HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 10:40 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,749
Commuter parkade with River Rock Hotel expansion on top - all built by River Rock. The parkade will be used for commuters during the day and casino patrons at nigt.
Mr. X posted renders in the Canada Line thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 10:44 PM
bils's Avatar
bils bils is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by excel View Post
Whats being built across the street from river rock with the crane? Looks like a pretty big development and its almost touching the canada line.
the thread's here: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=145106
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 11:23 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,158
ITs the River Rock Expansion... prettymuch a clone of the RR, and it will be connected to the canada line station i believe.

OD or X2 posted drawings here a couple days ago, im sure you can dig them up. Its a pretty boring design really, mainly above ground parking and more rooms.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 11:29 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,158
RE: Metrotower III, the design has not changed since the rendering's posted by cornholio... I have some additional renderings from other angles I can post, Ill do it when I get the time, kinda swamped right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2008, 12:04 AM
paradigm4 paradigm4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc85 View Post
semiahmoo shopping centre has been submitted for DP already. some towers, some retail, no LEED, BOSA is a cheap skate, looking to save some money after their abissmal loss in California. I could get plans, but they dont look very good.

19 storey tower does not have 510 units , thats the units over the entire site which includes townhouses.

blocks east of west whalley ring road north of 100 av and south of 107B av are/close to being bought up and assembled. ring ring deja vu
I'd be interested in the Semiahmoo RD if you have a link or whatnot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2008, 12:41 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by excel View Post
Whats being built across the street from river rock with the crane? Looks like a pretty big development and its almost touching the canada line.
Wouldn't that be the Park & Ride, and there is another hotel going up there, no?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2008, 4:11 AM
cc85 cc85 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Island City
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradigm4 View Post
I'd be interested in the Semiahmoo RD if you have a link or whatnot.
nah, there is nothing online, its all in paper form, i'll see what I can do on monday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2008, 12:21 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Still fronting Central Blvd - not Kingsway.
thats where i meant -
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2008, 1:30 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
left coaster is the Emporis height wrong, or is the 365 feet from lobby height wrong? Or did it just get taller without any design changes?

Also still wondering when the station square towers will be built where the Save on Foods(i think) parkade is on Mckay. Its been ages since iv seen the renderings and it looked like they were going to start soon(4-5 years ago or so). Does Anthem properties own the mall or are they/were just the developers of the towers? Anyways I was looking forward to them and still nothing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2008, 1:52 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Anthem is still trying to talk Bby City hall into allowing residential and not strictly office space, with the new office spaces across the street and Metrotower 3 going forward they might be able to convince them to at least allow some residential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2008, 5:29 AM
worldwide's Avatar
worldwide worldwide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver - Ktown
Posts: 704
it looks like the 28 story "brio" in Abbotsford is getting started on construction. new tallest.

also there has been a rezoning and development application for a trailerpark just north of west oaks mall. 468 units with some commercial. sounds like a big project.

also, just a rumor but it looks like at least 1 more tower project is in the works as well. no details on that one.

brio is at the corner of marshall and McCallum just west of McCallum and north of marshall. the area north of brio between the site and bevan ave, where a large school complex is located, is densifying fairly quickly in the form of 4 storey walk up buildings. you'd be suprised the amount of density you can get out of 4 storeys. same FSR as a highrise in some cases.. to the south is 2 new small condo buildings with another proposed and a mixed use retail/office building under construction like the one on the corner just to the north.
__________________
Hieroglyphics yeah, to the kick and the snare like that, there, yeah, we keep it raw rare
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2008, 6:58 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,105
time for some pics

watercolour is almost done and montage is going up fast - there wasn't much 2 weeks ago!



__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2008, 8:53 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
I noticed Watercolour the last time I was on the Millenium line, I like the glass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2008, 4:41 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,105
16,000 Coquitlam trees getting the axe

More than 16,000 trees will be chopped down on Burke Mountain in the coming weeks to make way for some 24,000 new residents.

City council on Monday approved four separate tree cutting permits for by Wesbild Holdings Ltd., the first wave of applications required under a new tree management bylaw.

