Quote:
Originally Posted by alex1
this isn't a first of its kind building. In form, there is at least one building I've seen photos of in the Netherlands that is like this one (only about 8 stories tall however). Undulating white balconies and everything.
it's also similar to Harry Seidler's work. I would not be surprised that in the research (or "mood" studies) that Seidler's work became a focal point. http://www.archidose.org/Blog/seidler1.jpg
|
Alex, I see your point, there ARE some buildings around the world with undulating balconies. BUT and this is a BIG ONE, those designs are highly uniform in their undulations. The AQUA is completely unique in the appearance of chaotic, unpredictable undulations. It looks much more organic and complex than any of those designs. I've taken a closer look at every building people compare to AQUA and they all have UNIFORM, predictable undulations. AQUA is not so predictable. I think it truly is a first of its kind. We can really claim something with this building I think. If i'm wrong about this, I want to see the pictures.
Another example people throw out is the the Australian building called WAVE, which is a smaller skyscraper and also has undulating balconies, even more similar to AQUA than the building pic you linked. But it still is highly uniform and repetitious every couple of floors. So I have to disagree with you. I think this is one of a kind, and a new direction for architecture in terms of complexity. (Im a scientist/engineer so I mean complexity in the sense of much information required to reproduce, unlike the other repetitious, smoothly transitioned buildings)