HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #701  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 3:10 PM
Utaaah!'s Avatar
Utaaah! Utaaah! is offline
Expatriate
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 257
While we're on the subject of Station Park, here's a timely article from Davis County Clipper: http://www.clippertoday.com/default.asp?...=&pform=&sc=1005&hn=clippertoday&he=.com

This project is very close to former homes I owned in Kaysvile and Farmington. I wish I could have stuck around to see the finished project.

City gives OK to 100-acre Farmington Station

FARMINGTON — Get ready Farmington, Park Station is on its way. Thursday evening, city council members finally approved the development master plan paving the way for CenterCal Properties to begin construction on the 100-acre development.

After making small revisions to the plan, pens came out, hands were shaken and agreements made between the city and developer.

The approval came just in the nick of time, as the Jan. 5 deadline facing CenterCal Properties was merely hours away.

While the development plan was approved, concerns regarding access roads from Park Lane into Park Station persisted throughout the night.

Before access roads — a necessary part of the development — can be built, UDOT’s approval is needed.

While the pending UDOT approval worried some city council members and CenterCal, both parties were confident that UDOT, who has already offered support for the development, will officially give its approval for the access road in the near future.

With finalized construction plans still in the works, Jean Paul Wardy, senior vice president for CenterCal, hopes that construction will begin soon, stating, “We will break ground this fall.”

With future tenants unknown, the development plan allows CenterCal to make independent decisions as to where specific stores will be located in the development.

This will give CenterCal the freedom to accommodate prospective tenants. The site, however, will have to meet all Farmington city guidelines, such as sidewalk depth, etc.

To confirm that the development will meet Farmington’s construction standards and to ensure that Farmington’s attractive rural feel is preserved, the city council established a committee to review the design and landscape throughout the project.

The committee will consist of members from the city council and the planning commission, as well as city staff and Farmington residents.

In the end, CenterCal guarantees that Park Station will be “the preeminent lifestyle shopping center in the Salt Lake Region.”

As the meeting came to a close, Wardy said, “We’re going to build a project that the community can be proud of. We’re really excited to get started.”

On its website, CenterCal states, “Park Station will be home to a broad selection of apparel, home goods, entertainment and restaurants, offering the shopper an experience unrivaled in the region.”

With construction beginning as early as fall 2007, Wardy hopes to have Park Station open for business by spring 2009.
     
     
  #702  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 3:41 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
We need to bring this forward.

Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post





Pdxman, whether this was posted before with pics etc I don't know, but I'm glad you brought it up again. In reviewing the different projects of this particular development group, "this is a big upscale positive." I'm really liking the design elements,particularly the large Victorian Canopy. What count of Lifestyle Centers are we at now along the Wasatch? Man, I'm loosing track. Between this, Farmington/Bountiful/No. Salt Lake sector and Provo there are a lot that either already exist and are expanding big time,are under construction, current malls converting over to the lifestyle theme, and projects breaking ground within the next year.
Recently I visited a large new lifestyle center on the western perimeter of Metro L.A.,(Rancho Cucamonga). The concept was great, but the execution,"materials, building designs, etc. was very disapointing." Projects like this one above will assure the Wasatch Projects keep the competitive bar high.
Does anyone know exactly where in relationship to Lagoon this project will be? Man, this is going to give that area a big one-two punch.
     
     
  #703  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 3:59 PM
Utaaah!'s Avatar
Utaaah! Utaaah! is offline
Expatriate
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Does anyone know exactly where in relationship to Lagoon this project will be?
Station Park (aka Park Station or Farmington Station) is directly across the freeway to the west of Lagoon. The project centers around a FrontRunner commuter rail station that should effeciently shuttle patrons to both destinations. The project also includes a hotel that may prove popular for Lagoon guests. A few years ago Lagoon and Farmington talked about building a monorail to connect the park to the rail station. I don't think that will happen, but Lagoon does plan to run shuttle busses.

While the rendering looks fantastic, depicting multi-story buildings housing office or residential space above retail, the site plan doesn't mention a residential component. I hope that hasn't fallen by the way side. I visited a similar looking lifestyle center in Jacksonville, Florida, last year that had second-story windows and balconies -- looked nice, but they were all fake. There's another one near my present home in Texas -- about half of the second-floor space is real and half fake. I hope the Farmington project includes 2-3 floors of real office or residential space above all the connecting retail.
     
