HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1321  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 5:03 PM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,270
Condo market warms up with little competition
Owner to begin marketing this month
Sacramento Business Journal - June 1, 2007, Mark Anderson



The first new mid-rise condominiums in downtown Sacramento go on sale this month, testing the local market for condo hotels. It's likely to be a short test. There are only 30 condos, and half of them already have been reserved for buyers. The Penthouses at Capitol Park occupies the 13th, 14th and 15th floors of the new Residence Inn at 15th and L streets.

Construction is almost done on the hotel, expected to open early this month, and the first condos should be delivered in July, said Georgina Valencia, the broker representing the seller.

Investor Warren Lortie of Newport Beach bought the condos as part of the complicated financing deal for the hotel. Lortie -- who built Warren Lortie Associates Inc. and then retired -- wouldn't say what he paid, but he did disclose what he's asking: Units start in the $500,000s, while the largest condo with the best view is priced around $900,000.

"I think it could have been tough to sell them with all the other competition that was supposed to be opening in downtown Sacramento, but with the other projects not happening, it should be easier," he said. "I don't give the other projects much of a chance of resurrection anytime soon."

When the Residence Inn was proposed back in 2004, it was one of at least three downtown projects that combined a hotel with condos. One project, at 12th and J streets, never materialized. The Towers project on Capitol Mall at 3rd Street was to have a 250-room InterContinental Hotel along with 760 condos, but escalating costs and financing woes forced a construction halt in January.

The Residence Inn was supposed to be completed late last year, which would have been better market timing, Lortie said. "It's no secret that it has gotten tougher to sell real estate now," he said. "Lenders are getting tougher, and people are wary of the whole housing market."

Still, Lortie said he's not concerned about finding buyers given the location. "It is right in the middle of the hubbub," he said. "It's kind of a New York thing to have a flat on the top of a hotel. You feel like you are in New York. It is a great urban view."

There are 10 different plans, with the condos overlooking Capitol Park commanding top prices. All the condos, which range from 750 to 1,350 square feet, have 12-foot-high windows from floor to ceiling. Parking is in a garage next door. The one- and two-bedroom condos have a separate entrance and elevator from the hotel, but residents would be able to order room service and use other hotel amenities.

The 30 condos have generated more than 200 inquiries, and Valencia said she's shown the spaces a handful of times. She's discouraging people from taking a tour until the construction is completed. "As soon as we get some of them done, we will start showing what we are offering," she said. Of the 15 units that have been reserved, all of them would be at least a second home for the buyers.

"In general, it's a tough time for condos, but the buyer pool those kinds of condos appeal to is not affected by the subprime fallout or the difficulty in getting financing. This is not a first-time buyer product," said Bruce Slaton, a real estate agent and president of SacramentoCondos.com. "After all the hoopla about (developer John) Saca's Towers project and the Aura Condos, there are people who want to live downtown."

^Even if the Towers and Aura Condos do not get built as planned..maybe their greatest legacy will be that they got people to finally take downtown Sacramento serious as a place to live? Also their possible demise "might" be a blessing in disguise in that they will move buyers who want to live downtown into some of the other smaller projects already uc/built. The goal right now is building synergy downtown in any form. Skyscraper condos will come to Sacramento but as they say-Rome was not built in a day.

Last edited by ozone; Jun 1, 2007 at 5:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1322  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 6:47 PM
foxmtbr's Avatar
foxmtbr foxmtbr is offline
Finger Lickin' Good.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by urban_encounter View Post
how are you able to post bee photos (and/or cartoons)??

