HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2008, 4:32 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
they only earn what they get from meetings? i never knew that....in that case, i'm all for it.
i have no idea if that is all they get paid for being on the board. i do interpret the article in that way though. if there was some other fixed salary in addition, why not just lump it all together? aren't the meetings themselves the crux of their work for the board anyways?
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2008, 4:44 AM
bils's Avatar
bils bils is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 563
the media always likes to blow these things out of proportion.... by saying things like "translink board approves 600% pay raise"
---------------------

from news1130.com

"Harcourt says paying each board member $1,200 a meeting is appropriate because of the responsibilities they're going to have.

And he hopes people will reserve judgement about the pay structure until board members have had a chance to prove their worth.

Twelve-hundred bucks a meeting is only a small portion of TransLink's total pay package.

A typical director could now be making $45,000 a year, compared to the $7,200 paid to the average director in 2006.

TransLink's new chair will collect $100,000 a year, up from the $40,000 the position used to pay.
"

---------------
i'm actually shocked they make so little
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2008, 10:10 PM
paradigm4 paradigm4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by bils View Post
the media always likes to blow these things out of proportion.... by saying things like "translink board approves 600% pay raise"
---------------------

from news1130.com

"Harcourt says paying each board member $1,200 a meeting is appropriate because of the responsibilities they're going to have.

And he hopes people will reserve judgement about the pay structure until board members have had a chance to prove their worth.

Twelve-hundred bucks a meeting is only a small portion of TransLink's total pay package.

A typical director could now be making $45,000 a year, compared to the $7,200 paid to the average director in 2006.

TransLink's new chair will collect $100,000 a year, up from the $40,000 the position used to pay.
"

---------------
i'm actually shocked they make so little
These types of people typically sit on multiple boards. It's not meant to be a full time position. Factor that in, and $45,000 times 3 boards becomes a lot more money.
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2008, 8:34 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,737
You're paying for expertise, rather than a politician (who may just have a high school education).
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2008, 3:00 AM
CPE's Avatar
CPE CPE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 143
Skytrain is closed between Lake City Way and Production because of a gas leak in the area. I only caught the end of the report on Global news.
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2008, 3:23 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,098
yeah a lot of roads are closed down too

major detours in the area
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2008, 7:51 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Traffic Update: They are going to close Lougheed Highway tomorrow morning for the gas-leek investigation and perhaps fix the problem or problems before, during, and after the gas-leek. SkyTrain, however, will continue to run.
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2008, 12:02 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,098
the underpass in surrey on hwy 1 is really underway - every week more and more so
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2008, 9:06 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Light-rail service pushed for Valley at public meeting

Glenda Luymes, Fraser Valley Reporter
Published: Sunday, February 17, 2008

The push for passenger rail in the Fraser Valley is on track -- at least with the 150 people who turned out for a public meeting in Chilliwack yesterday afternoon.

"The time is now," said Nathan Pachal, member of the Valley Transportation Advisory Committee.

The group is convinced the 850,000 residents living between Chilliwack and Surrey will support a modern light-rail service -- but getting the B.C. government on board is proving a challenge.

"We don't want any more hugely expensive subways for Vancouver," said speaker Brian Vogler.

Vogler, a former railway employee, is the founder of the advocacy group that helped get the West Coast Express commuter train going between Mission and Vancouver.

"The outcome [of public meetings] is what will get us from here to the government negotiating table -- or back to the highway for another 10 years!"

Before the meeting, supporters milled around the Lions Club Hall, sharing stories about "bumper-to-bumper" traffic on Highway 1.

"On Friday it took me two hours to drive into Vancouver," said Chilliwack senior Neil Hagman. "We need to start talking about this and planning for this now."

John Vissers said he'd like to see a service that people could use to travel between Fraser Valley communities -- not just for commuting to Vancouver. "I think this could become a municipal election issue in the Valley," the Abbotsford man predicted.

Teacher Stacey Chambers said she'd use rail to commute between Chilliwack and Abbotsford if it was accessible. "The amount of traffic on the highway is just crazy," she said.

