HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted May 12, 2007, 3:24 AM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,542
Well that area might be connected to LA. But it isnt LA.
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted May 12, 2007, 4:01 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Actually Los Angeles has more space to grow in the great Mojave Desert, beyond Palmdale and Victerville heading towards Barstow and California City.
The only problem is...how to get people from the northern basin into the LA basin.

Hmmm.... maybe a few tunnels under the San Gabrial Mountains?
The cost? Probably in tens of Billions? But its definatly worth it.
Think about it....both California City and the L.A. area at last truly joined.
Erm..no. Not only is that a retarded idea but Victorville and the Mojave Desert is in San Bernidino county.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted May 12, 2007, 4:39 PM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Actually Los Angeles has more space to grow in the great Mojave Desert, beyond Palmdale and Victerville heading towards Barstow and California City.
The only problem is...how to get people from the northern basin into the LA basin.

Hmmm.... maybe a few tunnels under the San Gabrial Mountains?
The cost? Probably in tens of Billions? But its definatly worth it.
Think about it....both California City and the L.A. area at last truly joined.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
Erm..no. Not only is that a retarded idea but Victorville and the Mojave Desert is in San Bernidino county.
JDRCRASH has suggested this before.

Los Angeles proper has more space to grow - right in it's core. Haven't you noticed all the parking lots and under-utilized construction and developments? We need to be going vertical rather than even more horizontal.

Wouldn't spending "tens of billions" for public transit and improved infrastructure to support increased density as well as encouraging developers to build in the center through financial incentives make more sense? I say in light of dwindling energy reserves (wonder why fuel prices are rising?) let those remote areas die a natural death and stop encouraging sprawl by subsidizing inefficient, nonsensical projects.
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted May 12, 2007, 6:20 PM
hughfb3 hughfb3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 908
Are we that dissappointed at Astani for the lack of progress Concerto has taken that we label it Approved rather under construction on the title page?
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted May 12, 2007, 6:41 PM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by hughfb3 View Post
Are we that dissappointed at Astani for the lack of progress Concerto has taken that we label it Approved rather under construction on the title page?
A pit in the ground that hasn't changed in months does not technically qualify for the label "under construction"
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted May 13, 2007, 5:15 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,099
I doubt the empty lots and parking lots all over the city are going to change anytime soon just because we need to expand up.
And the traffic through the 14 Freeway is getting worse every year anyway.
What suprises me is that a few don't know that the idea that L.A. must expand vertically is exactly the opposite of what most people want.
They want to stay in their gas-consuming automobiles, which is a shame.

@Threehundred: Oh but on the contrary, The Mojave Desert is indeed partly in Kern County and L.A. County..what you are referring to is the Mojave National Preserve...which is San Bernardino County...look it up in wikipedia

And as what history has shown us....many so called "retarted" ideas eventually give way to bolder and more innovative ideas, regardless if the original succeeds or not

Last edited by JDRCRASH; May 13, 2007 at 5:22 AM.
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted May 13, 2007, 9:42 PM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
I doubt the empty lots and parking lots all over the city are going to change anytime soon just because we need to expand up.
And the traffic through the 14 Freeway is getting worse every year anyway.
What suprises me is that a few don't know that the idea that L.A. must expand vertically is exactly the opposite of what most people want.
They want to stay in their gas-consuming automobiles, which is a shame.
I humbly beg to differ with you, sir. There are a ton of in-fill projects under construction or recently completed all around the urban core (and not just downtown) and even more planned. The core is becoming more dense every year. As this happens, coupled with increased fuel prices due to shortages, driving around in "gas-consuming automobiles" will become ever less attractive. Congestion will increase due to the higher density and higher energy costs will put personal autos out of reach for many of those who have been able hang in there up until now. Continued sprawl is becoming unsustainable with our current model of transportation.

Suburbia has been "driven" (forgive the bad pun) by cheap oil and the desire by people to live single-family detached homes with mini private parks that need to be (wastefully) heavily watered, located 30, 60 or even more miles from their work. If you haven't noticed Los Angeles is in a fairly arid region and as you add more people, each person has a smaller share of that pie is also. Denser urban development is much more efficient from an energy, resource and environmental standpoint.