Everytime I attempt to post a photo or rendering from the Bee it says embedded and nothing shows up?
For embedded photos like that, I always just use the Print Screen button, paste it in Paint and crop it, then host it online.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1323  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 7:33 PM
SacTownAndy's Avatar
SacTownAndy SacTownAndy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Bridge District, West Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,265
I've never had a problem direct-linking photos here from the Bee. You just have to make sure you get the whole URL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1324  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 7:56 PM
Sacdelicious's Avatar
Sacdelicious Sacdelicious is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Harlem, NYC
Posts: 132
FYI: Channel 14 is replaying the 5/29/07 Downtown Housign Strategy debate for the Sac City Council, now. Tune in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1325  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 10:24 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
There was article in Sactown Mag this month about that the Crocker finally breakin ground on the expansion July 26. Here is a nice rendering from the Mag



While I would have liked to have seen something a little more daring, I think it's still a nice looking addition. Clean and straight forward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1326  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 10:32 PM
Trojan's Avatar
Trojan Trojan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 224
Looks like similar architecture to the Getty Museum in LA. I like it, it adds a twist to the old-traditional type of architecture in downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1327  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 11:54 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
i feel like i want to like it... but i don't think i do

i thought the models actually looked more interesting. it looks a bit tame in that rendering.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1328  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2007, 11:58 PM
Schmoe's Avatar
Schmoe Schmoe is offline
NIMBY Hater
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,073
Why haven't I gotten my June/July mag yet?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1329  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 1:03 AM
arod74's Avatar
arod74 arod74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: east Sac
Posts: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by TowerDistrict View Post
i feel like i want to like it... but i don't think i do

i thought the models actually looked more interesting. it looks a bit tame in that rendering.
I think alot will depend on the characterstics of the materials they use for the skin. Im not crazy about it, the entrance doesn't do a whole lot. I like the roof line though it has a heavy industrial factory flavor to it..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1330  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 2:07 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugit View Post
There was article in Sactown Mag this month about that the Crocker finally breakin ground on the expansion July 26. Here is a nice rendering from the Mag



While I would have liked to have seen something a little more daring, I think it's still a nice looking addition. Clean and straight forward.

Fairly impressive...

At least it looks like a museum...

It's unfortunate that they scrapped the tower though..


On a side note i would love to see Sacramento build a museum of industry (similar to Chicago's museum of Science and Industry)..

It could include Rail Road displays, exhibits pertaining to the Pony Express, Gold Rush and Air Force history in Sacramento to name a few. And it could also serve as a place for touring shows (like the Da Vinci experience or Body Works...)
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1331  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 2:17 AM
creamcityleo79's Avatar
creamcityleo79 creamcityleo79 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 1,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by urban_encounter View Post



You have to admit, this was funny. At least i got a chuckle at the expense of the "Carole Migden Driving School" and "another fine Mo Mohanna property swap".


btw neuhickman, how are you able to post bee photos (and/or cartoons)??

Everytime I attempt to post a photo or rendering from the Bee it says embedded and nothing shows up?
Do you use Mozilla or IE? I notice that I'm not able to copy some pics in IE that I'm able to copy in Mozilla (emporis, for example)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1332  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 3:17 AM
creamcityleo79's Avatar
creamcityleo79 creamcityleo79 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 1,790
Great news(IMHO):
Quote:
Planners OK theater project
New retail center would replace old drive-in near Hwy. 50 and Bradshaw.
By Stan Oklobdzija - Bee Staff Writer


Published 12:00 am PDT Thursday, May 31, 2007
Story appeared in CITRUS HEIGHTS ORANGEVALE section, Page H1

A major commercial center set to replace the Sacramento 6 Drive-in movie theater has received approval from the Sacramento County Planning Commission.

The 438,700-square-foot development, to include a 16-screen movie theater as well as other major commercial outlets, was approved 4-0 on May 22.

Commission members William Miller, Candice Fields, Bruce Kaspari and Ryan Chin cast the yes votes, according to minutes. Commission member Kathilynn Carpenter was absent.

The project, north of Highway 50 and west of Bradshaw Road, will now head to the county Board of Supervisors for final approval.

This project has been long coming," said Bill Vierra, president and chief operating officer of SyWest Development, a subsidiary of conglomerate Syufy Enterprises of San Rafael, which will develop the project.

The project was proposed in 1998, Vierra said, but a design change caused a delay.

"The plan has evolved," he said. "Three years of intense redesign got us to the point where everyone likes the project."

Gay Jones, chairwoman of the Butterfield-Riviera East Community Association, which borders the proposed development, said she and other area residents recognize the need for more retail shopping in the area. Yet traffic issues still weigh on her mind.

