Quote:
Originally Posted by crewer
Our forum discussions have dealt almost exclusively on condo projects going up and the changing dynamics and skyline of downtown Austin. That's all great. But this euphoric attitude about living in a downtown high rise goes on with little discussion of the reality of high rise living. Everyone wants to get in on a condo in the sky with a great view and in the heart of downtown, but surely you've considered the other sides to it.
For those of you who are currently living in a downtown high rise, or have reserved your condo in the 360, I'd like to find out from you what convinced you to do that. What do you perceive as being the advantages to downtown living.
At the same time, what concerns do you have in the back of your mind? Were there issues that made it a little difficult for you to sign on the line when reserving or purchasing your unit?
|
I have been living on the north end of downtown for 5 years. Cambridge Towers. I teach at UT and work by the river so it was a great location. The capacity to walk downtown and the university area was a plus. I was drawn to codo living for many reasons: Bang for the buck; felt I got more for the money even with condo fees. Location; could no longer stand the idea of getting into a car to get coffee or a newspaper, much less food, entertainment,work, etc. Maintence: no yard to cut, no house to paint.....did I mention the garage attendent and the 24 hr door person.The inhouse maintinece staff is incredible. Security:I (both of us) travel a great deal so the idea of a reasonably secure situation was also of great benefit.
Drawbacks: community decissions. While many folks think Cambridge is a retirement home. It is not. It;s just that it was the only highrise for so long.....all the urban dwellers of 20 years ago moved in here and never left. It sounds awful, but so many times to only way a place comes open is when someone dies or is moved to a nursing home. (The later is how we got our place. 7th floor corner unit wiht a Capitol view. ) The problem is the older voting block that can make some decissions we aren't fond of. Nothing major yet.....a few aesthetic choices..... still can't have dogs here..... that's the next big hurdle. Conflicts with businesses on the first floor has provided the biggest headache for the Association.
We are considering looking at one of the new towers in a few years. One of the biggest concerns for me before signing was the health of the reserves of the building. Cambrigde was very established in terms of reserves and the solid construction of the building. I think it is important to find out how that might playout over the first 5 years of a new building..... especially at the point where the developer is no longer liable for the building. Can anyone shed light?