Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaroslaw
"The elevated road deck stops before it reaches Lake Shore Drive, so drivers on the road see a blank wall. The gap would be filled with future high-rises." Who cares what the drivers see. What do people see from the riverwalk? The concrete parking bases of the Regatta and the one E of it, and these are there for good.. Do your homework, Roderer.
|
He's talking about the area East of the Chandler, where there is vacant land with no extended parking deck, between the development and actual lakeshore drive, not wacker
also, the whole "we are going to get opposition from the people we already sold to", would be a moot point if they put in massing models of the proposed buildings to the east, so that buyers knew what they were getting into, ultimately a secluded highrise enclave near the river, lake, and millenium park, without reserved views of any from many of the first 1,000 units
i.e. buying a lancaster home for long term views of either the river or lake michigan was naive, short term I can understand, but opposing buildings within the same development for views you are only lucky to get because of interesting phasing that delays their construction is just idiotic.
So, even if I do like to rationalize "NIMBY" opinions, nobody should take any shit from any of the first buyers that were to dense to realize their landlocked condo wasn't going to have lifetime views of water, nor the density of a golf course for much longer after their purchase
sorry for the rant