^^^
Steely I just love your commentary...
Quote:
Originally Posted by trvlr70
If the land this building sits on was vacant and it was just announced that this "tower" was approved and will begin construction, every regular Chicago thread poster would be on suicide watch.
I find it incredulous to defend this POS waste of space.
|
Waste of space? Really, how so? This tower must have an FAR of 30+, thus maximizing use of space. You may hate the asethic quaility and massing of the building, but to call it a waste of space is just flat out wrong. I would gaurentee you that very few buildings would have an FAR higher than this one. A thinner building with the same floor area would just be taller, much taller. For example, waterview tower's FAR is also around 30.
Threaded Mode