HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #901  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 6:34 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by towerguy3 View Post
when does construction start?
The target year is 2010. Hopefully, barring any negative events, it will be so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #902  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 7:46 AM
munkyman munkyman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 136
This is awesome. The founder of The Gap, Donald Fisher, has a very large private collection of 20th and 21st century art, apparently one of the largest. He wants to build a 100,000 square foot museum in the Presidio, called the Contemporary Art Museum. Sounds exciting!

Link: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/08/MUSEUM.TMP&tsp=1

Article:

Donald Fisher, founder of Gap, offers to build a museum in the Presidio to house his art collection
Cecilia M. Vega, Chronicle Staff Writer

Tuesday, August 7, 2007


(08-07) 20:50 PDT -- Gap founder Donald Fisher, one of the world's leading contemporary art collectors and a powerful force in local politics, has offered to build a sprawling museum in the Presidio to showcase his vast collection, which until now has largely been hidden away in his company's San Francisco headquarters.

Since Fisher and his wife, Doris, founded Gap Inc. in 1969, they have amassed what is widely considered to be among the most extensive private collections of 20th and 21st century art. Yet with the exception of pieces that are occasionally loaned to museums, much of what they own has never been seen by people outside the art world.

The Fishers, whose retail empire brings in about $16 billion a year, hope to build a 100,000-square-foot museum with 55,000 square feet of gallery space -- 5,000 more square feet than at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art -- to house their collection of more than 1,000 works.

Donald Fisher, 78, will announce his plan to build the Contemporary Art Museum of the Presidio today at a news conference in the national park. The governing board that oversees park development would have to approve the plan, but it seems to have widespread support.

"I'm concerned about what happens to the collection," Fisher said in an interview this week in his Gap office, which is filled with works by such modern art icons as Andy Warhol, Alexander Calder and Roy Lichtenstein. "I don't want to turn around and sell it, and I don't want it to be sold when I pass away. I'd like it to be seen."

The Fishers have purchased works from some of the world's most famous modern artists, storing it away in their homes and in two galleries at the Gap's waterfront headquarters.

The hallways leading to Fisher's office look like museums in their own right. One hallway features a series of colorful Mick Jagger portraits by Warhol, a Picasso lithograph and a wall covered in Lichtenstein pop art. Whimsical Calder mobiles float from ceilings, walls and hangers.

Art experts say it is not the size of the Fishers' collection that is most impressive, but rather the depth of what they have accumulated. The Fishers have been careful to buy works representing all phases of the careers of such artists as Ellsworth Kelly, Gerhard Richter, Anselm Kiefer, Chuck Close and Claes Oldenburg. In other cases, they purchased a single outstanding piece or several small pieces by artists of distinction such as Cy Twombly, John Chamberlain, Richard Serra, William Kentridge and Sam Taylor-Wood.

"There's no question that the collection that Don and Doris have formed is one of the best in the world," SFMOMA Director Neal Benezra said. "There's no question that it would be nearly impossible, if not impossible, to form a collection of the same artists today. The works simply aren't available."

In 1993, ARTnews magazine listed Donald Fisher as one of the world's top 10 art collectors alongside the sultan of Brunei, British composer Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber and New York cosmetics heir Ronald Lauder.

"It certainly is one of the most ambitious and qualitatively successful collections that I know of, internationally speaking," said Roland Augustine, president of the Art Dealers Association of America. "The Gerhard Richter collection alone is unparalleled in our country by a single owner."

Yet Fisher and his wife have kept a low profile when it comes to their collection, allowing mainly museum groups or art insiders in to tour the headquarters' galleries. The couple pays the Gap nearly $900,000 a year for the space.

"We've kept it quite private," Donald Fisher said. "We basically are not looking for publicity. That's not our mantra, and so we've been out of sight. But in this circumstance, you can't stay out of sight forever."

Fisher hasn't maintained the same low profile in political circles, however. The Republican, who has powerful ties inside San Francisco City Hall and in the city's business community, is a regular contributor to local and national campaigns. He is involved in a high-stakes fight over parking spaces in the city that will play out on November's ballot.

