HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2901  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2007, 7:32 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,488
^Actually, that would be pretty nice if we had the first Green certified Casino to go with our other collection of firsts.
     
     
  #2902  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2007, 7:40 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,488
Here is a Moon Township (airport area) construction update. I took these pics about 1 hour ago:

Right by my office (Howard Hanna Real Estate - West Suburban). Building a third and final office building at the airside business park. From the Pittsburgh business Times:
Quote:
A California insurance company is taking steps toward anchoring a new 80,000-square-foot office building at Airside Business Park, potentially taking the last remaining site at the Moon Township park.

Balboa Insurance Group, a wholly owned subsidiary of Calabasas, Calif.-based Countrywide Financial Corp., is considering consolidating its local operations at a three-story office building on the 2.5-acre site, said Bill Hunt, president of Uptown-based The Elmhurst Group, developer of the project.



And this used to be Cutler Hammer, but then Cleveland based Eaton bought it out a couple years ago, is building a 120,000 sq ft adddition.
from the Pittsburgh Business Times:
Quote:
Eaton Corp., an industrial products manufacturer, is expanding its Pittsburgh-area operations.

The Cleveland-based company (NYSE:ETN) is planning a $24 million, 120,000-square-foot addition to its electrical business headquarters, which are based in Moon Township.

The company presently occupies a 140,000-square-foot building in Moon. The 120,000 square-foot addition will be built onto the current space.

The expansion is expected to add 30 jobs within three years to the company's existing 756-employee regional payroll.
Here is the current 140,000 sq ft building:


and here is ground moving next to it as part of the 120,000 new addition:
     
     
  #2903  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2007, 9:04 PM
Smoker's Avatar
Smoker Smoker is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 370
LEED New Construction - Version 2.2 January 2006

     
     
  #2904  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 5:31 AM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 24,141
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07315/832951-147.stm

Silence is deafening in airport concourses

Cutbacks by US Airways leave vast areas of Pittsburgh International's world-class facilities unused and quiet


Sunday, November 11, 2007
By Mark Belko, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


Steve Mellon/Post-Gazette
Travelers head to a security checkpoint at Pittsburgh International Airport on Friday.Kevin Tinta remembers the days, not too long ago, when his sandwich shop at Pittsburgh International Airport couldn't keep up with the crowds, when lines stretched down the concourse and he hardly had time to take a break.

Now, the few employees who work at Charley's Steakery, at the far end of B Concourse, can go eight hours without seeing a flight take off or land.

"A lot of times there's nothing for us to do," said Mr. Tinta, the manager.

The shop's plight is just one indication of the hard times that have befallen this once mighty hub. And it could get worse in January, when US Airways cuts another 40 flights and drops 18 of its 28 gates.

The cutbacks will leave the airline with 68 daily flights and 1,800 local employees, down from highs of 542 flights and 11,995 workers before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks dealt a devastating blow to US Airways and the entire airline industry.

Altogether, the 13 airlines now serving the airport offer an average of 227 daily flights, down from 633 in August 2001.

Nowhere are the changes more evident than on the A and B concourses, where US Airways once controlled all 50 gates.

Once crammed with vacation travelers and anxious business people hustling to make connections, both have gone from bustling to boarded up.

In A Concourse, yellow caution tape is strung across the entrances to several former US Airways gate areas. Wallpaper and logos have been stripped away and most monitors are blank.

A US Airways special services center has been closed. One day last week, the concourse had the feel of a wake, with the spacious aisles all but empty.

Visitors had no trouble hearing the announcements or the music coming from the airport's sound system. While it might have been tough to hear a pin drop, it was quite easy to pick up the high-pitched squeals of a video game coming from a bar.

At the end of A Concourse, a bank of five gates sits largely unused, the lone exceptions commuter flights to DuBois and Bradford/Jamestown. About 15 travelers waited to board.

It wasn't long ago that the gates harbored some of US Airways' biggest planes. Now they serve as a base for the airline's commuter flights. A turboprop idled on the tarmac, waiting to haul a handful of travelers to DuBois.

"It never was like this. This place used to be packed," said Stan Foster, sales and marketing manager for SGL Group, as he waited to board.

