Quote:
Originally Posted by Bert
The parking lot is ridiculous - it's the most low density parking I've ever seen. There are huge dividing lines between parking stalls, and several of the parking lanes are wider than most residential streets. I'm not exaggerating when I say they could easily fit the same amount of parking in half the space or less.
|
If you'd ever been to the Grandview Costco you'd know the parking lot was a joke, it was very cramped, many fender benders just waiting to happen. My girlfriend and I drive a 4 cyl compact car, and even so we were thrilled to see the dimensions of the new parking lot. The reality is that Costco shoppers tend to come in large vehicles. You can argue that this is not environmentally friendly, but Costco using a little more land for parking is hardly an environmental disaster.
The environmental issue has 2 parts:
1. Costco's operating environmental record as company: it could be better. Why didn't Burnaby force an environmental code similar to the Walmart site on Marine Drive for Costco? Who knows, maybe they wanted the giant tax revenues that are now coming to them instead of Vancouver. Chock it up on the list Vancouver has lost at Burnaby's gain. Personally I'd like to see a lot more rainwater capture and some form of local power generation (solar, wind) on big boxes like Costco. Energy efficient lighting and heating should be a given.
2. Costco as a business model appeals to the SUV driving, McMansion living, suburbanite crowd. As a group these are among the worst resource wasters and polluters in the world. Is that Costco's fault? We're still living in a free market. Exercise your opinion with your wallet (and by all means, tell all your friends).
I don't know about other parts of North America, but maybe with downtown stores and the like, Costco is trying to prove(?) to itself and others that it doesn't have to be just one other big box in the burbs.