Everyone knows there's a lack of good retail in our area," Jones said. "(Sacramento) County will need the sales tax ... but the traffic mitigation will make or break our community."

Jones said several state and local agencies in the area must deal with the increased traffic -- from Caltrans, which is responsible for Highway 50, to Regional Transit, which is responsible for the nearby Butterfield Station light-rail stop, to Sacramento County, which is responsible for Bradshaw Road. The area also abuts the boundaries of nearby Rancho Cordova, adding another jurisdiction into the crowded mix, Jones said.

Jones said both her community and the developer have similar goals and that these goals can be attained only by all agencies working together to devise a sensible traffic plan.

"It won't do their business any good if it's a big traffic jam, and no one comes," Jones said. "It'll take some leadership and statesmanship by Caltrans and the Board of Supervisors to solve this problem. But it'll be cheaper now than in the future."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1333  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 12:30 PM
BrianSac's Avatar
BrianSac BrianSac is offline
CHACUN SON GOÛT
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,646
Railyard proposal takes new shapes
Arena and canal are out as developer adds 1-acre parks and 2,000 housing units.
By Mary Lynne Vellinga - Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:00 am PDT Saturday, June 2, 2007
Story appeared in METRO section, Page B1

Print | E-Mail | Comments (0) | Digg it | del.icio.us

The developer of the downtown railyard this week unveiled a new version of its plan for the 240-acre site -- one that better connects the proposed development to the city's existing streets, and replaces a planned canal with a string of 1-acre parks.

Curving boulevards and long blocks have given way to a grid that mirrors Sacramento. City officials and community activists say the shorter blocks would be more hospitable to pedestrians.

"Before, it was much more of a suburban type subdivision with wide boulevards and cul-de-sacs," said Assistant City Manager Marty Hanneman.


The canal idea was scrapped because of concern about people falling in, and also the potential difficulty of keeping the water clean, he said.

Another 2,000 housing units were added to the plan -- bringing the total to 12,000.

A new arena for the Kings has been deleted -- at least for now -- because voters last November rejected the idea of paying for one. The "sports and entertainment zone" contained in the last version of the plan has been turned into a "West End" district of stores, housing and a hotel.

One thing hasn't changed, however. A giant Bass Pro fishing emporium will be one of the first things built in the converted railyard. It's planned for the northwestern edge of the site closest to Interstate 5.

The evolving vision for the railyard now includes a major performing arts complex and conservatory -- dubbed the California Academy of the Arts. Developer Thomas Enterprises is working with major arts groups in town, along with California State University, Sacramento, and the University of California, Davis.

"We want to attract students from all over. We want to become the West Coast Juilliard (School)," said Richard Rich, development director for Thomas Enterprises, the Georgia-based developer that in December bought the property from Union Pacific.

Rich also is working with representatives of the city Asian American community to create a memorial -- they are now pushing for a museum -- that would document the history of Yee Fou (or Second City), the Chinese neighborhood that once bustled just south of the railyard. It also could recall the contributions of Chinese workers to building the transcontinental railroad.

The city of Sacramento plans to solicit public comment on the new plan -- which will guide development in the railyard over the next 20 years -- at a workshop Thursday, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. in the Amtrak depot on I Street.

"We want as many people as possible to come and give us their feedback," Hanneman said.

The city took title to the depot at the same time that Thomas Enterprises bought the rest of the railyard, ending nearly 150 years of railroad ownership. The city plans to build a new transit center in the railyard, just south of the historic shops.

City leaders have adopted an aggressive timeline for getting the railroad development on track toward construction. The schedule calls for an environmental impact report to be issued by August, and for a final City Council vote on the project by fall.

"In the next six months, we're going to be moving at warp speed," Hanneman said.

Major financial hurdles remain before construction can begin, however.

Thomas Enterprises and the city are working on a financing plan they can use to cobble together the $530 million for streets, sewers, power lines and other infrastructure that will be needed in the railyard as it gradually builds out to become a major extension of downtown.

