^It won't be as much of a competitor as you think. You might find this interesting:
"While it would seem that HSR and airlines would be in competition in certain markets, there exists many opportunities for coordination and cooperation.
The Union of International Railways notes that "the advantages of the train when compared with planes are especially strong when travel times lie below 3 hours and distances under 800 km/h (sic) [480 miles], but rail-air complementarity really starts to come into its own when the rail journey section is combined with a medium or long-haul flight."15 A Lufthansa passenger can check in air baggage at the Stuttgart rail station, and take the 1h30m train trip to connect with a Lufthansa flight departing from Frankfurt. The European railway system feeds into the airlines' hub as another spoke. This enables the airlines to concentrate on more profitable longer haul and international flights."
http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/HighSpeedRail.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAMRetrofit
Kitchener could be connected to the system through Hamilton instead of running two duplicitous networks. It only makes economic sense to run the high speed service along the electrified GO line. Kitchener first needs to be serviced with conventional GO train service since it has become a major part of the GTA commuter shed. The city has yet to prove that it is amenable to such rail services. This would not preclude Kitchener as a future destination for high speed rail.
|
It wouldn't be two duplicitous networks. One line would serve Hamilton, Niagara, and Buffalo, and the other would serve Pearson and southwestern Ontario. Hell, the Niagara line could even get built before the SW Ontario line. There's no reason that GO transit should be a precursor to high speed rail. That was exactly my point earlier - Kitchener's better suited to intercity rail than commuter rail.
So your proposal is to have the line to Windsor go through Hamilton with a spur line from Hamilton to Kitchener. Any future Niagara/Buffalo line would go to Hamilton as well, essentially making Hamilton the hub of the system. That makes no sense. First, there absolutely should be some kind of rail service between Kitchener and Hamilton, that I agree with (transportation between those two cities is awful), but most intercity passengers in Kitchener are going to Toronto, not Hamilton. Same thing with passengers form Niagara Region or Buffalo. Not only that, but your proposal leaves out Pearson altogether (more on that later). Toronto is the logical hub of the system, and it's where the lines should meet, not Hamilton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAMRetrofit
North Americans will not be as amenable to high speed rail as the Europeans. I again state my case about this system connecting the cores of our urban centers over airports. Hub airports like London and Hamilton will lobby heavily against the system if it is conceived as a method to reduce connecting flights. These airports are trying to conduct business might I remind you.
|
No need to make this a competition of city cores versus airports. Both can and should be served. I think you're wrong about North Americans not being amenable to rail. If it's a superior mode of travel, people will use it.
London and Hamilton aren't hub airports. It's a hub and spoke system, and the hubs are Toronto, Montreal, etc. London and Hamilton are spokes. Passenger rail is the ideal form of transport over distances of a few hundred km. It's just as fast and more efficient, safe, clean, reliable, and convenient than air travel. High speed rail is can reduce greenhouse gases by huge amounts, according to the 1998 Lynx study, by 20%. Think about it, 20%, entirely through big reductions in driving and flying. It's ridiculous there are so many flights on routes like Ottawa-Montreal.
Edit: Here's something else I foudn WRT railways and airlines cooperating, and it's a great idea. From an editorial in the Montreal Gazette:
Airlines and politicians are legitimately worried about the risk of destabilizing the fragile Canadian air transport system. The way out of this problem is not for lobbyists to block high-speed rail, but rather for airlines to negotiate favorable terms for using high-speed trains to transport passengers bearing airline tickets. This is common practice in Western Europe and of benefit to traveller and airline alike.
http://www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimate...&f=45&t=000443