HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #901  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 7:37 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
I think that the Titan Towers are too tall for it's location.
OK, everyone, pls don't single me out as someone who always finds something to complain about.

And all the forumers who regularly post about LA, DT in particular, could hold a party in a phone booth, with room to spare. The number of ppl who post about the IE could hold a party in a shoe box, with room to spare. And it doesn't help that SSP's software or server is getting glitchy again.

As for the Medallion site, I guess it figures that their time schedule has been stretched out til the last minute. The fact they didn't even bother to close down more than a small portion of their parking lot a few days ago made me suspect their contractors must be following a "check is in the mail", "hasta manana" format.
     
     
  #902  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 11:00 PM
Tanster's Avatar
Tanster Tanster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: L.A
Posts: 466
I Posted this On SSC thought I might post it here too
So Today I went to Downtown L.A and took some picsWent by Ralphs



You can see the ABC News Vans... Probably be more to tom.

unloading... haha that guy on the back was looking at the cam




So I crossed the street to get a closer view









Trying to get a shot of inside
     
     
  #903  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 11:53 PM
LongBeachUrbanist's Avatar
LongBeachUrbanist LongBeachUrbanist is offline
Ridin' The Metro
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Metro Blue, Wardlow Stop
Posts: 2,578
Tomorrow night I'm heading down to Metropolis Books on Main Street: it's Harry Potter Eve!!!

(I try to make all my book purchases from Metropolis. This time, I just might make a stop at Ralphs for groceries as well! )



Then Saturday, we're going to the circus at Staples Center.

(All this would be so much easier if we just lived Downtown!!!)
__________________
COMPLETE THE CENTRAL SUBWAY BY 2020!!!
     
     
  #904  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 12:11 AM
Affrojuice Affrojuice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 47
thanks for the welcoming colemonkee
     
     
  #905  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 2:09 AM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,594
Thanks for the picture update Tanster.
     
     
  #906  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 3:00 AM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
If you look at camera 2, you can see that at least the hole is taking shape:

http://clarkconstruction.oxblue.com/lalive/

Friday: I'm all for density all over downtown. But I'm also a fan of design. The Titan Towers don't excite me as much as, say, Park Tower or One Santa Fe.

Obviously preference towards any design is highly subjective - everyone has their own likes and dislikes. Personally, I like the Titan tower's height and design (though, I think I liked it more when each was unique). They're of a classical design from a bygone era, and of a height that construction in LA was not yet allowed to rise to during that particular era. So I kind of see them as a bridge in a couple aspects. Firstly, they'd bridge the current height gap in the skyline from the Financial District to the Transamerica Tower. Secondly, they'd bridge a historical architectural gap on our building stock, that of pre-'50's style high-rise design.

There's absolutely nothing else even remotely like them existing or proposed anywhere in L.A. Even with towers of similar height eventually built nearby, they would always stand out (at least to me). They look very iconic and of a decidedly Southern Californian, even Angeleno style, exude class (IMHO) and are a welcome bit of diversity and departure from the sleek glass towers - of which many I also admire. They just belong here! Anybody getting the impression I like 'em yet?

All that said, sadly I have to say they likely won't be built any time soon (if ever), per early postings related to a club leased out on their proposed site for at least the next few years. Booooo!!

Last edited by ladowntowner; Jul 20, 2007 at 3:05 AM.
     
     
  #907  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 3:29 AM
fridayinla's Avatar
fridayinla fridayinla is offline
World Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladowntowner View Post
Obviously preference towards any design is highly subjective - everyone has their own likes and dislikes. Personally, I like the Titan tower's height and design (though, I think I liked it more when each was unique). They're of a classical design from a bygone era, and of a height that construction in LA was not yet allowed to rise to during that particular era. So I kind of see them as a bridge in a couple aspects. Firstly, they'd bridge the current height gap in the skyline from the Financial District to the Transamerica Tower. Secondly, they'd bridge a historical architectural gap on our building stock, that of pre-'50's style high-rise design.

