HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted May 27, 2008, 7:51 PM
texboy texboy is offline
constructor extrodinaire!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by texastarkus View Post
Look for the Austin-Seattle announcement on JetBlue soon.
American just dropped their Seattle flight...where are you getting your info on this "announcement" about Jetblue doing a Seattle route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted May 27, 2008, 8:13 PM
alexjon's Avatar
alexjon alexjon is offline
Bears of antiquity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Downtown/First Hill, Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom"n"Converse View Post
United does Seattle to SA direct and US and whatever WN is do SA to Seattle direct.
Ack! They must not be cheap flights since I use priceline and hadn't seen a direct flight in the past.
__________________
"The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion." -- George Washington & John Adams in a diplomatic message to Malta
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted May 27, 2008, 9:11 PM
sammyk sammyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by texboy View Post
American just dropped their Seattle flight...where are you getting your info on this "announcement" about Jetblue doing a Seattle route.
I don't know where his info comes from but it makes sense. If true, Jetblue is looking to capitalize on part of the 200+ seat void left by American. Didn't American use a 757 on that route?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted May 28, 2008, 10:42 AM
MAH4546 MAH4546 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: los angeles
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom"n"Converse View Post
United does Seattle to SA direct and US and whatever WN is do SA to Seattle direct.
They fly San Antonio-Seattle direct, which means one flight number. That does not mean non-stop. No airline flies it non-stop.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyk
I don't know where his info comes from but it makes sense. If true, Jetblue is looking to capitalize on part of the 200+ seat void left by American. Didn't American use a 757 on that route?
They used an MD80, though that's besides the point because there is no "void" left in this market, especially in today's economy.
__________________
los angeles
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted May 28, 2008, 7:14 PM
sammyk sammyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 518
Well there's no big void if they were using an MD-80 but it if was a 757 that they were barely filling then there would have been. jetBlue might be able to make it work with an E190.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted May 28, 2008, 9:40 PM
ATXboom ATXboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,832
It was an MD-80. I have been on this flight a few times. It usually ran about 80% full.

It will leave a market void because of all the work between Microsoft and Dell... with current fuel costs probably not enough of a void to justify a direct from a spoke and hub laggard airline. Jetblue may be able to make it work as it doesn't have to worry about logisitically gethering fleets at hubs... and they state they want to route cross country flights through Austin.

The 757's run between San Jose and Austin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 1:02 PM
M1EK's Avatar
M1EK M1EK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,194
JetBlue actually said they want to route California/Florida traffic through Austin; not cross-country traffic in general, if I remember correctly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2008, 8:41 PM
AustinTex AustinTex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 65
I have friends who work at Jetblue, and they gave me some inside info.

Here's the deal: JetBlue operates 2 kinds of aircraft, Airbus A320s and Embraer 190s. The A320s have 150 seats, the E-190s have 100 seats. The A320s can fly cross country without stopping to refuel, but the E-190s cannot. They need a midway point. The E-190s are GREAT planes because they have a lot of room, the windows are positioned higher than other similar sized aircraft, and they can serve less-trafficed routes yet still fill the plane.....without feeling like you're on a smaller plane. They have engines underneath the wings and have a Boeing 737 kind of feel, or for aviation enthusiasts, a reduced sized version of the A320/318.

Because they DO have a need for the E-190s to service routes (especially in these gas sensitive times and less passengers willing to travel), these E-190s have become very valuable to the airline. They searched for a midway point, a refueling city, a passenger exchange city, and it came down to Houston and Austin. JetBlue already like the business boom it saw when they started AUS service and stated the demographics made the city perfect to serve as it's E-190 coast to coast midway point. Mind you, the other airline model similar to JetBlue would be Southwest, and they do the most business out of AUS.

So, JetBlue announced to their staff they would use Austin as the midway city, and immediately, a number of pilots and their families jumped on the opportunity to move out of snow-locked Boston, and they bought homes here. The plans are, as they were, to slowly expand service out of AUS taking on Southwest. American dropped the Seattle and Orange County flights, not due to a lack of Austin traffic, but the other way around. Orange County (SNA) was on the national news the other night as being one of the most prominent airports in the nation to actually suffer badly due to having LAX and Long Beach so close with a gas price hike, and airlines are needing to consolidate and focus routes most efficiently. SNA (Orange County) is expected to lose A LOT of their service. The extent of the losses have not been realized yet, but the news is NOT good.

As for JetBlue, they could not have landed this structure any more timely. Yes, they will be adding routes. Which ones will be added are under wraps, but being that they use the E-190s out of AUS, they could potentially add a good number more since demand for the smaller aircraft will be of great importance in saving money overall. And yes, they will be taking up whatever valuable routes other airlines cannot maintain out of AUS. The only downside: they don't have too many E-190s. So, if traffic does demand, they may have to incorporate some A320s into the mix as well.

Again, this is not an Austin issue. This is an airline issue - and the cities losing the most flights are Chicago O'Hare, Boston, San Juan P.R., SNA, and 16 others, AUS not being one of them listed. If I can locate the list again, I'll post it.

