HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 4:52 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
I think that's Vetro.
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 4:52 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_hydrogen View Post
That meaning Burnham Pointe. But, after looking at the rendering, I think I'm mistaken.
yes, you are mistaken, burnham pointe just began pile driving last week. i believe the building under construction in your pic is vetro.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 4:56 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
yes, you are mistaken, burnham pointe just began pile driving last week. i believe the building under construction in your pic is vetro.
Yep, you guys are right. It's Vetro. Sorry for any confusion.
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 8:11 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
I do agree with your point, but I would much rather end up with projects like 340 on the Park and Canyon Ranch (that maybe didn't aim to be absolutely remarkable structures but are very worthy designs that I think will stand the test of time) than projects that aimed for greatness and missed, ending up mediocre at best, which for me sums up Park Tower fairly well...
Touché. LR's grandeur potential went down, but the quality of its designs went up. Go figure.

This could be luck of the draw, shifts in taste, or a conscious move, I guess. If the P+W proposal on LSD is as good as 340 OTP, I certainly won't complain.
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 8:17 AM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Great job on that conversion! Personally I think Haithcock has a half-decent chance to win without a run-off, despite the fairly large group of contenders. The 2nd ward is just so much larger than the Printer's Row Nimby Zone... At any rate, I couldn't agree with you more that there does need to be a shift in balance of power over development and zoning issues away from alderpeople and toward DPD...

Actually, I believe the large number of contenders is to her advantage. It splits up the opposition vote, and therefore she may win by defalt. She may not be the best Alderman, and I for one think she could have been a little more prepaired for that forum, however, she understands how the city works, and whats good for the city far more than the other candidates do, especially Hairy Dookie, er I mean Larry Doody.
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 8:29 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Hey all,

Very pleased to report that cladding is going up on the north side of 600 North LSD. Most exciting, the building will have a full curtainwall with apparently no exposed concrete slabs (spandrel cladding for slabs, continuous ribbon windows over columns). This one is on its way to being a fine addition to the city.

But what are they going to do at the corners? It seems these may become painted concrete? Let's hope not.
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 9:16 AM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,829
^ That is really good news, but I do believe those corners you speak of are panted concrete, although I could be wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicubs111 View Post
Jan. 10, 2007
That formula has worked well with CMK's other projects. At the end of the third quarter, buyers had signed contracts for 70% of the units in a 498-condo CMK development at 1720 S. Michigan Ave. and 98% of the units at a 249-unit project at 1620 S. Michigan, according to Appraisal Research.

http://chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=23426

Holy crap! 249 Units in that little building? CMK really knows how to pack them in. I am excited about 714 new condos+ Office+ Retail in that dead corner of the Loop, it should have a nice impact on street activity. Yeah its a big base of parking, but this is a dense building. Even with the poduim, it still checks in at only .798 parking ratio. Could be lower, but that is not too bad.

My only conern with more condos in the Central Loop is more potential NIMBYs. I am not too concerned with rental apartments, as those residents typically complain less than condo owners.
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 1:46 PM
Jaroslaw's Avatar
Jaroslaw Jaroslaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seoul
Posts: 1,792
-Well, 1620 is L-shaped, so I think the part fronting Michigan is only about half the total footprint. But yeah, these are warehouses for secretaries, or students.... SRO's for the new millenium. Glad it's there though.
__________________
Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:10 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Park 1000 - Goodbye towers B and C ?

The buzz on the street is that East/West University has purchased the Wabash frontage of the Park 1000 project (1000 South Michigan), to build of all things, a gym facility.

Personally, I am sick of condos and willing to consider more diverse uses of the remaining land in the South Loop, but this has me concerned. Just how interesting can a gym facility be? I would think that street level retail would be part of the program for the revenue generation required to fund the ongoing budget for this facility. THis is a big piece of land, so how tall is this thing going to be? two stories?

The other perplexing thing about it is that Columbia was diligently hunting for a piece of property like this for their production studio. How did little ole East/West end up with this prize parcel?

Has anybody heard anything about this?
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:29 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukecuj View Post
This blows. I think south wabash is a hidden gem especially once residents realize the views trump tower is going to give that street. Perhaps this deal involves a swap for EW property on Michigan Ave ?

I'm finding this hard to believe though since they are such a small educational entity... A gym.... it just doesn't make any sense.
Something interesting is going on. That's for sure.
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:35 PM
dvidler dvidler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loopy View Post
The buzz on the street is that East/West University has purchased the Wabash frontage of the Park 1000 project (1000 South Michigan), to build of all things, a gym facility.

Personally, I am sick of condos and willing to consider more diverse uses of the remaining land in the South Loop, but this has me concerned. Just how interesting can a gym facility be? I would think that street level retail would be part of the program for the revenue generation required to fund the ongoing budget for this facility. THis is a big piece of land, so how tall is this thing going to be? two stories?

The other perplexing thing about it is that Columbia was diligently hunting for a piece of property like this for their production studio. How did little ole East/West end up with this prize parcel?

Has anybody heard anything about this?
To be honest I can see this as true. One, why would East/West need a gym facility? And am I wrong in saying East/West is a very small school? It does not make sense to me.
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:43 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loopy View Post
The buzz on the street is that East/West University has purchased the Wabash frontage of the Park 1000 project (1000 South Michigan), to build of all things, a gym facility.

