Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean
I might be more in favor of this project if it wasn't one of the final pieces in Crow/Fulton's ultraconservative goal of cleaning up the campus of virtually everything that defines the college experience for a wide portion of the student body, especially those most affected by the new development. It's frustrating watching ASU push this on the frats threatening eminent domain when sites like the Tempe Center sit basically lifeless and Marina Point has taken maybe 10 years to come up with a massing diagram. I don't have much doubt that this project will see a similar glacial pace and the frats will be up shit's creek without a paddle in the exceedingly protracted meantime.
|
Dr. Crow and Fulton may be powerful, but no one has any delusions: they do not have complete control over students' behavior. Drugs, endless parties, all the trappings of the "college experience" will continue to exist. The existing frat houses, some of which are uninhabitable and many of the others won't be long behind, need to go, regardless of your or anyone else's opinion of the behavior of students inside them. IMO, the University itself has no obligation to support under-age drinking or any other illegal or even unhealthy behavior, but that's just me.
Some of ASU's capital projects have proceeded relatively expeditiously: McAllister Academic Village, the Honor's Dorms project, etc. A few isolated cases of delayed projects that were never particularly high up on the priority list to begin with (in addition to their over-reaching scope; have you SEEN the plan for the Tempe Center site????) does not mean ASU has no interest in improving the quality of the residences and other services it offers its students.
The project should move forward.