There's absolutely nothing else even remotely like them existing or proposed anywhere in L.A. Even with towers of similar height eventually built nearby, they would always stand out (at least to me). They look very iconic and of a decidedly Southern Californian, even Angeleno style, exude class (IMHO) and are a welcome bit of diversity and departure from the sleek glass towers - of which many I also admire. They just belong here! Anybody getting the impression I like 'em yet?

All that said, sadly I have to say they likely won't be built any time soon (if ever), per early postings related to a club leased out on their proposed site for at least the next few years. Booooo!!
I completely agree about the titan towers' uniqueness to our skyline.

The club leased out on the proposed site doesn't mean anything is set it stone. Leases are bought out by landlords commonly for various reasons. If the market became more appealing and the Titan Organization decided to move forward with the towers, buying out a 5-yr lease for a couple hundred grand wouldn't stop them. Although, you're right, don't hold your breathe on this project.
     
     
  #908  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 4:55 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,099
When the L.A. River is greened up, I want the high-rises there to be enviro-friendly, like the new WTC, Chicago Spire, Bryant Park Tower, Bloomberg Tower, and other clean looking towers.
What do you guys think about that?


And the "Grand Tetons"(Titan Project) fits just perfectly, because isn't Meruelo planning a 60 story tower, too?
__________________
Revelation 21:4

Last edited by JDRCRASH; Jul 20, 2007 at 5:03 AM.
     
     
  #909  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 9:04 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Patrick Patrick is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,606
I've been busy and havent been able to make very sexy renderings.

I did come up with these two

Park 5th goes perfeclty in the skyline. Especially from this angle, looks great next to the US Bank Tower. 755 Tower fills in nicely and compliments the 777 Tower. You can see the Zen Tower, but since we dont know the height, this view is likely to change.


The "famous" view, all thats missing is Mt. Baldy. Its this view that makes me want the US Bank Tower to be LA's tallest for well, ever . LA Live, I was worried, but I think its a nice addition to the skyline. Here is where Park 5th is separated from the skyline, not to crazy about that. 755 looks great, from basicly every angle, and I really hope it gets built! Too bad its blocking Figuroa & Wilshire, one of my favorites!


Grand Avenue? Its there, but I was rather dissapointed, I expected it to be taller, but oh well. Due to the elevation of Bunker Hill, the taller Grand Avenue Tower looks to be the same height as the KPMG Tower of the Wells Fargo Center.

More renders soon!
GO LA!
     
     
  #910  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 10:42 AM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
^ NICE! My favorite view of the current Downtown LA skyline is looking from the northwest towards downtown (usually from Echo Park). It looks the most impressive in my opinion.

__________________
DTLA Rising
     
     
  #911  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 2:33 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
Great renders, Patrick. Looks like you have Concerto, 717 Flower and Hanover in that second one. Nice.

Zen won't be that tall. At 50 stories - the first 8 or so being parking - it shouldn't be more than 550-600 ft. tall. Plus it sits on an elevation 50-60 ft. lower than California Plaza.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #912  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 4:31 PM
fridayinla's Avatar
fridayinla fridayinla is offline
World Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 467
Seeing those rendering of the new skyline re-energize me about living in LA . The best part is these aren't fantasy buildings, they'll probably get built. There will only be a few cities in the world who can rival LA's skyline - Houston, which I think currently has the most similar skyline, will be left back in the 80s.

I'm going to walk over the Ralph's opening ceremony at 11am. I don't have my camera, but I'm sure the blogs will have a plethora of them today.

I love this city!

BTW, thank you for the work, Patrick.
     