The old Interurban railway tracks, laid roughly 100 years ago, pass along most major population centres and colleges on their way from Chilliwack to North Surrey.

The route, which a 2006 TransLink study pegged at $27 million per kilometre to build, compared with $233 million per kilometre for the University of B.C. SkyTrain line, runs near both the Chilliwack and Abbotsford campuses of the University College of the Fraser Valley on its way through Langley, Cloverdale, Newton and finally near the existing Scott Road SkyTrain station. The line also passes close to the Abbotsford airport.

[email protected]
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2008, 2:36 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
Light-rail service pushed for Valley at public meeting


"We don't want any more hugely expensive subways for Vancouver," said speaker Brian Vogler.


"On Friday it took me two hours to drive into Vancouver," said Chilliwack senior Neil Hagman.
I'm all in favour of this but someone from Chilliwack telling the residents of Vancouver that they don't need a new subway for the Broadway corridor is ridiculous. Of course people are selfish and tend to view services that they don't personally use as unnecessary. It's bad enough that we have to wait for the UBC extension while an obviously far less traveled transit route, the Evergreen Line, is being built. Nevertheless, it would be equally ridiculous of me to oppose this line.

Sorry about your 2 hour commute, but you live in CHILLIWACK.... god... people have such silly expectations. Still, the new WCE idea is a good one.
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2008, 9:15 PM
g35 g35 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreambrother808 View Post
Of course people are selfish and tend to view services that they don't personally use as unnecessary.
And of course, people are selfish and tend to view services that they are personally affected by as the very most necessary. It's always me, me, me, and that goes for people in Vancouver, too.
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2008, 9:55 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,116
Welcome to the "me-first" generation...
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 12:36 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by g35 View Post
And of course, people are selfish and tend to view services that they are personally affected by as the very most necessary. It's always me, me, me, and that goes for people in Vancouver, too.
I agree, and that is why I say we need BOTH, as well as the Evergreen Line. But trashing the needs of Vancouver will not serve the residents of Chilliwack, Abbotsford, etc., especially when more people will use the expansion in Vancouver.
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 3:00 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Interesting video on Facebook - I made a comment on it =P

http://hs.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=12509411060&oid=4047993377

Anyone with facebook should be able to view this video
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 4:11 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
The Effectivness of Bus Rapid Transit, this is from TransJakarta SCC forum:

     
     
  #436  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 5:44 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,098
what are those unfinished concrete things? along the left
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 5:55 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
not sure public art?! =P

Or it might be the monorail columns they are doing. I'm not familiar with Jakarata.
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 8:36 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,737
I noticed those too - look like monorail or elevated guideway columns. They seem evenly spaced except for two close togther a bit down the road. They are not repeated on the other side of the street (so unlikely for a road deck).

Is Jakarta building a monorail? I know KL has one.
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 8:48 AM
worldwide's Avatar
worldwide worldwide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver - Ktown
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
Interesting video on Facebook - I made a comment on it =P

http://hs.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=12509411060&oid=4047993377

Anyone with facebook should be able to view this video
yeah so much for that. the kid obviously doesnt fully understand the issues here. urban design in the larger context? no. just build a line and people will take it. yeah right.
__________________
Hieroglyphics yeah, to the kick and the snare like that, there, yeah, we keep it raw rare
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2008, 3:32 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I noticed those too - look like monorail or elevated guideway columns. They seem evenly spaced except for two close togther a bit down the road. They are not repeated on the other side of the street (so unlikely for a road deck).

Is Jakarta building a monorail? I know KL has one.
I think they are...

Quote:
Originally Posted by worldwide View Post
yeah so much for that. the kid obviously doesnt fully understand the issues here. urban design in the larger context? no. just build a line and people will take it. yeah right.
The South of Fraser is severely underserved by transit, both rapid and buses. I think the provincial government should consider it and do a study or a business case first. If ridership proves that the line is needed, then build it. We can first start off with a DMU type of line, which is not expensive (the Otrain was about 26 million if I don't recall wrong) and then move on to LRT later. Or expand the DMU to Abbotsford.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.