Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy
Even 37th largest metro is not too bad I mean at least we are in the top 50. And honestly either way you look at it, Austin is Ranked as the 16th largest City population inside the city limits, nearly tied with San Fransisco at 15. That is nothing to balk at at all. Many cities who are ranked higher in metro population are smaller than Austin by itself. That alone is impressive considering Austin was not even in the top 50 in 1980. Also shows that instead of more people living in the suburbs rather than the core city, more people overall are living inside the city limits of Austin.
|
Yep it is pretty impressive. I remember back in 1986 when I first moved to Austin and it was much smaller than it was today no traffic issues a awesome oasis city..
Actually I just check wikipedia and its 700K for the city and 1.6 million for the metro..
1.6 million people in the Austin metro area is nothing to balk at..
San antonio is only 1.3 million for the city and almost 2 million for the metro area...
That means between Austin and San Antonio there are 3.6 million people.
The Dallas\Fort Worth metro plex is 6.1 million..
Austin is bigger than Ft Worth and San Antono is bigger than Dallas...(just city not metro)
There is no reason why Austin and San Antonio can be a metroplex....it may take years...like 20...but it could happen.
The San Austin Metroplex....just a thought..