HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2981  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2008, 9:32 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacamenna kid View Post
Has anybody heard when they're ever going to build that arts building at 14th and H? It was announced a long time ago.
I think they need it to be ready by 2010, so I would imagine anytime now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2982  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2008, 10:48 PM
Steven Fong Steven Fong is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15
Demolition of the Central Plant has started


The view from my desk


The infamous gassifier


View of the new tank from the NE side of the complex

In order to maintain heating and cooling service to surrounding state buildings, the project will be divided into two phases:
Phase 1 will be the demo of the old gassifier and construction of the new heating/chilling plant.
Phase 2 will be the demo of the old plant and the construction of the new tank.

It looks like Phase 1 will be complete by late 08/09 and Phase 2 will be complete by 2010.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2983  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2008, 11:17 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
That actually looks pretty cool considering what is there right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2984  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2008, 3:30 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,008
You and i seldom disagree, but i think that cooling plant looks like a cross between Chernobyl and Star Trek set.
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2985  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2008, 3:38 AM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Considering the 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 🞵🞵 🞵🞵🞵🞵 that is there now...Beam me up, Urban.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2986  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2008, 7:40 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugit View Post
Considering the 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 🞵🞵 🞵🞵🞵🞵 that is there now...Beam me up, Urban.



o.k. you have a point..
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2987  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 3:20 AM
jsf8278's Avatar
jsf8278 jsf8278 is offline
Edge_City
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
Finally Some good News!!!

Residential towers proposed for site near Capitol
By Mary Lynne Vellinga - [email protected]

Published 8:02 pm PDT Thursday, March 27, 2008

A Los Angeles-based developer is proposing to transform a leafy, four-block area south of the Capitol with five new residential towers.

The Bond Cos., an experienced developer of infill housing and retail projects nationwide, filed an application with the city of Sacramento Thursday to replace 206 low-rise apartment units in the Capitol Towers neighborhood with five towers ranging from 15 to 33 stories.

Mark Bachli, a principal in the Bond Cos., said the "market will determine what is actually built" on the Capitol Towers property, bounded by Fifth, Seventh, N and P streets.

Still, he said his company views the parklike superblock -- where no cars are allowed -- as the perfect place for a high-density urban development, which can be built in phases as market conditions permit.

The proposed project also would contain 50,000 square feet of street-level retail -- which Bachli said could include a grocery store -- and parking garages wrapped by three to five stories of housing or office space. It may also include a hotel.

The 15-story apartment building at the center of Capitol Towers would remain.

In total, Bond Cos. is proposing to build 1,646 new housing units. Doing so would create a neighborhood nearly eight times as densely packed with people as the current one on the four-block property, which city leaders have long viewed as underused.

For a complete story, see Friday's Bee.

The Sacramento Bee Unique content, exceptional value. SUBSC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2988  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 3:59 AM
aufbau's Avatar
aufbau aufbau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bushwick
Posts: 246
My heart skipped a beat thinking it was regarding the towers' old site. However, this is definitely welcomed news-the current sprawlplex does not belong any near the urban core.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2989  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 4:20 AM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
I had the same feeling, aufbau.

I remember quite a few years ago a different company wanted to do the same thing, but obviously that didn't go anywhere.

Who knows when this will be built (my guess not for at least a couple years), but I sure am glad they are starting the process now instead of waiting for market to get hot again, then start from scratch..thus missing the market by the time they get everything lined up. At least now they can jump at the right moment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2990  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 4:51 AM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
I'm sure Majin will be thrilled to hear about that...hopefully they can fix the dreadful "superblock" concept and reorient the buildings back towards the street. The idea of superblocks was to create an inwardly-directed residential area that would try its best to ignore the street--an effort that many would consider successful, at the price of effectively removing the residents of the complex from the neighborhood.

I'd agree it is a very good place for high-density infill. Great location, and they don't have to knock down anything old.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2991  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 7:52 AM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
I lived at Capital Towers briefly when I was attending CSUS undergrad. At that time, the city would not allow the current owners to develop more towers. Now, finally it seems to be happening? I certainly hope so...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2992  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 2:49 PM
Deno Deno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 104
They won't block the Mayor's view so they might have a chance to be built not sure how sleek they may be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2993  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 4:04 PM
jsf8278's Avatar
jsf8278 jsf8278 is offline
Edge_City
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugit View Post
I sure am glad they are starting the process now instead of waiting for market to get hot again, then start from scratch..thus missing the market by the time they get everything lined up. At least now they can jump at the right moment.
I agree. That seems to be the catch phrase for why Aura and some other projects failed, or can't get off the ground. "the housing market this, and the housing market that."
It would seem to me you would to begin building now in a slow market, and be finished building in a year or two right when things begin to pick back up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2994  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 5:20 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
more complete article

Five new towers envisioned downtown
An L.A. firm, undaunted by others' failures, plans to transform apartment site.

