HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 5:53 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
Port Moody mayor says park will be 'an oasis' amidst highrises

In a city dotted with highrises and cluttered with cars, Port Moody is still saving land for the birds and bees.

City council voted unanimously in favour of dedicating more parkland at Tuesday's meeting.

The location, at the intersection of Ioco Road and Newport Drive, is adjacent to Pioneer Memorial Park. Petro-Canada donated the green space to the city in support of the recreation centre capital campaign.

Council received a verbal report by Mayor Joe Trasolini that called for requirements to dedicate the space as parkland.

Coun. Mike Clay said he is in favour of the dedication, but wants to leave no stone unturned in the process.

"I'm voting for it, but I want to make sure we don't forget [to consider] anything," he said.

According to the report, the land adds significantly to the city's green space at the Inlet Centre area.

"I'm really excited about this," Trasolini said. "It's going to be an oasis in an area that's slated for high-density development."

http://www.canada.com/coquitlamnow/news/story.html?id=2fd6c171-1bc9-4143-a385-6847db0df06a
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #642  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 5:54 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
Port Moody hotel may not be built before Olympics

Development on a brand new hotel and convention centre "desperately needed" by Port Moody residents might have screeched to a halt for good.

The proposed amendments to increase density at the Suter Brook site were defeated at third reading Tuesday, with only the mayor voting in favour.

The site, south of Murray Street and west of Ioco Road, has become a hotbed of controversy since Onni Development Corp. claimed it didn't have enough money to fund an eagerly anticipated hotel and convention centre.

The nine-storey, 140-room structure would include 11 meeting rooms and a ballroom with more than 500 theatre-style seats.

The developer has put a hold on hotel construction even though the foundation and parking lots are completed. Onni told the city the hotel depends on council's approval of amendments to the city's land-use contract to allow for 455 more residential units.

For the proposed highrise residential buildings, this would increase the maximum number of allowable storeys to 32 from 26, though Onni claims building heights would not be changed. The developer bore charges of blackmail during a council meeting earlier this month, as Coun. Diana Dilworth criticized the proposed exchange of density for the hotel.

However, "There was no blackmail," Mayor Joe Trasolini said at Tuesday's council meeting, held directly after a public hearing on the issue. He said Onni representatives approached council eight months ago with claims the hotel couldn't be built.

"They told us the costs have gone up by 10 to $15 million, and they needed additional densities," he said.

The city checked Onni's statements and found that its claims of rising prices were legitimate, Trasolini said in an interview. He added that, with the endorsement of council, he went to the developer to drive more of a bargain.

"I have hit some developers very hard when it is warranted, but it's not warranted here," Trasolini said. "Both myself and staff, we grabbed them by the neck and said, 'Give us an opportunity and see what we can do to save the hotel,' because council unanimously asked us to do so."

After several meetings with Onni, Trasolini returned to council with plans he said met the developer's expectations.

"Onni responded with an offer of $2 million in affordable housing because they knew that was important to us," he said.

Onni also agreed to shrink building footprints by eliminating two, four-storey residential buildings; keeping the building height the same by making ceilings eight feet high instead of nine; and obtaining silver LEED certification.

At Tuesday's public hearing, resident Sharon Dixon urged members to vote against the application. "They are trying to hold us hostage to complete the hotel," she said. "Did they not already agree to build it? Keep them to their original plan."

In contrast, Port Moody resident and Tri-Cities Chamber of Commerce representative Stephanie Booth voiced her support for Onni, claiming the lack of hotels and conference facilities in Port Moody "desperately needs to be addressed."

Resident Willy Martin then addressed the hazard in providing too many vacant units.

"There are more and more condos being built in the Lower Mainland, and this is driving prices down. Approving this [now] is poor timing," Martin said.

Tim Savoie, the city's director of planning and development services, noted that Onni agreed to not build the units until the hotel is occupied and the Evergreen Line is built.

He added that the developer is not obligated to build the hotel. Rather, Onni just has the zoning for the structure and, therefore, the land could sit vacant.

"A land-use contract is not a contract per se," Savoie said. "We can't force a developer to build."