The Fishers are active philanthropic donors, funding everything from charter schools to museums, with SFMOMA being a regular recipient. Donald Fisher serves as an officer on the museum's board of trustees. He donated to the city a 60-foot-tall bow-and-arrow sculpture that sits across the street from his Gap offices at the foot of the Bay Bridge.

He was also one of the original members of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors -- an appointment that required White House approval. So to him, building a museum on the sprawling 1,500-acre national park seemed like a natural fit.

The historic Main Post, the area in the park the Fishers are eyeing for their museum, must be inhabited by a major cultural institution under the Presidio Trust's plan for the former military site. A bowling alley and tennis courts located there would be torn down to make room for the museum, but Presidio officials said they will try to relocate the bowling alley.

The seven-member Presidio Trust board must approve any new development. The plan would also undergo an environmental review and public hearings. Others interested in building a cultural institution in the Main Post have until Nov. 9 to submit proposals, but early indications are that the Fishers' plan has the backing it needs.

Mayor Gavin Newsom is expected to attend Donald Fisher's news conference in the Presidio today. On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signaled her support in a statement that praised the couple's commitment to the city and the Presidio.

A museum celebrating the life of Walt Disney is also planned at the Main Post, as is a three-story hotel. A contemporary art museum would "really bring it to life," said Presidio Trust Executive Director Craig Middleton.

Donald Fisher, who had a hands-on role in designing his stores and the Gap's Embarcadero high-rise, will collaborate on the museum design with the New York-based firm Gluckman Mayner Architects, which designed sites such as the Whitney Museum of Art in New York and the Museo Picasso Malaga in Spain. Exactly how much the building would cost remains unknown, but insiders say the Fishers have no spending limit.

Fisher said he hopes to open the museum in about three years. The plan also includes making space for traveling exhibitions and possibly works from area high school students.

One of the first pieces the Fishers ever purchased was by abstract sculptor Barbara Hepworth. Donald Fisher says he still remembers how much they paid for every piece, but the exact value of the entire collection is unknown.

Buying art became a habit -- even an addiction, he said. The couple purchased most of the paintings without the help of a curator. They have visited museums around the world to review artists' collections to learn more about their favorite periods.

Fisher said he never imagined they would have amassed such a wold-renowned collection.

"It's the same as when I bought my first store," he said. "We never thought we'd have the number of stores we have. ... You can dream about it, but that's all it is -- a dream. You have to execute. When it came to buying art, our stock in our company was worth more money as time went along, and we could buy more art and we continued to buy."

"It's a habit," he said. "But it's an avocation as well."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #903  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 8:26 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
^^^Oops. Sorry. I just started a thread with this article. It seems huge to me and I thought it deserved a thread and never thought of checking here first. Anyway, I'm just thrilled that SF could be getting another world calls art institution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #904  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 8:44 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTinSF View Post
^^^Oops. Sorry. I just started a thread with this article. It seems huge to me and I thought it deserved a thread and never thought of checking here first. Anyway, I'm just thrilled that SF could be getting another world calls art institution.
Again, let's please not be so quick to start threads, especially when something is first mentioned (like this) or not of major significance (which this would be).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #905  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 8:58 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
^^^I totally disagree and reject your criticism. I thought this deserved a thread and I still think so. It's huge and it will result in something--either SF will get a major museum or somebody else will to SF's humiliation and shame. Donald Fisher wants a museum and has the resources to build one somewhere and note the time frame to get it up--3 years (when, under the best of conditions, the TransBay will be just a hole in the ground). I don't regret starting a thread in the least. I just didn't want munkyman to think I was trying to upstage him. My apology is to him.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #906  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 9:00 AM
munkyman munkyman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
Again, let's please not be so quick to start threads, especially when something is first mentioned (like this) or not of major significance (which this would be).
Not of major significance? Well thank you oh mighty thread God for coming down from the heaven's to tell us what is of major significance. Please guide us wayward souls.