By Mary Lynne Vellinga - [email protected]
Published 12:00 am PDT Friday, March 28, 2008
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1

Undaunted by the recent failure of two high-rise condominium projects planned for downtown Sacramento, a Los Angeles-based developer proposes to transform a leafy, four-block area south of the Capitol with five new residential towers.

The Bond Cos., an experienced developer of infill housing and retail projects nationwide, filed an application with the city of Sacramento Thursday to replace 206 low-rise apartment units in the Capitol Towers neighborhood with five towers ranging from 15 to 33 stories.

Mark Bachli, a principal in the Bond Cos., said the "market will determine what is actually built" on the Capitol Towers property, bounded by Fifth, Seventh, N and P streets. Still, he said his company views the parklike superblock – where no cars are allowed – as the perfect place for a high-density urban development, which can be built in phases as market conditions permit.

"It's ideally located along the light-rail line. It is close to thousands of jobs, retail, restaurants and entertainment opportunities; those are the key ingredients to smart and sustainable growth," Bachli said.

The proposed project also would contain 50,000 square feet of street-level retail – which Bachli said could include a grocery store – and parking garages wrapped by three to five stories of housing or office space. It may also include a hotel. The 15-story apartment building at the center of Capitol Towers would remain.

In total, Bond Cos. is proposing to build 1,646 new housing units. Doing so would create a neighborhood nearly eight times as densely packed with people as the current one on the four-block property, which city leaders have long viewed as underused.

"I think it's great," Assistant City Manager John Dangberg said of the plan, which is in its formative stages. "This site is one of the few superblocks we have in the downtown. It's part of a four-block neighborhood. And it has the highest-density residential zone that we allow in our zoning code, but it has only two-story walk-up units on it."

Since the early 1960s, when it was developed by the late U.S. Rep. James Scheuer, Capitol Towers has been a tree-shaded oasis in downtown. The streets that once ran through the property were closed long ago and replaced by pedestrian walkways. At the project's heart sits an Olympic-size pool, fountain and an abstract sculpture mural by artist Jacques Overhoff.

While Capitol Towers remained static, however, the neighborhood around it has changed significantly in the past 40 years. The downtown skyline emerged. Light rail appeared next door. The potential of the nearly 10-acre parcel has not been lost on developers, but none has been successful so far.

In the early 1990s, the Scheuer family tried and failed to land a big state office tenant for the land. In 2000, developer Post Properties, a well-known firm from Atlanta, proposed to turn the property into an "urban village." Post pulled out after running into a buzz saw of neighborhood opposition. Frustrated by the lack of movement, the Scheuer family allowed the two-story garden apartments to deteriorate and sit vacant. In 2001, the property was purchased for $25 million by a Marin County development firm, which performed an extensive renovation and upgrade of the tower and garden apartments.

The complex is now 93 percent leased at rents ranging from $875 for a low-rise studio to $2,165 for a three-bedroom tower unit. A partnership controlled by the Bond Cos. bought Capitol Towers in June 2007. Bachli would not disclose the purchase price, but property records show the partnership borrowed $43 million on the parcel the same day it changed hands.

Mayor Heather Fargo said the Bond Cos. may fare better than others with its development plan. Unlike Post Properties, it is proposing to keep the streets closed to cars, and to preserve as many of the trees dotting the property as possible.

"This (plan) does a good job of preserving what's special about Capitol Towers; that's the tree canopy," Fargo said. "It's also the superblock where people can walk for several blocks without having to cross a street. "I think it will help maintain the sense of community that's very strong in the neighborhood."

Bachli said his firm has held two meetings with tenants of Capitol Towers and plans to reach out to residents of the neighboring 500 N St. and Pioneer towers as well. Still, Jim Pachl, an environmental lawyer who opposed the Post proposal, is watching the latest idea for Capitol Towers with a wary eye. He met with Bachli and other project representatives about a month ago. Pachl and Judith Lamare own a condominium on the 14th floor of 500 N St.

Pachl said he's troubled by the recent failure of the Aura and the Towers condominium projects. The Towers was under construction when it melted down financially, leaving a huge hole in the ground on the Capitol Mall.

"I'm sitting here saying, 'How realistic is this?' " Pachl said.

Unlike John Saca, the developer behind the Towers project, Bond Cos. has substantial experience building infill residential developments in such cities as Los Angeles, San Francisco and Chicago. Its Sunset & Vine project in Hollywood is credited with helping spark that neighborhood's revitalization. Headed by brothers Larry and Robert Bond, the firm has offices in Los Angeles, Chicago and the Washington, D.C., area. New projects in Oakland and Chicago include Whole Foods stores.