But now the same application cannot be made for another six months, killing any opportunity to take advantage of the Olympics.

At the hearing, Onni executive vice-president Chris Evans said the hotel's healthy lifespan hugely depends on it being built in time for the 2010 Olympics.

"Word-of-mouth is how this building is going to be a success," Evans said. "One example is Woodstock. It was one event, and people are still talking about it."

But Coun. Karen Rockwell questioned the validity of this claim.

"In terms of long-term viability, a hotel booked for 10 days shouldn't make a difference," Rockwell said. "How will [this] ensure 30-year viability for the hotel?"

However, in business, marketing is everything, Trasolini retorted in an interview.

"To have a four-star hotel and convention centre open during the Olympic event would allow that name to be branded all over the province, the country and the world. But that window of opportunity has slipped away."

Onni was not available to comment on future plans before NOW deadlines.

http://www.canada.com/coquitlamnow/news/story.html?id=490d555b-122b-440e-95bb-e6921051fa2b
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 5:58 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
21 floors :O I didn't think it would be that high - nice

Casino hotel bid to go before the public

First they came out to fight a casino opening up in their city.

Then, after it opened, they came out to oppose gamblers drinking between hands.

But now that the 80,000 sq. ft. Boulevard Casino is running successfully with a 1,200-seat Red Robinson Show Theatre, will they ask the city to quash plans for a hotel and nightclub?

Council will find out this fall whether residents fundamentally opposed to casino gambling will continue to voice their opposition to it during a public hearing regarding the Great Canadian Gaming Corporation’s plans to build a 21-storey hotel with 202 guest rooms, a cabaret-style nightclub, an expanded restaurant and conference/meeting room space.

While most councillors voted Monday to give first reading to the required rezoning bylaw and refer it to public hearing, not all were willing to support the expansion plans just yet.

While Coun. Lou Sekora said he supported the high-rise hotel, he didn’t like plans for a cabaret on its fourth floor. “To me, I’ve got great difficulties with nightclubs,” he said, citing fights, noise, shootings, “and you name it.”

Councillors Neal Nicholson and Fin Donnelly said they wanted more information before moving the application forward. Surrounding businesses were angry when the plans were approved in 2004 for a 1,647-stall, six-storey parkade, said Donnelly, who noted hotel plans may “surprise” them again. He also cited concerns about the nightclub and unsuccessfully moved deferral until more questions could be answered.

Nicholson agreed to wait for more information, noting he’d like details from city planners about how the local hotel market could be affected.

But the rest of council was willing to move the application forward and let the public have its say on the plans, with Coun. Brent Asmundson pointing out that it’s not the city’s role to legislate monopoly for businesses.

Coun. Mae Reid said the proposed nightclub would be more secure than any other in the city. And Coun. Barrie Lynch added it’s in Great Canadian’s best interest to responsibly operate the club so it does not affect patrons at the hotel or casino. He also cited job creation — the hotel and amenities would add about 200 new part- and full-time positions — and noted many theatre performers are staying in other cities because they don’t like the facilities in Coquitlam, “so we’re missing out.”

Coun. Richard Stewart said the new hotel would accommodate the city’s effort to attract sports tourism spurred by its new Town Centre Tournament Facility, which in early July hosted the U-19 Men’s Lacrosse World Championships.

“We had people from around the world — staying in Surrey,” he said.

And while Mayor Maxine Wilson said she was initially concerned that the casino would draw local residents who couldn’t afford to gamble, she now sees it as a destination place. “I see this as a way to attract business in the vicinity of the venue,” she said.

Designs presented by the project’s architect at a June committee of the whole meeting show the hotel tower fronting United Boulevard (where a restaurant currently sits) with glass elements including an atrium that could potentially house a coffee shop.

The ground floor would feature a large lobby connecting to the theatre and casino while the second floor would have a restaurant, a bar and an off-track betting area. The third floor would feature conference space that could be subdivided into three rooms and would hold a combined 700 to 1,000 people depending on layout.