You're joking right? One of the preeminent private art collectors of the last 30 or so years decides to unload his one of a kind art collection into a brand new art institution that he is fully funding (with no apparent budget limit), and that will go into a landmark open space in our city? How is that not big to you? Even if it's a proposal?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #907  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 9:07 AM
munkyman munkyman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTinSF View Post
^^^I totally disagree and reject your criticism. I thought this deserved a thread and I still think so. It's huge and it will result in something--either SF will get a major museum or somebody else will to SF's humiliation and shame. Donald Fisher wants a museum and has the resources to build one somewhere and note the time frame to get it up--3 years (when, under the best of conditions, the TransBay will be just a hole in the ground). I don't regret starting a thread in the least. I just didn't want munkyman to think I was trying to upstage him. My apology is to him.
BT, I completely agree with you. I've been to every major art institution in the city multiple times, and I consider it a privilege every time I step into one of them. I also consider it a gift of epic proportion and opportunity for our city when someone with an art collection this well known decides to not only donate the entire collection to our great city, but further, to fund it himself. It's a huge development - let's not forget, the entire Transbay project is all a proposal at this point - should we take down all of those threads as well?

For the record, I started to create a new thread, and decided against it at the last minute. But I completely agree, this deserves its own thread.

Btw, no apology necessary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #908  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2007, 10:38 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by munkyman View Post
Not of major significance? Well thank you oh mighty thread God for coming down from the heaven's to tell us what is of major significance. Please guide us wayward souls.

You're joking right? One of the preeminent private art collectors of the last 30 or so years decides to unload his one of a kind art collection into a brand new art institution that he is fully funding (with no apparent budget limit), and that will go into a landmark open space in our city? How is that not big to you? Even if it's a proposal?
No, I wasn't joking, but I certainly didn't write it very well in order to be understood. What I meant by "which this would be" is that it would be of major significance, but in hindsight it looks like just the opposite. Sorry!

It somewhat surprised me that the Fishers aren't donating their collection to SFMOMA in order to give it preeminence, especially considering their involvement there. When the museum opened, I remember reading that it was designed with the possibility of future expansion. I know that individuals and couples certainly enjoy creating their own landmarks, but also feel that they would have been globally recognized for taking the other route. It seems that SFMOMA could end up being quite diminished in stature.

Does anyone have any insight regarding this? [Edit: Just saw Kenneth Baker's article in the other thread, so that answered my question.]

Last edited by viewguysf; Aug 8, 2007 at 10:57 PM. Reason: Added aditional information
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #909  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2007, 10:13 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
Westbay Builders picks up warehouse site for condos

Quote:
Westbay Builders picks up warehouse site for condos
Westbay Builders has purchased a 25,380-square-foot industrial property at 72 Townsend St. for $9.2 million and plans on developing a nine-story, 74-unit condo building on the site. Edward Suharski of Grubb & Ellis office represented the seller, Lambert Development. The buyer represented itself. The project is fully approved and will incorporate a historic one-story warehouse built in 1874 for grain storage.
Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2007/08/13/newscolumn1.html?t=printable
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #910  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2007, 9:44 PM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 656
Upper Lake Merrit Condominiums and Ellington :Oakland (previously mentioned)

From:http://www.molaskypacific.com/highres/recentprojects/ul-merritt.html



Upper Lake Merritt Condominiums is a to-be-built $88 million, twenty story, 237-unit, multi-family community. The community is to be developed on a 1.4 acre parcel located on the northwest corner of Twenty-third and Valdez in the Lake Merritt district of Oakland, California.

From:http://www.molaskypacific.com/highres/recentprojects/ellington.html



Ellington Condominiums is in its construction phase, $100 million, fifteen story, 134-unit multi-family community.The community is to be developed on a .8 acre parcel located on the southeast corner of Broadway and Third Street in the historic Jack London district of Oakland, California. Unit amenities will include nine feet 4 inch ceilings, oval tubs, separate shower enclosures, granite counters, hard wood cabinets, upgraded sink and plumbing fixtures, wood flooring and an upgraded stainless steel appliance package. Community amenities will include a swimming pool, fully-equipped fitness center and resident's clubhouse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #911  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2007, 10:55 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
Chinese Garden for GG Park

Quote:
A slice of China for Golden Gate Park


A Chinese garden is presently in the planning stages for the area bordering Spreckels Lake near Fulton Street in Golden Gate Park.

Alexandria Rocha, The Examiner
2007-08-13 11:48:00.0
Current rank: # 47 of 4,920

SAN FRANCISCO -
A traditional Chinese garden — complete with pavilions, waterfalls and rock sculptures — may soon border Spreckels Lake near Fulton Street in Golden Gate Park.

