HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2501  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2007, 12:46 AM
jlrobe jlrobe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDan35 View Post
Wow, sorry if this offends some people but I'm seriously so sick of LA and all it's bullshit. Nothing gets built here. Everyone has a construction boom...we are the 2nd largest city in the whole US and we are putting up little 5 - 10 story buildings.
LA is a huge city. Sometimes I look at it and see all the good things and love it, and other times I see the bad things.

When I think about the ridiculous policies, increasing gang violence, homelessness, overcrowded schools and hospitals, insufficient park space, endless graffiti, excessive bureacracy, increased traffic, funding problems for the expo line, silly NIMBYism over the expo line, stalled street imrpovements because of lack of funding, scrapped civic projects like the courthouse, 3x more cars than pedestrians on sunset blvd, awesome restaurnats/museums/stores closed on Sundays, bickering over building great projects because of lack of parking or traffic, severe smog days, etc. etc. I get overwhelmed.

When I think about all the new restos opening, the great new music scene developing, the maturing arts scene, the increasing cultural offerings, the geographic and population diversity, going to the beach in december, a continual revival of culver city, ktown, venice, silver lake, hollywood, and downtown, I get quite happy.

I dont know what it is, but in LA, I can love it one minute, then hate it the next. i do more loving than hating, but like you said, some things just REALLY REALLY piss me off!


With the park fifth news, iI am a little peeved. This, along with the expo lines severe problems, make me a little annoyed at the moment, but LA is a huge town, and there are other projects and other things happening around town to make me forget about this news.
     
     
  #2502  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2007, 1:14 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongBeachUrbanist View Post
From Eric Richardson on blogdowntown.com: Last week I was over with VP of Marketing Erika Nelson doing some final testing. I can assure you that she's still gainfully employed and about to be moving her office into the sales center.

Bottom-line: The project's construction schedule remains unaltered and there's lots of interest in both buying and in investing.


I'll say "whew!" & when I'm 1000% sure-----hello, Echo Park!-----that the negative rumors were based on a total misunderstanding of what's actually occurring, or that one of parkfifth's competitors has been involved in a tricky smear campaign. I trust everyone knows about the efforts of one devlpr of large apt bldgs to sue & harrass another devlpr to prevent their constructing the University Gateway proj next to USC.


Quote:
Groundbreaking is still scheduled for the first half of 2008 and completion of the first tower is set for 2010.
Unfortunately, it appears that parkfifth's groundbreaking schedule will be slower than originally predicted. It's gone from first qtr of 2008 to "first half."
     
     
  #2503  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2007, 1:30 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlrobe View Post
LA is a huge city. Sometimes I look at it and see all the good things and love it, and other times I see the bad things.
I couldn't have said it any better. Just as long as there is constant, continuous improvement, I can live with the disappointments & f'ups.

I know I tend to get greedy & wanna see alot more changes for the better, & see them move faster. Then I stand back, pause for a moment & realize that there has been & there really are quite a few important improvements underway right now.

I started thinking that if parkfifth was delayed or, worse, cancelled, that, hey, there are other things to over, such as watching the new LA Live hotel rise over the next few yrs. Yea, alot of that was rationalizing, but it's still a kind of reasonable way to look at things. Nonetheless, I'd rather see both parkfifth's tower & LA Live's hotel going up around the same time.
     
     
  #2504  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2007, 3:55 AM
RuFFy's Avatar
RuFFy RuFFy is offline
FlyyyFALiiFe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 364
Thought you guys might want to see this. I saw it on the LA Downtown News...

Speak Up on Metro Lines

News Brief

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is holding two public meetings Downtown this week to gather feedback on its Regional Connector Transit Corridor Study. The study will analyze various alignments, station locations and transit modes for the possible connection of the Metro Gold, Blue and Expo lines through Downtown. Meetings will feature a formal presentation and displays offering several layout options for an area that includes approximately two square miles of Downtown. Attendees will be invited to submit written comments on the proposals. Meetings will be held Tuesday, Nov. 6, from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Central Library, 630 W. Fifth St., meeting room A; and Wednesday, Nov. 7, from 6 to 8 p.m. at the Japanese American National Museum, 369 E. First St., Central Hall. Those unable to attend the meetings can submit comments by phone, fax, mail or email through Nov. 21. More information is at (213) 922-7277 or metro.net/regionalconnector.
     