A cabaret is planned for the fourth floor with an outdoor patio overlooking green roofs. Floors five to 21 would each have about 12 hotel rooms and the basement would house a large kitchen and loading dock.

A traffic study completed by Great Canadian’s consultants has concluded additional traffic impacts will be minor given current and planned road upgrades nearby. About 60 people came out to an open house hosted by the casino June 19, of which nine completed comment forms, all in support of the proposed development. The casino also sent letters to 209 adjacent property owners and tenants informing them of the plans, and no written responses were received, according to a staff report.

If the proposal succeeds, the Boulevard hotel would be about a third taller than the hotel at Great Canadian’s River Rock Casino and Resort in Richmond. That facility also features a show theatre, casino and restaurant along with a spa, a health club/fitness centre, a pool, conference facilities and a hotel.

http://www.bclocalnews.com/tri_city_maple_ridge/tricitynews/news/26073749.html
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 4:45 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Note much new info except it's having a public hearing on Aug 26.

OFFICE BLDGS, RETAIL, CONDOMINIUMS & TOWNHOUSES
Burnaby, Greater Vancouver RD BC PREPARING PLANS
SW Corner of Lougheed & Willingdon Development, 4420 & 4444 Lougheed Hwy, 2060 Rosser, 2131 Willingdon Ave, V5C 5Y1
Start: 2009
Note: In design and going through a lengthy rezoning/development approvals process. Must also get approval from the Ministry of Transportation. Working drawings and construction schedules are undefined. There will be a public hearing on August 26 for approval. Further update in late Fall 2008.
Project: Office bldg of nine-stys; office bldg of 17-stys; three condo towers between 28-34 stys; townhouses on the SW portion of the site; retail space along streetfront on Willingdon & Lougheed; existing restaurant, car dealership, warehouses etc will be demolished.
Scope: 980,000 square feet; 34 storeys; 3 storeys below grade
;
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 10:15 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
not gonna recognize this area in 5 years
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2008, 11:23 PM
bils's Avatar
bils bils is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 563
Dunno if anyone's posted this one yet:
-----------------------------------------
Condo project could boast university, community centre

By Martin van den Hemel - Richmond Review

Published: July 25, 2008 5:00 PM
Updated: July 25, 2008 10:57 PM

Downtown Richmond residents clamouring for their own full-feature community centre may get more than they’re asking for in the near future.

A massive $1-billion five-tower condo complex proposed for the city core on the current site of Lansdowne GM could include a 30,000-square-foot community centre and a 20,000-square-foot post-secondary institution for 150 students, The Richmond Review has learned.

And that post-secondary institution is Trinity Western University, sources say.

The site straddles No. 3 Road and Minoru Boulevard, a half-block north of Westminster Highway.

Last April, the Review revealed that a Richmond philanthropist wanted to give back to the community by building a local campus for Langley-based Trinity Western University, which offers 40 undergraduate and 16 graduate programs and has some 4,000 students.

The philanthropist wishes to remain anonymous, but he has links to the Malaysian community.

He is the founder of a financial services group, headed a media group that publishes newspapers, and is a graduate of Simon Fraser University.

Wing Ting Leung Architects, which has designed the project, is seeking a rezoning of the land to comprehensive development district from the current automobile-oriented and light-industrial zoning.

In what would be the most significant project in the revitalized downtown core, five towers would rise from the edges of the property, containing 590 apartments, 40 townhouses, 15,000-square-feet of commercial space and nearly 900 parking stalls.

The project would see the extension to the west of Ackroyd Road.

A four-storey building would be constructed at the property’s southwest corner, housing the community centre and university.

Discussions are currently underway between the developers and city staff about the size of the community centre and the amount of space the university would need to run a viable facility.

The first phase of the project, which encompasses the eastern parcel of the property, is expected to be completed by 2010, with the western parcel finished by 2012.

Although a Trinity Western spokesperson wasn’t available for comment, spokesperson Joan van Dyck said in April that the university plans to consult with the community about what it would like to see the educational institution offer.

“The desire is to bring something relevant and important to the community of Richmond,” van Dyck said.