Abandoning A Concourse

In January, US Airways will abandon A Concourse altogether, where it once occupied all 25 gates, and consolidate what's left of its operations in B Concourse where it will keep 10 gates.

That will leave only Southwest Airlines, which started operations in Pittsburgh in May 2005, and its three gates on A Concourse. Twenty-two others will be empty.

The airport authority is still trying to determine what to do with those gates, spokeswoman JoAnn Jenny said. One possibility is to relocate other airlines now operating out of C and D concourses to A, a move that would have been unthinkable six years ago.

"There's something bubbling and percolating in the planning process," she said. "It's not likely that that concourse is going to stay vacant for a lengthy period of time."

The gate consolidation could bring a shot of life to B Concourse, which has suffered much the same fate as A Concourse because of the repeated US Airways cutbacks.

While the first half of the corridor still brims with US Airways activity, the rest of it is dormant, much like a computer in sleep mode.

At the very end of B Concourse, five gates are empty and the monitors black. On this day, state officials are using one corner of the spacious waiting area to discuss assistance available to displaced US Airways employees.

It's the only sign of life.

A short walk away, Kyle McCusker, the lone employee staffing a Ben & Jerry's ice cream concession, said business has been extremely slow.

"By the end of the night, I'll probably be able to count the number of customers I had on my hands," he says.

In January, to save money, the airport authority plans to wall off the ends of the A and B concourses and close 27 gates.

Airport passenger traffic has fallen from a high of 20.7 million in 1997 to 9.9 million last year, due mostly a huge drop in connecting traffic. As US Airways has retrenched, abandoning its hub and spoke business here, pass-through traffic has plunged from a high of 13.9 million people in 1996 to 1.7 million last year.

With the cutbacks, airline costs have increased. The airport's per passenger cost has gone from a low of $5.98 in 2000 to $11.89 in September. It's a simple equation -- as fewer travelers come through the terminal, the per passenger cost increases.

Concession revenue from the award-winning Airmall has plummeted from a high of $89.9 million in 2001 to $65.3 million in 2005. It was $65.9 million last year. The number of stores has dropped from 110 (including those in the now closed commuter terminal) in 2001 to 99 in September.

Despite that and the many flight cuts, Jay Kruisselbrink, vice president of development for BAA Pittsburgh, the Airmall manager, said sales are still "very good" and actually "trending up over last year."

He acknowledged that some stores likely will be hurt when 27 gates are closed and the ends of the A and B concourses are walled off. But what overall impact that will have is hard to predict.

"We're hoping the impact in January will be minimal but time will tell," he said.

To some extent, the airport has been able to offset the losses by boosting its local traffic, spurred in large part by the success in recruiting low-cost carriers like Southwest and JetBlue to start service in Pittsburgh after US Airways dropped the airport as a hub in 2004.

In two years, Southwest has become the airport's second largest carrier, with 15.5 percent of all traffic.

Origin and destination traffic -- that is, the number of passengers not getting off connecting flights and getting on another one -- hit a high of 8.2 million last year. That in turn boosted parking and rental car revenues to a record $29.7 million and $82.4 million, respectively, producing this paradox: While the airport has lost more than half of its passenger traffic, the parking lots are full.

Mr. Kruisselbrink said what the industry calls origin and destination traffic is actually better for the Airmall than connecting because travelers have more time to browse, particularly given security measures that require them to be at the airport 90 minutes to two hours before flights.

With the shift away from US Airways, the airport's C and D concourses, traditionally slower than A and B, have become busier. On these concourses you will find upstarts AirTran and JetBlue along with legacy carriers United, Delta, American and Northwest.

Most of these airlines have posted gains as US Airways has cut. But despite those successes and more local travelers than ever before, they cannot come close to making up for the traffic that has been lost.

Still, Mr. Kruisselbrink said BAA has given no thought to pulling out of Pittsburgh. He says the airport will rise again.

"It's a fantastic facility," he said. "It's just a wonderfully designed building. It's got the best staff of any airport. It's situated perfectly. We don't have any air space issues. So yeah, I don't know how long it will take but this is going to be a viable airport for a long time to come."

