HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1381  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2007, 6:25 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by neuhickman79 View Post
However, the colors in the pic...divine and awe inspiring. Great pics, as usual, innov8!
Thanks man These photos were taken about five minutes apart late in
the day last Monday. Evening shots can change so fast when clouds are in the sky to block the sun.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1382  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2007, 1:42 AM
downtownserg89's Avatar
downtownserg89 downtownserg89 is offline
BUFF$LUT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Era Park
Posts: 397
wonderful pics, innov8y, but i must agreewith the neuhickster, it looks very depressing! the streets are more dead than my dinner.
__________________
facebook.com/buffslut
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1383  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2007, 4:40 AM
uzi963's Avatar
uzi963 uzi963 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: sacramento, ca
Posts: 33
West Sac condo tower on tap
150 units will wait for hotter market
Sacramento Business Journal - June 8, 2007
by Michael Shaw
Staff writer



While residential towers have seemingly stalled in downtown Sacramento, a San Diego developer with pension fund backing is seeking approval for a 24-story condominium tower on the West Sacramento riverfront.

Fairfield Residential LLC is looking to build a 150-unit development on about 1 acre between the pyramid-shaped Ziggurat building and the California State Teachers' Retirement System's new headquarters under construction.

"I don't think you can get a better view from a residential project in the downtown area," said Val Toppenberg, West Sacramento's redevelopment director. The site also abuts West Sacramento's River Walk Park.

Fairfield bought the property last year, but the developer said it's likely to wait until conditions are more favorable before building.

"We're not going to rush into a bad market," said Dan Milich, development manager with Fairfield. "We're in a position to wait it out. If you're wondering about a groundbreaking, it's too early for that."

It's also too early to set prices for the condominiums, he said.

Fairfield has time on its side, Milich said, because fees at the site were frozen for 10 years when development agreements were struck.

Meanwhile, the project has a mighty equity partner in the form of CalSTRS. The pension fund has partnered with Fairfield before. In 2006, the fund's real estate portfolio included $95.1 million in assets attributed to Fairfield or its affiliates, according to a CalSTRS investment report.

The West Sacramento condo tower was originally pitched last year as a 17-story building, but developers decided they needed more stories to make the project work, said Jim Bermudez, associate planner with the city.

Fairfield on Thursday was scheduled to seek approvals from the city's Planning Commission for design approval and permission to add seven stories, which would bring the building up to about 240 feet. Planning staff has recommended approval of the changes. The Planning Commission vote was not available before press time. If adopted, the project could go before the West Sacramento City Council within a month.

City officials are optimistic that the project won't suffer the same setbacks as high-rise condo projects on the Sacramento side of the river.

"Given the nature of the project and the nature of their financing, this probably has an excellent chance of moving forward," Toppenberg said.

Fairfield would need to seek a construction loan to build the project, Milich said. Financing of pricey residential projects is scarce these days, judging from the delays and problems with Sacramento's other condo towers. A resurgent housing market, however, might lead to looser lending.

Fairfield struck an unprecedented agreement with the city over affordable housing.

West Sacramento has a citywide policy that typically requires 15 percent of new housing units to be priced so that low- or very-low-income residents can purchase them. Fairfield, however, does not have to provide affordable units within the tower. For the first time, the city allowed a developer to provide off-site affordable housing to satisfy its inclusionary housing rules.

Fairfield paid about $1.9 million to cover the costs of a nonprofit housing agency that acquired 23 low-income studio apartments in the neighborhood that will be refurbished.

Now, off-site affordable housing is an approach the city will consider with other riverfront properties, given the premium land costs there and the additional expense for building vertical developments, said Aaron Laurel, with the city's Housing and Community Investment Department.

Fairfield develops multifamily housing, ranging from small apartment buildings to high rises nationwide, primarily on the East and West coasts. It often acts as construction manager on its own projects.

The site is part of an overall development plan for 18 acres known collectively as Raley's Landing, so named because the development group included Raley's Inc. The overall plan for Raley's Landing was approved last year and includes additional housing as well as office and commercial space on other riverfront sites. Developers involved in other aspects of the plan include Panattoni Development Corp. and Signature Properties Inc.

Signature is now planning the first phase of a 7-acre site north of Raley Field and West Capitol Avenue for lots that would house 134 townhomes, with prices starting in the mid $300,000s, said David Nybo, Signature's director of land acquisition and forward planning. The company is seeking tentative map approval from the Planning Commission and if all goes well, could begin construction within a year. Future phases include a neighborhood coffee shop and restaurant, and two mid-rise projects that would bring the total number of units to about 400.

Large condo projects have not fared well in the past year.

In Sacramento, there has been no word yet from the partners in The Towers on Capitol Mall project -- John Saca and the California Public Employees' Retirement System -- on what will happen with their plans to build twin 53-story condo towers. Saca has failed to come up with enough financing to satisfy the agreement with CalPERS, essentially putting the project on hold.