“Perhaps a place for Canadian-Asian culture and dialogue...a centre for excellence.”

The City Centre Community Association currently operates a community centre from cramped quarters on the ground floor of a high rise on Saba Road, but doesn’t have a gymnasium.

Bob Jones, president of the association, said it is exciting that this new development might serve as home to a new community centre.

“We are involved with the powers that be for the new community centre. But we haven’t been told where,” Jones said Friday morning when told of the residential project. “I had no idea.”

Jones said the proposed location for the community centre makes sense since it would provide easier access to those who live in the downtown core.

Last year, the city said a new community centre for downtown residents could be four or five years away, Jones said.








Find this article at:
http://www.bclocalnews.com/richmond_southdelta/richmondreview/news/25928444.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2008, 8:35 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Note much new info except it's having a public hearing on Aug 26.

OFFICE BLDGS, RETAIL, CONDOMINIUMS & TOWNHOUSES
Burnaby, Greater Vancouver RD BC PREPARING PLANS
SW Corner of Lougheed & Willingdon Development, 4420 & 4444 Lougheed Hwy, 2060 Rosser, 2131 Willingdon Ave, V5C 5Y1
Start: 2009
Note: In design and going through a lengthy rezoning/development approvals process. Must also get approval from the Ministry of Transportation. Working drawings and construction schedules are undefined. There will be a public hearing on August 26 for approval. Further update in late Fall 2008.
Project: Office bldg of nine-stys; office bldg of 17-stys; three condo towers between 28-34 stys; townhouses on the SW portion of the site; retail space along streetfront on Willingdon & Lougheed; existing restaurant, car dealership, warehouses etc will be demolished.
Scope: 980,000 square feet; 34 storeys; 3 storeys below grade
;
Im a bit confused..does this development not border Dawson st?
If anyone could outline the foot print of the development on google maps or something then that would be great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2008, 4:22 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornholio View Post
Im a bit confused..does this development not border Dawson st?
If anyone could outline the foot print of the development on google maps or something then that would be great.
The site does not border Dawson St. It includes everything between Willingdon, Rosser and Lougheed up to the lane, but not the storefronts on Dawson. I can’t post photos right now, but you can check out a site plan at the City of Burnaby’s website under July 21, 2008 council reports.

I’m a little disappointed to see that it looks like they are electing to go with a much smaller office component. Originally, they were considering a scheme to develop what had the potential to be Burnaby’s tallest office tower at 29 storeys. An article was posted earlier, but here are the two schemes:

Scheme A (full office component)
11 and 29 storeys for office buildings (566,115 sq ft)

Scheme B (reduced office component)
8 and 15 storeys for office buildings (303,925 sq ft)

Both Schemes:
1 and 2 storeys for commercial/retail podium
35 storeys for apartment Tower A
29 storeys for apartment Tower B
31 storeys for apartment Tower C
(509 units, 686,513 sq ft)

Both schemes are still on the table at this point, but citing “changing market conditions for office space”, it sounds like they are going with the second one; presumably Metrotower III going ahead didn't help their case. Also, they are proposing to build this project in phases, and you can guess which phase comes first – residential of course! Could be a few years before we see any office there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2008, 1:43 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
there is some weird fenced off building just south of that lane near the site - i wonder what it is - i never really noticed it before until i was looking at the area
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2008, 4:29 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
[Surrey] | Infinity towers 2 & 3 | July 27th


Taken by SFUVancouver, July 27th, 2008.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 11:08 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
out near the new wal-mart where the new shopping village development is going - some of the stores look close - Sony already has its signage up!

but the area is quite insane with work going on
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2008, 12:07 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
'Plan A' to transform city

Rec centre, museum, hospital, arena nearly finished

City staff call it "keeping up with growth."

But the opening of a new hospital, museum, rec centre and 7,000-seat arena -- all within the next year -- is almost guaranteed to change the face of Abbotsford.

In a 2006 referendum, a slim majority of residents voted in favour of property-tax increases to build the three civic facilities (excluding the hospital). Almost two years later, the construction is nearing completion, on time and on budget, not including some extra costs to clean up contaminated soil at one of the sites.