Under that bylaw, when more than 50% of tree cover is proposed for removal, a permit may only be issued by council.

The first permit granted is for 2,700 trees from 6.9 hectares of land at 1403 Coast Meridian Rd; the second is for 280 trees on a .9 hectare lot at 3431 Galloway Ave.; the third is for 7,000 trees on 9.1 hectares at 3390 Galloway Ave.; and the fourth is for 6,150 trees on 6.6 hectares of yet-to-be addressed parcels.

The trees must be felled before the spring bird nesting season or a generation of birds there will be lost.

Although the development plans for northeast Coquitlam have already been approved by council — and the removal of trees is part of that — there was considerable debate about the extent of clear-cutting.

Coun. Fin Donnelly said Burke Mountain was supposed to be focused on sustainability and selective logging practices.

“If we grant theses permits... the entire area will be denuded of trees,” he said, noting re-greening will take years.

But Coun. Richard Stewart said development and tree removal have to go hand in hand.

“If council voted to create an omelette, inherent in that would be the breaking of some eggs,” he said, after questioning whether some trees can’t be retained because of safety or practicality.

City planner Jim McIntyre admitted competing objectives with the mountainside development. The Northeast Coquitlam Area Plan calls for efficient land use but, on an individual lot basis, “it’s hard to retain individual trees that have grown up in forest conditions,” he said.

Burke Mountain would need a density similar to Belcarra or Anmore to retain trees, he said, and planting requirements such as tree-lined streets will help re-green neighbourhoods on Burke Mountain upon completion.

Mayor Maxine Wilson said the former council came up with a vision, including policy and regulations, to do the “best-possible” development on Burke Mountain, and she lambasted the current council for not following through.

“It’s been a disappointment to me that a lot of the policies and regulations were eroded in the last two years,” she said, noting the vision of an environmentally-friendly development has been diluted.

Council voted 6-2 to grant the permits, with councillors Donnelly and Neal Nicholson opposed (Coun. Doug Macdonell was absent).

During question period, resident Helen Brown said that at a new development near where she lives, trees are not being replanted following its completion about two years ago.

“I hope there are plans underfoot to increase the number of trees denuded,” she said.

Meanwhile, a controversial notice of motion by Coun. Mae Reid regarding the city’s tree bylaw has been deferred.

Reid wants the bylaw amended so that lots greater than .3 hectares and within an approved neighbourhood plan are exempt from its rules.

A staff report will come to council to deal with the proposed exemption in a more streamlined, clear way, Reid said.

Her motion has sparked some fury in the community, expressed in letters to city councillors as well as The Tri-City News.

It took the city 16 years to decide to update its “tree cutting” bylaw and months — too many, some say — to formulate new rules, which were ratified about two months ago.

“I put it forward for good reason and any councillor has the right to do that,” Reid said at the end of Monday’s council meeting, citing personal attacks and threats against her following the notice of motion.

[email protected]

http://www.bclocalnews.com/tri_city_maple_ridge/tricitynews/news/16000_trees_getting_the_axe.html
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2008, 4:45 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,105
New Riverview development fears

Transit announcement raises concerns
Leneen Robb, Coquitlam NOW
Published: Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Friday's announcement that the Evergreen Line will use SkyTrain-like technology and that the southeast corridor route past Riverview Hospital is back on the table has advocates for the site worried.

Elaine Golds, vice-president and conservation chair of the Burke Mountain Naturalists, says she's always been concerned about a possible rapid transit route along Lougheed Highway because of its implications for opening up the provincially owned Riverview lands for development.

"We were quite alarmed to find out that SkyTrain is back and that we now have 45 days to discuss a possible change in the route along the Lougheed Highway," Golds said. "And we're opposed to that because of the threat that would pose to Riverview, especially when (Housing Minister Rich) Coleman said last July he thinks there's room for 7,000 or more private housing units on the site."

On Friday, Transportation Minister Kevin Falcon held a news conference in Vancouver to announce that the Evergreen Line will use advanced light rail technology (ALRT), similar to SkyTrain. Falcon also said he is giving local mayors 45 days to discuss route options, and is now looking at the southeast and northwest route running through Port Moody. Both would start at Lougheed Mall and terminate in the Town Centre area of Coquitlam.

