Changing the luck of the draw
After Sept. 11, 2001, the city had to alter its strategy at Cascade Station, but Portland still came out ahead
Monday, July 23, 2007
T he Red light-rail line to Portland International Airport opened Sept. 10, 2001. And that's really the best explanation of what has happened since at Cascade Station.
Fun as it may be to speculate about what went wrong with the huge transit-oriented development the airport line was supposed to trigger, there's no mystery involved.
Six years ago, the development failed to take off because of circumstances beyond Portland's control -- and beyond America's wildest imagining.
In retrospect, it's lucky for Portland that the Red line was up and running that Sept. 10. Just 24 hours later, the world was a much darker place, and everything connected to air travel had gone into an economic tailspin. Had the airport line still been languishing on TriMet's wish list at that point, we'd all likely still be waiting for the train to arrive.
Almost certainly, it wouldn't have attracted the private partnership of Bechtel Corp. Although connecting to the airport had always been a TriMet dream, it took a huge private investment to accelerate the plan and thereby realize it. In 1997, the city and the Port of Portland struck an unprecedented deal. In return for development rights to 120 acres near the airport, Bechtel agreed to provide $28 million to get the Red line built.
In retrospect, it's clear that citizens got the best of this bargain and it's fair to wonder whether Bechtel's hopes were realistic in the first place. But that's a question that remains on the table. Portland got its airport connection, even if the private development faltered. To Portland's credit, it eventually regrouped and came up with Plan B -- as in Big Box. In case you're one of the few mortals on the planet who hasn't heard, Swedish furniture pop-star Ikea is opening at Cascade Station.
Ikea is so off-the-charts popular it's actually expected to create traffic gridlock when it opens. That's what it has done elsewhere, and who knows? Maybe we can top that. Maybe it will spark retail road rage here.
Just kidding. Although it will be fascinating to see how many people use light-rail to get to the store, clearly this is not the "transit-oriented" development anyone had in mind. And yet it's a good fallback position, just the kind of stellar anchor that magnetizes shoppers and changes the luck of the draw.
Ultimately, the number of people who take light rail to Cascade Station doesn't matter as much as the number who come, any way they can, to shop there -- or the number who ride past that station.
Last year, residents of our region made more than a million trips on the Red Line to and from the airport. That single train is so valuable, Metro Councilor Brian Newman recently suggested, that it has helped transform popular opinion about light rail. Some in his once-hostile Clackamas County district, for instance, are now eagerly awaiting two light-rail connections of their own.
Plan A was inspired, but a terrible reality intruded and necessitated a shift to Plan B. How that evolves, helped along by Ikea, is very important. But whatever happens, Cascade Station has already taken the region where it wanted to go:
The airport.
http://www.oregonlive.com/editorials/ore...se/editorial/1184972161285940.xml&coll=7