HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2661  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2008, 10:22 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
No, Im talking about the landscaped strips on the sidewalk along Folsom Blvd. For example, the huge landscraped strips in front of the office max building at F65. All of that can be taken away and street parking be added.
One foreseeable problem is that the landscaped strip is generally part of the property owner's domain, rather than city property that can be taken and converted into parking. The other problem with parking that close to a busy intersection (where cars are typically traveling 35-45 MPH, or very backed up) is the strong possibility of accidents from people trying to parallel park into traffic. In either case, they have a parking lot in back (which removes cars from view and puts the building and lanscaping in the front) instead of street parking--which makes more sense than putting parking in the front and landscaping behind the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2662  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2008, 11:20 PM
YouSoSpecial YouSoSpecial is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post

I assume part of the reason for the parking structure is to maintain the park & ride aspect of the light rail station, as most of the project's current space is occupied by a parking lot.
That's not a parking lot - that's the bus transfer center. There are a half dozen bus lines that use it. How are they accommodated in this plan?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2663  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2008, 11:20 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
East End Gateway Site 1 at 16th and N is up for Design Review on Jan 16th.

- 15-Stories
- 125 Units: 63 1B/1B, 53 2B/2B, 3 townhouses, and 6 penthouse units
- 3,450 Retail Space

One thing I noticed right away that I like is how they wrap the parking with housing. That's such a damn site for sore eyes after 621 and Meridian II.

The down side is they are looking to use precast concrete...I'm not a fan of that stuff at all.








Last edited by sugit; Jan 11, 2008 at 11:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2664  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2008, 11:29 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
Cool, thanks sugit. Been waiting to see these. I'm glad they wrap the building
to hide the parking too... I wish the city would make that mandatory for
new proposals. That stretch of 16th is going to be a buzzing with so much
in the works right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2665  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 1:20 AM
Grimnebulin's Avatar
Grimnebulin Grimnebulin is offline
Got Good Grub?
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Midtown Sacramento
Posts: 286
Does anyone know of a website for Tapestry Square? I searched and couldn't find one. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2666  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 1:29 AM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimnebulin View Post
Does anyone know of a website for Tapestry Square? I searched and couldn't find one. Thanks!
http://www.tapestrisquare.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2667  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 5:19 AM
sacamenna kid sacamenna kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 44
16th and N

among the nicest renderings of new things for Sacramento that I've seen in a long time. I think the wrap-around parking helps immensely, esp. so close to the Capitol Building. But the design itself (apart from the pre-cast stuff), and lower levels on N, make for fine composition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2668  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 5:54 AM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacamenna kid View Post
among the nicest renderings of new things for Sacramento that I've seen in a long time. I think the wrap-around parking helps immensely, esp. so close to the Capitol Building. But the design itself (apart from the pre-cast stuff), and lower levels on N, make for fine composition.
I totally agree. I think that may be the best part of the design. Too many times it seems like the design on the side streets is totally forgotten and jacked up. This one interacts and puts eyes on the street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2669  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 6:43 AM
creamcityleo79's Avatar
creamcityleo79 creamcityleo79 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 1,790
I love it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2670  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 3:07 PM
creamcityleo79's Avatar
creamcityleo79 creamcityleo79 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 1,790
Yay for this!
Quote:
Bob Shallit: Dough's been raised for Freeport Bakery to move
Published 12:00 am PST Saturday, January 12, 2008
Story appeared in BUSINESS section, Page D1



A new banner at Broadway and 19th Street announces the "future home" of Freeport Bakery.

But the popular gourmet bakery won't be moving from its current digs, just one light-rail stop south near William Land Park, for at least two years.

The sign? It went up because developers of the corner site – an impressive mixed-use project to be called Broadway Lofts – recently hosted an Urban Land Institute meeting and wanted to showcase their mouth-watering future tenant, says Marc Jasso, whose firm, Millennium Real Estate Services, is the project's lead partner.


Freeport Bakery's owners, Marlene and Walter Goetzeler, also are partners, along with an unnamed Bay Area company.

Under current plans, the bakery will more than double in size, occupying a 6,000-square-foot space facing Broadway. The rest of the new building, which wraps around the corner onto 19th Street, will include retail shops and live-work housing units. Up above will be four floors of LEED-certified apartments. Also in the works: a separate six-story office building at the block's northwest corner.

The existing building, which will be demolished, is occupied by a state prison office, a medical call center and church offices.

Jasso says his development team will seek City Council approval later this month and hopes to begin demolition work by early summer. Construction could take another 18 to 20 months, he says.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2671  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 4:33 PM
BrianSac's Avatar
BrianSac BrianSac is offline
CHACUN SON GOÛT
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugit View Post
East End Gateway Site 1 at 16th and N is up for Design Review on Jan 16th.

- 15-Stories
- 125 Units: 63 1B/1B, 53 2B/2B, 3 townhouses, and 6 penthouse units
- 3,450 Retail Space

One thing I noticed right away that I like is how they wrap the parking with housing. That's such a damn site for sore eyes after 621 and Meridian II.

The down side is they are looking to use precast concrete...I'm not a fan of that stuff at all.







Shweet! So much better than that Lionakais eyesore proposed at 15th & Capitol(Taylor's new building)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2672  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 6:39 PM
Web Web is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianSac View Post
Shweet! So much better than that Lionakais eyesore proposed at 15th & Capitol(Taylor's new building)

isnt 15th and capitol fully developed???
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2673  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 6:50 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Web View Post
isnt 15th and capitol fully developed???
State budget crisis forced the sale of the east lawn of Capitol Park.