Personally, I am sick of condos and willing to consider more diverse uses of the remaining land in the South Loop, but this has me concerned. Just how interesting can a gym facility be? I would think that street level retail would be part of the program for the revenue generation required to fund the ongoing budget for this facility. THis is a big piece of land, so how tall is this thing going to be? two stories?

The other perplexing thing about it is that Columbia was diligently hunting for a piece of property like this for their production studio. How did little ole East/West end up with this prize parcel?

Has anybody heard anything about this?
It's not buzz... I went to the sales center 2 days ago, and the sales associate told me this also. I didn't know about the gym though... I figured that it would be a waste of space, shit project. Institutions never build anything good. The only plus that I can think of is that the cash infusion that the developer gets from the sale of the land can go towards 830 South Michigan.

I was also told that they want to break ground, I believe she said February. The have currently sold 30% of the units. I know that this seems low, but when the new developers took control, they had to begin all over again.

I was told that financing has already been secured, and that they don't have a 50% quota to meet.

So I guess there are some pluses and minuses.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:59 PM
dvidler dvidler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 313
^ I am really surprised by this. I hope they try to incorporate the street activity with the design. I would hate to see dead space.

Maybe it will another dorm/gym facility? With Daley pushing for more dorms downtown this would make sense. I hope it is more than a gym facility. I am thinking it will not be a public gym facility with Fitplex and State/Roosevelt and the new X-Sport going into State & 8th
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:06 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
I was also told that they want to break ground, I believe she said February. The have currently sold 30% of the units. I know that this seems low, but when the new developers took control, they had to begin all over again.

I was told that financing has already been secured, and that they don't have a 50% quota to meet.

So I guess there are some pluses and minuses.
One big plus for Rennaissant is that they can market units on West side of Park 1000 as having much better views than they could have with the original 3 tower program.
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:06 PM
museumparktom museumparktom is offline
Chicagotom SSC
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loopy View Post

The other perplexing thing about it is that Columbia was diligently hunting for a piece of property like this for their production studio. How did little ole East/West end up with this prize parcel?

Has anybody heard anything about this?
I just read on SSC Chicago/Cultural Compilation that Columbia production studio had a design completion and that it was going to be built at 16th and State, just north of the District 1 police station.
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:09 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvidler View Post
^ I am really surprised by this. I hope they try to incorporate the street activity with the design. I would hate to see dead space.

Maybe it will another dorm/gym facility? With Daley pushing for more dorms downtown this would make sense. I hope it is more than a gym facility. I am thinking it will not be a public gym facility with Fitplex and State/Roosevelt and the new X-Sport going into State & 8th
Given the way that 2nd Ward poilitics are shaping up, it will more likely be a Gym/Parking facility.
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:38 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
I figured that it would be a waste of space, shit project. Institutions never build anything good.
Well, I disagree with this. The U of C has built many amazing buildings and continues to do so. The new UIC gym is pretty cool too. But of course, these guys have a lot more cash.

In any case, it would be sad to see this great amount of land not used for high density. East-West or whoever the buyer is, they should consider selling air rights above their development if they don't max out the potential of the site themselves. It would be foolish not to.

This also may be "selective confusion" from the sales office designed to foster the concept that the units will have good views to the west, as Loopy mentioned.
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 7:04 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
Well, I disagree with this. The U of C has built many amazing buildings and continues to do so. The new UIC gym is pretty cool too. But of course, these guys have a lot more cash.

In any case, it would be sad to see this great amount of land not used for high density. East-West or whoever the buyer is, they should consider selling air rights above their development if they don't max out the potential of the site themselves. It would be foolish not to.

This also may be "selective confusion" from the sales office designed to foster the concept that the units will have good views to the west, as Loopy mentioned.
The new UIC facility is pretty good. It was cooler before value engineering came to the project. One of the items cut from the design was a cantilever over the Polk Street stub. You can see where it was to be, it was reduced to a small bump out of the south facade.

I am crossing my fingers for a deal East-West makes with a developer to build a high-rise with the lower floors for facilities, class rooms, dorms and the upper floors as condos, where all the selling views are.
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 7:12 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
Well, I disagree with this. The U of C has built many amazing buildings and continues to do so. The new UIC gym is pretty cool too. But of course, these guys have a lot more cash.

In any case, it would be sad to see this great amount of land not used for high density. East-West or whoever the buyer is, they should consider selling air rights above their development if they don't max out the potential of the site themselves. It would be foolish not to.

This also may be "selective confusion" from the sales office designed to foster the concept that the units will have good views to the west, as Loopy mentioned.
I think that they should partner with some major condo developer and do a large mixed-use project on that site. A tall one, not super tall, but tall. The school could use the first 10 or so floors. Then, I'd like to see 20 or so floors of commercial office space. No big firms, but something like what the Reliance Building originally was, home to doctors and lawyers and other small businesses. It's time to get some commercial and retail space into that area, and what better way? It's better than having a strip mall isn't it? Then it should be topped off with between 20 - 40 floors of residential.

How does that sound?
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 7:59 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Columbia is proposing to develop the lot just South of this into a high-rise theater production facility. It's too bad that they couldn't have snatched up this parcel before East/West for their Film/Video/Sound Production Studio that they just announced for 16th and State.

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:25 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.