HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4901  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 6:38 PM
leerjet leerjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 110
They didn't get very specific about this program but it sounds nice...

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=3117296

I wonder if it has anything to do with LEEDS certification?
     
     
  #4902  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 7:17 PM
DENrising's Avatar
DENrising DENrising is offline
New Coloradan
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
From the way the head of Delta talked it would definately appear that AMS will be in the near future. I imagine that the Guv. is going to push for a non-stop to Asia big-time. One thing is sure obvious. If the merger goes as planned, the airport is finally in for alot of change and growth.
This is good to hear. I would like to see these two IC flights added, perhaps momentum will pick up once the merger is approved. I understand the Guv also travels to Asia frequently and even has adopted children from Asia. I think his travel experience there and connections WILL get a SLC>Narita flight. What about Shanghai? Wasn't the ATL>Shanghai flight approved? This merger is going to be so good for Asia travelers, I look forward to earning my TransPac skymiles.
     
     
  #4903  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 8:25 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Another big impact this pending merger would have, is to put the Wasatch ski industry into an even bigger boom than it's already in. This has the potential to add an additional huge market of Europeans and Asians to the already growing domestic market. Because of the proximity of the airport and metro to the resorts, we could be catching up with Colorado in skier days a lot sooner than anticipated. It would mean the expansion plans around the Ogden area, the new proposed resorts, and the interconnect will probably be put on a much higher priority list by investors and developers.
.
     
     
  #4904  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 9:35 PM
DENrising's Avatar
DENrising DENrising is offline
New Coloradan
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Another big impact this pending merger would have, is to put the Wasatch ski industry into an even bigger boom than it's already in. This has the potential to add an additional huge market of Europeans and Asians to the already growing domestic market. Because of the proximity of the airport and metro to the resorts, we could be catching up with Colorado in skier days a lot sooner than anticipated. It would mean the expansion plans around the Ogden area, the new proposed resorts, and the interconnect will probably be put on a much higher priority list by investors and developers.
.
Delts, this is yet one more reason why Delta's hub in SLC is so secure. SLCIA is a mere 30 minutes from multiple world class ski resorts and we still brag about over 500" of fresh powder (thats 12.70 meters) as we even exceeded this year. So why not use the ski industry to attract European and Asian skiiers. After all, when Europeans get tired of the Alps they can use their advantage in the Euro>Dollar exchange rate and visit SLC for skiing!

How long is it from an International Airport to the ski resorts in Colorado? British Columbia? Salt Lake definitely has the advantage here.
     
     
  #4905  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 9:53 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCrising View Post
Delts, this is yet one more reason why Delta's hub in SLC is so secure. SLCIA is a mere 30 minutes from multiple world class ski resorts and we still brag about over 500" of fresh powder (thats 12.70 meters) as we even exceeded this year. So why not use the ski industry to attract European and Asian skiiers. After all, when Europeans get tired of the Alps they can use their advantage in the Euro>Dollar exchange rate and visit SLC for skiing!

How long is it from an International Airport to the ski resorts in Colorado? British Columbia? Salt Lake definitely has the advantage here.
I'm not sure about BC but it is a minimum of two hours to the nearest resort from Denver IA. It is in no way a fly in in the morning, shuttle to the resort get a full day of skiing and fly back out that evening type of option. Yet one additional reason why our ski industry is the best.
     
     
  #4906  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 10:18 PM
DENrising's Avatar
DENrising DENrising is offline
New Coloradan
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Mayor View Post
I'm not sure about BC but it is a minimum of two hours to the nearest resort from Denver IA. It is in no way a fly in in the morning, shuttle to the resort get a full day of skiing and fly back out that evening type of option. Yet one additional reason why our ski industry is the best.
Exactly Future, SLCIA is quite possibly the closest airport of its size, volume to major ski resorts, just counting The Cottonwoods (4) and Park City (3) all within a very short shuttle ride of the baggage claim. No one else can say that.

I think this and a weak dollar overseas should attract more and more international skiiers to Salt Lake. The potential is mind boggling. How will they get here? More Non stop flights by Delta.

We should start planning that LTR up Parleys Canyon.
     
