HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #781  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 12:17 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,288
^ Kind of like that, but with a lot more concrete and glass. Seriously, though, it's nice to see a crane on that site.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #782  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 1:17 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
^ Your sarcasm owns me.

But I wonder why they are installing the crane so early? Is there anything going on in the pit of despair?
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #783  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 1:27 AM
funhaus's Avatar
funhaus funhaus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by fridayinla View Post
In fact, the company is already thinking of the future. Hirz said last week that Ralphs is looking at designs for a new location at First and Grand, where the Grand Avenue project is expected to break ground later this year.
Hmm, this adds a little more intrigue to the scenario that Whole Foods (an early contender for the Grand Ave project) might be choosing LA Central as its downtown location...
     
     
  #784  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 2:49 AM
unmentioned's Avatar
unmentioned unmentioned is offline
intern extraordinaire.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland Empire
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
I don't mean to hijack but owell.

Riverside could very well have a downtown that could resemble Pasadena but alot of the city planners are retarded. The Main Street Promenade is devoid of any sort of retail sans a Tamale Factory and some weird novetly stores that sells medievl crap. In a ideal world, they would convert those empty buildings into some sort of SOMETHING. This is what Main Street SHOULD look like:
I definitely agree, the mall is horridly underused. The main problem is, the City Council and Planning Division are basically accused of totalitarianism by the misguided individuals who would like to see Downtown remain a hodgepodge of antiques stores and empty storefronts.

An effort needs to be made to maintain the current eclectic retailers that rent on Main, but we need national, big retail - coupled with the coming housing - to breathe life into DT Rside.

Just this week, Council approved plans to renovate the pedestrian mall to include a civic plaza, seasonal ice rink, updated landscaping, actually coherent paving, decorative bollards, statues, and a whole slew of new stuff, basically the only things that will stay where they are the statues and trees.

So change is in the works in more places than are evident.

Quote:
One other problem I have with downtown Riverside is the Metrolink station. There is so much area to build more restraunts, and even some condo units. There is a Applebees, and down the way sits a Spagetti Factory and a few other restraunts.
Though they're still in very, very conceptual stations, two rather large TOD's are in the works at both of Riverside's Metrolink stations, the larger and more intensive of which is Downtown - it basically includes the whole Marketplace plus some of the ghetto around Hunter Park, very exciting, trust. Those old depots and huge packinghouse? The city wants to see those converted into live/work lofts. When I get back to the office Monday, I'll snag some renderings and put them up and hope I don't get fired. haha.

Quote:
But Downtown Riverside is starting to change for the better. On the north side of downtown where old auto repair shops and long empty houses once sat are going to make way for Raincross Promenade. Raincross Promenade will have 250 units on 2 blocks.


Down the street, m'sole is underway with 125 units:
Very true. Dirt is moving for Raincross Promenade, and m solé pads are being poured for phase I.

Quote:
And yet to break ground is the massive Fox Plaza with 500 units, 130 room hotel, and 65,000 square feet of retail:


And the 10 story Regency Tower is under construction (or near construction):
[/QUOTE]

Fox Plaza is not yet approve, but that's only because they had to do an Environmental Impact Report because it's so large.

Regency Tower is approved and currently in parcel assembly, expect excavation by fall.

There you have it, for the two people who care about Riverside on this thread

Also:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy View Post
I don't really know what obtaining a subterranean ROW entails, but does the fact that our subway tunnels generally follow publicly owned land, like underneath Wilshire Blvd., help at all?

Personally I love mass transit, but I detest freeway lines. They are terrible places to wait for a train. They are uncomfortably loud and usually too far from destinations. I don't know what the decibel level is, but I'm sure that it's over 85dB which is the level where OSHA would require workers to wear earplugs. I wouldn't think that we would want to subject passengers to such conditions unless there were no other options.
Correct, it is publicly owned land... but that's the thing - every utility of any kind that shares that right of way is owned by various public agencies, which are even harder to navigate. Every line - water, sewage, electricity, telephone, fiber optic, you name it, not to mention any underground aquifers or other natural features - is managed by a different agency at any given level (local, county, etc.) that would probably require extensive impact reports, lengthy comment periods, generous notification, and so on.

Bureaucracy at it's best.

Don't get me wrong. I think the Wilshire Boulevard extension is GREAT, that will probably turn out to be one of the most well-used lines in the country.