The San Francisco-Shanghai Sister City Committee is hoping to break ground on the garden by next year, opening it to the public in 2009 or 2010. A Chinese garden has been in the works since San Francisco and Shanghai became sister cities more than 25 years ago, but it has been put on hold year after year because of a lack of space and funding.

However, the City’s Recreation and Park Department has now approved a 1½-acre site to the northeast of Spreckels Lake on Fulton Street between 31st and 32nd avenues, department spokeswoman Rose Marie Dennis said. Committee members were interested in the nonlandscaped space because local residents already heavily utilize the area.

“This will be a place that local residents in the immediate community, not just tourists, can come and stroll around the garden, maybe have a cup of tea in the pavilion,” said Carolina Woo, chairwoman of the garden subcommittee.

Final designs and size of the garden are still up in the air, but the committee and the Recreation and Park Department plan to hold a meeting Tuesday to work out the details. Members of the committee will also head to China in September to outline the funding plan with Shanghai’s government leaders.

“The actual scope of work, what will be planted there, how things will be designed and the final concept for what this place will ultimately look like is far from determined or decided on,” Dennis said.

A few years ago, committee members were ready to build a Chinese healing garden on the UC San Francisco campus. The plan fell through, however, after members decided the area was too small.

Renderings of the proposed Golden Gate Park garden, which will be modeled after Shanghai’s famous Yu Yuan Garden, feature a placid blue-green pond surrounded by walkways and bridges. Waterfalls, pavilions, rock sculptures and trees will fill the area enclosed by a classic Chinese wall.

“In most gardens in China, there are places where people can sit, but they’re also for people to observe the beauty from different angles, so there will be a good option for walking,” said James Fang, chairman of the San Francisco-Shanghai Sister City Committee.

While the total estimated cost of the garden has not been determined, Fang said it would likely be in the millions. He said the committee plans to raise funds for the initial costs, as well as the ongoing maintenance expenses. “This will not cost The City a nickel,” he said.

[email protected]
Source: http://www.examiner.com/a-878158~A_slice_of_China_for_Golden_Gate_Park.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #912  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2007, 5:16 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
S.F. General moves on eight-story, 284-bed rebuild

Quote:
S.F. General moves on eight-story, 284-bed rebuild
San Francisco Business Times - August 17, 2007
by Chris Rauber
San Francisco General Hospital is finally moving forward with plans for a seismic rebuild.

The safety net hospital, run by San Francisco's Public Health Department, wants to build a 419,000-square-foot, "up to 284-bed" acute-care facility on its existing campus, according to an Aug. 2 report by the city planning department, which is preparing an environmental impact report on the project.

Preliminary plans now call for an eight-story building, including two basement levels, to be built on the little grassy space between S.F. General's infamous "red brick" buildings, former hospital wards now used for medical research, support and various administrative purposes.

Its maximum height will be 105 feet, the planning department report said, noting that "no existing housing or businesses would be displaced" by the structure.

A meeting is planned for Aug. 28 at the hospital for public comments on the EIR's scope and content. A controversial rooftop helipad proposal is being considered separately, with its own impact report.

Given the hostility of some residents in the Potrero Hill vicinity to the proposed helipad, gripes about the new structure seem likely.

But alternatives are few, city officials said, and include a retrofit (a nightmare alternative, according to outside observers); the use of other, discarded sites on S.F. General's jam-packed 24-acre campus; an alternative design for a less massive, taller and more slender structure, or -- least likely of all -- no alternative, in which case "The General" would have to shut its doors by Jan. 1, 2013, to meet California's seismic safety regulations for acute-care facilities.

There's no way Mayor Gavin Newsom, Public Health czar Dr. Mitch Katz, or S.F. General CEO Gene O'Connell would ever let that happen, so it's likely the current plan -- or something very much like it -- will be pushed through the governmental sausage-making process.