Another $300 million -- about a third of which already has been identified -- is needed for the city to build its planned multi-use transit center for trains, light rail and buses. Part of that plan is to move the historic depot about a block to the north and make it part of the new complex.

Finally, the developer also will be looking for funds to help restore the historic brick railroad shops into a public market, restaurants and entertainment venues.

The state, meanwhile, is working on its own plan to transform some of the buildings as an extension of the California State Railroad Museum that would showcase railroad technology.

City leaders and executives of Thomas Enterprises are busy meeting with politicians in the Capitol -- getting in line for money from state bonds approved last fall to help transit-oriented development.

"We're getting a lot of attention at the state level," said Thomas Enterprises Vice President Suheil Totah.

These days, as they begin the daunting task of pushing their vision toward reality, Totah and Rich are spending much of their time giving tours of the railyard, which was long shuttered and off-limits to the public.

Marj Dickinson, assistant vice chancellor of UC Davis, took a tour on Wednesday. She was charmed by the old shop buildings, a warren of 19th-century brick structures lined with arched windows and separated by narrow alleys.

"I kept wandering around looking at those buildings and saying, 'Who would ever build industrial buildings with all those wonderful arches now. They're beautiful. Aesthetically you can imagine all sorts of exciting space that just brings people in."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1334  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 12:39 PM
BrianSac's Avatar
BrianSac BrianSac is offline
CHACUN SON GOÛT
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by neuhickman79 View Post
Great news(IMHO):

Highway 50, Bradshaw proposal: I agree, good news.

Taken from the article you posted:

"It won't do their business any good if it's a big traffic jam, and no one comes," Jones said. "......sort of an oxymoron dont ya think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1335  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 5:27 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianSac View Post

The evolving vision for the railyard now includes a major performing arts complex and conservatory -- dubbed the California Academy of the Arts. Developer Thomas Enterprises is working with major arts groups in town, along with California State University, Sacramento, and the University of California, Davis.
This is my favorite part of the entire plan..

Hopefully by "performing arts complex", they mean theater and or conert hall, in additon to the Academy.

On a side note, i'm surprised that a separate thread doesn't yet exist for the Railayards in the Sacramento sub forum. With all of the things that will be ahppening, if any project deserves it's own thread, it's the railyards..
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1336  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 5:33 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
California Indian museum finds a site
Published 12:00 am PDT Saturday, June 2, 2007
Story appeared in METRO section, Page B2


WEST SACRAMENTO -- A planned museum to showcase the heritage of California Indians found a home Friday when the city agreed to donate riverfront property for the cultural center that will include an amphitheater.

The California Indian Heritage Center Task Force had tried to put the museum on the banks of the American River, but was unable to resolve land issues.

The West Sacramento Parks and Community Services Commission will consider a formal proposal on June 8 to donate 43 acres.

The California Indian Heritage Center will have a library, exhibit space and landscaping with indigenous gardens.

-- M.S. Enkoji
__________________
Sacramento

Last edited by urban_encounter; Jun 6, 2007 at 2:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1337  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 8:58 PM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,270
fu'k why is this city letting west sac get everything?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1338  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 9:51 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
BrianSac: Indeed, that's a Zen statement worthy of Yogi Berra.

Although I hear that kind of thing a lot: "People don't ride light rail because the cars are overcrowded!"

Last edited by wburg; Jun 2, 2007 at 10:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1339  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 11:02 PM
sacamenna kid sacamenna kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 44
West Sac

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozone View Post
fu'k why is this city letting west sac get everything?
Because it's a smaller city with a more nimble apparatus for approvals, and they're properly aggressive. The era of competition with them is a matter of the past. It's now time to cooperate, as is already happening on the River sheme, in regional planning. My only regret is that they don't also have I-5.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1340  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2007, 2:11 AM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by urban_encounter View Post
It's unfortunate that they scrapped the tower though..
What was the plan for that? I knew there was one originally, but I couldn't find any details on what it looked like or why is was scrapped?

Good news on the Indian Heritage Center as well. I was beginning to think it was going to wind up in Folsom.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.