one of the best firms in the world for really cool/sleek designs. They are the designers of the world's tallest highrise (Burj Dubai?) currently under construction) and MHTN(a good local firm that designed the Gateway Tower West (located on the southest corner of Main and S. Temple) and the design of the recently completed reskin of teh Zions Bank Building( located on the other side of Main from the Gateway Tower West).

http://www.som.com/content.cfm/hyatt_global_headquarters

http://www.som.com
     
     
  #6499  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 4:47 PM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Don't be mislead by the renderings of 222. The finished building will look a lot nicer. This building is designed by SOM (one of the best firms in the world for really cool/sleek designs. They are the designers of the world's tallest highrise (Burj Dubai?) currently under construction) and MHTN(a good local firm that designed the Gateway Tower West (located on the southest corner of Main and S. Temple) and the design of the recently completed reskin of teh Zions Bank Building( located on the other side of Main from the Gateway Tower West).

http://www.som.com/content.cfm/hyatt_global_headquarters

http://www.som.com
I bet it'll still be ugly.

"It seems to me that one of the things that I would want from a project ... would be to really do something that's interesting to our skyline, to our city," Nancy Saxton said. "It seems to me that the emphasis on the glass is interesting, and the night-lighting is very interesting, but in the day it seems to be less than titillating. It's just a square building."
Bingham maintained that the tower will be unique to the city and will prove to be anything but dull.
"With all due respect, within the context of your question: Compared to what?" Bingham said. "Compared to New York, compared to Chicago, compared to San Francisco? I think you've got valid concerns. Compared to Salt Lake City, it is a striking building. There is nothing else like it."

Uhhh... it's just a dull, square building. How is that striking?
     
     
  #6500  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2008, 5:14 PM
utahboozer's Avatar
utahboozer utahboozer is offline
Lurking in a wigwam
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by TANGELD_SLC View Post
WELCOME Utahboozer! I got my numbers from the Salt Lake MSA development forum. We were having a discussion about an outsider's perception of Salt Lake and some of us just started adding cities to Salt Lake for the heck of it.



The metro population is the population for the Wasatch front.

you ought to go check out the forum if you havent yet.

Good stuff. Thanks!


Also, I was checking out the 222 Main building yesterday and was amazed at how quickly it seems to be going up. The design looks interesting, in its curved front appearance.

I'll be getting sushi with the Mrs. this afternoon, so maybe we can walk by and I'll post some pics I snap.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:02 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.