     
  #913  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 5:04 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by fridayinla View Post
The best part is these aren't fantasy buildings, they'll probably get built.
I hope they do, & my impatience at seeing such projs, esp parkfifth, under actual construction still drives me crazy. However, and although the amt of new devlpt here is way below what's going on in Fla, the good thing about projs being delayed (like the Glass tower) is we're not going to get as snagged as what's happening to the ppl in Miami:






Miami Condo Glut Pushes Florida's Economy to Brink of Recession

(Bloomberg) -- In the middle of the biggest glut of condominiums in more than 30 years, Miami developers keep on building. The oversupply will force prices down as much as 30 percent, the worst decline since the 1970s, and help push Florida's economy into recession as early as October, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at West Chester, Pennsylvania-based Moody's Economy.com, who owns a home in Vero Beach, Florida.

"Florida is the epicenter for all the problems that exist in the housing industry,'' said Lewis Goodkin, president of Goodkin Consulting Corp. and a property adviser in Miami for the past 30 years, who also foresees a recession. "The problems we have now are unprecedented and a lot of people will get burnt.''

Thirty-seven new high-rise condos and 20,000 new units are being built in Miami's 1,040-acre downtown, where sales fell almost 50 percent in May, according to the Florida Association of Realtors. The new units will join the 22,924 existing condos in Miami-Dade County that were for sale in April, according to Jack McCabe, chief executive officer of McCabe Research & Consulting LLC in Deerfield Beach, Florida. That's the most unsold units since McCabe began tracking sales in 2002.

Downtown Miami developers already are offering incentives for brokers who connect them to buyers. John Rosser, president of the Key Biscayne, Florida-based John Paul Rosser & Associates Inc. estate brokerage, said he is usually paid a commission of as much as 5 percent when a sale is completed. For the Capital at Brickell, a block off Miami's Brickell Avenue, he was offered what he called "an unheard of'' deal to steer buyers to one of the 832 units proposed. A salesman said Rosser would be paid 5 percent -- payable when buyers put down a deposit. The project has just broken ground and won't open until 2011.

Florida banks have already quit making loans to Miami condo developers, said Kenneth H. Thomas, a Miami bank consultant and a lecturer at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. "South Florida lenders were the first to put money into the condo market, they were the first to see the oversupply and they were the first to get out,'' Thomas said.

With prices falling, international investors, hedge funds, private equity firms and Wall Street banks are beginning to shop for deals, said Peter Zalewski of Condo Vultures Realty LLC, a consulting firm in Bal Harbour, Florida. Miami lags only New York in the number of foreign visitors to U.S. cities, attracting 5.3 million in 2006 from Europe, Canada and Latin America, according to the Greater Miami Convention & Visitors Bureau. "Bigger and bigger funds are coming to me wanting to buy,'' Zalewski said. "Prices have yet to hit bottom because the bulk of Miami properties won't come on the market for another six months.''

Cement dust swirls at 10 high-rise condo construction sites on Biscayne Boulevard, with its prime locations overlooking the waterfront; at six sites on Brickell Avenue, home to the glass and steel offices of Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Banco Industrial De Venezuela and Banco Santander Brazil International; and at eight locations on the Miami River, which splits the city into north and south. That's according to data collected by the Miami Downtown Development Authority.

Since it can take up to four years for a condo project to travel from conception to completion, many of the towers rising from the coral rock of Miami were planned and financed during the Florida housing boom, which lasted from 2001 to 2005. Lenders typically require enough advance sales to cover the cost of a construction loan. Customers' deposits, however, don't always mean the sales will close, said Ian Bruce Eichner, a developer whose latest Miami Beach condo tower is scheduled to open in November.

"The market is as close to a depression as Miami has seen in 30 years,'' Eichner said. "There's a gargantuan supply of homes and the overwhelming preponderance were built for speculators, not for people who are living there.''

As much as half of those putting down deposits for Miami condos are speculators looking to flip units, or sell them quickly for a profit without living in them, said McCabe of McCabe Research. With sale prices falling, McCabe said he expects up to 50 percent of them to walk away from their deposits in the next 18 months rather than complete the sales.

"What's going to happen to all those units?'' Eichner asked. "God only knows. You couldn't give me a piece of property in Miami for nothing. I like sleeping at night.''

