HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2008, 9:52 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
30 km speed limit recommended

30 km speed limit recommended
Apr 11, 2008

The North End may see Hamilton’s first attempt to foster a pedestrian and child-friendly neighbourhood. A draft transportation plan prepared by a city consultant is calling for 30 km speed limits on all but two streets and the creation of more than 50 traffic-calming structures.

The measures would be implemented in the neighbourhood bounded by the harbour, the CNR and Wellington Street. James North and parts of Burlington Street would have 50 km limits, but on-street parking would be added to slow traffic speeds. The plan also includes new cycling paths, conversion of one-way streets to two-way, and some street closures.

The plan has emerged from a lengthy process that included development of a contentious secondary plan for the neighbourhood as well as proposals to re-develop the Pier 8 area near the Parks Canada Discovery Centre.

Residents were concerned that their neighbourhood was becoming a thruway and a parking lot for harbourfront events, and vigorously fought against plans for ‘traffic mobility’ streets through the area. That battle is reflected in the draft traffic management plan prepared by the IBI consulting group.

“Largely through the efforts of the community representatives, it was realized that there is potential for the North End study to help the entire City achieve its goals for sustainability, and to become a case study for other communities,” explains the report. “It was also concluded that a traditional street by street approach to solving traffic issues was appropriate, and that the solutions would need to be community-wide and comprehensive.”

The proposed solutions include the addition of 37 permanent curb extensions and ‘chokers’ affecting almost all the North End’s streets, including four each on Bay, Hughson and John, and two on Burlington Street. On-street parking would extend the full length of James as well as between Ferguson and Wellington on Burlington Street.

While James, and Burlington east of James, will be excluded from the 30 km speed limit on all other streets, the curb extensions and street parking reflect the specific aim of discouraging drive-thru traffic. One of the stated objectives of the plan is to “divert through traffic as much as possible from the neighbourhood”.

A study using observed licence plates and Ministry of Transportation information confirmed resident arguments that much of the traffic in their neighbourhood comes from elsewhere.

“On Burlington Street west of James Street, approximately 90% of traffic was from vehicles registered outside of the study area – including approximately 50% registered in East Hamilton, Stoney Creek and Niagara/St. Catharines”, says the report. “Similar results were evident for Bay Street, where the amount of non-neighbourhood traffic was recorded at 70%.”

Under the proposal, through traffic would be directed “as much as is possible, to Wellington and Victoria Streets.” There is also a call for permanent transit service between downtown and the waterfront. The HSR currently provides a free summertime shuttle along James Street to Bayfront Park.

Other elements of the plan would convert MacNab to two-way traffic, add bike lanes on Ferguson, Guise and Bay, and enhance pedestrian safety with pavement markings at several intersections. New off-street bike trails would be added along the edge of Eastwood Park and parallel to the railway between Bay and Ferguson.

Estimated costs for the entire plan are $1.6 million. In addition to the physical limitations on streets, the report suggests the reduced speeds could be backed up with increased police enforcement and using photo radar on residential streets if the province changes its rules to allow that.

The reduction to 30 km per hour only became possible in January of last year when the provincial government made changes to the Highway Traffic Act to allow municipalities to set speeds lower than 40 km per hour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2008, 9:54 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
To see the report....

http://www.hamiltoncatch.org/reports...gmt%20Plan.pdf

If this only cost $1.6 million I say do this immediately! Use the infrastructure money that the Province gave to Hamilton under the new budget, worth around $8.5 million.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2008, 10:00 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
awesome!!! it's about time we started taking back our neighbourhoods!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2008, 10:08 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,252
good price for something that would have a positive effect on the area's quality of life
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2008, 10:13 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2008, 12:15 AM
I, Sinclair I, Sinclair is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 49
I hope city hall pulls the trigger on this, it appears to be a very good idea. And actually doable this century.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2008, 3:04 AM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,677
This is similar to what I observed in parts of the Annex in Toronto.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 5:07 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Slowly does it in North End

BY DANA BROWN

North End drivers better get ready to slow down. Way down.

A draft consultant’s report has recommended dropping speed limits to 30 km/h on nearly all streets from Wellington Street North to the CN Rail line and over to the harbour.

Only James Street North and Burlington Street, east of James, are exempt and will stay at 50 km/h.

The report, dated February 2008, outlines recommendations for a preliminary preferred North End Traffic Management Plan and has been in the works for some time.

Three public open houses were held on the $1.6-million plan from May 2006 to June 2007.

In addition to reducing speed limits, the report also recommends more than 50 traffic calming and management initiatives, including street closures, bike lanes, extended curbs, chokers and more onstreet parking.

Previously, municipalities weren’t allowed to drop speed limits below 40 kilometres an hour, but changes to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act have now made it possible.

