Quote:
Originally Posted by Del
I'm not talking about major expansions without a building permit. The most recent example for me was neighbors putting up a backyard pergola. They had to stop what they were doing and go downtown to file plans for their little "landscape feature." There was also a case of some folks living in a run-down house in a pre-gentrified block who were fixing their front porch railings with ordinary one-by-somethings. To be honest I didn't know if those folks owned or if it was the landlord, but to me it looked like they were doing the best job they knew how to do with what they could afford. There are some slumlords who own property down here, true, but I don't want to see people who own their homes driven out so that---exactly what you said--- a bunch of investors can make a buck redoing their houses. I feel hypocritical since our block is pretty solidly gentrified, but I think there should be a middle ground between slumville and Colonial Williamsburg.
|
I agree. One of the main reasons I like living here is because of the diversity - and that includes incomes and economic status. The real issues lie with slumlords and Section 8 properties as well as houses that are totally vacant and in terrible shape. If some lives somewhere and truly can't do any better, you can't be over demanding on how there house looks. However, if a house is vacant and an eyesore, I think the city should a have the right to seize the property and auction it to someone who will fix it up. There is a house a block away that burned a year ago that has not been touched. I assume it was a rental and that the same jerk still owns it, but even if it was owned by folks living there, they obviously abandoned it, which makes the area look bad, invites crime, etc...