HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5901  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 4:17 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Or was that Alliance or someone...
In my efforts to imagine this building in context, the glass was cheap and wavy like a funhouse.
     
     
  #5902  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 4:27 AM
DCCliff DCCliff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 88
[QUOTE=Nowhereman1280;3351722]^^^ I completely agree, that would be a great spot for some openspace. Unfortunately I think its far too valuable for this use and will never see use as an open space.

For years I have dreamed of some intelligent development of this block. It has such incredible potential as has just been mentioned. Rather than all public space, why not a clever use of parts of the block with some open public space in the interior, sited to take advantage of the sightlines to the more interesting/historic surrounding buildings. Then, at least, the site would be producing revenue.
     
     
  #5903  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 5:27 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Plan Commission Agenda for Feb is up. Looks like another fairly uneventful one. Notable projects:

1413 N Clybourn, 9 stories (87 res. units & 87 parking spaces)

161 W Kinzie, 32 stories (249 res. units, 213 parking, 25,000 sf retail)
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4WNEwTDZlUKB1w8ED5bV2Q

People who say housing is a human right deserve to be homeless
     
     
  #5904  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 7:26 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
http://chicagojournal.com/main.asp?SectionID=46&SubSectionID=139&ArticleID=4015&TM=8482.982

Children's gets council stamp of approval
Ordinance contingent on further study of heliport

By MICAH MAIDENBERG


At its meeting last week, the Chicago City Council approved Children's Memorial Hospital's plans to build a 22-story, 288-bed hospital in Streeterville, bringing the $1 billion project a step closer to reality.

Children's hopes to break ground on the site, located between Chicago Avenue and Superior Street one block east of Michigan Avenue, by April.


-------------
Definitely more pleasant to look at now.
     
     
  #5905  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 2:35 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ Yeah, that's a touch better, I would agree.
     
     
  #5906  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 2:39 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
161 W. Kinzie - Finally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Plan Commission Agenda for Feb is up. Looks like another fairly uneventful one. Notable projects:

1413 N Clybourn, 9 stories (87 res. units & 87 parking spaces)

161 W Kinzie, 32 stories (249 res. units, 213 parking, 25,000 sf retail)


Wow - could 161 W. Kinzie actually not get pulled from the agenda this week? Not holding my breath, but hopefully will be pleasantly surprised...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #5907  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 2:46 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
http://chicagojournal.com/main.asp?SectionID=46&SubSectionID=139&ArticleID=4015&TM=8482.982

Children's gets council stamp of approval
Ordinance contingent on further study of heliport

By MICAH MAIDENBERG


At its meeting last week, the Chicago City Council approved Children's Memorial Hospital's plans to build a 22-story, 288-bed hospital in Streeterville, bringing the $1 billion project a step closer to reality.

Children's hopes to break ground on the site, located between Chicago Avenue and Superior Street one block east of Michigan Avenue, by April.


-------------
Definitely more pleasant to look at now.

Yeah - I like the changes - looks like substantially more glass area.....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #5908  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 3:26 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
1413 N Clybourn, 9 stories (87 res. units & 87 parking spaces)
I'm lovin' it...we need more urban continuity between the North/Clybourn area and the rest of Near North/Old Town. Cabrini-Green, from Chicago to Blackhawk, is such a vortex.
     
     
  #5909  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 4:14 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,249
British tycoon remains bullish on Chicago development


Auchi: Riverside Park project to create 10,000 new construction, retail and commercial jobs; it is a win-win for Chicago.


not much detail about the project but it looks good for chicago never the less.

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=24332
     
     
  #5910  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 4:31 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
http://www.chicagorealestatedaily.com/cgi-bin/page.pl?id=2166

The Andrew, 5649 N. Sheridan Rd., 288-unit multi-residential development, July 2009, $60 million.
     
     
  #5911  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 5:26 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicubs111 View Post
British tycoon remains bullish on Chicago development


Auchi: Riverside Park project to create 10,000 new construction, retail and commercial jobs; it is a win-win for Chicago.


not much detail about the project but it looks good for chicago never the less.