     
  #2505  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2007, 5:32 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Shy Provides Details on 777-Unit Project

News Brief

Downtown developer Barry Shy has begun the public outreach for a 777-unit condominium project he is planning for 601 S. Main St. The approximately $150 million development would stand 39 stories and 350 feet tall, and feature 25,000 square feet of ground-floor retail and 1,100 parking spaces on four levels, with 200 to 300 spaces open to the public. The land is currently a parking lot. One-, two- and three-bedroom units, ranging from 600 to 2,500 square feet, would cost between $400,000 and $1.5 million. Although Shy is not yet seeking city permits for the project that has been labeled Shy Barry Tower II, he is briefing community groups; the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council gave its approval two weeks ago, and Shy said he expects to go before the Downtown Center Business Improvement District by the end of the month. Shy, who has opened several structures in the Historic Core and is working on multiple developments in the area, said he hopes to acquire city entitlements and break ground on the new project in about 10 months. If all goes according to plan, Shy said, construction should take approximately two years. Silver Lake-based Accorsi Architecture is working on designs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Los Angeles Downtown News
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #2506  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2007, 11:40 PM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongBeachUrbanist View Post

The issues with Expo Line (esp. 20% cost increase reported today) are incredibly unsettling. But what is the alternative? Clearly, our exposure to skyrocketing gasoline prices, increased dependence on our fragile freeway system, and expanding gridlock are only going to get worse.

Skyrocketing gasoline prices ($4 tomorrow, $10 by the end of the decade isn't impossible as Mexico's Cantarell Field is declining by 14% every year) will be the best remedy to mitigate our gridlock traffic. What we're looking at folks is recession after recession until we end up with an economic DEPRESSION that doesn't go away. The United States is screwed. It invested trillions of the dollars in a suburban paradigm that is coming to an end. It doesn't work and will never work again.
__________________
DTLA Rising
     
     
  #2507  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2007, 11:58 PM
LAofAnaheim LAofAnaheim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 761
Amen LAB...and that's why I think people who invested in downtown will continue seeing property values increase. I think the end of suburbia will come to an end in our lifetime.
     
     
  #2508  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2007, 1:11 AM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
^ Appropriately enough, you should watch this video:

http://www.endofsuburbia.com/
__________________
DTLA Rising
     
     
  #2509  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2007, 10:34 AM
alikaalex's Avatar
alikaalex alikaalex is offline
Registered Schmoozer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DTLA Historic Core
Posts: 41
Talking

Well, for some good news on the pedestrian-oriented front, the Pacific Electric has finally removed the street-level scaffolding obscuring the west-facing ground floor of the building. In its place are several recessed doorways and roll-down security grilles (not full shutters!). A small step to be sure, but I was beginning to doubt that scaffolding would ever disappear.

I took a pic on my phone, but I'm not sure it's of good enough quality to be worth posting.
__________________
(signature.)
     
     
  #2510  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2007, 7:00 PM
ucland ucland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 38
Went to the Kings game last night and Nokia is amazing. I work downtown so I see it everyday from my office--but being there at street level at night is a completely different experience. I do think LA Live will be successful in bringing people downtown.
     
     
  #2511  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2007, 6:13 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by alikaalex View Post
Well, for some good news on the pedestrian-oriented front, the Pacific Electric has finally removed the street-level scaffolding obscuring the west-facing ground floor of the building.

I took a pic on my phone, but I'm not sure it's of good enough quality to be worth posting.
Good to know, esp since I'm sure tenants in the PE over the past few yrs must have been anxious to see their bldg finally in a finished state. BTW, even cell phone pics are better than no pics at all.



Quote:
Originally Posted by ucland View Post
Went to the Kings game last night and Nokia is amazing. I work downtown so I see it everyday from my office--but being there at street level at night is a completely different experience. I do think LA Live will be successful in bringing people downtown.
It's a welcome bit of news hearing that LA Live is going to be as good as hoped.

I like how various new projs, inc LA Live, & the ppl who support such projs, are coming together:


Watering Holes, Developments Lead to Student Rush Downtown

Residents say a 1,400 percent increase of liquor licenses downtown might hurt the area.