     
  #4907  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 10:52 PM
RFPCME RFPCME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 555
Hope you're right

Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Mayor View Post
I'm pretty sure the local government is awake and fully aware of the airport issue. We have to remember that roughly a year ago Delta was still in bankruptcy and could have still gone belly up at any time. Now that things seem more solid with the proposed merger I think SLC and the state will begin to implement the airport expansion, but again we have to be patient because the FAA still has to approve the merger.
Future Mayor:

I sure hope you're right. But, like Skyguy, I feel the airport administration lacks vision and direction, taking the path of least resistance.
     
     
  #4908  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 10:55 PM
Scraperdude801's Avatar
Scraperdude801 Scraperdude801 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCrising View Post
We should start planning that LTR up Parleys Canyon.
Forigve me, but what does LTR stand for? Light Rail?
     
     
  #4909  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2008, 11:33 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFPCME View Post
Future Mayor:

I sure hope you're right. But, like Skyguy, I feel the airport administration lacks vision and direction, taking the path of least resistance.
Wasn't it more of dealing with the reality and aftermath of 9-11. The necessity of getting by as best as one can during some very difficult times for all of the industry. If an airport wasn't expanded before 9-11, it was pretty much out of luck. It actually looks like many of the bright and newly expanded domestic airports of the 90's are going to see a significant downsizing in their out and inbound flights. Not only are the airlines being forced to merge or go under, but many airports/metros in a way are going to have their services absorbed by a lucky minority, such as SLC.
     
     
  #4910  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 12:29 AM
ski_steve ski_steve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scraperdude801 View Post
Forigve me, but what does LTR stand for? Light Rail?

yeah, LRT means Light Rail. Which would be absoulty amazing to have up Parleys to Park City! Would cost a load though.
     
     
  #4911  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 1:49 AM
Scraperdude801's Avatar
Scraperdude801 Scraperdude801 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 583
yeah that would be amazing. ... Is this just speculation on SLCrising's part or is this an actual consideration in the next 20 years? This is the first I've heard of this.
     
     
  #4912  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 5:39 AM
StevenF's Avatar
StevenF StevenF is offline
The Drifter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,172
Im not sure if LRT up parleys would be cost effective with how much energy it would take to push it up the steep canyon.

There is a reason why there is a rail line coming from the Tremonton side into Cache Valley instead of Brigham City up Sardin Canyon. There just isn't near as much of a climb from that side then going up the 4-6% grades. That route even adds a few miles getting into Logan since the rail line splits at Cache Junction heads south through Mendon, Wellsville, Hyrum then heads North into Logan and farther north.

Sorry, but I just don't see a LRT running up Parleys.
     
     
  #4913  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 12:47 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
SLCrising, wasn't this more one of your wishes on a wish list? I think we had talked about it over on the comp. thread. Also, you had mentioned the electrified third rail vs. the current type set-up of TRAX. Is the electrified rail something more feasible for climbs such as those that would be required for Park City?

I imagine that the population of Snyderville Basin wouldn't justify rail transport for quite some time into the future. However, perhaps the advent of several million additional visitors moving to and from the resorts would put pressure on the need for a better commuter system between the Valleys and the Resorts. Probably, that would be best accomplished by new CNG or more enviromently compatible buses. I'm a big fan of the new CNG buses, which have been coming on-line in L.A.

Last edited by delts145; Apr 22, 2008 at 1:48 PM.
     
     
  #4914  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 12:58 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Cats back on guard at the Capitol

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695272666,00.html



A marble lion weighing around 17,000 pounds adorns the east-side steps to the state Capitol in Salt Lake after it was hoisted to its spot Monday. Eventually, the statehouse will have four such gaurdians - "Fortitude," "Intergrity," "Patience" and "Honor" - Which replace concrete versions. (Tim Hussen, Deseret News)

.
     
     
  #4915  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 1:50 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Holly refinery
$17M vowed to curb pollution
Woods Cross business will also pay a $120K fine for violations


http://www.sltrib.com/business/ci_9009034

.
     
     
  #4916  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 3:23 PM
RFPCME RFPCME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 555
A Gentleman

Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Wasn't it more of dealing with the reality and aftermath of 9-11. The necessity of getting by as best as one can during some very difficult times for all of the industry. If an airport wasn't expanded before 9-11, it was pretty much out of luck. It actually looks like many of the bright and newly expanded domestic airports of the 90's are going to see a significant downsizing in their out and inbound flights. Not only are the airlines being forced to merge or go under, but many airports/metros in a way are going to have their services absorbed by a lucky minority, such as SLC.
Ah, Delts, you are always such a gentleman, a trait to be admired. Tis true that all airports in the US after 9-11 put things on hold. But my concerns about SLC Int go way back before 9-11.