“I think it’s ... almost daring in a sense because 30’s a very slow speed,” said Ward 2 Councillor Bob Bratina.

“You try to drive your car at 30 and you’ll find that it’s difficult. But we need to re-examine the way we move around the city.”

The report points out the area could be used to monitor things like traffic volumes, safety, air quality and speed.

“The North End is well-defined, it’s easy to monitor, and then we can see whether it’s something we should apply to other neighbourhoods,” Bratina said.

The study started as a result of concerns about the redevelopment of Pier 8.

The plan is striving to make the North End neighbourhood more pedestrian- and family-friendly, in part by getting rid of cut-through traffic.

Key recommendations for the North End:
❚ Reduced speed limits with traffic calming measures
❚ Establish a permanent transit route for North End and waterfront users
❚ Convert MacNab Street to two-way
❚ Narrow lanes at key entry points
❚ Build a roundabout at the intersection of James and Strachan streets
❚ Close Hughson Street North between Guise Street and Brock Street; close northbound traffic on Bay Street North above Burlington and southbound traffic on Ferguson Avenue North at Burlington
❚ Enhanced pedestrian crossings

North Endby the numbers:
5,250: Number of people who live in the North End
21: percentage of residents under 15
8,170: Number of vehicles a day on James Street North
10,030: Number of vehicles on Burlington Street per day

(Figures only cover the part of the street
that falls within the study area.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 12:20 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
I hope they do this....it's a great neighbourhood plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 12:26 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
This makes me want to move to that area!
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 1:33 PM
beanmedic's Avatar
beanmedic beanmedic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 215
I'm worried that this will make non-north end residents reluctant to even travel to the north end. I'm referring to the morons who are worried about getting to their destination as quickly as possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 1:36 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,677
You'll still be able to drive at normal speeds on James. There's generally no reason for non-residents to drive on side streets. People would drive faster anyways if not for the structural barriers to speed they're putting in.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 2:36 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Yes, but James St North will be improved with the round about and onstreet parking. Cars tend to slow down when there's onstreet parking. It'll be better than what it is currently.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 4:18 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
you should have heard the clowns calling into 900 CHML today saying they'll never go back to the waterfront or north end if they do this plan. haha. please, do us a favour and follow through on your threat.

I don't want anyone that stupid coming into our city anyhow. James, John, Wellington, Victoria and Burlington Streets will still remain 50km. One caller made that point and suggested that most folks from the suburbs probably have never heard of Wood St or Guise St etc.... they'll never know the difference.
For someone to actually phone a radio show and basically say "I'll never go back down there on 50km an hour James or John St BECAUSE nearby streets are 30km" shows the level of stupidity in this city and level of desperation by CHML for callers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 4:40 PM
HAMRetrofit's Avatar
HAMRetrofit HAMRetrofit is offline
Pro Urban Degenerate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto-Hamilton Mega Region
Posts: 839
To recall the wizard of OZ

They're melting, melting...

The vocal minority of car cornucopians are starting to wither away. Too bad for them if they can't handle driving at appropriate speeds to access the waterfront. It will be better without them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 6:53 PM
beanmedic's Avatar
beanmedic beanmedic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 215
I think I made up my mind on this issue. With these TERRIBLE changes to the speed limit, it will take 1m:48s to get from Strachan & Hughson to Guise & Hughson. Thats FORTY-THREE SECONDS longer than if the speed limit were kept at 50.

I don't think all of you morons care about my kids being deprived of potentially 86 seconds of waterfront enjoyment! I'm so tired of hearing from people who complain about cars driving through their neighbourhood. If you don't like it, move somewhere else. And that's probably a good thing. It would make room for more parking and possibly a new gas station. That part of town is seriously lacking those things and that's why nobody ever goes there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 7:16 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,677
shhhhh, don't give anybody ideas about putting in a gas station.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 7:17 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by beanmedic View Post
I think I made up my mind on this issue. With these TERRIBLE changes to the speed limit, it will take 1m:48s to get from Strachan & Hughson to Guise & Hughson. Thats FORTY-THREE SECONDS longer than if the speed limit were kept at 50.

I don't think all of you morons care about my kids being deprived of potentially 86 seconds of waterfront enjoyment! I'm so tired of hearing from people who complain about cars driving through their neighbourhood. If you don't like it, move somewhere else. And that's probably a good thing. It would make room for more parking and possibly a new gas station. That part of town is seriously lacking those things and that's why nobody ever goes there.
haha....that's sweet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 7:28 PM
oldcoote's Avatar
oldcoote oldcoote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 627
This is gonna open floodgates for traffic calming in the city.

It happened in Toronto 15-20 years ago. Traffic calming is everywhere there now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 8:06 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
15-20 years behind...sounds about right for the Hammer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:51 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.