Craig Nassi, the developer of Aura, another high-rise condo tower in downtown Sacramento, has struggled to secure financing for the project since last fall.

[email protected] | 916-558-7861
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1384  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2007, 6:13 AM
arod74's Avatar
arod74 arod74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: east Sac
Posts: 358
Well, more high density housing on the west bank of the river is a good thing I just wish it didn't look like a cheap square state office building. Hopefully just a bad render.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1385  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2007, 3:19 PM
creamcityleo79's Avatar
creamcityleo79 creamcityleo79 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 1,790
More good news for downtown!...from the Sacramento Bee:
Quote:
Extreme makeover: Owners of the ramshackle Marshall Hotel downtown are eyeing a major renovation that could convert the historic Seventh Street structure to condos, apartments or a boutique hotel.

No specific plans have been made, says Pete Noack, part of a local investment group that bought the historic, five-story building two years ago.

But he says his group has had informal talks with city officials about "an adaptive re-use" of the 95-room hotel, at Seventh and L, and is convinced the time is right for the building "to have its second life," given a spate of redevelopment activities planned or under way in the downtown core.

The current 75 or so low-income residents probably wouldn't be displaced for at least 24 months, Noack says. And the owners are considering including some kind of low-income residential component in their project.

"We have an obligation to the people who live there," he says.

Whatever the eventual plan for the site, the innards of the building will need to be gutted. The rooms are tiny and obsolete; most don't have bathrooms, for example. Plumbing and electrical systems are in serious disrepair.

What's the building's charm?

"The exterior, period. That's it," Noack says. "There are no other redeeming features."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1386  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2007, 8:52 PM
travis bickle travis bickle is offline
silly slackergeek
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozone View Post
I’m trying to picture where this is going to be. The Co-op is on S/Alhambra …so where is this going in relationship to it?

I like the clean, modern design. I also like the mixture of warm, dark earth tone/autumn colors I see in this project and many others lately around Midtown. Maybe it’s a trend everywhere but it’s a particularly good color for the Sacramento light. I hate that ubiquitous pinkish beige. I can’t think of a more unattractive color for Sacramento. I don’t like fixed design regulations but if I could I would ban the ‘Sacramento beige’ and encourage those dark autumn colors.

Yeah there are still a lot of suburbanites in Midtown and East Sacramento who want to have all the benefits of living close to the center of things but they don’t want to give others the same opportunity.
Yes... I've discovered the difference between a good developer and a bad developer.

A good developer is the one who built your house.

A bad developer is one who built any house after that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1387  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2007, 11:13 PM
Phillip Phillip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nawlijispower View Post
I am pretty sure that there is a BofA drive thru ATM off of Stockton Blvd just south of Fruitridge on the west side. I dont bank there so im not positive. And you do run the risk of getting held up at gun point coming over here.
Right you are, Nawlijispower! A BofA driveup ATM on Stockton south of Fruitridge. And I wasn't held up at gunpoint!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1388  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 12:04 AM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis bickle View Post
Yes... I've discovered the difference between a good developer and a bad developer.

A good developer is the one who built your house.

A bad developer is one who built any house after that.
Hey now...my house was built in 1907, and I like quite a few buildings built since that date!

Just slightly a gross overgeneralization...there's a definite difference between neighborhood activists in the central city and those out in the 'burbs. I read a story in the Bee a few months back about some neighborhood group in Citrus Heights that wants to make any development denser than 4 DUA require a citywide public vote!

The midtown variety neighborhood activists are often very interested in infill projects, public transit, opposition to new suburbs and freeway expansion, etcetera...occasionally we'll even come out to speak on behalf of a new neighborhood development or even write a letter of support.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1389  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 1:02 AM
Nawlijispower's Avatar
Nawlijispower Nawlijispower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 65
Drive Thru

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillip View Post
Right you are, Nawlijispower! A BofA driveup ATM on Stockton south of Fruitridge. And I wasn't held up at gunpoint!

Im glad it worked out for you.
__________________
www.myspace.com/matt_altop
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1390  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 8:43 PM
ericm2031 ericm2031 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 31
Crystal Ice

I don't know if anyone has posted this about Crystal Ice. Click the link above
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1391  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 9:23 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
Interesting...although I assume the mix of retailers is theoretical rather than ones he has already tied down. The building marked with the "Green Sacramento" sign is the Orchard Supply structure that is slated to be La Bou's new bakery.

SOCA hosted a history tour of R Street last month that included a walk inside the Crystal Ice plant led by Mark Friedman. I thought it went pretty well, and the tour through the plant was really fun. He has some great ideas about adaptive reuse of the current structure--about two-thirds of the existing structure would remain, with modifications, although the eastern portion of the building is probably not stable enough to be preserved. I'm hoping for as much preservation of the interesting urban grit along that street as possible--especially the in-street track and the loading docks.