In the very near future (perhaps the time is already upon us) it won't matter what people "want", they will have no choice - unless they are uber-rich. Much of suburbia in the hinterlands will (rightfully) wither and die.
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted May 14, 2007, 4:43 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by hughfb3 View Post
Are we that dissappointed at Astani for the lack of progress Concerto has taken that we label it Approved rather under construction on the title page?
The reasoning behind labeling Concerto "Approved" rather than under construction was that there hasn't been any construction activity at the site for about 4 months. It's not a knock to Astani or the project, I just thought it to be more accurate.

Technically it should be labeled "On Hold", but I didn't want to create a whole new category for one project. Once we see some activity on the site, I'll move it back to under construction. Hopefully we see that soon. I really like this project.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted May 14, 2007, 5:33 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,099
Well ladowntowner I hope your right because i'm tired of more and more people resorting to using their cars in this city
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted May 14, 2007, 11:55 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
Took a look at the LA Live webcam, and they have removed half of the dirt ramp that provided access from Georgia St., and built a new, smaller ramp that accesses the site from Olympic. It looks like they're prepping for the hotel tower to start.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 4:43 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,099
Is it just me...but does anybody find it a little odd that the last part of the project to be built is the Hotel?
Its almost like critics want delay it to buy enough to time to find something else about it to criticize and protest and thus force officials to cancel the project.
It really ticks me off when crap like that happens to soooo many projects these days
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 5:12 AM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Is it just me...but does anybody find it a little odd that the last part of the project to be built is the Hotel?
Its almost like critics want delay it to buy enough to time to find something else about it to criticize and protest and thus force officials to cancel the project.
It really ticks me off when crap like that happens to soooo many projects these days
Don't fret, JDRCRASH. The hotel at L.A. Live is very much anticipated and welcomed. I don't think there is anyone in the city government against it - nor much of anyone who matters anywhere else. The only person I recall crying out against it was the owner of the Bonaventure Hotel a bit further up Fig. (gee.. I wonder why?) L.A. has desperately needed a world class hotel directly across from the Convention Center for decades.

I think we have little to worry about on this one, short of a complete economic collapse in the next year or so.
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 5:29 AM
fridayinla's Avatar
fridayinla fridayinla is offline
World Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 467
Hey Colemonkee, great job on the project rundown! I didn't see Glo on Wilshire on the Under Construction list. Also, Vero is recently completed... in case you'd like to add those to your list.
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 6:31 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
^ Yes! You're right. I tried to find a render of Glo Wilshire and couldn't. If you can find one, post it and I'll add it to the front page. If you have a picture of Vero completed, I'll add that as well.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 5:15 PM
SC_00_05 SC_00_05 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
Bad news about Gansevoort West

[From curbed LA] Heartbreaking news this morning. We learn from the kind people of the Gansevoort Hotel Group that the proposed Gansevoort West at 9th and Grand downtown is off. We've been waiting for more news since our last update in August, but unfortunately none came. And now this from the GHG people: "The Gansevoort Hotel Group (GHG) and The Chetrit Group have renegotiated the two projects they currently have under development. GHG will wholly own and manage the Gansevoort South hotel and condominium development in Miami. The Chetrit Group will develop the 9th Street/Grand Avenue project in Los Angeles under a different brand name; GHG will not be involved." And it was such a lovely rendering...
· Gansevoort West: Update in Brief [Curbed LA]



Well, hopefully the Chetrit Group can still do a good job with this. At least it's still being developed and can hopefully be made into something even better.

Last edited by SC_00_05; May 15, 2007 at 6:45 PM.
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 6:21 PM
RAlossi RAlossi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,573
And now we know why there wasn't much work going on. Hopefully we will see some action soon.

EDIT: If they're as good with their construction as they are with their web design https://www.chetritgroup.com/ we're in for some fun.

Last edited by RAlossi; May 15, 2007 at 6:26 PM.
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 6:51 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
^ I love sarcasm.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 7:27 PM
SC_00_05 SC_00_05 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
^^Yeah, wow, that website could seriously have been built by a 12 year old who had to build a "homepage" for a 10 minute project in 7th grade. I especially like that ultra low-res logo of theirs that they use.
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 9:26 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
Well, the folks at Park Fifth seem to be a bit more serious. They're running a 2/3 page color ad in today's LA Times, and their sales center doesn't open until "Summer 2007".
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted May 15, 2007, 9:47 PM
alikaalex's Avatar
alikaalex alikaalex is offline
Registered Schmoozer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DTLA Historic Core
Posts: 41
^ Is that ad viewable online?
__________________
(signature.)
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.