Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280
^^^ I agree that is why there is so much traffic, but the roads in that area aren't going to be getting any wider so let them drive, the more people who drive the more choked off the roads will get and the more people who will be discouraged from driving. The benefit of that is the people who decide to drive anyhow get punished with extremely long waits in traffic.
|
Just to continue as the counterpoint, gridlocked traffic also impedes buses (perhaps worse than it impedes cars), unless buses are given some sort of bus-only lanes, queue-jumping/signal-priority, etc. I would argue that traffic isn't what scares people out of their cars; rather, only parking does that. Traffic in LA is awful, but there is free parking everywhere so everyone drives. Because of expensive and scarce parking in the Loop, it gets a good transit mode share even on weekends. Once free parking is impossible and people gotta pay, they'll seriously consider transit. Thus I really dislike that off-street parking is
mandated in areas with such high land value warranting high-intensity uses (North/Clybourn being a great example); even if the parking is fee-based and not free (I have a suspicion this development's parking will be free with validation), that fee will be subsidized because more parking than the market warranted is being provided.
This is why I'm less enthused about this project, especially now that the residential density (which should at least contribute a few hundred transit trips a day for work commuters) is being slashed. I just don't see the retail portion making great use of its transit-friendly location when that much off-street parking is provided.