HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 2:27 AM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is online now
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,738
Definitely not a train station, I've seen many a Loblaws and Zehr's that look like that. It's kinda surprising that there aren't any grocery stores of that design around here. I guess we'll have one now.

It'll be interesting to see what effect this development will have in this area of Hamilton.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 1:32 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
wow....Hamilton really is tossing away the future simply to fatten the pockets of a few multinationals. amazing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 1:49 PM
BrianE's Avatar
BrianE BrianE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 352
There's some disapointing features for sure. But look at the site how it was before. http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&hl=en&geo...79.811136&spn=0.005267,0.009356&t=h&z=17

These plans are a quantum leap forward if you ask me. Viewed from the air, Centre mall was a parking lot wasteland. Not a single building along Barton, Ottawa or Kennilworth.

Does anyone have time to do a quick layout of how they think this 31.7ha plot of land should have been developed? I would be interested to see the ideas. For example, I think they could have made the stretch along Barton look like the International Village BIA on King St. Retail on bottom and 2 -3 stories of apartments on top. Would it kill them to have people actualy living on this land?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 2:56 PM
DC83 DC83 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianE View Post
Does anyone have time to do a quick layout of how they think this 31.7ha plot of land should have been developed? I would be interested to see the ideas. For example, I think they could have made the stretch along Barton look like the International Village BIA on King St. Retail on bottom and 2 -3 stories of apartments on top. Would it kill them to have people actualy living on this land?
There's already the Centre Mall Apartments in the west-end of the lot. Let's just say the bldg isn't the most desirable rental units in the city hahaha

Streetwall is an improvement, 100%! No arguing that! However, they SHOULD have built those units with street-entry. I also doubt there'd be any display windows facing the street either.

Street-facing entry along Barton along with mix-use units (either businesses or residential on top, even if only 2-3 stories) would have made much, much more sense. The fact they didn't do any of this is why I'm so annoyed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 3:04 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
agreed. how hard is it to continue the streetwall down Barton with a built-in clientele living upstairs.
All the big box crap could still have been built along the back of the site, but the street would have been much nicer.
This way just sucks, like upper james.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 3:35 PM
DC83 DC83 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,430
^^ Well, firstly, the big boxes aren't built to house anything ontop besides maybe a million A/C units to make sure their suv-driving clientelle are just as cold in the summer as they are in the winter.

I was up at Costco the other week, and saw they were ripping apart the old Future Shop for the new Best Buy (wow.. what a difference), and the side 'walls' (if you want to call them that) were about as thick as my arm... and I'm a small guy haha

These boxes are made so crappy b/c the developpers want to walk away with as much $$$$$$$$ as they can. To hell with quality or sustainability.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 10:32 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,786
The project may suck, but as already posted it's leaps and bounds ahead of the current Centre Mall. The place was so horridly out of date, barely maintained and incredibly oppressive. Had to walk through a sea of parking spaces to even get to the mall. At least now we'll have a modern project going up, even if it's of the big box kind.

I'm sure most people will argue of it's 1950's vintage, but I just don't see it in my eyes. I kind of blame the owners in the past 10-15 years for letting it go to waste.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 11:28 PM
DC83 DC83 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by LikeHamilton View Post
The the new Centre Mall. I wonder if they will change the name as it will not be a mall anymore?[/IMG]
I think they should go old-school and (re)rename it 'The Greater Hamilton Shopping Centre'!

What would everyone else like to see it called?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2008, 11:36 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
I concur - and I hope they make good on their promise to incorporate the signature triple-arches into the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 12:08 AM
fastcarsfreedom's Avatar
fastcarsfreedom fastcarsfreedom is offline
On Guard For Thee
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Essex County
Posts: 1,007
Surprise!...I agree...it definitely should refer to the full name (Sears, for the record, continued to use the fall name in it's ads/corporate materials). I'm sure abbreviated name "The Centre" works well also. And the triple arch ABSOLUTELY should be preserved...it is the Centre as I remember it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 1:55 AM
mishap mishap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC83 View Post
I think they should go old-school and (re)rename it 'The Greater Hamilton Shopping Centre'!

What would everyone else like to see it called?
That, or "The Barton Centre."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 1:57 AM
MsMe MsMe is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,267
Yea the arches need to stay. Not sure where they would look best though. Maybe at an entrance on Barton St. somewhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 3:03 AM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
maybe over the TD drive-thru.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 12:02 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
I was thinking of the site of the HSR terminal, which I guess is technically a drive-thru as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 12:37 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,364
It'll likely go along the front entrance from Barton and next to the food court building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 1:22 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
I'm not aware of any HSR terminal on this site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 1:25 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelTown View Post
Here's a proposal for a Centre Mall transit terminal with labelled retail stores like Loblaws, Shoppers, Canadian Tire, Zellers, etc.

posted by steeltown some time ago
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 1:33 PM
DC83 DC83 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,430
^^ That render shows that this tudor-style bldg we were wondering about is clearly a Loblaws. Makes sense since I've seen this style used before.

Those arches will most likely be incorporated at the main entrance where, in the photo above, the buses enter.

I had no idea the 4 Bayfront went to Centre Mall? Or is this new for the route?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 1:37 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,364
That's just a proposal hsr terminal, nothing serious.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2008, 1:41 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
that proposal was done by a guy over on the Canadian Transportation blog. it's not a 'real' proposal from the HSR or Centre Mall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.