Mark Belko can be reached at [email protected] or 412-263-1262.
First published on November 11, 2007 at 12:00 am
     
     
  #2905  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 6:11 AM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,801
I posted this on another forum, but I'll copy it over here because it's in line with the article Evergrey just posted.

I just flew non-stop from Cancun back to Pittsburgh this past Saturday afternoon. If you think the emptiness of the regular concourses of PIT are depressing, you should see what has happened to the customs and immigration level below C. I am talking abandoned machinery strewn everywhere, flat screens pulled out of the walls with wires hanging, baggage claims that haven't been used, empty check-in gates, wrong signs.......and they let it stay in this condition while funneling people through! It was one of the biggest customs stations I've been through, but they only had two lines open. We actually got in early....I was the first person to get to the international security screening point and I surprised them. They jumped up from a card table and were like "Look. People!" "The flight's early!". They had me wait five minutes while they turned on the X-ray machines and metal detectors. Really really sad. Talk about a ghost town. You seriously had to maneuver around old US Airways — all over the place. It was like walking through someone's basement.
     
     
  #2906  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 11:14 AM
BMikeSci's Avatar
BMikeSci BMikeSci is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooluther View Post
The article said the casino will meet 32 of the 33 LEED requirements...the only one being the non-smoking thing.

Can we please just pass that statewide ban and join the rest of the country?
Banning smoking in public would be antithetical to the state's position on lungs - which is, if we protect people from smoking, we will have to blame asthma, cancer, etc. on coal mining and coal burning industries like US Steel. Smoking is just too convenient a dodge.

Last edited by BMikeSci; Nov 11, 2007 at 6:14 PM.
     
     
  #2907  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 1:16 PM
Johnland Johnland is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 764
Ghost town airport

Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronClark View Post
I posted this on another forum, but I'll copy it over here because it's in line with the article Evergrey just posted.

I just flew non-stop from Cancun back to Pittsburgh this past Saturday afternoon. If you think the emptiness of the regular concourses of PIT are depressing, you should see what has happened to the customs and immigration level below C. I am talking abandoned machinery strewn everywhere, flat screens pulled out of the walls with wires hanging, baggage claims that haven't been used, empty check-in gates, wrong signs.......and they let it stay in this condition while funneling people through! It was one of the biggest customs stations I've been through, but they only had two lines open. We actually got in early....I was the first person to get to the international security screening point and I surprised them. They jumped up from a card table and were like "Look. People!" "The flight's early!". They had me wait five minutes while they turned on the X-ray machines and metal detectors. Really really sad. Talk about a ghost town. You seriously had to maneuver around old US Airways — all over the place. It was like walking through someone's basement.
Oh, that is just sad. I just read the Post Gazette article and your post above. As a frequent traveller to Pittsburgh, I've seen the airport go from the old, crowded original terminal of the 80's to the new terminal that opened in the early 90's. Every year was busier than the previous. The AirMall was great. To think it has fallen so far down it very disheartening.

I'm getting tired of my own rant against the casinos, but it would think the airport situation should be a higher priority than —. All the money, planning, time and effort put into casinos should've been directed to toward the airport. The state, county and city should be developing a viable remedy. I don't know if that means running rail out to the airport from the city or what, but something better get more flights in and out of that place. As has been pointed out, Pittsburgh, long runways and none of the congested airspace issues plagueing the East Coast. From what I've read, the space over Wash DC to New York is literally packed. The FAA is considering flight caps on JFK.

My big concern is that airport is an asset now being grossly underutilized, which will drain money from the area.
     
     
  #2908  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 4:03 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 24,141
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07315/832966-147.stm

Getting Around: Transportation wish list would cost billions

Sunday, November 11, 2007
By Joe Grata, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

If you missed the Nov. 1 Post-Gazette article headlined "Transportation Wish List: County panel recommends light rail to Oakland and airport," you didn't miss much.

Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato held a news conference to announce the study results, which included reviving plans to establish rapid transit between Downtown and Oakland and creating an "Oakland Circulator System" to link Pitt and Carnegie Mellon to the Pittsburgh Technology Center, possibly with people movers reminiscent of the old Skybus system that politicians scuttled in the early 1970s.