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=24332
This is great, to have the "eastern Trump" interested in Chicago. But let's hope he takes his design cues from Kelleher, not Trump. In fact, the little render shown in the article makes it look like the design cues are coming from Loewenberg. Seriously, it looks like State Place on steroids.
     
     
  #5912  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 5:32 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,682
Quote:
In fact, the little render shown in the article makes it look like the design cues are coming from Loewenberg. Seriously, it looks like State Place on steroids.
I think we have seen that render before. That is an old concept for Riverside Park I think right/
     
     
  #5913  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 6:15 PM
Chicago2020's Avatar
Chicago2020 Chicago2020 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,322
Where exactly is this project located???
__________________
Sorry Chin, but my late night host is Conan O'Brien!
     
     
  #5914  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 6:24 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
http://chicagorealestatedaily.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=28199

Reschke brings on team to lease tower
By Andrew Schroedter


Prime Group Inc. has tapped veteran landlord reps Nancy Fendley and James Philbin to market a Lucien Lagrange-designed office tower planned for the West Loop.

Their hiring marks the beginning of the Chicago-based Prime Group's push to land a big-name tenant at the proposed 50-story high-rise at 400 W. Randolph St.
     
     
  #5915  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 8:16 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago2020 View Post
Where exactly is this project located???
The giant parcel of vacant land south of Roosevelt.
     
     
  #5916  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 8:20 PM
Down_Under_the_El Down_Under_the_El is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 140
^ The whole lot! Wow this might help make chinatown feel more connected to the downtown and bring activity to the river. very cool.
     
     
  #5917  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 8:22 PM
cbotnyse cbotnyse is offline
Chicago Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 1,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
This is great, to have the "eastern Trump" interested in Chicago. But let's hope he takes his design cues from Kelleher, not Trump. In fact, the little render shown in the article makes it look like the design cues are coming from Loewenberg. Seriously, it looks like State Place on steroids.
That is exactly what it looks like. I dont mind State Place all that much, but why duplicate the design? I'm sure that will change, but it looks ike the South Loop is making the same mistakes River North did, as far as bland, repetitive concrete highrises.
     
     
  #5918  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 8:59 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbotnyse View Post
That is exactly what it looks like. I dont mind State Place all that much, but why duplicate the design? I'm sure that will change, but it looks ike the South Loop is making the same mistakes River North did, as far as bland, repetitive concrete highrises.
Not hardly
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #5919  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 9:07 PM
Mr Roboto Mr Roboto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chi 60616
Posts: 3,573
Re the south loop parcel

That looks like just a concept rendering and is hopefully old. But I love the density and height for that area, and integration of greenspace along the river (although the river is never that blue). The density between the river and lake south of roosevelt should be maximized to the extent possible.

I am still wondering how they will provide access into that place though - which is obviously one of the most challenging aspects in utilizing this site. Clark is a pretty fast thoroughfare, people go upwards of 40 mph. Not to mention the concrete I-wall already there, which shields the metra tracks. (It does it look like the highrises will cover the metra, similar to the buildings on the west side of the river in the loop.) Then theres the freight tracks on 16th. How would this be done?

Access could be reached by extending Wells from the north going under roosevelt, ramps directly off Roosevelt (as the rendering appears), and Wentworth from the south. But where else? Possibly 16th. Im just worried that this development will be just another fortress practically inaccessible to pedestrians. Just another reason why DPII pisses me off. Ill take the density though.

Anyways, I think its great another billionaire foreign investor is still willing to continue this despite the Rezko scandal. He apparently really likes the chicago market. But someone has to tell me what 'bullish' means.
     
     
  #5920  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2008, 9:40 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
The approved Riverside Park PD had a "LaSalle Street" drive coming into the retail center up at the Roosevelt level (just like Roosevelt Collection), access from Wells-Wentworth extended through the property, and a new entrance at 13th from Clark (over the Metra tracks). All the civic and neighborhood groups asked for access at 15th, but there's some guy who lives on 15th who had the clout to prevent that. The PD just has "parkland" shown where a connection could be made.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:51 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.