Quote:
Originally Posted by coalminecanary
it's not about this building having been anywhere near "the best", it's more about the problem of its replacement, namely that it's almost guaranteed to be EVEN WORSE than what went before.
Is it just me, or does all this noise about building safety appear to be a thinly guised attempt on LIUNA's part to look like the good guys while basically searching for excuses to bring every building they own surrounding the lister down as soon as possible?
|
this is exactly why most Hamiltonians lament the loss of our historic buildings. I for one, would 'say take it down' if it was being replaced by something better. And by better I mean,
- no set back,
- taller and denser,
- mixed/multi use,
- post mod architecturally designed (not builder designed, or kit design, like new Fed Building),
- modern features,
- engages the street,
- green roof / LEED,
- no blank walls,
- windows and glass,
- quality craftsmanship, built to last, something we'd fight to save in 100 years.
We're concerned because when they're replaced with the type of building like the plaza at Wilson and James (beside Tivoli) or the one at Catherine and Main or just left empty like 37 James, the Hess Parking Lagoon, HMP, Tivoli, John and Main, Hughson and Main and on and on...
that's our concern. Not that the building is super great. Even the Lister is a medium-looking building, but what will replace it? that's the question.
It all adds up the gradual suburbanization of the downtown urban heart.