Those two projects may be plausible and realistic to pursue again, ASAP, although neither one has gotten very far in the past.

But the wish list didn't stop there. It ended up being a pipe dream, recommending a laundry list of concepts and ideas, some with improbable outcomes.

Additional strategies included expanding an Oakland Circulator System to Shadyside, Lawrenceville and the South Side; building a rapid transit system between Downtown and Pittsburgh International Airport; converting busways into high occupancy toll lanes for cars; establishing commuter rail service; creating an "Airport Area Circulator System" fed by trolleys; and advancing transit-oriented development in locations such as Castle Shannon and East Liberty.

Gulp!

That's at least five times more public transportation than Allegheny County has been able to develop in the past century.

Mr. Onorato didn't say how much all of this would cost, but undoubtedly it would be many billions of dollars. He suggested that "public-private partnerships and innovative funding approaches could make these linkages a reality," an interesting thought from the man having trouble finding $27 million in his 2008 budget just to keep the Port Authority afloat this year.

To be fair, the recommendations announced by Mr. Onorato were not necessarily all his. They were drawn up by a Transportation Action Team that he appointed in March 2006, with help from a consultant, Lea-Elliott, hired by the Allegheny Conference of business bigwigs.

The team consisted of 15 members (one died), including political supporters and a few people with transportation backgrounds. It was chaired by Dave Hickton, a partner at Burns White & Hickton LLC, a Pittsburgh law firm.

The Port Authority had one representative, Richard Taylor, of Forest Hills, a three-year authority board member. And although the authority would be the agency charged with building and lining up federal and state funding for any project, none of its planning or engineering people was sought to provide input for the Transportation Action Team study.

"Getting Around" has a few more observations, such as:

• If TAT wants to charge cars to use the West Busway as a "HOT Lane" to bypass Parkway West congestion "to generate revenue for priority capital projects identified in this report," the county better be prepared to reimburse the Federal Transit Administration about $200 million for the federal share of busway costs. The FTA does not permit general traffic to use exclusive busways that it funds;

• The study does not mention the little-used Wabash HOV Tunnel and how this waste of money could somehow be salvaged. It ignores -- rightfully so, probably -- the highly unlikely prospect but still active effort of building a high-speed maglev line between the airport and Downtown;

• The study does not consider ideas as simple, practical and affordable as re-establishing streetcars in the Strip District and on the South Side as useful local public transportation and a visitor attraction;

• If light rail were extended to the airport as the study recommends, who would ride? Downtown and Oakland account for less than 20 percent of airport passengers and employees. The Parkway West will soon be three lanes in each direction between the airport and Carnegie, at the junction of the West Busway that provides a transit alternative to traffic. And a significant number of cars will be removed from the Parkway West when the next section of the Southern Beltway is built between I-79 and the Findlay Connector.

The bottom line: Unless it was for political reasons, Mr. Onorato didn't need to create a Transportation Action Team.

He has me.
     
     
  #2909  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 4:13 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 24,141
Brian O'Neill has an excellent piece on the political dysfunction of Pittsburgh... noting that the city is a tenent of the state and plays by the state's rules. The state has denied Pittsburgh many of the powers that cities in other states have... such as annexation. Pennsylvania's hyper-fragmented system of local governance is a failure and cannot cope with modern economic realities. What kind of crisis does this state need to endure to address this fundamental problem?

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07315/832686-155.stm

Can mere mortals fix Pittsburgh?

Sunday, November 11, 2007
By Brian O'Neill, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Two days after 68,500 Pittsburghers voted to determine who gets to be mayor, four guys who hold real power sat behind a table in City Council chambers.

The four state senators from Allegheny County do not, by themselves, hold enough power to turn the city around. There are 249 other lawmakers in the state Legislature with something to say, too. But as the hearing by the state Senate Urban Affairs and Housing Committee made clear, Mayor Luke Ravenstahl is not entirely the master of his own fate.

Do you think the hospitals and universities should be kicking in more to pay for cops, firefighters, ambulances and such?