I just think that if that subway line can be done, than practically ANYTHING is possible as far as transit goes. Simply because of the hugeness of that project, less complicated ones would seem... well, less complicated. Even more doable. You know.
__________________
i didn't go to see the city, i -

i went to see it around you
     
     
  #785  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 3:28 AM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by funhaus View Post
Hmm, this adds a little more intrigue to the scenario that Whole Foods (an early contender for the Grand Ave project) might be choosing LA Central as its downtown location...
LA Central has my vote, since it'll be less than a 10 minute leisurely stroll from my front door - even closer than Ralphs. Even though it'd likely get less of my $$ than the latter, it will provide me with more options. Options are good.
     
     
  #786  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 3:45 AM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by unmentioned View Post
There you have it, for the two people who care about Riverside on this thread

Please forgive me, I don't want to be viewed as a jerk, and as a noob here myself, far be it for me to complain... BUT... while the posts about Riverside are of a peripheral interest, they stray pretty far from the topic of this thread. Is there another thread that might be more appropriate? Or if not, might you consider starting one, since there seems to be a fair deal of development out there to just possibly warrant it? You appear to be quite knowledgeable on the subject and would make a great initiator, if in fact there isn't yet one.

Regards.
     
     
  #787  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 4:18 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladowntowner View Post
Please forgive me, I don't want to be viewed as a jerk, and as a noob here myself, far be it for me to complain... BUT... while the posts about Riverside are of a peripheral interest, they stray pretty far from the topic of this thread. Is there another thread that might be more appropriate? Or if not, might you consider starting one, since there seems to be a fair deal of development out there to just possibly warrant it? You appear to be quite knowledgeable on the subject and would make a great initiator, if in fact there isn't yet one.

Regards.
Another I.E. hater. Lol.

Riverside was brought up because the LA Times article said that California is on course to surpass 60 million people in 2050. Riverside County also was slated to become the second most populated in California after LA in 2050. Talk was made about how to handle the influx of people in LA and SoCal in general and Riverside was brought up into the mix. LosAngelesBeauty posted this:

Quote:
Now for Riverside's case, planning ahead of time is harder to predict where density would be high enough to warrant subway construction. Density is usually determined economically by geographical constraints (Hong Kong being on an island, SF being on a peninsula, Taipei surrounded by mountains, Manhattan on an island, etc.). LA has gotten denser because the SPRAWL HAS HIT THE WALL. It's finally able to follow the other densified cities paradigm model because it's becoming denser (it just took longer to get to the point). But where will the built environment in Riverside be suitable for pedestrians? I can only think of Downtown Riverside. If that were the case, I would say that Downtown Riverside needs to develop more density geared for pedestrians. More high-rise apt. and all the amenities to attract wealthier/middle class people as well to live inside it. Then have a mass transit system built to serve Downtown Riverside and then add many more trains to connect to LA/OC and the surrounding Riverside region.
And I posted projects that were proposed and/or approved for the city only because I live here and it seemed relevant. Unmentioned went into further detail. Even though this thread didn't get derailed and remained topical, at that point, Riverside became a topic at that point in time. Seeing as how it now isn't, back to LALA land.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #788  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 5:10 AM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by unmentioned View Post
Correct, it is publicly owned land... but that's the thing - every utility of any kind that shares that right of way is owned by various public agencies, which are even harder to navigate. Every line - water, sewage, electricity, telephone, fiber optic, you name it, not to mention any underground aquifers or other natural features - is managed by a different agency at any given level (local, county, etc.) that would probably require extensive impact reports, lengthy comment periods, generous notification, and so on.

Bureaucracy at it's best.

Don't get me wrong. I think the Wilshire Boulevard extension is GREAT, that will probably turn out to be one of the most well-used lines in the country.

I just think that if that subway line can be done, than practically ANYTHING is possible as far as transit goes. Simply because of the hugeness of that project, less complicated ones would seem... well, less complicated. Even more doable. You know.
I don't think that it will be quite as bad as you make it sound. We do have lots of bureaucracy and building a subway tunnel is complicated, but the utility relocation for this project won't be anything extraordinary as far as subway tunnels go. Or really even extraordinary at all. It would only be the scale that is unusual. There will be a lengthy EIR, public outreach, and comment period regardless just as there are for every major transportation project.

If you think that this is complicated you should see what happens when airports are built. Or even worse when we try to build freeways through South Pasadena!
     