The Plan A project, as it was sold to voters by city council, remains controversial, and critics say it could come back to haunt politicians in the November civic elections.

But by then, the $10.8-million cultural centre and $23-million rec centre will already be open.

On a media tour of the three facilities yesterday, city staff talked about the "prestige" the three facilities will bring to Abbotsford.

The cultural centre, set to be opened Sept. 22, will be an "important centre for life in Abbotsford," said director Suzanne Greening.

The "landmark" building, which employs geothermal heating and other energy-saving measures, will serve as both a museum and art gallery. Staff hope to attract travelling exhibitions while showcasing local talent.

A large welcome figure is being carved by Salish artist Stan Greene to greet visitors at the centre's front entry.

Across the city, adjacent to the University of the Fraser Valley campus, the $66-million arena will become home to a pro hockey team (just which one is still a secret) as well as more than 60 entertainment events each year.

Six of the arena's 22 luxury suites have already been purchased, although the opening date is still months away in April 2009.

Watching a crane lift steel on to the domed roof yesterday, contractors called it a "mini-GM Place."

The 5,400-square-metre rec centre, which will be attached to the city's existing pool and arena, will feature an indoor running track, two gyms and numerous multi-purpose rooms with an "open, town-square concept."

The building will be opened in October.

"Abbotsford has always been a great place to live," said the city's parks, recreation and culture director, Mark Taylor. "These are first-class facilities that are going to make it an even better place."

http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=3ffa1da3-e5b1-449a-b7ce-948f1014824f
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2008, 9:37 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
City backs off 10-storey plan north of 17th

Wednesday, August 06, 2008


City of North Vancouver council has put the brakes on a density bonusing scheme that would see residential apartment building height top out at 10 stories north of 17th Street.

The plan, coming out of Central Lonsdale planning study stakeholder group discussions that included key city staff as well as community members, sees a trade-off of one market-priced residential unit for every one rental unit built. In the case of non-profit housing the ratio would be three market units for each one non-market residence.

The goal is to build up the city's diminishing rental housing stock, hard hit by aging buildings and high priced real estate.

Instead, in a 5-to-2 vote July 21, council voted against changing the city's official community plan to advance the plan. First it wants further public consultation.

"This decision does not need to be taken tonight," said Coun. Barbara Perrault. "What's the rush?"

Towers were never envisioned for the area north of 17th Street. Such a drastic OCP change needs more consideration, she said.

"We need broader consultation beyond the stakeholder group with property owners, tenants and the development community."

The stakeholder group was not unanimous in its proposal, with one dissenting voice strongly opposed to blocking views of the North Shore mountains from Lonsdale Avenue, said Perrault.

"I believe what's proposed here is quite radical a change," said Coun. Pam Bookham. "It is so complex and it is very controversial. I think people need to fully understand the implications of these proposals."

She said she would like to see a scale mock-up of the building heights proposed in order to properly envision what Central Lonsdale would look like.

This is an election issue, said Bookham, who hopes council members take a stand and residents speak up through ballot decisions.

Two significant issues, the future of Central Lonsdale and rental housing, are mixed in this proposal, said Coun. Bob Heywood.

"Looking at the rental housing stock situation, I'm really troubled with us trying to find the absolute solution to this in the City of North Vancouver, which has one per cent of the Metro Vancouver housing stock," he said.

"If you take every four-level walk-up in the city and go to three times the density, we'd come up with a very, very uninteresting city. And would we solve anybody's problem?" asked Heywood. "We already, in this city, have 53 or 54 per cent of our people in rental accommodation."

The argument between rental and strata ownership is moot, said Heywood. The cost to the individual is the same, he said. "It may be cheaper to own," he said. Few home owners pay 30 per cent of their income for housing as do some renters, he said (referring to upscale rental residences not subsidized rental stock).

Heywood said he would support trying the scheme out on a single building first.

Council needs to be concerned about the loss of rental housing to market condominium development, said Coun. Craig Keating. The development on the southeast corner of 13th Street and Chesterfield Avenue is an example, he said.