That would require changing a 10-year-old state law that stripped away the leverage the cities had to get payments from non-profits in lieu of taxes.

Since the city has cut 1,000 jobs, about a quarter of its work force, since 2002, is it time to tighten workers' compensation payments that cost millions?

However you answer that loaded question, workers' compensation is in the hands of Harrisburg lawmakers, too.

The relative inconsequence of any mayor compared with the state was the background noise of this hearing on Act 47, the state system that is supposed to stop Pennsylvania cities from circling the drain.

That system is looking like the Roach Motel: Cities check in but they don't check out. Nine cities and boroughs have been flying the Act 47 distress flag for at least 15 years -- Scranton, the state's sixth-largest city, among them.

No city has ever escaped the designation, though six boroughs have. Homestead emerged last spring after 14 years of official distress. (For policy wonks scoring at home, Ambridge has the record for shortest stretch, spending only three years in fiscal palookaville in the early '90s.)

The wonder is that more Pennsylvania cities don't topple because their set-up has been exactly wrong for a half-century. Even the city's fiercest critics unintentionally show that when they make comparisons.

Jake Haulk, president of the Allegheny Insitute for Public Policy, testified that Pittsburgh doesn't compare well with cities such as Omaha, Charlotte, Columbus and Salt Lake City.

But the smallest of those cities covers twice as much land as Pittsburgh's 55.5 square miles. Columbus and Charlotte have four and five times Pittsburgh's footprint. That's the key to survival in a commuter age: A city must capture where citizens make money and spend money for a stable tax base.

That's why Charlotte has annexed almost 250 square miles around it since 1950, making it nothing like the 30-square-mile city it once was. Omaha has annexed aggressively, too, while Columbus has quintupled its spread. Salt Lake City has merely doubled its land area, but the look of these auto-centric places is more like Allegheny County than the crowded city in its belly.

Pittsburgh, the city that has lost more than half its population since 1950, crowded? Well, Pittsburgh still has about 5,600 residents per square mile. That makes it more densely packed than the most crowded of the other four, Columbus and Omaha, which have but 3,400 per square mile. Pittsburgh would have more people per square mile even if it lost another 100,000 residents.

That seems to be the plan.

Those statistics didn't come up at the hearing. I got them when I Googled around later at the office, then pulled out a calculator. We should have no illusions that Pittsburgh will annex anything because not only is it too late, Pennsylvania law and politics make it impossible. The clout is in the suburbs, so the only response can be getting the county to start assuming more of the metropolitan load.

A shift from a city to a county police force seems a good bet at some point this century, but it's hardly on the radar now. There's a lot of fiddling around the edges of reform because the city's massive debt and pension burdens means any city-county marriage would come with an anti-dowry.

That won't be easy to figure out. Meantime, though, the state should realize that some of Pittsburgh's big non-profits are gold mines and their employees pay millions in state income taxes. It's time that Pennsylvania, like Connecticut and Rhode Island, reimburse cities for some of the property and business taxes they don't get for hosting the economic engines of the modern economy. Or get hospitals and universities to pony up as much as they do in Massachusetts cities.

It's either that or wait for $4-a-gallon gasoline to get commuters back to living close to where they work. Don't bet your Giant Eagle fuelperks on that.

Brian O'Neill can be reached at [email protected] or 412-263-1947.
     
     
  #2910  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 6:17 PM
BMikeSci's Avatar
BMikeSci BMikeSci is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 289
Getting Around: Transportation wish list would cost billions

It would be great to have rail between Oakland and the Downtown. On the other hand, it's really easy to get from one to the other by bus.
     
     
  #2911  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 6:28 PM
xyagentguy xyagentguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 87
Quote:
It would be great to have rail between Oakland and the Downtown. On the other hand, it's really easy to get from one to the other by bus.
I know a TON of people who won't use the bus but would easily use the light rail. Of course, I guess that's there problem, though.
     