I have been flying in and out of SLC Int on business since the late 70's (that's 1970's, not 1870's), and airport development has always been ad hoc, catch-as-catch-can, path of least resistance.

There have always been master plans, but those master plans seem to get circumvented when it comes time to spend money. What irks me most is what appears to be a lack of understanding of the economic value of that airport to the entire region. Local leaders give it lip service, but not much else.

I assume Salt Lake City has the primary responsibility for setting policy and direction for the airport. Maybe it's time to move that responsibility state-wide since what goes on at the airport affects a much larger area than Salt Lake City. Sometimes local governments are not well equipped to deal with large, sophisticated, critically important issues. We would never expect a city to be responsibile for a freeway system within its boundaries. Maybe it's now time to apply the same logic to the airport.
     
     
  #4917  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 3:34 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post


Nice. I was watching this story on the news last night and thought it was cool that these guys are bring back the loins. I really love how nice our capitol is now that it's restored and it's something we can all be proud of.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #4918  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 3:57 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553



Don't get me wrong RFPCME, I definately agree with much of what you are saying. Although, I do think that the Corradini administration spear-headed some good improvements along the way, so as to keep up with the Olympic event. It should be noted that Salt Lake has fended off and triumphed over many competitors and trends emerging over the past 15 years. This could not have happened if Salt Lake didn't have one of the better reputations around, and other serious advantages in it's pocket. But yes, I agree that Salt Lake has been very comservative with its approach to the airport. Instead of building a facility that was visionary or years ahead of it's time,(such as Denver) it has instead expanded and made improvements on a 'pay as you go' type of schedule. Some would say this is wise, and others would say its stepping over the dollar bill to pick up the shiny penny. Anyway, my belief is that now the former conservatism is no longer so warranted. The pending merger, along with our very aggressive Governor and Utah's hyper growth in key sectors, will make past frugal practices seem ill advised and unnecessary.

As long as the merger proceeds it won't be a matter of 'if' the expansion will take place. It will be about whether it will be uber-fast, fast-track or just accelerated quickly, LOL.
     
     
  #4919  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 4:52 PM
DENrising's Avatar
DENrising DENrising is offline
New Coloradan
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 167
Yes thats right, the idea of rail up the canyon was tossed around about a month ago. I agreed the LTR probably wouldn't make the steep hill, then suggested some type of funicular. Others suggested an elevated monorail, but I still think that would not fit in with the environment.

Here is a link to that page.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?p=3443392&highlight=parleys#post3443392

Perhaps the PC area wouldn't justify that type of investment now or in the near future, but I brought this up thinking about bringing in more skiiers thru SLCIA, then thought, wow, how can our local transportation handle this? I'd love to see the extra ski traffic, but only if we can transport them more efficiently, without adding congestion and CFC's. I'd guess the greener buses would be the best choice for now and some time in the future.
     
     
  #4920  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 5:25 PM
RFPCME RFPCME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 555
Uber-fast!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post



Don't get me wrong RFPCME, I definately agree with much of what you are saying. Although, I do think that the Corradini administration spear-headed some good improvements along the way, so as to keep up with the Olympic event. It should be noted that Salt Lake has fended off and triumphed over many competitors and trends emerging over the past 15 years. This could not have happened if Salt Lake didn't have one of the better reputations around, and other serious advantages in it's pocket. But yes, I agree that Salt Lake has been very comservative with its approach to the airport. Instead of building a facility that was visionary or years ahead of it's time,(such as Denver) it has instead expanded and made improvements on a 'pay as you go' type of schedule. Some would say this is wise, and others would say its stepping over the dollar bill to pick up the shiny penny. Anyway, my belief is that now the former conservatism is no longer so warranted. The pending merger, along with our very aggressive Governor and Utah's hyper growth in key sectors, will make past frugal practices seem ill advised and unnecessary.

As long as the merger proceeds it won't be a matter of 'if' the expansion will take place. It will be about whether it will be uber-fast, fast-track or just accelerated quickly, LOL.
Delts:

You are forever the voice of reason...not much of that around anymore.

Uber-fast airport development is what I vote for.

Speaking of voting, let me know when you run for public office. You got my vote.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.