[email protected] / (415) 288-4946
Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2007/08/20/newscolumn3.html?t=printable
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #913  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2007, 9:01 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
Does anybody know anything about the narrow building in the 700 block of Market St (the next block west of the Ritz Residences) that appears to be under demolition. I'm not sure of the address but it should be something like 710 because it's the second building from the corner (Kearny & Market I think). A long time ago I remember posting something about a project to either replace or increase the height of this building so as to eliminate the "gap-tooth" appearance looking north on 3rd St. but I can't find it now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #914  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2007, 3:13 AM
mthd mthd is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTinSF View Post
Does anybody know anything about the narrow building in the 700 block of Market St (the next block west of the Ritz Residences) that appears to be under demolition. I'm not sure of the address but it should be something like 710 because it's the second building from the corner (Kearny & Market I think). A long time ago I remember posting something about a project to either replace or increase the height of this building so as to eliminate the "gap-tooth" appearance looking north on 3rd St. but I can't find it now.
it was approved by the planning comission on july 13, 2006 - a '10 story horizontal addition' to the existing building at 1 kearny.

Quote:
SPEAKERS:

Council Representative of the Project Sponsor
We work on a lot of historic buildings and this is one of the most interesting historic structures I have dealt with.
When we entered into this with this building it was obvious that 1 Kearny was the historic building and the annex has less historic merit.
When we discovered there was a debate on whether or not it was historic, the owners of the building decide to preserve the building.
The design went through two extensive hearings at the Landmark’s Board where there was a divergence of opinion.
Some say the annex should be torn down.
We changed the design in response to the comments made by the Landmark’s Board.
You see a design that received unanimous support by the board.
It’s an improved design based on a long dialogue with the Planning staff and the Landmark’s Board on how to treat a building that is the average landmark restoration project.
Charles, Architect for the project
This is a very important building at an important location in San Francisco.
It is in the Kearney/Market Conservation District, at a very important corner in the city. Where one of San Francisco’s grids intersects on Market Street.
It’s a dramatic building especially seen from Third Street as you approach the city.
There are three parts: The original 1902 Savings Bank in the building, which is an early quake survivor, and the annex added in ’64.
We planned to tear down the three-story build seen on left in the picture and replace it with a 10-story building.
Our design is an attempt to fill in the missing tooth to Market Street.
We are sensitive to the urban design and context as well as to the specific design itself.
One Kearny and bank annex function as one building.
There are a number of functional problems.
The annex has elevators, stairs and bathrooms.
It is difficult to divide the building into floors.
There is no air conditioning or heat in the annex.
One of our objectives is to correct the functional problems.
The building has a seismic prospect. Even though it was an earthquake survivor, it has a stiff element that makes it twist during an earthquake.
Our project will correct all of the functional problems by creating a new core in the new building. We’ll take the elevators out of the annex. We’ll make their front door their back door.
We want to put the building in architectural balance.
We are changing brick to glass.
We are using traditional materials like terra cotta in contemporary ways.
We don’t have open space on the ground floor; we are proposing to put it on the roof at the top.
The architect is the same as the ritz carlton addition (Charles Blozsies) and DPR is signed on to build it. I don't know anything beyond that.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #915  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2007, 7:48 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
^^^Thanks. I went to his site at http://www.archengine.com/ and, sure enough, there is a render of the addition there but it isn't a format I can paste here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #916  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2007, 5:27 PM
citizensf's Avatar
citizensf citizensf is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 82
BT, here's the render I think you are referring to from http://www.archengine.com/

(the images are all in a flash file, so the only way I could grab it was by using a screen capture utility)


(credit: www.archengine.com)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #917  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2007, 6:46 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24,071
^^^Yup. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #918  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2007, 9:25 PM
Arriviste's Avatar
Arriviste Arriviste is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by munkyman View Post
This is awesome. The founder of The Gap, Donald Fisher, has a very large private collection of 20th and 21st century art, apparently one of the largest. He wants to build a 100,000 square foot museum in the Presidio, called the Contemporary Art Museum. Sounds exciting!

You lucky devils. Actually I might be lucky too, for perhaps it will be complete in time for my possible move to the Bay area in Dec 2008.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #919  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2007, 5:23 AM
LBDman449's Avatar
LBDman449 LBDman449 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5
New to San Jose area.... anyone have details on the numerous projects going on here, on this side of the bay?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #920  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2007, 6:18 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,234
San Frangelino has gathered some really cool info on SJ here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.