Norma Gillespie, vice-president of the Riverview Horticultural Centre Society, is also concerned about a possible southeast alignment.

"I'm absolutely baffled, the same as everybody else must be about that one," she said of Falcon's surprise announcement. "Certainly we realize it would impact us ... we urge all our members and anyone that cares about the site to write (to their MLA and the premier)."

NDP MLA Diane Thorne, who tabled petitions with about 11,000 signatures calling for the preservation of the Riverview lands in the legislature last November, is also concerned.

"Why else (other than to develop Riverview) would they be including the southern route again?" the Coquitlam-Maillardville MLA asked. "I can't think of any other reason."

Thorne said ridership projections for the southeast corridor weren't adequate when Coquitlam council studied possible route alignments years ago, and nothing has changed since then.

Riverview advocates are also digesting comments made in recent days by Health Minister George Abbott, who suggested the province plans to re-open Riverview to house people with severe mental illnesses.

Golds and Gillespie both said that plan doesn't bother them.

While Thorne also wants to see Riverview play a greater role in helping those with severe mental illness, she's worried by the coming together of three provincial plans: Falcon's potential southeast SkyTrain route alignment, Abbott's talk of re-opening Riverview and Coleman's trial balloon about building market housing on the site.

"So my advice would be that he (Abbott) should sit down and have a cup of coffee with Coleman," Thorne said, "because I don't think they're talking -- because there's no way that they're going to re-open Riverview and have market condos."

Her worst-case scenario?

Temporary housing for the homeless and mentally ill at Riverview to clean up the Downtown Eastside for the Olympics, another round of deinstitutionalization, then SkyTrain and condo development.

But she's hopeful that may not happen because, despite Falcon's promise of SkyTrain to the Tri-Cities by 2014, the project is still about $600 million short of funds.

"And the feds have been pretty clear that they're done for a while with B.C.," she said.

http://www.canada.com/coquitlamnow/news/story.html?id=5b83ddb5-1cef-404a-9f24-3e477330f20e&k=74074
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2008, 6:39 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,749
From the Province:

Quote:

Riverfront mill site, marked in red, 'a magnificent piece of property,' says New West Mayor Wayne Wright.

'For sale' sign on 'green' plant
Canfor mill 'screams out for government intervention'

Gordon Clark, The Province
Published: Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Canfor is charging ahead with the liquidation of its New Westminster panel and fibre mill.

Less than a month after closing the doors of the 70-year-old plant and laying off the 125 workers who made wood panelling and other specialty products from wood waste, the company announced yesterday that the 22-hectare waterfront site at the south end of Braid Street is up for sale.

Bill Randall, vice-president of Cushman & Wakefield LePage, the real-estate firm handling the sale, said a couple of parties have expressed interested but there have been no offers.

"We've definitely had some interest," he said yesterday.

News of the sale came as a surprise to Stephen Hunt, Western Canadian director of the United Steelworkers, which had 125 members working at the mill until it was shuttered Jan. 8.

"It's green jobs, it's recycled wood -- it screams out for government intervention," he said. "Up until September the crews were told they were making money. There was no indication the mill was in trouble."

Hunt said the mill converts waste wood that normally would be burned into panelling and a special spray-on product mixed with seed used to stabilize slopes. "They sold every ounce they could make and they were the only producer," he said.

Canfor officials didn't return calls yesterday but have said in the past that the rising dollar, the downturn in the U.S. construction market and rising fibre costs made the mill unprofitable.

New Westminster Mayor Wayne Wright said he met with Canfor officials trying to figure out ways to save the mill. "They just kept saying it wasn't financially viable," he said.

"It's their business. I would assume if it was viable they'd keep it open."

Wright said council has made it clear that the site will remain industrial land, but it will consider proposals. "It's a magnificent piece of property," he said.

New Westminster MLA Chuck Puchmayr of the NDP called on the provincial government to offer incentives to preserve the "green" mill, its value-added wood products and the jobs instead of sitting idle as Canfor sells the machinery to U.S. interests.

