HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2007, 11:17 PM
Daquan13 Daquan13 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by STERNyc View Post
You're right, Again, I can't wait for this project to come to fuition.


As are a lot of us with baited breath.

Last edited by Daquan13; Apr 15, 2007 at 1:22 PM.
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2007, 11:24 PM
Urban Sky's Avatar
Urban Sky Urban Sky is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by kznyc2k View Post
It's not about whether I like the tower or not (I give it a 3 outta 5), but you just have a really, really huge — for this tower, D, and it's quite apparent by the volume with which you post. It's good and all to be enthusiastic about your passion, but I think you're beyond being enthusiastic, and have jumped over into the "obsessive" category.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 12:50 AM
CoolCzech's Avatar
CoolCzech CoolCzech is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGII View Post
Holy sweet new rendering. I just wish they could make the heights a little more realistic.
Really. Even the 4 WTC would dominate the area, if by itself. That rendering makes it out barely larger than the surrounding older building. And 2 WTC looks downright puny, when in reality it will be just shy of the original Twin's height.
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 7:02 AM
Daquan13 Daquan13 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Sky View Post

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


I've forgotten about this and moved on. How old are you?

For Pete's sake, why don't you grow up? Stop acting like you're five years old!

Last edited by Daquan13; Mar 20, 2007 at 1:05 PM.
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 8:24 AM
sfcity1 sfcity1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGII View Post
Rough height correction:

A very nice addition (I offer no opinion as to how good of a replacement of the TT though) to the NYC skyline. Now, if only this can catch on elsewhere in Manhattan.
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 12:28 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGII View Post
Rough height correction:

Very nice. BTW, things will change (again) when we get a final design for Tower 5, probably approaching 900 ft. Goldman should also be added to the rendering. Can't get a read on the Beekman.
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 12:29 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by STERNyc View Post
anyone remember the "three sisters" rendering of 425 Fifth Avenue? Again, I can't wait for this project to come to fuition.
OH, don't bring up that insult to our intelligence again. I've never gotten over that.
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 12:32 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfcity1 View Post
A very nice addition (I offer no opinion as to how good of a replacement of the TT though) to the NYC skyline. Now, if only this can catch on elsewhere in Manhattan.
It seems to already have (check the proposals forumn), if only because developers have WTC envy and Manhattan is desperate for new office space.
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 3:51 PM
Ghost's Avatar
Ghost Ghost is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 251
Please, someone go taking pictures there! Does anyone have acces to 7 WTC? I know there is not happened much but still... something to stop that fight between Daquan and others!
That webcam really —... I tried to make better quality but don't make much difference... What is that red X?
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 3:57 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Very nice. BTW, things will change (again) when we get a final design for Tower 5, probably approaching 900 ft. Goldman should also be added to the rendering. Can't get a read on the Beekman.
Beekman would appear just to the left of 7 WTC, at about the same height, no?
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 7:59 PM
ramvid01 ramvid01 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGII View Post
Beekman would appear just to the left of 7 WTC, at about the same height, no?
Beekman is about 830ish feet, so it's actually taller than 7 WTC.

But I doubt you'd see it from that angle at least. Its on the other side of Manhattan.
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 8:01 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramvid01 View Post
Beekman is about 830ish feet, so it's actually taller than 7 WTC.
Yes, but if it were included in the rendering posted earlier it should appear to be near 7 WTC in height, due to perspective.
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 8:04 PM
Scruffy's Avatar
Scruffy Scruffy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,773
Beekmans taller than 7wtc by over 100 feet.
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 10:03 PM
BINARY SYSTEM's Avatar
BINARY SYSTEM BINARY SYSTEM is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 119
From certain angles Beekman Tower will be visible from Jersey City. Midtown and Brooklyn will easily see Beekmans Tower, as it's almost another 1000 footer.
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 10:37 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,341
Perhaps you don't understand. Beekman Tower should appear the same height as 7 WTC from that view due to perspective, not because it's physically the same height.
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2007, 12:42 AM
Daquan13 Daquan13 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 7,746
I was told that ALL of the towers, including Tower 5 is supposed to be taller than 7 WTC.

Last edited by Daquan13; Mar 21, 2007 at 1:10 AM.
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2007, 1:06 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,734
^ Yes 7 WTC is the shortest highrise of the cluster. From what I heard 5 WTC is shorther that 4 WTC, but taller that 7 WTC. Then again that was a while ago and things change quickly on this project.
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2007, 1:12 AM
Daquan13 Daquan13 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 7,746
No doubt about that!!
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2007, 1:15 AM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,117
Looks eerily familiar

     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2007, 1:19 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,734
I would personally visualize them (being the towers) as steps. One is taller than the other leading up to the Freedom Tower. 7 WTC is just a side bar.

To tell you the truth, I think 7 WTC looks out of place compared to the rest of the towers designs. Sure the facade, matches up, but the structural architecture just isn't flowign with me. Just goes to show you how the glass box concept is out. (I'm still a glass box fan though!)
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.