     
  #789  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 6:31 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
^ Your sarcasm owns me.

But I wonder why they are installing the crane so early? Is there anything going on in the pit of despair?
Ha! Sorry, I was just in a sarcastic mood today. It's purely in jest, I assure you. As for why they're installing the crane so early, my guess would be that it would allow them to bring materials in while they remove the access ramp. But that's just a guess.

BTW, is that Bjork in your avatar?
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #790  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 7:07 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
^Agreed. LASportsFan, I think you need to alter your signature slightly. Citywatch seems to be more optimistic now that Concerto and Medallion are underway.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #791  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 7:47 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemonkee View Post
Ha! Sorry, I was just in a sarcastic mood today. It's purely in jest, I assure you. As for why they're installing the crane so early, my guess would be that it would allow them to bring materials in while they remove the access ramp. But that's just a guess.

BTW, is that Bjork in your avatar?
Bjork and child. I found my 'Homogenic' cd yesterday after 3 years of not knowing where it was. I of course transfered it to my ipod. Now if I lose my ipod, somebody's catching the wrath.

Westside: Now that Concerto and Medallion are underway, I reckon citywatch would be giddy. Like Micheal Jackson at a Boy Scout meeting.

Lol. Reckon.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #792  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 9:50 AM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladowntowner View Post
Please forgive me, I don't want to be viewed as a jerk, and as a noob here myself, far be it for me to complain... BUT... while the posts about Riverside are of a peripheral interest, they stray pretty far from the topic of this thread. Is there another thread that might be more appropriate? Or if not, might you consider starting one, since there seems to be a fair deal of development out there to just possibly warrant it? You appear to be quite knowledgeable on the subject and would make a great initiator, if in fact there isn't yet one.

Regards.

I concur.


Even though I went off on a short tangent about Riverside earlier, I think it's definitely appropriate to start another thread about Riverside. There seems to be a substantial amount of development to warrant entire discussions solely on that.

Thanks unmentioned and ThreeHundred on your first-hand knowledge of Riverside!
__________________
DTLA Rising
     
     
  #793  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 9:55 AM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by fridayinla View Post

"We hope to create a real gateway around Wilshire and Bixel and along the bridge over the 110 Freeway so that it really connects Downtown to City West," Warren said. "There's almost a competition to see who can create the best neighborhood."

This is what I'm most excited about from the article fridaynla posted. You can have all the residential buildings built and occupied, but if your environment still looks like crap (think Broadway swap meets), it won't be an urban playground. It'll be either ugly and/or desolate still.

Warren mentions the 110 bridge and I'm curious what kind of pedestrian enhancements they have in store. It is definitely NOT a pleasant trek over that bridge. Especially if you're walking uphill from Downtown into City West on a hot sunny day.
__________________
DTLA Rising
     
     
  #794  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 2:56 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesBeauty View Post

Warren mentions the 110 bridge and I'm curious what kind of pedestrian enhancements they have in store. It is definitely NOT a pleasant trek over that bridge. Especially if you're walking uphill from Downtown into City West on a hot sunny day.
Tell me about it. Also, the railing is dangerously low. It wouldn't be too hard to fall and..you know..die.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #795  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 3:41 PM
LongBeachUrbanist's Avatar
LongBeachUrbanist LongBeachUrbanist is offline
Ridin' The Metro
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Metro Blue, Wardlow Stop
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by edluva View Post
damn you figured me out. now i need a new method of sounding superior to you guys in my posts...

in the spirit of this thread (and to avoid being deemed a pedant), i suppose i must "contribute"....
Thank you so much for cutting through the bull, edluva! Gosh, your so smart!
Not like us, we don't know nuthin! Why waste your time slumming with us idiots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by edluva View Post
my comments aren't aimed at anyone in particular being as they're more of a commentary on how pathetically underdeveloped and ironic this so-called city is.
L.A. is a city in development. There is a long history of bad planning in L.A.: this fact is understood by everyone here. In fact, this is the context for our excitement about new projects. I shouldn't have to explain this to someone as intellectually gifted as you.
__________________
COMPLETE THE CENTRAL SUBWAY BY 2020!!!
     