"Why should it be made in the U.S. and not here?" he said. "It doesn't sustain communities or put money in people's pockets other than investors when they liquidate those lands."

[email protected]

© The Vancouver Province 2008
From the Globe & Mail:

Quote:
Canfor puts New West riverfront property up for sale
JESSICA SMITH

February 6, 2008

VANCOUVER -- Forestry company Canfor is selling a 45-acre parcel of riverfront land in New Westminster as "viable for redevelopment," but city council plans for the site to remain for industrial use.

"It does not come as a surprise they do not want to see the Hudson's Bay Co. or 10 condo towers down there, but I think probably at the end of the day it will be a mixed-use type of site," said Bill Randal, vice-president of Cushman & Wakefield LePage, the firm handling the sale.

Canfor is also selling another 10 acres within the Coquitlam city limits that is zoned industrial.

Mr. Randal said if the city insists the land will be strictly for industrial use, its value will not be affected.

On Jan. 28, New Westminster council adopted a new strategy for the future of the city's industrial land.

"The council wants to preserve lands that are designated for industrial land for industrial purposes," said Beverly Grieve, New Westminster manager of planning.

Cushman & Wakefield has not set a firm price for the property, but identified several types of potential buyers.

"It's going to be a fairly expensive site ... I think that certainly developers, possibly industrial users, possibly some forms of government - whether it be Metro Vancouver, the province or the federal government - may consider it just because of all of the infrastructure work going on," Mr. Randall said, referring to the twinning of the Port Mann bridge and new transit.

Canfor was not available for comment yesterday.

The company's first mill was built near or on this site on the Fraser River in New Westminster in 1938. Canfor has announced the closing of four mills since November.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2008, 9:13 AM
East Van East Van is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PacificNorthWest
Posts: 713
Is there any links to the Burke Mtn. development ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2008, 6:33 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
David
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,453
Northeast Coquitlam Area Plan

Quote:
The NECAP encourages the orderly development of a community that accommodates a future population
of approximately 24,000 persons within 7,600 housing units. The major components of the overall
development concept include:
• One walkable, village node or centre which serves as a focal point for the area’s employment,
shopping, education, recreational and social uses and for future direct transit services between
Northeast Coquitlam and Coquitlam’s Regional Town Centre;
• A mix of transit-supportive land use types and densities within the proposed urban development
“village” area;
• A concentration of residential land uses with a ten minute walk of the village centre with use
intensity decreasing as distance from the village centre increases;
• Opportunities for lower density suburban and rural residential development in areas beyond the
village area;
• Protection of areas of high environmental sensitivity;
• Protection of lands within the Agricultural Land Reserve for agricultural uses;
• A network of active and passive parks and leisure opportunities; and,
• A transportation network which accommodates cars, transit, bicycles and pedestrians and which
includes two new connections across the Coquitlam River and improvements to the capacity of
Coast Meridian Road and Freemont Street.
In addition to the concept above, the Plan is guided by principles detailed in the CWOCP, as well as specific
Northeast Coquitlam policies regarding environmental protection, increasing transportation choice,
phasing of servicing, reducing energy consumption through efficient neighbourhoods and buildings, and
encouraging the development of a strong economic base in the community.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2008, 7:57 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
^^^Obviously their hoping that who ever buys it is going to believe they can get it rezoned to residential since its right next to the huge Coquitlam development. Unfortunetly I dont see New Westminster going for that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2008, 5:48 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
We've heard of this one on and off for a few years now, well it's now offical with tenders going out in April/08, here's the lastest details.

RCMP HEADQUARTERS, GOVERNMENT OFFICES
Surrey, Greater Vancouver BC
RCMP E-Division Headquarters Relocation Project, 9800 140 St, near Green Timbers Urban Forest, V3T 4M5
$80,000,000 est
Project: 68,753 sq m of office, support and special purpose space. The facility will include a post-disaster building of 2,365 sq m, a forensic laboratory of 6,314 sq m, high bay space (garage and workshop) of 4,730 sq m, and 1810 parking spaces; this will be a LEED Gold facility.
Scope: 68,753 m²; 14 hectares
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:27 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.