Many "flippers'' closed on their units and now can't sell them, said Michael Cannon of Integra Realty Resources-Miami Inc., leaving completed condo towers with floors of dark windows and empty balconies. The Jade Residences at Brickell is an example, Cannon said. The 338-unit, 48-story waterfront tower, a block from the Brickell Avenue financial district, opened in August 2004 with buyers willing to pay as much as $5 million snapping up all the units. Now, the new owners have listed 112 condos for sale and 17 units totaling $15 million are in foreclosure.

In the 1970s, when condos were a new product, Florida developers built 500,000 units and prices fell 50 percent, said Brad Hunter of MetroStudy, a research firm in West Palm Beach.

"The difference is, back then they were two-story condo buildings that had $50,000 units,'' Hunter said. "Nowadays they are $700,000 units in 20-story buildings. Instead of building too much stuff that people could afford like we did then, this time we built too much stuff that people can't afford.''

A lot of the inventory 30 years ago was sold off and converted to rental apartments, Goodkin said. That solution won't work now because prices have soared and properties coming on the market will compete with existing condos whose prices have plummeted, he said.
     
     
  #914  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 5:54 PM
Sodha Sodha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 155
Can somebody do a protest at the Ralphs opening regarding the $1.3 billion cut in mass transit funding??? This is seriously going to hamper development in Los Angeles! Possibly no expo line for a while.
     
     
  #915  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 6:14 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sodha View Post
Can somebody do a protest at the Ralphs opening regarding the $1.3 billion cut in mass transit funding??? This is seriously going to hamper development in Los Angeles! Possibly no expo line for a while.
This doesn't seem to be effecting them yet. Construction crews were out in force today at Expo and Figueroa. I'm pretty sure the Expo line has already been funded. They usually don't start construction without some cash money.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #916  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 6:17 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,706
This is a photo I came across at centralcitye.blogspot.com, taken yesterday, which just happened to catch a glimpse of the Medallion's site. It's odd that the northern half of the parking lot, along 3rd St, has no cars on it, while the southern half, where the 1st phase is supposed to be located, still is full of vehicles. Only a small patch of land cleared out by bulldozers a few days ago shows any sign of change. And none of the fugly billboards have been taken down.





     
     
  #917  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 6:28 PM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemonkee View Post
This doesn't seem to be effecting them yet. Construction crews were out in force today at Expo and Figueroa. I'm pretty sure the Expo line has already been funded. They usually don't start construction without some cash money.

It'll delay Phase II to Santa Monica, not Phase I. The MTA timeline would have worked out to possibly have Phase II starting about the same time that Phase I was wrapping up.
     
     
  #918  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 6:37 PM
Sodha Sodha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 155
^ Well, I hope y'all know more than the MTA who say this will delay funding for Exposition Line from downtown to Culver City ($314 million) and Eastside extension ($43 million). Refer here: http://www.mta.net/news_info/press/metro_133.htm
     
     
  #919  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 6:53 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
^ They still have much more than $314 million in Federal and City/County funds that will theoretically get them through the fiscal year, but the State will need to restore these funds in the following year's budget, or the project will come to a halt. Remember, the Expo Line will cost over $680 million, and will take 2-3 years to build, so they should be able to continue working for at least a little while. Hopefully they don't stop it.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #920  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 7:32 PM
fridayinla's Avatar
fridayinla fridayinla is offline
World Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 467
South Park Ralph's Cell Phone Snapshots

There were 2 huge lines to get in before the ribbon cutting this morning. Decent size crowd, and once we were all in, you could barely more around all the people. Overall, the Ralph's is VERY nice, everything they promised. Prices seemed really cheap, especially on the produce, but they may be introductory. I was struck by the diverse group of people who were shopping there. You can see the pent-up demand for a grocery store in DT.

Several cell phone snapshots from inside after the ribbon cutting:














     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.