By Nicole Dailo and Jean Guerrero
Posted: 11/1/07
dailytrojan.com

USC students fed up with the early curfew on The Row and never-ending line at the 901 Bar & Grill are turning to an influx of bars downtown. But some are concerned by an increase in approved liquor licenses and a development boom in the area feel more like a hangover than added fun. More than 40 bars and restaurants hold liquor licenses in the Historic Core - a 1,400 percent increase according to state regulations, the Los Angeles Downtown News recently reported.

The area has evolved rapidly since 1998, when the city adopted an adaptive-reuse ordinance allowing vacant office buildings to be rezoned into residential lots. Amenities such as restaurants, dry cleaners and hair salons followed as the area became more residential. Kevin Keller, a city planner with the L.A. City Planning Department and president of the L.A. chapter of the American Planning Association, said this transition supplemented the demand for clubs and bars in the area.

The influx of downtown haunts, however, is unwelcome to some residents. The area's development is controversial because of a burgeoning over-concentration of alcohol retailers in close proximity to Skid Row. "We've got folks who are going through things in life that are very difficult, and having access to alcohol could add trials and tribulations," said Ginny-Marie Case, a member of the Downtown Neighborhood Council.

Despite such concerns, planning and construction of developments with liquor licenses has continued. Earlier this month, the city overturned a previous decision by the zoning administration by approving conditional-use permits for the Santa Fe Lofts, a residential complex that included plans for a street-level bar, said Kate Bartolo, who worked for seven years with the Los Angeles-based real estate company backing the project. She said the zoning administration was concerned for the homeless on Skid Row because of the "overwhelming temptation" that might arise from new liquor establishments.

Bartolo said the developments will actually benefit homeless people, who are oftentimes the victims of attacks, because many instances of violence could be avoided by enlivening the area's storefronts.

Case expressed mixed feelings about focusing on the perceived problem of too many liquor licenses and bars. "For all the folks who want to complain about too many liquor licenses, there are bigger issues here," Case said. "There isn't enough affordable housing. This neighborhood has been ignored for many years."

Safety concerns

Some students said the prospect of a night out downtown raises safety concerns. Despite rapid growth, many feel the area remains unsafe to frequent late at night. In spring 2004, a USC junior was shot and killed after being dropped off at a gas station two miles away from his downtown apartment. The student, Maxwell Hazlett, had asked his friends to let him walk so he could look for an open liquor store on the way home, the Daily Trojan reported in 2004.

Charles Hockenbury, a junior majoring in political science, said the consequences of reviving downtown must be calculated before problems arise, because partygoers will give these issues little thought. "If a place pops up downtown, [students] assume that work has gone into making sure it's a safe and viable option," he said.

Adrian Santos, a junior majoring in public relations, said he thinks downtown is a lot safer than the area around campus. Since 2006, there has been a 28 percent decrease in violent crimes around the Historic Core, according to the Los Angeles Police Department. Throughout the city, there has been an 8 percent decrease within the last year.

Some students said they believe the use of common sense usually suffices in avoiding danger. "If I'm with a group of people, then I feel safe," said Janet Kim, a second-year graduate student in occupational therapy.

Clara Irazabal, assistant professor of urban planning and design, said increasing activity downtown at night might actually make the area more safe. "The most effective way to make a district safe is to plan for people to be there at all times. This is safer than security cameras - people make places safe," Irazabal said.

Keller said more careful review of individual cases should suffice in keeping the area safe. "Patrols, security, training and those kinds of regulations will be placed on each business," he said.

Future hot spot

Some downtown residents and workers said they are optimistic about the young, hip feel development is bringing to the historically business-oriented area. "People in the area are responding really well to the new development. You can sense that downtown finally has a true feel to it," said an employee at Lost Souls Café in the Historic Core.

With the grand opening of the 7,100-seat Nokia Theater earlier this month and its accompanying Central Plaza, downtown seems to be morphing into a youth-friendly hot spot. By October 2008, the L.A. Live project plans to unveil a conglomeration of new enterprises, including a broadcasting facility and restaurant along with the ESPN's West Coast headquarters, up to 14 new restaurants, two night clubs and the Grammy Museum, Keller said.