"That is the future, unless this council or the next council takes action," said Keating. "And the only action I can say that we can do with the measly powers that municipalities have, is make the construction of rental and renewed rental units affordable and possible in this market place."

This one-for-one plan and three-for-one for non-profits does that, he said.

Both Keating and Mayor Darrell Mussatto voted in support of the OCP amendment.

"The reality is the buildings are getting old," said Mussatto. "We have very few tools to provide affordable rental housing." Senior levels of government are not in the game, he said.

"We need to use all the tools we can that the stakeholder groups recommended and go forward with this. That's being realistic," he said. "If we're going to look at some OCP changes let's go forward with that. Let's talk about how we are going to keep rental housing in our community."

The staff report noted that the limitation to 10 stories may be economically restrictive and insufficient to cover building costs.

It's on that point that Coun. Sam Schechter said he wanted the further public discussion that a policy committee meeting would provide. The height limitation may be too conservative, he said.

Forty-two per cent of the city's rental housing stock is in Central Lonsdale. Most of the apartments are between 20 and 60 years old. The city rental housing stock is shrinking as it loses rental housing to redevelopment.




http://www.canada.com/northshorenews/news/story.html?id=11d0388c-4ee0-4323-9dc5-8e4eaa4150e8
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #654  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2008, 10:16 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
Inifity update | August 10th & 11th


Taken by SFUVancouver, August 10th, 2008.


Taken by SFUVancouver, August 11th, 2008.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #655  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2008, 10:18 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
The Executive Plaza redevelopment has been placed on hold indefinately. It was to be a 3 Phased project on the site of the Executive on Lougheed in burnaby. The project had been stalled for a while so I think most of us saw that coming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #656  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2008, 2:55 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
Eagle Islanders sink bridge plan

Residents reject proposed link at W. Van meeting
Melanie Kuxdorf, North Shore News
Published: Friday, August 15, 2008
Residents of Eagle Island will remain physically isolated from the mainland after they rejected a proposal to build a bridge to shore at a meeting this week.

The plan was one of three options presented to island homeowners at an open house Wednesday night.

Currently, the small island just off the coast is only accessible by boat, although it is possible to reach it by foot at very low tide. The docks for the open-air, flat-bottomed barges used by residents to ferry themselves and their belongings back and forth are ageing, so the District of West Vancouver commissioned an engineering firm to come up with options for replacement. The alternatives it proposed were to replace the existing docks, expand the docks or build a footbridge to connect the island directly.

At the public meeting, the bridge was overwhelming rejected by residents. Islanders instead opted for the status quo.

The bridge would have been for pedestrians only, although Brent Dozzi, manager of roads and transportation for West Vancouver, said it would be designed to accommodate a golf cart.

This electric mode of transportation appealed to new resident Nick Coward, adding that the golf carts would be communal.

"On the island we are a bit split. But from my family's perspective we think the fixed link would be more eco-friendly than all the barges and probably a little bit safer," said Coward.

Those opposed to the plan wanted to prevent the island from becoming a tourist attraction, he said.

"They certainly like their privacy and they like the feel or the ambiance of living on an island separated from the rest of the community," said Dozzi.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans would have preferred the building of a bridge, he added.

"Because you've got a smaller footprint in the water, you don't have 50 boats spewing oil and gas . . . . As far as disruption to the water flow through the channel, there's a lot of environmental benefits to a bridge, but approval of any of the options by the governing bodies is contingent on community support," said Dozzi.

Residents will convene to produce their own proposal, which the consulting group will include in its study as the preferred option.

The island has 31 properties, with two others undeveloped. Residents from 21 of these properties -- over 40 people -- attended Wednesday's meeting.


http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/...17f-ac0c-192ad0df93e0/eagleislanders.jpg

http://www.canada.com/northshorenews/news/story.html?id=f6ca517b-2862-4379-b8a6-b82ca5ce659a
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #657  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2008, 11:01 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Amusing piece - where your strata fees go...

