HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #401  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2007, 11:42 PM
Mr Man Mr Man is offline
(insert title here)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Road Warrior
Posts: 3,212
Here's one that puts it all together



On this map if you look close enough you can see the Elgin-O'Hare Expressway, The O'Hare Ring Road, and Terminals 4 (by Terminal 5) and Terminal 6 (on york rd).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #402  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 6:08 AM
ih8spires ih8spires is offline
Marina City
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 120
Thank you K0512 and Mr. Mann. That did a lot toward clearing things up for me. I am a pilot based out of ORD and all the different names for all the different terminals even had me confused.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #403  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 2:59 PM
2PRUROCKS!'s Avatar
2PRUROCKS! 2PRUROCKS! is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 535
Mr Man or anyone else in the know...I am a bit confused by the O'Hare terminal plans. I thought the new western terminal would be terminal 7. Also are these plans, maps and renderings Mr Man has provided the current plan? I noticed that the first two pdf. files that Mr Man posted seemed old. The first on appeared to have been a terminal plan from before Sept. 11, 2001 and the second seemed to be last updated in 2004?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #404  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 6:51 PM
Mr Man Mr Man is offline
(insert title here)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Road Warrior
Posts: 3,212
Its still maybe a year off, so any plans are preliminary. But the basics are the same. There will be a METRA station at the new Western Terminal since the tracks already exist. I say Terminal 6, but I guess they can call it whatever they want at the end of the day.

That road map from the Village of Des Plaines provides an acurate description of everything that's being planned.

So two new major highways
two new terminal buildings
two more runways
and a metra station at the western terminal/gateway
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #405  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 8:38 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,130
In merger news...

Crain's is reporting that United and Delta are in talks about a combination. The combined entity would be headquartered in Chicago and have its operations base (maintenance, etc) at Atlanta Hartsfield.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #406  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 8:52 PM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
In merger news...

Crain's is reporting that United and Delta are in talks about a combination. The combined entity would be headquartered in Chicago and have its operations base (maintenance, etc) at Atlanta Hartsfield.
I this deal, Indianapolis is a net loser.. of UAL maintenance jobs..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #407  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 8:56 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpIllInoIs View Post
I this deal, Indianapolis is a net loser.. of UAL maintenance jobs..
On further reading, that's not necessarily true. Here's the quote:

"The exact financial details of the transaction being discussed are not clear. But the talks involve United being the name of the combined airlines, the headquarters staying in Chicago and Delta's Atlanta hub being an operational center for the two carriers, the official said. One possible scenario involves Delta CEO Richard Anderson being the chief of the combined airline, the official said."

The "an" may be key. This may just mean that the hubs will be Chicago, Atlanta and Denver, as United is currently in Chicago and Denver and Delta is in Atlanta. Or they may be moving everything to Atlanta. In any merger you have to justify the combination with cost savings to create synergy, so if they decide they don't need 3 hubs, or Delta has lots of excess capacity in Atlanta (which may be the case, because there's a lot more room there than around O'Hare), they may move some of UAL's ops to Atlanta. Or this may just mean that they won't be shutting down the Atlanta operation, which I'd never expect anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #408  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2007, 3:13 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,371
Now they're completely denying that any merger talks have occurred.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #409  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2007, 4:02 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Man View Post
Its still maybe a year off, so any plans are preliminary. But the basics are the same. There will be a METRA station at the new Western Terminal since the tracks already exist. I say Terminal 6, but I guess they can call it whatever they want at the end of the day.

That road map from the Village of Des Plaines provides an acurate description of everything that's being planned.

So two new major highways
two new terminal buildings
two more runways
and a metra station at the western terminal/gateway
Worth noting that the city is currently accepting bids for consulting on extensions to the airport transit system. Presumably this would include extensions on both ends, to the O'hare Transfer Metra and to the west terminals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #410  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2007, 6:57 AM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Man View Post
Here's one that puts it all together



On this map if you look close enough you can see the Elgin-O'Hare Expressway, The O'Hare Ring Road, and Terminals 4 (by Terminal 5) and Terminal 6 (on york rd).
Oh hell yeah, this roadway expansion added to the modernization plan just gang rapes those two little pisshole suburbs of Bensinville and Elk Shit Village. I am in support of it for that reason alone. Icing on the cake would be all the lost tax revenue and legal fees from the O'hare expansion and roadway ROW forcing the two towns to disolve their governments and annex to Chicago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #411  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2007, 12:33 PM
Rail Claimore's Avatar
Rail Claimore Rail Claimore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,231
Folks, that rendering is old. Proposed terminal 4, not shown on the map, would be directly adjacent to terminal 3 (it would be where the current infrastructure-building is located), and terminal 6 directly to the east of terminal 5. Also, the location of the proposed O'Hare Ring Road was drawn in by the Suburban O'Hare Commission as a paranoia ploy by Bitchin'ville and Elk Grove Garbage. Every other proposal has the Ring Road directly adjacent to the tracks.

