HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5881  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 3:46 PM
Northernlad Northernlad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFPCME View Post
Projects: I share the same bad feeling. There is something wrong with this project. Don't know what it is, but I suspect the project has hit a financing snag. How did this project get approved in the first place. Pardon my stupidity, but I assume in order to get demolition and building permits for the city there must be some financial statement that must be approved. How else would a city prohibit purely speculative development that may result in vacant eyesores for years to come. Does someone know the answer?
This is the talk among developers in the valley. A lot of us think this may sit vacant for a long time as the national and state economy continues slumping.
     
     
  #5882  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 5:02 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Gentlemen, I wouldn't be at all overly pessimistic about this little piece of development. This is probably one of the hottest pieces of potential in one of the nations hottest markets. At the very worst we'll see a phased-in schedule.

My gut tells me that this project will commence in the near future. It won't be in perhaps one fail swoop, as would have been the case, if the national economic trend were more stable. However, the SLC market is still among one of the nations most comparitively sound investments. We'll see respectable chunks of this project up and going within the next year, if not three to six months.

If the local economy resumes it's former hyper-growth by early to mid 2009 as many have predicted, then the Sugarhouse project will be fully completed much sooner than later. Again, this is a plum project in a plum area, with little at this point to discourage already committed financiers. It's just a matter of proceeding with caution, and a bit of a speed adjustment.


The odds are much better that this particular location will see phases of development within the next year rather than sit empty or be strung out for years like a Boise Place, etc.
     
     
  #5883  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 5:10 PM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
My general contractor clients have said that recently they have been bidding on many commercial projects. They said that they have bid on more projects so far this year than all of last year. Hopefully, this is a good sign of things beginning to turn around.
     
     
  #5884  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 5:16 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Mac View Post
My general contractor clients have said that recently they have been bidding on many commercial projects. They said that they have bid on more projects so far this year than all of last year. Hopefully, this is a good sign of things beginning to turn around.

Hopefully this would lead to more new Office Towers in downtown.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #5885  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 5:20 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,622
You are soooo right T-Mac!! Increasingly, the Wasatch Front is separating itself as one of a handful of the brighest commercials prospects in the nation. One only need look at the business section of a major newspaper recently to understand that major names are moving in and not in a small way. These are typically thousands of new residents, who will be earning above average income and are going to be in the market for either a purchase or at least to rent. Again, this recent development with the Rockefeller Group is but the tip of the pending iceburg.
     
     
  #5886  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 7:59 PM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
The building on the northeast corner of 300 East and 100 South is fenced off and looking like it is getting ready for demo. Anyone know what is going on there?
     
     
  #5887  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 8:35 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,628
Is it the old Odyssey House? If it is, that's where Providence Place is planned, so hopefully this means they're getting ready to start construction!

     
     
  #5888  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 9:03 PM
blazefirelight's Avatar
blazefirelight blazefirelight is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 104
Borg Cube....

So, I saw Hancock last night, and they're in some Hospital. It looks like it's in downtown Los Angeles (but it could've been made up, who really knows?) and when I saw this hospital, the first thing that struck me was "Borg Cube." AKA, new Salt Lake Courthouse. I think that it didn't really look THAT bad. It looked pretty ok.

If anyone else has seen the movie, do you know what I'm talking about?
     
     
  #5889  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 9:26 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Main Street 2005



These were the same photos to ballardphotograhix.com that viperlord posted last night. I just went ahead and posted all the main street photos together.

check out his main street section
http://ballardphotographix.com/PortfolioMainSt.htm

Main Street West side June 2005





Main Street East side June 2005

__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #5890  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 10:17 PM
arkhitektor arkhitektor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearfield, UT
Posts: 1,784
The old malls certainly looked terrible didn't they?
I'm glad that they are just a distant, horrible memory.
     
     
  #5891  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 10:40 PM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
Is it the old Odyssey House? If it is, that's where Providence Place is planned, so hopefully this means they're getting ready to start construction!

It is the old Odyssey House building. I think that it is coming down soon from the looks of it.
     
     
  #5892  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 11:15 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor View Post
The old malls certainly looked terrible didn't they?
I'm glad that they are just a distant, horrible memory.
Ditto!!
     
     
  #5893  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 3:29 AM
RFPCME RFPCME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 555
When a developer does not want attention...

I just read over the D-News article, posted on the Ogden thread, about the Falcon Hill development taking place near the west gate to Hill AFB. It strikes me as odd that this development, mainly office space, is receiving such little attention. The project seems to be moving forward with out a lot of hoopla, positive or negative, which is odd in this day and age and which is why I am beginning to believe something significant is going on behind the scenes.

The project is breaking all kinds of new ground--e.g., the first time the Department of Defense has traded land in return for free office space, which is remarkable and is being replicated at DoD installations across the country. The size of the develoment is staggering, literally 100's of thousands of sq. ft., most of it office space.

Even to a person like me, who knows very little of development, the high concentration of office space at Falcon Hill tells me both the Air Force and the developers expect major expansion at Hill. Oddly, the high concentration of office space across the development, which seems to fit Air Force expectations exactly, also points to a very different mission for Hill rather than its traditional role as a logistics, repair, and maintenance facility. You don't need a lot of modern office space, with state of the art utilities (such as fiber optic cabling) if your job is to maintain and repair aircraft.