Quote:
Burnaby NewsLeader
Strata plans to trap cats

By Brent Richter - Burnaby NewsLeader

Published: August 12, 2008 5:21 PM
Updated: August 14, 2008 9:50 AM Cats that roam onto one Burnaby apartment complex may soon find themselves caged and sent to the SPCA.

The strata council at The Beresford in the Edmonds area has purchased a "cat trap" in response to complaints from residents that roaming cats are a nuisance on the property, relieving themselves on doorsteps and digging up gardens.

Donna Bracun, a resident of the Beresford complex said the strata council first discussed the trap in September 2007.

When the council purchased a trap this July, she decided to fight the cat-trapping policy. Bracun sent letters to the property manager and the SPCA stating she opposed the trap because it put cats and other animals at unnecessary risk and there is no legal reason to remove cats from the property.

"The SPCA is so full of animals, and they've told me this, they really don't have any room to go and have people just catching cats and dropping them off to punish owners who let their cats out, who are entitled and allowed by law to let their cats out," said Bracun, who works as a paralegal at a North Vancouver law firm.

There is no provincial law or city bylaw stating cats cannot roam on private property, but a Beresford strata bylaw states animals must be either held or on leash when on common property owned by all Beresford residents.

Bracun, a self described animal lover, said she doesn't believe any of the building owners have the know-how to properly trap a cat and care for it.

"The law is quite specific as to the treatment and what you have to do and I don't think they're qualified to do this," she said.

Bracun says the trapping could potentially lead to charges of animal cruelty.

Craig Wilson, The Beresford's strata council president disagrees with Bracun saying the trap is both merited and legal.

Wilson argues that since the Strata Property Act is a piece of provincial legislation and the building bylaws are within the Strata Property Act, there is no reason the owners cannot trap and remove unwanted animals.

"This is within the provincial laws. The provincial legislation has given the corporation the ability to do this," he said.

Wilson confirmed the strata council bought a trap but said it will only be used if "certain owners continue to flout the bylaws."

"We hope we will not have to use it. It is not our intention to go around trapping cats for the sake of trapping cats." he said.

Regardless of legality, Wilson said Beresford residents frequently bring complaints to him and demand he address the cat problem.

"People in the residence are upset about cats digging up their gardens, defecating on their patios, urinating on their screens. That is something they feel they should not have to tolerate."

Mark Takhar, assistant manager of operations at the SPCA said he does not recommend private citizens trapping cats.

The SPCA can only deal with animals that are considered "at large"—roaming off their owner's property. Common areas at privately-owned strata complexes do not fall under that definition, despite what property bylaws are passed by the owners, according to Takhar.

Takhar said there is tremendous potential for harm to trapped animals and the humans who trap them without proper training and experience.

According to Takhar, set traps must be monitored, at minimum, once per hour, including overnight.

"I'm hoping that there's a better solution than what's being mentioned. You have to look what what's best for the animals' interests as well as the people," he said.

Meantime, as an alternative, Bracun said she'd like to see owners bothered by cats in their gardens use natural deterrents such as cayenne pepper, mothballs or certain types of soil cats are known to avoid.

Although she currently does not own a cat, Bracun welcomes neighbourhood cats to her property, arguing they are friendly and help control the rat population, which has skyrocketed since last summer's garbage strike.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #658  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2008, 1:17 AM
Jacques Jacques is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 430
WTF: PortCo kill the bears for they encroach their back yards ( you moved there you oughta know you destroyed its habitat), Richmond poison the dogs because me no like dogs( well dogs have been around way before you where alive and they are decent pets), Burnaby private citizen trap cats because it pooped in its garden(since when cats have to be on a leach they will outlive us get with the program) , Vancouver well it has homelessness so that takes care of the rats population, they adopt as pets( we wont even discuss that one).
Pretty soon we will get arrested for having a bee stuck on a lapel, what kinda of world are we building don't anyone realized that the animal kingdom no matter its size it the most valuable assets to the balance of life.
Stop sanitizing IT
Welcome to the X FILE and MONSANTO world domination
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #659  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2008, 8:49 PM
bdigital bdigital is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #660  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2008, 11:20 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Interesting - thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:29 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.