HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #761  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2008, 6:24 PM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
It's 61, and it's made enough of a difference that the only person who actually knows more about this project than the average skyscraper-junkie would has walked out of this thread.
Ya, its because many on here hope for us to break the 200m mark.

And there is the debate between storeys, floors, levels.

And then there is the debate between how fair it is to measure a building from street level and NOT ground level (as in the Sears Tower, which actually has a GROUND floor that is below the raised street. ... There are many Vancouver buildings like this also).

the debates go on..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #762  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2008, 7:00 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
The debate doesn't go on. the developer has set 61 stories, there will only be 61 stories, no more, no less. What I'm hopinh for is that the fins will be extended to their original length, brining the building over 200m, but that ain't likely to happen.

There is no "hidden" 62nd floor. There is no ground floor beneath street level, just parking, lots of parking. Just because you hope for it doesn't mean it is real, especially when a man who is fairly high on the pecking order say's it isn't.

The debate doesn't go on.

The only real argument is over whether the first/second floor count as one floor or not, and the developer has already set them as 2 floors.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #763  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 12:06 AM
towerguy3 towerguy3 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,124
Curious why they left the telephone poles standing along Alberni from Shangri-La almost to Denman. With Shangri-La and all the other condo towers stretching down almost to Denman, I find it interesting the city never bothered to bury those lines along Alberni.

Thery're not a problem or hazard, just seems those lines should be invisible considering the upscaleness of thoses condo towers.

Having telephone poles across the street from a $ 250 million Shangri-La just doesn't seem, well, "correct"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #764  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 1:11 AM
204 204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Terminal City
Posts: 1,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by towerguy3 View Post
Curious why they left the telephone poles standing along Alberni from Shangri-La almost to Denman. With Shangri-La and all the other condo towers stretching down almost to Denman, I find it interesting the city never bothered to bury those lines along Alberni.
It's indeed odd that they have left those poles.

Also, the sidewalk kind of disappears at Cardero (north side) and turns into a gravel path for a block. It's almost like this street was an afterthought.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #765  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 1:27 AM
squeezied's Avatar
squeezied squeezied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by towerguy3 View Post
everything about Shangri-La is hype
funny that came from u...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #766  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 2:14 AM
nathan6969 nathan6969 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by towerguy3 View Post
Curious why they left the telephone poles standing along Alberni from Shangri-La almost to Denman. With Shangri-La and all the other condo towers stretching down almost to Denman, I find it interesting the city never bothered to bury those lines along Alberni.

Thery're not a problem or hazard, just seems those lines should be invisible considering the upscaleness of thoses condo towers.

Having telephone poles across the street from a $ 250 million Shangri-La just doesn't seem, well, "correct"?
What are the poles going to though, cuz none of the new condos take power from them, maybe some of it has to do with construction, cuz I know they've got a bunch running down to pender where all that construction is goin on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #767  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 2:40 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by towerguy3 View Post
Having telephone poles across the street from a $ 250 million Shangri-La just doesn't seem, well, "correct"?
Correction: $400 million
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #768  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 2:44 AM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
Who cares about burning dumpsters?
That could be someone's home.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #769  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 4:13 AM
towerguy3 towerguy3 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,124
ummm... wa? Shangri-La's cost has gone to $ 400 million?

What is the developer thinking now?

anyways, I'm going back to staring at the Full Moon. Anyone see the Full Moon tonight? Looks nice eh?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #770  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 8:23 AM
Hong Kongese's Avatar
Hong Kongese Hong Kongese is offline
Yellow Fever
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 506
^^^ I think it's original cost was $350 millions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #771  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 5:01 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
Let's try and get this thread back on track...

...photos from this morning:











The verdict is still out on the glass on the corner/box part, but I think it will achieve the desired effect of breaking up the facade quite well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #772  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 5:13 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,161
Wow, I hadn't had the chance to walk by and see the glazing on the box yet... It has a much better effect than expected.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #773  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 5:18 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,598
great photos phesto!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #774  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 7:30 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,765
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #775  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 7:59 PM
towerguy3 towerguy3 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,124
so that is 61 they're on right now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #776  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 8:29 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,765
Pic from the TD Tower I took today - looks like they've topped out.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #777  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 8:31 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
great photos, i love the morning glow!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #778  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 8:38 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,765
Kinda wish the box has a more pronounced colour of glass to stand out more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #779  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 10:09 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,724
^ Nice shots Phesto, Officedweller.

I took a couple of shots of the Shangri-La while I was downtown today (January 23rd).


My Photo, taken January 23rd, 2008.


My Photo, taken January 23rd, 2008.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis

Last edited by SFUVancouver; Mar 4, 2008 at 11:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #780  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2008, 10:27 PM
bils's Avatar
bils bils is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 563
SFUVancouver, I had a few moments to play around with your image. hope you don't mind. here's what we should be lookin' like this summer, boys



i'm assuming we're topped out already
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:21 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.