But yes, Austin is the Coast to Coast connector city for JetBlue though it's in its initial phase right now. It may not look like a lot, but when pilots move their families for work, you know there are changes coming that would justify such a decision.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 2:45 AM
sammyk sammyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 518
That's excellent news. I remember hearing they had issues with those E190s early on, I guess they resolved them or found a better way to use them.

---

On a ABIA related note, anyone know if there was a last minute runway switch? Planes usually fly parallel to my house when landing on 17L but tonite around 9PM they were perpendicular and then hung a left to land on 17R. Looked like a couple of AA MD80s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 5:53 AM
Mikey711MN's Avatar
Mikey711MN Mikey711MN is offline
I am so smart, S-M-R-T!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moved south to Austin, TX
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinTex View Post
As for JetBlue, they could not have landed this structure any more timely. Yes, they will be adding routes. Which ones will be added are under wraps, but being that they use the E-190s out of AUS, they could potentially add a good number more since demand for the smaller aircraft will be of great importance in saving money overall. And yes, they will be taking up whatever valuable routes other airlines cannot maintain out of AUS. The only downside: they don't have too many E-190s. So, if traffic does demand, they may have to incorporate some A320s into the mix as well.
Good news for both ABIA and JetBlue! (I, for one, will be taking my first flight with them on Friday, and I'm pretty excited about it)

However, surely any JetBlue expansion plans will be quite muted in the short-term with the severe lack of gate space. So first, I'd like to see them stick it out on their new routes like SFO and MCO, where I believe they face some pretty committed competition (UA hub traffic to Asia on the one hand, the behemoth Southwest on the other). If they can excel there, I think only then can they make the business case to expand.

That said, however, I believe--if without hard data--that the market is there for E190 service to IAD and SEA (once AA drops it, which I believe is planned). But the secret's out on AUS: we are remarkably well-served and so there are very few diamonds in the rough as they existed back when JetBlue first entered the market.

It'll be interesting all the same. Thanks for the thorough post!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 7:55 AM
hookem hookem is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,565
Mikey711, you'll love it. I'm flying JetBlue for the 3rd time next month.

The E190s are pretty awesome. With only 2 seats on each side of the aisle, and the leather seating... it feels very close to first class on the legacy carriers. Also, the personal direct TV and satellite radio are great. They are always on, from taxi out to taxi in... no having to wait until you can turn on your electronic devices, or waiting for the flight crew to press play on the "in flight entertainment"... you can start watching a TV show/movie while boarding and pretty much keep watching it through takeoff, landing, taxi to your gate. I love it. We're lucky to have Jet Blue here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 12:14 PM
Mikey711MN's Avatar
Mikey711MN Mikey711MN is offline
I am so smart, S-M-R-T!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moved south to Austin, TX
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by hookem View Post
Mikey711, you'll love it. I'm flying JetBlue for the 3rd time next month.

The E190s are pretty awesome. With only 2 seats on each side of the aisle, and the leather seating... it feels very close to first class on the legacy carriers. Also, the personal direct TV and satellite radio are great. They are always on, from taxi out to taxi in... no having to wait until you can turn on your electronic devices, or waiting for the flight crew to press play on the "in flight entertainment"... you can start watching a TV show/movie while boarding and pretty much keep watching it through takeoff, landing, taxi to your gate. I love it. We're lucky to have Jet Blue here.
Indeed we are. That's why I look to support them any time that I can, which, honestly, isn't all that often (at least by comparison with the amount I travel).

As it were, I'm flying on the only A320 service AUS currently has*, so I'll miss out on the E190 experience with 2 across seating per side of the aisle. But if they take from Gordon Bethune's playbook, my suspicion is that they're dilligent on a consistent product regardless of airliner flown.

* And here's hoping I get extra lucky and get the internet-wired one!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 4:01 PM
AustinTex AustinTex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 65
You're flying on an A320 JetBlue???? since when?! If you are, then that is brand new and I am not aware of that.

If that is now SCHEDULED service, then JetBlue did what I thought they would - demand has now brought them to integrate the A320s. That is brand new because I keep a tight pulse on AUS and they have not had A320s as of yet. I need to check their info and find out if this is here to stay or a temporary move. But, it very well could be the beginning of the A320 / E190 mix-in. Freakin nice!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 4:21 PM
AustinTex AustinTex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 65



There's your E-190.

hey, Mikey, where are you flying to on JetBlue? They don't list anything about an A320 so I'm curious what route they're using it on.

thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 5:11 PM
Mikey711MN's Avatar
Mikey711MN Mikey711MN is offline
I am so smart, S-M-R-T!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moved south to Austin, TX
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinTex View Post
hey, Mikey, where are you flying to on JetBlue? They don't list anything about an A320 so I'm curious what route they're using it on.
JetBlue 1264 - AUS-BOS - has operated as an A320 since 5/1/08. (source) It surprised me to see it there too, but it's been in place since I booked the trip a few months ago, so it's definitely not a last-minute equipment swap.

