Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor
Do you ever see a need for a second airport with scheduled commercial service for the Salt Lake Valley?
Would the current Airport 2 location work? I have no idea how long its runway is or what is required to land a commercial airliner.
Thoughts???
|
I like your sketches, they are cool and creative. Unfortunately, Airport 2 will likely never see any commercial airline service. Some reasons include:
1. The residents around the airport would never allow it. The airport is landlocked and surrounded by residential neighborhoods.
2. The runway is not adequate for commercial airline operations. It cannot support the weight of commercial airliners and is too short and has too many obstacles around it to allow a commercial aircraft to safely take-off and fly to another city with a decent payload. Even if you were to only use aircraft with short take-off and landing capability, atmospheric conditions would need to be ideal to even get a flight to say, Denver or Las Vegas with a plane full of passengers, bags, and cargo.
3. It only has one instrument approach (GPS). It would need more than that to be attractive to any airline.
4. The purpose of the airport is simply for general aviation aircraft. Utah National Guard also uses the airport for Apache and other helicopters.
5. There isn't really a need for a second commercial airport in Salt Lake. SLC Int'l has room to grow, and does a good job at moving the amount of traffic they do get with few delays related to the flow of traffic.
The more likely places to ever see commercial airline traffic are Provo, Ogden, and Logan. All three of those airports have expressed interest in gaining airline service. The problem is, people are willing to drive a little further to SLC international because they will get more competition (thus lower fares), more non-stop flights, and more flights to choose from.
I still like your designs though.
I would like to see them maybe put in a golf course or something along those lines around the airport (like in the empty area north of the airport). Buildings are not likely because they create obstacles for aircraft, so thats why I think a golf course would be more appropriate and would have some purpose, rather than an empty field.