Bachli would not discuss possible financing for the Capitol Towers site, other than to say that Bond has partnered with financial giant AIG Inc.

__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2995  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 5:22 PM
SacUrbnPlnr SacUrbnPlnr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsf8278 View Post
I agree. That seems to be the catch phrase for why Aura and some other projects failed, or can't get off the ground. "the housing market this, and the housing market that."
It would seem to me you would to begin building now in a slow market, and be finished building in a year or two right when things begin to pick back up.
Bond Companies is seeking land entitlements, but may not acutally build the project. One or more pieces could be sold to others to build over a period of time. It may take several years before the first part of the project is developed. So, we'll have to be patient.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2996  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 5:53 PM
JeffZurn's Avatar
JeffZurn JeffZurn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 126
Well finally some good news around here, lets hope this guy actually plans on doing something instead of just talking about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2997  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2008, 6:00 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
Don't you love the environmental lawyer sitting in his 14th floor, penthouse condo opposing high-rise residential towers.

And I totally agree with wburg, that the "super block" concept should be trashed, or at least never replicated. Ironically, that seems to be what prompted neighbors to go up in arms against the 2000 proposal. And looking at the crude diagram above... it looks as though the towers would address the street and the pedestrian walk-throughs would be oriented in a corresponding grid. That's what I'd like to see, opposed to a meandering garden.

Question is... why would the City put any money into 601 when this looks to be everything and then some?
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2998  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2008, 2:00 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,008
I personally don't believe we're likely to see a residential highrise built for the next 5 years..

The lending for these projects is just too strict (at least for Sacramento) and the housing market here is the worst i've ever seen.


Although i do think the downtown/midtown and TOD need to be the city and county's priority if housing is going to be built at all...
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2999  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2008, 4:41 AM
NewToCA NewToCA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 90
The project would be a good match with a significant upgrade to Downtown Plaza. It would put a nice base of folks within walking distance to DTP, OldTown Sac and K St.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3000  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2008, 8:34 AM
cozmoose's Avatar
cozmoose cozmoose is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 173
Bob Shallit: Rumor suggests a 22-story hotel at 13th and I

Another boutique hotel may be in the works for downtown Sacramento, this one at 13th and I streets.

The rumor is that local developer Roger Hume and his Southern California partners want to build a 22-story boutique hotel, with a new version of the swanky Masque Ristorante on the premises.

Hume, who developed the La Borgata retail center in El Dorado Hills where Masque is located, couldn't be reached for comment. One of his partners, Nick Magliarditi of Newport Beach, confirms via e-mail that the partnership purchased the former Bountiful Country Market site at 13th and I last year – for $2.45 million, according to county records.
Click here to find out more!

But, Magliarditi says, "we will not be disclosing any plans right now as it is premature."

One possibility involves construction of an Avia hotel – a new brand of upscale inns being rolled out by LodgeWorks LP of Wichita, Kan.

Initially, four Avias – in California, Georgia and Texas – are to be built over the next two years, with interior design work done by New York firm McCartan, which also has offices in San Francisco.

What is McCartan's take on plans for the I Street corner? Company spokeswoman Jennifer Zaudke acknowledges that the company has had discussions about "the Sacramento Avia." But, she adds, "we haven't actually started on it."

* * *

Z's on K: Speaking of downtown lodging, developer Tony Giannoni says he's "exploring the idea" of building a hotel on K Street.

Gianonni, who helped develop the Marriott Residence Inn at 15th and L streets, hinted he was working on some sort of K Street hotel project while speaking on another matter at this week's City Council meeting.

What are the details? Gianonni says he won't be ready to spill them for another week or two. But he'd like to bring upscale lodging to the long-blighted pedestrian mall.

He also notes that some public money will be needed because the financing market is so tight.

"I've never, ever done a project that required a city subsidy," he says. "But that's the only way (this one) can be done."

* * *

Bumpy times: Even Sac International has been snagged by the economic downdraft.

After steady passenger gains in recent years, airport traffic started falling late last year due to the economy's turbulence.

Passenger volume was down 0.5 percent last November, compared with the same month a year ago. That was the first downturn in 15 straight months of gains.

December's count was off 1.3 percent from the year earlier and January's numbers dropped 3.1 percent. Traffic increased 1.3 percent in February – but only because the month was one day longer than last year, says airport boss G. Hardy Acree.

Despite the slowdown, Acree is optimistic things will start picking up later this summer. "We expect to see a 1 percent growth in passenger activities" by year's end, he says.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:23 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.