Also, the amazing cooperation between the Air Force and the private sector in this development suggests the Air Force may be leaning toward Hill as its location for Cyber Command, which is exactly the opposite of what I wrote on this thread a couple of days ago because I didn't think Utah could supply enough engineers to support the command. Not the first time I've been wrong about something.

As I read more, the joint Air Force and private sector development has been in the works for over two years, just about the same time when the Air Force created the temporary Cyber Command at Barksdale AFB in Louisiana. Very interesting.
     
     
  #5894  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 11:49 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,622
This is extremely interesting RFPCME. When will there be a definitive announcement on whether Utah is chosen or not, and how many jobs again did you say this would generate? Was it in the 5000 range? I was also curious as to the supply of engineers. Wouldn't it be easy enough for Hill AFB to glean engineers from nearby areas such as California? I was thinking that the Airforce would prefer to operate in Utah, over say a place like New England or California, and it seems it would be easy enough to attract engineers from around the country. Hill has never had a problem attracting personnel before, and I think the local universities have also proven an ability to expand quickly their programs.

This seems like a really big economic development for the region. Sorry for all the questions, but now you really have me interested in the prospects that this could generate.
     
     
  #5895  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 8:47 PM
UTPlanner's Avatar
UTPlanner UTPlanner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 941
RFPCME-- you are right that there has been little attention paid to the Falcon Hill Development though the repercussions could be huge. The lack of attention is not surprising though. The SLC based media does not like to leave the county to report on items. I have a good friend that is a camera man for KSL and they're are encouraged to find stories in Salt Lake County because it saves them money. If this project was based in Salt Lake County it would have more coverage than it would like. I live in SLC and work in Davis County and I'm always shocked at things that do not make the news that occur in Layton or Ogden but if a cat gives birth down in Murray, well that's front page news. (Perhaps I am exaggerating just a bit.)

Anyways just a pet peeve of mine.
     
     
  #5896  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 8:57 PM
arkhitektor arkhitektor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearfield, UT
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTPlanner View Post
RFPCME-- you are right that there has been little attention paid to the Falcon Hill Development though the repercussions could be huge. The lack of attention is not surprising though. The SLC based media does not like to leave the county to report on items. I have a good friend that is a camera man for KSL and they're are encouraged to find stories in Salt Lake County because it saves them money. If this project was based in Salt Lake County it would have more coverage than it would like. I live in SLC and work in Davis County and I'm always shocked at things that do not make the news that occur in Layton or Ogden but if a cat gives birth down in Murray, well that's front page news. (Perhaps I am exaggerating just a bit.)

Anyways just a pet peeve of mine.
Its no exaggeration, especially if you get news from KSL or the Deseret News.
Here are just a few of the "newsworthy" gems that are featured today on KSL.com:



Many of the stories on KSL's websites are so irrelevant and poorly written that I wonder if their online editors are high school students.
     
     
  #5897  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 10:29 PM
IFtowner IFtowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 616
Canning in Utah?

No way.
     
     
  #5898  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 10:33 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,622
Hey, don't laugh!! I have to learn how to can/bottle tomatos, or I'm going to be overwhelmed by them pretty soon from the garden. LOL
     
     
  #5899  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2008, 12:05 AM
Viperlord's Avatar
Viperlord Viperlord is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,900
rather unfortunate

After 35 years in same location, deConde's to leave downtown SL

After 35 years in same location, deConde's to leave downtown SL

High-end interior design and home furnishings retailer deConde's is leaving downtown Salt Lake City after 35 years at 270 E.100 S.

Ken deConde, a partner in the business with Harry Warrick, said parking woes - are driving him from the site where he "planned to stay forever."

A moving sale is under way, and deConde's plans to be up and running at its new, approximately 10,000 square foot location at 3130 S. Highland Dr., Salt Lake City, in July or August. It will be near a sister deConde's Accents store, which sells high-end home accessories, at 3000 S. Highland Dr.

deConde said the city's removal of many parking meters along 100 South has hurt his business. While some might argue that free parking is good for retail the previously metered spaces are used, day and night, by nearby apartment dwellers, leaving little or no parking options for his customers.

"I just got tired of fighting it," he said. "So I'm saying, 'goodbye, downtown.' I would think after 35 years, downtown needs places like us. What have we got left? OC Tanner, deConde's, Bennion and the Oxford Shop. The City Council is paying too much attention to what's going on with all the new construction and they're not paying attention to those that they need to realize are important too."

deConde's leased its new space on Highland Drive with the assistance of Commerce CRG.

Copyright Enterprise Business Newspaper Inc. Jun 9, 2008
     
     
  #5900  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2008, 12:07 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor View Post
Its no exaggeration, especially if you get news from KSL or the Deseret News.
Here are just a few of the "newsworthy" gems that are featured today on KSL.com:



Many of the stories on KSL's websites are so irrelevant and poorly written that I wonder if their online editors are high school students.
Cut KSL some slack. It's a slow day. You also missed the real news (which can be found at the top of the page):

__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.