HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2341  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 12:29 AM
Port_of_Bama's Avatar
Port_of_Bama Port_of_Bama is offline
Jubilee on the Bay !!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mobile
Posts: 1,077
I`m proud of the Port cities economic progress but it time for the city to lure in other amentities as well such as a river walk and other things. AWhy would people want to go Dt if everything shuts down earlier an no hang out spots. The Market in the square has been a sucess but i`m shur we can get other things as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2342  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 12:30 AM
Port_of_Bama's Avatar
Port_of_Bama Port_of_Bama is offline
Jubilee on the Bay !!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mobile
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by elb401 View Post
That hotel restraurant isn't going to happen. the floor is for rent right now. who knows though. maybe in the future.

Oh and about the palms on government......that would be stupid. I think everyone was talking about putting them on water street. Its the type of palm at the GMAO building.

I really wish that they would put facades on the parking garages and make them look like historic buildings.

The Palms that are in front of GMAO are king palms
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2343  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 2:09 PM
MobileMoving's Avatar
MobileMoving MobileMoving is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
Lights on the 4th

Downtown Mobile had a beautiful light display on the spires for the 4th of July!




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2344  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 2:25 PM
10101000 10101000 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,711
Just the site of the tower and the new spire on the river plaza is stunning. I still cannot believe that we have such a nice skyline now. I know that it is not as big as others, but it is such an improvement. Thanks for posting the pics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2345  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 2:47 PM
Del Del is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by nimsjus View Post
There is an article in today's PR about moving Middle Bay Lighthouse to Battleship Park to preserve it and protect it from the abuse it takes out in the middle of the bay. I don't have anything against the Battleship Park idea, but I think it would be alot cooler if it could be placed in the area that will eventually be the Maritime Museum.I kind of see it as an outdoor exhibit connecting the Maritime Museum to Cooper Riverside Park. People already go to the Battleship so another exhibit there does not really provide that much additional benefit (not to mention the lighthouse doesn't really go with the other military exhibits). I think it would be nice to have something else across Water Street to pull people across to the waterfront in downtown, plus it would go great with the shipping/port emphasis that the Maritime Museum is focusing on. Any thoughts??
Nimsjus, this is a great idea. Has anybody suggested it to the lighthouse organization or to the museum people? Would your location also expose the lighthouse to less danger during a hurricane?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2346  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 4:36 PM
SouthSky's Avatar
SouthSky SouthSky is offline
surely you're not serious
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mobile
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by MobileMoving View Post
Thanks for the pictures... I like this one in particular.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2347  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 5:33 PM
OCA REP OCA REP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montgomery (Old Cloverdale)
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Del View Post
Nimsjus, this is a great idea. Has anybody suggested it to the lighthouse organization or to the museum people? Would your location also expose the lighthouse to less danger during a hurricane?
An article on this subject was in today's Montgomery Advertiser:
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps...D=/20080708/NEWS02/807080331/1007/news01

Group wants to move bay landmark
The Associated Press • July 8, 2008

MOBILE -- A proposal to move the Middle Bay Lighthouse some 15 miles to Battleship Memorial Park, restore it and put it on permanent display could cost about $1 million.

The Alabama Lighthouse Association has proposed to move the 123-year-old, storm-lashed lighthouse, according to one of the association's founding members, Hal Pierce.

Pierce said the idea has the backing of the Battleship Commission and will be brought before the Alabama Historical Commission on Aug. 6 in Montgomery.

The move is needed so the wooden lighthouse can be maintained better and can be seen by hundreds of thousands of visitors to the park, Pierce said.

The lighthouse was built in 1885 and sits in the Mobile Ship Channel. Shaped like a hexagon and placed on steel screw pilings, it was patterned after several lighthouses on Chesapeake Bay, according to lighthouse association literature.

Frank White, executive director of the Historical Commission, said he doesn't yet know the specific details of the proposal, but it sounds like a good idea. The commission has jurisdiction over the lighthouse.

Pierce expects to turn to the public for donations.

He said the project is expected to involve lifting the lighthouse by crane and transporting it by barge to the park on the Mobile Bay Causeway.