Here's a more accurate rendering of the future airport. New terminals are in dark blue:

__________________
So am I supposed to sign something here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #412  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2007, 4:16 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rail Claimore View Post
Folks, that rendering is old. Proposed terminal 4, not shown on the map, would be directly adjacent to terminal 3 (it would be where the current infrastructure-building is located), and terminal 6 directly to the east of terminal 5. Also, the location of the proposed O'Hare Ring Road was drawn in by the Suburban O'Hare Commission as a paranoia ploy by Bitchin'ville and Elk Grove Garbage. Every other proposal has the Ring Road directly adjacent to the tracks.

Here's a more accurate rendering of the future airport. New terminals are in dark blue:

Looks like the approach to 4L goes right over the new terminal building? That doesn't seem wise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #413  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2007, 12:06 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rail Claimore View Post
Proposed terminal 4, not shown on the map, would be directly adjacent to terminal 3 (it would be where the current infrastructure-building is located),
That's not accurate anymore - go back one page. Earlier this week OMP made a press release stating that, because of major cost savings, the HVAC-infrastructure building will not move. Heated steam and chilled water for HVAC will simply be transported to the new terminals by creating long pipelines underneath the tarmacs and runways. The plans for Terminal 4 are being re-evaluated, and the terminal may be built next to the infrastructure building, if it is built at all.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #414  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2007, 12:26 AM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,636
Actually I think Rail Claimore is right. Look at the date for that article you are talking about (2/04). All that had to do with the World Gateway stuff which is difference then OMP. OMP just includes the new West Termina, road and ATS system expansions,l and the rearranging of runways.

Eventually I think the World Gateway program (addling adjacent terminals 4 and 6) may happen after the OMP but it is not I believe part of the same package.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #415  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2007, 1:06 AM
Rail Claimore's Avatar
Rail Claimore Rail Claimore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
Looks like the approach to 4L goes right over the new terminal building? That doesn't seem wise.
Except that landings won't use 4L. What's likely is that the runway will be used for landing operations on 22R (opposite direction) by smaller aircraft when prevailing wind directions on 27R make it undesirable given the alternative. On the south airfield, 22L will have a similar function and be used primarily for take-offs as an alternative to 28L.
__________________
So am I supposed to sign something here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #416  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2007, 3:57 AM
Go7SD's Avatar
Go7SD Go7SD is offline
(Go7SD)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: INDY
Posts: 2,486
Right now I'm sitting in my truck parked at the eastbound side of the Oasis service plaza off I 90. I see there is a control tower being built right next to the American Airlines maintenance hangar located on the northside of the airport. Does anyone know what this tower will be used for? Will it replace the current one?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #417  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2007, 3:54 PM
2PRUROCKS!'s Avatar
2PRUROCKS! 2PRUROCKS! is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 535
That is the North airfield air traffic control tower. It will not replace the current ones but is needed to provide visibility for the north runway currently under construction. The current controls towers can't view this new runway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #418  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2007, 9:30 PM
Grego43's Avatar
Grego43 Grego43 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 769
Looking at what will be the new runway alignments, I would be awesome (if money grew on trees) to build all new linear concourses straight down the alley...same design as the West Terminal, or ATL with a massive terminal complex at the East and West ends.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #419  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2007, 12:36 PM
Rail Claimore's Avatar
Rail Claimore Rail Claimore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grego43 View Post
Looking at what will be the new runway alignments, I would be awesome (if money grew on trees) to build all new linear concourses straight down the alley...same design as the West Terminal, or ATL with a massive terminal complex at the East and West ends.
I would not be surprised to see something like that take shape at O'Hare in the long-run... long being the key word here. The current terminal complex has at least a good 20-30 years left.
__________________
So am I supposed to sign something here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #420  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2007, 4:51 PM
Mr Man Mr Man is offline
(insert title here)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Road Warrior
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rail Claimore View Post
I would not be surprised to see something like that take shape at O'Hare in the long-run... long being the key word here. The current terminal complex has at least a good 20-30 years left.
I gotta agree. I'm sure someone at O'Hare took note of Hartsfield-Jackson. They both handle a similar amount of passengers per year, but Atlanta's layout is so much easier to get around. O'Hare is an absolute nightmare.

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.