CHICAGO | 375 East Wacker (Arquitectonica Tower) | 840 FT / 256 M | 76 FLOORS | PRO - Page 32

Ch.G, Ch.G · #**621** Posted **Jan 8, 2008, 12:20 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdrianXSands

what happend to the three towers?

Hadn't someone said that that was in fact an older rendering?

Dolemite · #**622** Posted **Jan 8, 2008, 4:46 PM**

What happened to the height? I thought that this was supposed to be 82 floors and 921 feet? And rumored for a height increase to supertall status.

ItsConanOBrien · #**623** Posted **Jan 8, 2008, 5:27 PM**

I'm not usually a fan of these types of buildings but I got a good feeling about this one. I kind of like the whole base area. I look forward to seeing this at a few more angles.

Northwest · #**624** Posted **Jan 8, 2008, 10:14 PM**

Well, when the height estimate in the thread title changes, I tend to take that information as fact.
Sure, I would love to see this baby 200' taller, with flanking towers, but if the execution is well done, using quality materials, this will still be a stunning structure at 840'.
Hell, I would be proud to call this my home, and given the fact that I may be in the market for delivery of a downtown condo ~2010 - 2012, this just may be on my wish list!
BTW, does anyone know whats inside that MASSIVE base? Is that ALL parking?

aaron38 · #**625** Posted **Jan 9, 2008, 2:10 AM**

A lot of the base is a hotel.

simcityaustin · #**626** Posted **Mar 11, 2008, 5:10 PM**

It's been two months...any news/rumors?

Steely Dan · #**627** Posted **Mar 11, 2008, 5:16 PM**

if there were any news or rumors to report, they would have been posted in this thread.

Alliance · #**628** Posted **Mar 11, 2008, 5:51 PM**

Woah...but why 840'? what did I miss?

Steely Dan · #**629** Posted **Mar 11, 2008, 5:58 PM**

^ go back and read post #613

simcityaustin · #**630** Posted **Mar 11, 2008, 10:44 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steely Dan

if there were any news or rumors to report, they would have been posted in this thread.

Yea, I know, but sometimes when people bump threads it reminds people of rumors/news they've heard, which I was hoping to be the case. Guess not.

Anyways, did we ever get any type of estimated start date on this?

Juan_M2118 · #**631** Posted **Apr 20, 2008, 8:05 PM**

Anything going on with this one?

Alliance · #**632** Posted **Apr 20, 2008, 8:18 PM**

If there was, someone would have posted.

aaron38 · #**633** Posted **Apr 20, 2008, 8:18 PM**

At this point, I think it's a pretty safe bet that there won't be movement on Arquetectonica until Aqua is topped out. We're looking at another year, at least. Get comfy.

honte · #**634** Posted **Apr 20, 2008, 10:09 PM**

^ I don't know about that... there isn't much product at all left in Aqua. If Magellan feels that they have a niche in the presently reduced market, they might go ahead with marketing it anyway.

Alliance · #**635** Posted **Apr 21, 2008, 5:02 AM**

And hopefully feel there is enough niche to make this building its original height.

aaron38 · #**636** Posted **Apr 21, 2008, 2:00 PM**

Oh yeah, I would hope they wouldn't wait a year to start marketing. They probably should start that soon.
I was talking about actual construction.

BVictor1 · #**637** Posted **Apr 21, 2008, 3:34 PM**

^^^
Whether they wait or not, I'm sure it's a safe bet to say that it'll be built. LSE has been very successful, and I don't see things suddenly going under.

Dr. Taco · #**638** Posted **Jun 16, 2008, 5:28 PM**

just letting you know I'm still thinking of you, arquitectonica

*hugs*

Chicagoguy · #**639** Posted **Jun 20, 2008, 10:26 PM**

I believe I read that this one has been approved? If so when might sales start for it? When are they projecting construction to start?

MrLakepoint · #**640** Posted **Jun 20, 2008, 10:43 PM**

edit...