HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5501  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2008, 10:08 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrabbit View Post
Also, the Swisshotel Ballroom is designated in light blue - has Magellan acquired it for development as well?
I don't think so. It was probably much cheaper and easier to build Swissotel's ballroom and Aqua at the same time, so Swissotel and Magellan worked something out. The ballroom is part of the master plan for the site, but I doubt Magellan has any residential units planned there.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
     
     
  #5502  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2008, 10:38 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,806
There's a full page add in the real estate section of the Tribune for Solstice on the Park.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #5503  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2008, 11:03 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,831
The Clare from Ashland/Lake transfer bridge 01-20-2008

     
     
  #5504  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 12:23 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
Speaking of the Clare, I heard on the news the other evening that the "tax exemption" might be illegal. It was a follow-up to the previous story.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #5505  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 12:35 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Speaking of the Clare, I heard on the news the other evening that the "tax exemption" might be illegal. It was a follow-up to the previous story.
What happens if this is the case? Are all sales contracts null and void and they have to start over? Could this cause the construction loan to default and stall the project?
     
     
  #5506  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 12:37 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Would it happen to be in this picture (yellowish brick structure on the right):

Yeah. It's really not awful, and it's infinitely better than beige shit brown painted concrete. Most brick takes a couple decades to start to look cool, anyway. And the expensive pre-aged classy looking brick, is well, expensive.
     
     
  #5507  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 1:23 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
There's a full page add in the real estate section of the Tribune for Solstice on the Park.
The website is also up and running (but no info yet).
     
     
  #5508  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 1:29 AM
samoen313's Avatar
samoen313 samoen313 is offline
millard fillmore
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ys
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrabbit View Post
I could be imagining things, but looks to me as though Magellan has updated their Lake Shore East map slightly:


http://www.lakeshoreeast.com/site-plan-map.html
Which of the remaining "future development" plots are to be among the more significant buildings in Lakeshore East? Or are Aqua and the Aquitectonica building going to be the headliners and the rest of the sites will be more along the lines of the Lancaster or the Tides? Or does nobody really know what is on deck for the master plan until it is announced?
__________________
the sky is falling.
     
     
  #5509  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 2:08 AM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by samoen313 View Post
Which of the remaining "future development" plots are to be among the more significant buildings in Lakeshore East? Or are Aqua and the Aquitectonica building going to be the headliners and the rest of the sites will be more along the lines of the Lancaster or the Tides? Or does nobody really know what is on deck for the master plan until it is announced?
The plot at the upper right, at Wacker & LSD is widely rumored (or hoped) to be a supertall, but that's rumor only.
There's no info on anything else that I've seen.
     
     
  #5510  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 2:17 AM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
What happens if this is the case? Are all sales contracts null and void and they have to start over? Could this cause the construction loan to default and stall the project?
Well the Clare looks to be even with 50 E. Chestnut, and therefore only ~100' short of topping out, so there isn't much left to stall.

The lawyers will now have to review all the contracts and see what was promissed and what wasn't. Hopefully that takes a couple months and they top out by then.
     
     
  #5511  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 3:39 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
353 N clark - Jan 18

7:45 am - pouring a floor, the guy with the backpack and wand is using a "dick" which vibrates and helps the cement settle and bring bubbles up to the surface.

[from SSC ]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoPrecaster View Post
The "Dick" for those of you not with clean and pure minds.











10:00 am - seen from above



12:30 - surface finishing ( a different floor ) guy with the brush is sprinkling water in front of the rotary surfacer.








1:45pm - pouring on the core







4:00pm - forms for the next floor ( these are not on top of the just finished area )



__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #5512  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 3:53 AM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,341
Is 353N a concrete office building, or are they transitioning to steel?
     
     
  #5513  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 4:36 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
Last Week

Marriot River North
Jan 15th


Palomar
Jan 15th

Jan 18th




Gammonley Condos - 757 N Orleans
Jan 16

[ full set http://picasaweb.google.com/harry.r.carmichael/757_N_Orleans_Gammonley_Condos ]

453 N Clark ? ( NE corner of Clark and Hubbard )


353 N Clark ( by by big John )
Jan 16


Silver Tower
Jan 17

[ full set http://picasaweb.google.com/harry.r.carmichael/325WOhioSilverTower ]

Stay Bridge & 110 W Superior
Jan 15

[ full set http://picasaweb.google.com/harry.r.carmichael/StayBridge ]

?? & ??
Jan 18
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #5514  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 7:25 AM
pasadenabinks's Avatar
pasadenabinks pasadenabinks is offline
Urban planning nerd
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL (Ukrainian Village)
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by samoen313 View Post
Which of the remaining "future development" plots are to be among the more significant buildings in Lakeshore East? Or are Aqua and the Aquitectonica building going to be the headliners and the rest of the sites will be more along the lines of the Lancaster or the Tides? Or does nobody really know what is on deck for the master plan until it is announced?
Nice typo on Millennium Park in the lower left of the map.
     
     
  #5515  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 7:37 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
Is 353N a concrete office building, or are they transitioning to steel?
Steel
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #5516  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 8:26 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
River North Center Residential Tower

See Harry's photo above that he labeled 453 N. Clark. I noticed the soil testing rig onsite as well today. This had been planned as condos by Friedman - I'm not sure what the current status is, but right now of course it would make much more sense to go rental...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #5517  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 6:00 PM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 1,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
See Harry's photo above that he labeled 453 N. Clark. I noticed the soil testing rig onsite as well today. This had been planned as condos by Friedman - I'm not sure what the current status is, but right now of course it would make much more sense to go rental...
That is great to hear...I work in the old courthouse building accross the street. Given all the new developments on that block I figured it was only a matter of time before something was put there.

I still can't figure out how the tiny adult bookstore wedged right there between brasserie jo and the new hotel on dearborn and hubbard staved off all the redevelopment.
     
     
  #5518  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 6:06 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,806
Looks like the height of 150 E. Ontario has been reduced to 523' 6"
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #5519  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 6:14 PM
simcityaustin simcityaustin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Usa
Posts: 407
^^^^ That's pretty significant. To bad.
     
     
  #5520  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2008, 6:17 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,249
Jeez...first its 588ft..then it grows in height now its down to 523ft...what the hell man!!!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:51 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.