Last edited by Mikey711MN; Jun 11, 2008 at 5:11 PM. Reason: removed the image to save screen real estate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2008, 7:34 PM
LoneStarMike's Avatar
LoneStarMike LoneStarMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin -> Tyler, TX
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinTex View Post
That is brand new because I keep a tight pulse on AUS and they have not had A320s as of yet.
Actually, jetBue did operate 1 daily AUS-JFK roundtrip on an A320 from April 6 through April 30, 2006 but that was only because jetBlue - at the time - was short an E190 for their then new service out of Richmond.

See this thread from USAviation.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinTex View Post
I need to check their info and find out if this is here to stay or a temporary move. But, it very well could be the beginning of the A320 / E190 mix-in. Freakin nice!!
The current A320 to BOS lasts 6 months and will go back to an E190 beginning November 2, 2008 according to OAG

http://timetables.oag.com/aus/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2008, 12:13 PM
LoneStarMike's Avatar
LoneStarMike LoneStarMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin -> Tyler, TX
Posts: 2,317
April passenger totals

First I see this story from the Austin Business Journal

Quote:
Passenger traffic at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport rose 3 percent in April and cargo traffic saw an even bigger increase.

More than 832,450 passengers traveled through the Austin airport in April with Southwest Airlines and Delta Air Lines posting significant increases over April 2007.

Air cargo for the month totaled 18.3 million lbs., up 7 percent from April 2007, led by a 27 percent increase in ABX Air Inc. cargo and a 22 percent increase in UPS cargo.

General aviation operations at ABIA increased 3 percent.

So far this year, nearly 2.9 million passengers have traveled through the airport, a 5.5 percent increase over the same four-month period in 2007.

Air cargo for the year is up 12 percent and general aviation has increased 6.5 percent.

www.ci.austin.tx.us/austinairport

Then I see this blurb in the Austin Chronicle's Naked City section:

Quote:
• Passenger travel at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport dropped 3% in April compared to the same month last year. That's Bergstrom's first drop and probably the initial sign of an economic downturn at the airport, the Austin Aviation Department's Shane Harbinson told the Airport Advisory Com­mis­sion Tuesday night. Going into the next year's operating budget, Harbinson said, the airport anticipates that airline mergers could also lead to a loss of four gates under the worst-case scenario. Despite that, the airport still anticipates that revenue will be up 2% next year. – Kimberly Reeves
Gotta love the media. Neither story is entirely accurate, although the Austin Business Journal is "more" accurate than the Austin Chronicle.

ABIA's Aviation Activity Report for April shows that we actually had 747,509 passengers, an increase of 3.06% over April 2006's passenger totals of 725,293.

The "more than 832,450" passengers reported by the ABJ is actually the airport's current all-time monthly passenger record that was set back in July. Other than that, their story is correct.

I don't know where the Austin Chronicle got their info. They either looked at the activity report wrong or else attended an aviation advisory meeting where either wrong information was given out or they misunderstood what was said.

BTW, I'm guessing that the Austin Chronicle's report that the airport anticipates that airline mergers could also lead to a loss of four gates under the worst-case scenario. refers to currently occupied gates becoming vacant and available for other carriers. I don't necessarily see that as being a bad thing - especially if a legacy airline gives up a gate and it's picked up by a low-fare carrier.

I personally think our traffic will continue to rise through the end of the summer. Most of the recently announced flights that will be discontinued won't happen until late August/early September and the new flights that were added in May weren't operating last summer, so we have more seats available than last year.

However, if we do have a drop in passenger traffic in the fall due to a sour economy and/or airlines reducing service here, I wonder how that would affect the plans for the East Concourse expansion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2008, 12:56 PM
sammyk sammyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyk View Post
On a ABIA related note, anyone know if there was a last minute runway switch? Planes usually fly parallel to my house when landing on 17L but tonite around 9PM they were perpendicular and then hung a left to land on 17R. Looked like a couple of AA MD80s.
Quoting myself but on my way home yesterday I saw big X sign lit up in front of 17L, wonder if there was any runway damage that caused it to be closed. I guess this questions really for A.net...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2008, 4:12 PM
ATXboom ATXboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,832
The data from ABIA's website itself says 3% increase... I would trust the actual airport media release over Austin Chronicles...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2008, 4:10 PM
texastarkus texastarkus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Far Sub-Urban San Antonio
Posts: 467
construction at abia

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyk View Post
Quoting myself but on my way home yesterday I saw big X sign lit up in front of 17L, wonder if there was any runway damage that caused it to be closed. I guess this questions really for A.net...
There is a pretty big runway/taxiway rehab project going on that'll last almost a year to complete. This will cause both runways to close for extended periods...the same for various taxiways and ramps while concrete panels are replaced or spalls repared. This project also included some lighting work on the east side and some perimeter roadwork and roads to the PAPI's. Runway 17L/35R should open this afternoon with displaced thresholds and will be a daylight runway for a couple of months. Hope that answers your question.

Keep up with closures by NOTAMs....https://www.notams.faa.gov/dinsQueryWeb/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.