HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    300 North LaSalle in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2007, 3:32 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
April 5, 2007

     
     
  #642  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2007, 12:17 PM
VA_Gentleman's Avatar
VA_Gentleman VA_Gentleman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 214
^ Oh Hell Yeah! It's rising.
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2007, 2:59 PM
museumparktom museumparktom is offline
Chicagotom SSC
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 438
Compared to Waterview Tower this one just looks massive. I know the city wants developers to go thin and tall but 300 LaSalle is going to be a brut
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2007, 4:12 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
^But beautiful. It'll be great if they can start on the apartment building on the nearby lot soon.
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2007, 11:56 PM
DePaul Bunyan DePaul Bunyan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
^But beautiful. It'll be great if they can start on the apartment building on the nearby lot soon.
How tall is that one going to be? If it broke 700 that would be awesome. If it's on the river it can't be less than 40 stories though.
__________________
"Who does vote for these dishonest shitheads?"

-Hunter S. Thompson (click for full quote)
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2007, 1:16 AM
Sir Isaac Newton Sir Isaac Newton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
^But beautiful. It'll be great if they can start on the apartment building on the nearby lot soon.
Do you know where exactly the nearby lot is?
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2007, 1:18 AM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Isaac Newton View Post
Do you know where exactly the nearby lot is?
I believe it is where those cars are parked in Solarwinds picture.
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2007, 1:30 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
Everywhere all at once
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SI NYC
Posts: 2,458
AH! that was a sudden shriek of excitement.

I can't believe this ones so far along already. I always love a classic office building in a sea of condo, hotel and mixed-use towers.
__________________
BUILD IT. BUILD EVERYTHING. BUILD IT ALL.
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2007, 1:49 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by DePaul Bunyan View Post
How tall is that one going to be? If it broke 700 that would be awesome. If it's on the river it can't be less than 40 stories though.
Not to take the thread further off topic, but I'm talking about 161 W Kinzie.
There's an article here if you're interested.
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2007, 3:38 AM
JuniorReb JuniorReb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 227
Kinzie and Lake there is a sign for that apartment building right next to Merchandise mart
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2007, 4:33 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by museumparktom View Post
Compared to Waterview Tower this one just looks massive. I know the city wants developers to go thin and tall but 300 LaSalle is going to be a brut
It is definitely much less thin than Waterview but it's important to note that office towers here will never come close to being as thin as residential towers can be - just reflects the differences in requirements of the 2 uses and the economics involved. That being said, it is notable that 300 probably has the smallest floor plates (not by a huge margin but still notable) of all of the recent large office towers built downtown (25,000 sf vs the more typical 27,000-31,000 sf or so).......this sounds great to me and I hope it could be somewhat of a trend (although you'll probably never see floor plates again for office towers of less than 23,000 sf or so)...maybe we could get the average back down to the mid-20's (000s), and gain some height! I'm remaining hopeful as to this for 200 N. Riverside (especially because it's also a Hines project)...I would love to see over 800' for that one...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2007, 4:59 PM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Even smaller than Hyatt? Maybe smaller area.

Hyatt may be longer, but its sure as heck not that broad.
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2007, 2:22 PM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Pic Taken Thursday April 5th. For full size/higher rez photo, drop me a pm.
     
     
  #654  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 4:00 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
April 13, 2007






Last edited by SolarWind; Apr 14, 2007 at 4:05 AM.
     
     
  #655  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:05 PM
jcchii's Avatar
jcchii jcchii is offline
Content provider
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: city on the take
Posts: 3,118
going fast.

thanks for all your photos, solarwind
     
     
  #656  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 7:57 PM
Chitown Chitown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 584
I'll bet that barge is convenient for them. They should do all the large pieces by barge.
     
     
  #657  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2007, 1:13 PM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
April 20, 2007


^ looking at 300 N LaSalle from across Waterview Tower site


^ the core is well above LaSalle street





     
     
  #658  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2007, 2:31 PM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 9,019
The construction technique seems similar to that of Waterview.
     
     
  #659  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2007, 2:07 AM
jjk1103 jjk1103 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 878
.....we have too many densly packed skyscrapers ! the foundations really get complicated !
     
     
  #660  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2007, 4:21 AM
JMininger JMininger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk1103 View Post
.....we have too many densly packed skyscrapers ! the foundations really get complicated !
Don't believe I've ever heard that complaint on this website before. Too many skyscrapers!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:10 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.