With these new developments that cater to young adults, some say downtown will become an even bigger party spot.Corey Hall, a senior majoring in business administration, said students are going to start heading downtown for the social scene. "I think the revitalization of downtown is just going to continue the trend that's already started," he said.

But Tom Aldrich, a senior majoring in business administration, said he thinks students will not go downtown yet because "it's so dirty" and because of the popularity of the 9-0 near campus. "It's going to take a while, and it depends on whether or not [venues] are strict on [checking proof of age]," he said.

Hockenbury said that while staying close to campus is more convenient for students, the perceived Department of Public Safety crackdown on Thursday-night parties on The Row and the administration's attempt to steer USC away from its party-school reputation is driving students out of North University Park and toward downtown's bright lights. "Naturally, the first place [students] go is The Row," he said. "But [the crackdown has] been forcing people to supplement their social activity, … and downtown is a short cab ride away."
     
     
  #2512  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2007, 6:35 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,710
I was hoping that after the Hanover apt tower was completed, or nearing completion, the site next door to it, where the FIDM dorm tower is supposed to go up, would break ground. But based on fridayinla's new pic of it, not only does it not look like the site is being readied for new construction, it looks like it's now no longer even prepped for any devlpt at all. It's become a deadzone parking lot all over again.


fridayinla at flickr.com




I noticed Ralossi's web site had an interesting entry about one of the hood's other major deadzones, one that's even worse than a parking lot.


fridayinla at flickr.com

Even a parking lot on that spot, in which it at least has been cleared off & cleaned up----&, better yet, surrounded by landscaped strips----wouldn't be as bad. Sites like the one above hurt the walkability of the hood as much, if not more, than anything else, inc lack of convenient access to transit or stores along the sidewalk. IOW, not only is the hood not welcoming to ppl who want to walk around it, it discourages ppl from spending any time in it to begin with.
     
     
  #2513  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2007, 8:31 PM
LAofAnaheim LAofAnaheim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 761
"Despite such concerns, planning and construction of developments with liquor licenses has continued. Earlier this month, the city overturned a previous decision by the zoning administration by approving conditional-use permits for the Santa Fe Lofts, a residential complex that included plans for a street-level bar, said Kate Bartolo, who worked for seven years with the Los Angeles-based real estate company backing the project. She said the zoning administration was concerned for the homeless on Skid Row because of the "overwhelming temptation" that might arise from new liquor establishments." - who the heck are these people?

1,400% increase??? Is downtown LA not allowed to have fun? Why is alcohol okay on La Cienega, Fairfax, La Brea, etc...where people DRIVE, whereas in downtown, we can get by with foot & taxis? Jeez, freakin' outdated thinking. Why do we have to bend over backwards for the homeless?

BTW, downtown will be the true "it" spot for USC once the Expo Line connects. Imagine, a night into downtown on the train and a taxi ride back after a night of drinking. Now, that's college life in the City!
     
     
  #2514  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2007, 11:28 PM
jlrobe jlrobe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAofAnaheim View Post

1,400% increase??? Is downtown LA not allowed to have fun? Why is alcohol okay on La Cienega, Fairfax, La Brea, etc...where people DRIVE, whereas in downtown, we can get by with foot & taxis? Jeez, freakin' outdated thinking. Why do we have to bend over backwards for the homeless?
The homeless advocates are fighting tooth and nail, but they are fighting a losing battle.
     
     
  #2515  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2007, 11:30 PM
LAofAnaheim LAofAnaheim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 761
I hope so...homeless advocates make me hate homeless people. Ironic, eh?
     
     
  #2516  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2007, 11:47 PM
LA/OCman's Avatar
LA/OCman LA/OCman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 374
Regarding the increases in alcohol licenses being a problem...The whole notion is really quite absurd. The opposite should happen. More tax dollars to the city allows more funds for rehabilitation and counseling as well as more policing. Plus, I don't see the homeless in the Edison or the Broadway Bar...more like in the alley and in the street with a brown paper bag. I say let's make downtown a hub for entertainment....theatres, bars, restaurants and nightclubs.
     
     
  #2517  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2007, 3:33 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,099
LOL, I went to downtown with my dad in a D.W.P. sidewalk sweeper at 2:30 early in the dark foggy morning on Sunday!
Boy has it changed! The last time I went to Downtown to TRULY explore the city, L.A. Live was just a parking lot!