This Sunday I spoke briefly with the developer who is putting together the proposal for the two half-blocks on the other side of the R/S alley. I am curious as to how it will look, because unlike the Crystal Ice project it is directly adjacent to residential homes, mostly two-story, and a lot of tree canopy. They assured me that they will hold a presentation soon, and that the retail mix is aimed at local artisans rather than chain stores, which I think is a darn good idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1392  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 9:49 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Nice catch, ericm2031

Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
Interesting...although I assume the mix of retailers is theoretical rather than ones he has already tied down, or at least maybe a letter of intent. The building marked with the "Green Sacramento" sign is the Orchard Supply structure that is slated to be La Bou's new bakery.
The La Bou idea was quite a while ago, maybe things have changed.

I'm not sure so those aren't tenants he has nailed down. Usually if they want to fill in the spaces with theoretical business, they will use some generic name that so closely resembles that is obvious you know the business they are trying to refer too, he is using the actual business names here.

If you look at the brokers website for 800J, they list the actual business that have signed on on their flyer.

If they have been nailed down, that is a pretty impressive list of reailers he was able to sign. Banana Republic, Market Hall, Barnes and Noble, American Appeal, Aveda, Anthropologies Couple seem to be small business from other cities like Manzana (Portland) and Market Hall (Oakland).

Green Sacramento is local (obviously):
http://www.greensacramento.com/

That Market Hall place sounds great...I've been looking for a meat shop close to my place than Taylor's.
http://www.rockridgemarkethall.com/


Last edited by sugit; Jun 12, 2007 at 10:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1393  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 10:12 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
wburg - did they mention anything the track and cobblestones? I think I remember you saying something about how that might be a problem with ADA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1394  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 10:30 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
CADA (and Fulcrum Properties) still considers it a very high priority to preserve the track and the cobblestones, which add atmosphere as well as a particularly aesthetically pleasing form of traffic calming. Most of those are in the numbered streets, so they aren't as directly threatened, but there are some ADA issues with the planned streetscape. ADA prefers a conventional sidewalk with curb, whereas the idea here was to create a more integrated streetscape, using a pattern of yellow "truncated cones" to indicate where pedestrian areas ended and streets began (seen at some Light Rail stations). Either the cones or a conventional sidewalk will cover over tracks in the street.

The La Bou was still in the cards when I went to an earlier presentation, and it was mentioned again when we did the tour last month. I suppose I'm pretty down with the Green Sacramento place, especially if it is local--I wouldn't mind having a hardware store within a short walk of my house, and there's a certain historic-use ring to it, considering that building was an Orchard Supply before closing down. I guess I am going off of how other developers have handled their retail (for example, the TCR folks said that they won't decide on a retailer until after the project is built and the retail space is ready to rent.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1395  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2007, 10:34 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Thanks for the info...

I have to think to get this financed, Freidman would have to have show some sort of revenue coming into the project in the form of signed leases.

Maybe since Trammell Crow is a pretty deep pocketed corporation (Now CBRE), they can get away with not needing the retail leases.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1396  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2007, 12:16 AM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
All those look like quality retailers. Only one local, but it is an interesting mix. Green Sacramento is a great fit there, rather than their present strip mall digs. Really nice people, too.

Anthropologie and American Apparel were both name checked as prospective tenants in Zeiden's 700 block. Looks like everybody is jumping ship.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1397  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2007, 12:29 AM
travis bickle travis bickle is offline
silly slackergeek
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 470
That is an outstanding retail lineup. Of course, none of those stores will ever open on K Street now so the Moe mess and the Westfield curse strike again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1398  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2007, 12:32 AM
aufbau's Avatar
aufbau aufbau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bushwick
Posts: 245
^Well, it's good to know there are plans still for quality retail chain stores *somewhere* in the central city (and not the DTP)...just wont be K street I guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1399  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2007, 9:24 AM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,270
R Street will the K Street we never had?

I believe that the Central City is capable of having multiple successful shopping districts. These shops along R Street will ultimately help K Street because it will encourage people to shop in the Central City. Besides competition is not the Dowtown Plaza or K Street Mall’s problem. Today many people living even in Midtown have to drive out to the suburbs to do their shopping. And as more retailers see that they can make just as much money in the Central City as the suburbs they’ll want to open up shop here too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1400  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2007, 4:28 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
Indeed...a project like this on R Street has an easier path to success because there are already dense residential neighborhoods surrounding R Street in midtown. K Street has the built-in limitation of being just a tad farther out of walkability range, but as the central city starts to refill that won't remain the case. Of course, it would help if we dropped Mo Mohanna down a deep, deep hole first.

It seems like the city is getting that part--at the city council meeting last night, regarding approval of the 2030 General Plan land-use element map, there was considerable discussion about the problems of "demolition by neglect" and the after-effects of "non-malicious" building fires. I'm hoping that the Ice Blocks will also provide yet another good model of how to do adaptive reuse in the central city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.