Where have you been??!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2674  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2008, 10:25 PM
BrianSac's Avatar
BrianSac BrianSac is offline
CHACUN SON GOÛT
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Web View Post
isnt 15th and capitol fully developed???
I was actually talking about 15th and K streets...my bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2675  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2008, 3:28 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,008
Wathcing the replay of the city council meeting from 1/8/08 (at 6:20 p.m.) the Metropolitan was appealed and called up for council reconsideration (due to a challenge to the EIR from Davis Attorney William Kopper.


Apparently his three secret clients (presumably the same three who are challenging the railyards), challenged the EIR..

But the really funny part is that the city council started complaining about the Metropolitan.

The Mayor said that she would personally call up large projects until the city has a height restriction in place.

Cohn (although not present) wants the building to go back to the design review for redesign and new setbacks because he wouldn't be able to see the Capitol building from his city hall office. Lauren Hammond echoed the same meesage.

The Mayor thinks the building is designed too "sleek" for the historic surroundings..

Apparently the council is less interested about getting a major residential highrise off the ground than they are their views from city hall..

Saca will eventually throw his hands in the air and realize the chances of getting a residential highrise built in this city are slim.

Last edited by urban_encounter; Jan 16, 2008 at 6:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2676  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2008, 4:26 AM
Majin's Avatar
Majin Majin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Downtown Sacramento
Posts: 2,221
Man you really have to be kidding me...

Why are these kind of people in power? Can someone get this circus out of here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2677  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2008, 4:32 AM
Majin's Avatar
Majin Majin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Downtown Sacramento
Posts: 2,221
How about the forumers plan a trip to city hall to the next council meeting and present to try to knock some sense into the council? I mean, with most of these "arguments" presented by them such as not being able to see the capitol from their office, it just seems unreal.

Why in the world you send the project through more hoops for something stupid like that? "Too sleek"?

Sorry, this is just making me fustrated beyond belief.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2678  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2008, 9:39 AM
cozmoose's Avatar
cozmoose cozmoose is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 173
Fargo offers no vision, plays it safe

By Marcos Bretón - [email protected]

Published 12:00 am PST Sunday, January 13, 2008

Sacramento is facing a $55 million budget deficit, has critical development projects pending downtown, and Mayor Heather Fargo offers this bit of wisdom:

We each need to change one light bulb to a compact fluorescent because it's good for the environment. Oh, and be sure to walk more and drink tap water to promote a "green Sacramento."

No lie. Such were the primary points Fargo made during a "State of the Downtown 2008" speech to an auditorium filled with regional leaders and serious people last week.

Delivered at Memorial Auditorium, her talk was amazingly lacking in substance, and ultimately depressing considering our complex times.

There is no political risk in promoting the idea of a "Green Sacramento." It's like saying we should all be nice to each other.

If you really want to make Sacramento green, why give a dumbed-down version of how to do it? Fargo knows the issue, has pushed the city toward embracing lowered energy use and carbon emissions. Why not tout that in a serious, detailed way that resonates with people?

When you have a room full of large-scale developers, as Fargo did, why not use your pulpit to educate them on how "green" building materials can be cost-effective too? Why not show them that they can still make their money and build projects that are better for the environment?

The point is, there was no point, no vision, no risk, no message of any real substance.

There was also no sense from Fargo of how the city will respond to Sacramento's budget shortfall and the inevitable pink slips for city workers and cutbacks in city services.

Others were left to articulate the brutal work of developing the downtown railyard in a depressed economy. Fargo wanted to announce that the downtown Greyhound bus station may be moving after 20 years of failed tries – but there is no deal yet. So she announced that there may be an announcement. Maybe.

And then she tried flattering the Westfield Mall conglomerate after the City Council had disparaged the owners of the Downtown Plaza last month. No matter. Westfield sued the city the next day.

The impression left is of Fargo not as a strong mayor, but as one frustrated voice on a City Council incapable of managing a tough, powerful, city tenant.

"It was a missed opportunity to talk about the future of downtown, no question," said Matt Mahood, president and CEO of the Sacramento Metro Chamber of Commerce.

In March, Fargo is scheduled to give her "State of the City" speech before Mahood's group. Here's a tip: Try harder. March is also when time runs out for Fargo challengers to get their names on the June ballot. Fargo is running unopposed for a third, four-year term.

There has been a lot of clandestine smack talk around town about how Fargo has no vision – how she can't marshal five votes on the council; is driven by issues others see as arcane; is about the process over results; plays it safe; and leaves tougher issues to others, such as City Councilman Rob Fong.

But Fong says he isn't running, and a host of supposed political talent is staying on the sidelines and sniping – but never on the record, of course.

(Insert chicken sound here).

It was tough watching Fargo struggle as she walked to the podium to give her flawed speech. The effects of multiple sclerosis are clearly progressing.

But it was even tougher listening to her because Sacramento needs much more from its mayor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2679  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2008, 10:00 AM
BrianSac's Avatar
BrianSac BrianSac is offline
CHACUN SON GOÛT
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
How about the forumers plan a trip to city hall to the next council meeting and present to try to knock some sense into the council? I mean, with most of these "arguments" presented by them such as not being able to see the capitol from their office, it just seems unreal.

Why in the world you send the project through more hoops for something stupid like that? "Too sleek"?

Sorry, this is just making me fustrated beyond belief.
Sleek, in my opinion, are some of the most attractive buildings.

Serna is flip flopping in his grave as we speak.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2680  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2008, 6:24 PM
Majin's Avatar
Majin Majin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Downtown Sacramento
Posts: 2,221
Hey guys, im serious about us forumers organizing to either convince current city council to change their ways or if that fails, overthrow them and install a new council. Who's with me? We should start comming up with some talking points, spread them throughout the grid (don't bother with the suburbs) and organize a grassroots campaign for a coup of the current council. Again, I am dead serious about this.

Also, does anybody know how I would go about contacting John Saca?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:15 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.