Anyways, I saw the Digital Billboards on the six towers of Nokia Plaza and the curved Billboard on the Nokia Theater.
Unfortunately, the Billboards on the South side Theater along Chick Hearn Ct aren't Digital.
Also the Theater's sky spotlights weren't on.(I wonder if they're only turned on during event days?)
Heh, nobody was there except for a few workers sweeping and spray-washing the plaza.

Meanwhile, I also saw the Theaters of Broadway and Spring, Hanover, Concerto, Medallion, the new LAPD HQ, 717 Ninth St.,the empty sites of L.A. Central, South Figueroa and the new Federal Courthouse, and I was fairly able to make out Evo. It looks close to being topped out.


But.........the place I saw that really touched me at the heart was on Winston St.
I mean, dude, there had to have been about at least 30 odd people standing on both sidewalks, with a few tents, boxes, sleeping bags and blankets here and there. And they were pretty much all homeless.
Heh, obviously we had to have the doors and windows locked in the sweeper.

And it got me thinking:
When you see the lifestyle of people like that, you realize that you often take for granted the things you have......every day.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #2518  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2007, 5:40 PM
LongBeachUrbanist's Avatar
LongBeachUrbanist LongBeachUrbanist is offline
Ridin' The Metro
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Metro Blue, Wardlow Stop
Posts: 2,578
^ Yeah seriously. That life's gotta be hard.
__________________
COMPLETE THE CENTRAL SUBWAY BY 2020!!!
     
     
  #2519  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2007, 1:37 AM
DowntownCharlieBrown's Avatar
DowntownCharlieBrown DowntownCharlieBrown is offline
Good Grief
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Downtown, Orange County, L.A.
Posts: 537
Angelenic ( www.angelenic.com ) is reporting the following update to the Herald Examiner redevelopment project:


Today the City Council certified the Herald Examiner redevelopment project’s Environmental Impact Report and denied appeals by Conquest Student Housing, a USC-area residential developer opposing the project. This move is considered an approval of the mixed-use highrise redevelopment project in the works by Hearst Corporation who owns the landmark property.

Conquest’s appeal came as a surprise to many since the Herald Examiner project is outside of the USC area. Furthermore, the company doesn’t hold other interest in the project. It appears that Conquest may have filed the appeal in retaliation to an earlier dispute over the University Gateway project with Urban Partners — the company originally hired by Hearst Corporation to develop the project.

Last year, Hearst dropped Urban Partners and proceeded to redevelop the property on its own. Urban Partners has filed a lawsuit against Conquest seeking damages related to being dropped by Hearst Corp.

An Anchor Development for a Changing Neighborhood
At 11th and Broadway, the dual adaptive reuse/new construction development will be the largest in the area, at the confluence of the Historic Core, South Park, and the Fashion District.
The City Council’s project approval is for two new mixed-use towers with 587 condominium units and associated amenities with improved open space and pedestrian connections to adjacent properties.
The new towers would rise on the site of the former press building immediately west of the historic Herald Examiner structure.

Demolition of the old press building occurred early this year.

Preliminary plans released by the developer called for 40,000 square feet of office space and 20,000 square feet of retail in the historic Herald Examiner building, which will be renovated.

No timeline has been released for the commencement of construction.

Early renderings of the Herald Examiner redevelopment project by Thom Mayne of Morphosis pictured above.


Photo Credit: Thom Mayne of Morphosis


I look forward to seeing more detailed renderings of this project. Those available are really hard to grasp what the final product will look like.
     
     
  #2520  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2007, 2:31 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,710
A recent change to the site of the LA Central proj now is evident!

Unfortunately, it involves the filling in of some of the landscaped strips that used to line the periphery of the former parking lot.


Westsidelife via fridayinla


I wanna see asphalt REMOVED, not added!

And so the wait continues.

BTW, if there have to be parking lots in DT, the ones owned by AEG/staples are or were the way to go. They at least have/had decent light fixtures, unlike the makeshift lighting used for many other lots, similar to the ones near Disney Hall, which are nothing but cheap wood poles with a flourescent light strung up at the top. And the Staples lot also at least had landscaping around its perimeter.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:23 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.