The largest expense would involve restoration of the lighthouse and site preparation. Pierce doesn't yet have a timeline for completing the project but hopes to have the structure moved to Battleship Park by the end of the year.
I really like the Maritime Museum idea. Someone should bring this to the attention of Frank White with the Alabama Historical Commission. The article says they will meet on August 6th and this subject will be brought up at that time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2348  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 6:26 PM
10101000 10101000 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,711
I know this is a cheesy tee, but I bought it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2349  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 6:28 PM
10101000 10101000 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,711
I wish it were more stylish, kind of not me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2350  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 6:36 PM
Del Del is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 101
Would it be much more difficult and expensive to get the Middle Bay lighthouse to the museum site rather than beside the battleship? I know nothing about transporting lighthouses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2351  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 7:17 PM
10101000 10101000 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,711
I duno, but I am glad that they are moving it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2352  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 8:01 PM
10101000 10101000 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Del View Post
Would it be much more difficult and expensive to get the Middle Bay lighthouse to the museum site rather than beside the battleship? I know nothing about transporting lighthouses.
Congrats on you 69th post!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2353  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2008, 10:10 PM
bayou15's Avatar
bayou15 bayou15 is offline
No Respect
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South of 10
Posts: 235
69 ha ha!
__________________
"Thank ya Mississippi , Without you we be #50!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2354  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 2:11 AM
pkp's Avatar
pkp pkp is offline
<- My idol
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mobile
Posts: 1,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Del View Post
Would it be much more difficult and expensive to get the Middle Bay lighthouse to the museum site rather than beside the battleship? I know nothing about transporting lighthouses.
still on the water and extra 1/8 mile
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2355  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 3:05 AM
Muskavon Muskavon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Del View Post
Would it be much more difficult and expensive to get the Middle Bay lighthouse to the museum site rather than beside the battleship? I know nothing about transporting lighthouses.
Nothing about transporting lighthouses? What the hell are our high schools teaching these days?


Seriously though...anyone ever seen a footprint of the maritime museum? What kind of property are they dealing with? I like you guys (yall's in normal southern speak) idea of moving the lighthouse there. Is it really possible on the site is the question.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2356  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 3:08 AM
Del Del is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 101
Only 1/8 of a mile?

Lighthouse Transport was only offered as an elective at my high school, Muskavon.

I wonder if the thing would just end up smack dab under the new 215-foot Frances Coleman bridge. Which may explain why nothing's happening on the Maritime Museum, too.

I had an email all ready to go to Frank White and the power went out. Haven't tried again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2357  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 1:08 PM
sandebr00 sandebr00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 33
According to an article in the online edition of the Press Register, Mayor Jones thinks that Carnival may announce "any time now" that Mobile will be getting a larger cruise ship. The City, in fact, is willing to spend money to build a new gangway for passenger vessels, and has been in preliminary discussions to do so, should Mobile get a larger ship. Moreover, according to Mayor Jones, Dr. Bronner is in discussions with Carnival about possible incentives should Carnival place a new ship in Mobile.

http://www.al.com/news/press-register/index.ssf?/base/news/121559495634500.xml&coll=3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2358  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 1:25 PM
LHG LHG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 23
Tanker Decision Expected Today

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2359  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 1:30 PM
sandebr00 sandebr00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 33
Also according to the online edition of the Press Register, Defense Secretary Gates is expected to present his plan for moving forward with the refueling tanker contract sometime today. It appears from the article that there are four possible recommendations that Defense Secretary Gates can make, but it is unclear at this time which of the four he will propose. First, he could recommend that a new competition be held. Second, he could recommend that the Air Force reevaluate certain criteria in light of the GAO report, but not hold a new competition, Third, he could recommend that a contract be given to one of the companies. Finally, he could recommend that the contract be split between the two companies.

http://www.al.com/news/press-register/index.ssf?/base/news/121559490534500.xml&coll=3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2360  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2008, 1:31 PM
sandebr00 sandebr00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 33
Sorry about the report, LHG. I apparently was typing my post about the tanker decision at the same time that you posted your comment!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.