     
  #796  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 4:25 PM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
Another I.E. hater. Lol.
Nah.. I don't hate the I.E., per se. I'm actually quite familiar with the city of Riverside and it's environs, as I have travelled there 1-2 times weekly for the past 10 years (not particularly of my choice, mind you), so I've spent a fair deal of time travelling to and through, as well as in Riverside proper. However, the need to go there has ended, just this past week as a matter of fact. That city is definitely going through it's own form of "densification".

I did acknowledge that the posts were of "peripheral interest" in part because of the Times article and how it related to the greater region. I think they crossed the line right about the time photos and renders were embedded in them, but I'm certainly not a moderator here. Just making a friendly suggestion to a fellow noob (unmentioned). Sorry if I came across harshly.

Peace out.

P.S. I thought that's who that was in your avatar. Bjork's OK in my book.
     
     
  #797  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 4:42 PM
WonderlandPark's Avatar
WonderlandPark WonderlandPark is offline
Pacific Wonderland
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bi-Situational, Portland & L.A.
Posts: 4,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by edluva View Post
ut don't get all high on that yet, my comments aren't aimed at anyone in particular being as they're more of a commentary on how pathetically underdeveloped and ironic this so-called city is.
Yea! someone who gets it! Everytime a see celebration of a damn coffee bean opening or a 4-5 story North Hollywood cheapo wood frame building in Downtown it makes me wretch.
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away"

travel, architecture & photos of the textured world at http://www.pixelmap.com
     
     
  #798  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 6:56 PM
fridayinla's Avatar
fridayinla fridayinla is offline
World Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesBeauty View Post
Warren mentions the 110 bridge and I'm curious what kind of pedestrian enhancements they have in store. It is definitely NOT a pleasant trek over that bridge. Especially if you're walking uphill from Downtown into City West on a hot sunny day.
The walk on Wilshire over the 110 from downtown to City West is dreadful. To make things worse, (even though I realize it's temporary) all the blocked sidewalks from the 1010 Wilshire and Glo projects force you to cross the street, walk around and cross back over again. I always walk the extra block to the 7th Street bridge just to avoid that nightmare.

City West has huge potential and can easily become one of the most desirable neighborhoods of downtown. If all the projects get built (including 1027 Wilshire) it will be there in only 2-3 years. But the 110 remains a huge mental and physical block from the Financial District, and I'm glad the activist developers in City West realize the pedestrian needs.

Several months ago when that Hollywood park to be built above the 101 was announced, I thought how perfect that idea would work over the 110 to connect City West to the rest of downtown. The 110 is currently under grade through downtown and it would be an excellent way to bring more green space. Now that I'm thinking about it, this could work for the 101 in downtown ALSO! What a great way to connect the dots in downtown.
     
     
  #799  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 7:14 PM
unmentioned's Avatar
unmentioned unmentioned is offline
intern extraordinaire.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland Empire
Posts: 5
I do apologize, and think that yes, what ThreeHundred and myself were talking about does indeed belong in a separate thread... however, I think it useless, being that (a) the number of projects is not sufficient to warrant starting a thread, and (b) no one but he and I would care, likely. Ha.

But no more, I promise.

::sigh:: Alas, if only I was interning with the planning department in Los Angeles, so I could slip you pre-release renders of projects that are actually of a scale to be worthy of discussion.

__________________
i didn't go to see the city, i -

i went to see it around you
     
     
  #800  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2007, 7:15 PM
fridayinla's Avatar
fridayinla fridayinla is offline
World Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by WonderlandPark View Post
Yea! someone who gets it! Everytime a see celebration of a damn coffee bean opening or a 4-5 story North Hollywood cheapo wood frame building in Downtown it makes me wretch.
It's more than that, at least to me. Obviously, projects like LA Live and Grand Avenue are much more worthy of people's attention, but smaller scale projects, even 4 -5 story wood frame buildigns in Downtown, help define and contribute to emerging, walkable neighborhoods, especially when retail will be involved. Sometimes it may seem petty to celebrate these low-on-the-totem-pole developments, but they're all important! They fill in dead zones and create a more pleasant urban atmosphere, which I think it the collective grand vision for our downtown area. I'll be the first to admit I'd rather see projects like Concerto or 717 Ninth to fill in these dead zones, but smaller scale can get the job done also. Just look at Hikari in LT or even the Market Lofts in South Park - c'mon, do I even need to make this point? It's NOT the "Coffee Bean" or the "cheap" construction that we get excited about, it's the sign of progress for our growing downtown. Some steps are smaller than others! Help us out here!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:19 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.