     
  #2912  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 6:37 PM
BMikeSci's Avatar
BMikeSci BMikeSci is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 289
Convention center getting more work & latest news on the Penguins Arena

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_535839.html
     
     
  #2913  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 7:31 PM
hyperion1110's Avatar
hyperion1110 hyperion1110 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMikeSci View Post
Getting Around: Transportation wish list would cost billions

It would be great to have rail between Oakland and the Downtown. On the other hand, it's really easy to get from one to the other by bus.
Bus transportation between Downtown and Oakland is NOT easy for quick. During rush hour, when most of us are moving between the two, it takes half an hour to travel 2 miles by bus. If there were to be light rail, with its own right of way, it would become a 5 minute commute, regardless of time. And that would be awesome

Regarding the state of the city, it's in sad shape, but it's not too late for Pittsburgh. Things will turn around, though it will take a lot of years still, and a lot more decline. It will be economics that drive it, too, not legislation from Harrisburg. The most optimistic new forecasts put geological peak oil production at 2012. Political peak, however, when petroleum exporting countries start hording their resources, will come much sooner, if not already.

Cities will be coming back in a big way, very soon.
     
     
  #2914  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 10:03 PM
BMikeSci's Avatar
BMikeSci BMikeSci is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperion1110 View Post
Bus transportation between Downtown and Oakland is NOT easy for quick. During rush hour, when most of us are moving between the two, it takes half an hour to travel 2 miles by bus. If there were to be light rail, with its own right of way, it would become a 5 minute commute, regardless of time. And that would be awesome

Regarding the state of the city, it's in sad shape, but it's not too late for Pittsburgh. Things will turn around, though it will take a lot of years still, and a lot more decline. It will be economics that drive it, too, not legislation from Harrisburg. The most optimistic new forecasts put geological peak oil production at 2012. Political peak, however, when petroleum exporting countries start hording their resources, will come much sooner, if not already.

Cities will be coming back in a big way, very soon.
I don't take the bus during rush hour; so I will defer to your experience. I do really like light rail, and I would love to see it between the downtown and Oakland.

Last edited by BMikeSci; Nov 12, 2007 at 4:24 PM.
     
     
  #2915  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 10:59 PM
Johnland Johnland is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 764
I've yet to hear anyone say "there should not be light rail between Downtown and Oakland". Seems almost everyone agrees that it's a logical decision. Doesn't it make you wonder why it has never come to pass?
     
     
  #2916  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 11:19 PM
xyagentguy xyagentguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 87
Quote:
I've yet to hear anyone say "there should not be light rail between Downtown and Oakland". Seems almost everyone agrees that it's a logical decision. Doesn't it make you wonder why it has never come to pass?
Money.
     
     
  #2917  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 11:47 PM
Johnland Johnland is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by xyagentguy View Post
Money.
Riiiiiight. They built the Civic Arena, a couple of stadiums, a light rail 'connector' to those stadiums and a now empty airport. They have somehow funded parking for three thousand eight hundred slot machine players.
     
     
  #2918  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2007, 11:57 PM
hyperion1110's Avatar
hyperion1110 hyperion1110 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 354
I like the idea someone had a few posts back about just ripping up the street to uncover the street car tracks (it may have been a news article, not sure). All the track is still there, and, in some place, it's even still on the surface. It wouldn't be too expensive to restore rail service that way, I should think.
     
     
  #2919  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2007, 12:33 AM
Johnland Johnland is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperion1110 View Post
I like the idea someone had a few posts back about just ripping up the street to uncover the street car tracks (it may have been a news article, not sure). All the track is still there, and, in some place, it's even still on the surface. It wouldn't be too expensive to restore rail service that way, I should think.
Exactly!! That's one practical, expedient and affordable solution to a transportation need.
     
     
  #2920  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2007, 2:32 AM
xyagentguy xyagentguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 87
After reading the two good articles, Getting Around: Transportation wish list would cost billions and Can mere mortals fix Pittsburgh, it seems to me that at least the city is aware of the problems and even has ideas to fix them.

So why aren't wheels in motion to do just this?? I just don't understand, it's like Pittsburgh is now clearly aware of it's own doom (which is an EXCELLENT thing, after all, you can't fix something if you are in denial about it), but nothing seems to happen or is done about it!!

I'm so frustrated. It's been like this for decades. I just don't get it, it's like Pennsylvania WANTS to fail at progress.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
   
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:43 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.