     
  #704  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 4:16 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Seems to me that this incredible coop of a location would be ripe for the full-blown plan. Like you Utaaah, I sure hope they go all out. What a Location!!!!
     
     
  #705  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 4:21 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Historic clock back after big restoration
By Dawn House
The Salt Lake Tribune/Heritage Foundation newsletter



Luke Winters disengages the "Old Zions Bank Clock" from... (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune)An iron street clock and the terra cotta building behind it are among surviving structures that early Utah settlers would have recognized in downtown Salt Lake City nearly five generations ago.
On Thursday, a giant crane eased the 3,000 pound Old Zions Bank Clock back into its base on the southwest corner of 100 South and Main Street after extensive restoration on its gears, springs, motors and column.
"As we look to the renovation of the downtown area, it's particularly meaningful to have this historic landmark at the Old Clock Corner," said Zions Bank Senior Vice President Rob Brough. "It certainly is the iconic image of the history of Zions Bank and yes, of Salt Lake City as well."
The 20-foot timepiece had become so recognizable that a 1918 Zions' advertisement showed only the clock when announcing: "The bank which gives careful, cheerful, helpful service has the most successful customers."
The clock had been cast in Philadelphia shortly after the end of the Civil War, when iron - like today's plastics - was commonly fashioned into durable goods and ornamental artworks. It originally stood in front of the Eagle Emporium retail store, constructed in 1864. The building also housed the first LDS Church-owned ZCMI department store, and lastly, a Zions Bank. Coincidentally, the bank was founded across the street in 1873, the same year the clock had been installed.
People have set their watches to the clock's time since oxen-driven wagons hauled it to the Utah Territory. The clock was originally powered by a water wheel from a diversion canal off City Creek. Later, it kept time with springs and wet cell batteries. By 1912 it was hooked up to a new electricity system inside the bank, said Zions spokesperson Heidi Prokop.
In the 1960s motors kept the time. Those motors have been replaced by four new ones made the American Clock Co.
The Old Zions Bank Clock is one of the few remaining pieces of 19th century street furniture in Salt Lake City's downtown, according to the Utah Heritage Foundation. But look behind it as well.
The bank building, constructed in 1864, is the city's only remaining commercial structure built prior to the transcontinental railroad, completed at Promontory on May 10, 1869.


History of the clock
* The Old Bank Clock was originally powered by a water wheel. By the turn of the century, motors driven by wet cell batteries were used.
* IBM replaced the original gears in 1912 and connected the clock to the new electricity system inside the bank.
* From the 1900s until the late 1950s, Zions employee Joseph Baud made sure the clock never slowed or stopped.
* To set the clock, a professional climbed a ladder, opened the 8-foot-tall clock body and tweaked the gears. Now, the clock may be set at the bottom of its base.
Source: Zions Bank, Utah Heritage Foundation
The renovation
* Old Zions Bank Clock's four 1960s motors are replaced and the clockwork rewired. The old green paint on the clock and column are refinished with a bronze and a faux patina.
     
     
  #706  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 4:28 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553


Jmonkey, I think this is probably the kind of ornamental iron work we would both like to see as embellishment on the new Sky Bridge.
     
     
  #707  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 4:58 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Thumbs up Depot District: Setting high goals

Backers say the transit hub will revive west side
By Patty Henetz
The Salt Lake Tribune

The rennaissance underway along this corridor is among the most appealing of any around. The Intermodel hub will secure a bright future. Downtown Salt Lake City has been fortunate to have not just one,but two beautiful old depot's to create these new projects around. Here is a pic of the Union Pacific,which serves as the centerpiece for The Gateway and also some interesting pics of the construction pace of the Rio Grande Depot,which sits just a few blocks to the south of the Union Pacific.

Rio Grande Depot under construction September 1909

November, 1909

December 1909, This crew is keeping a pretty good pace

April,1910

September 1910, One year later and looks like we are in business




To save their nickels for candy bars, young Van Turner and his Glendale buddies used to walk home from downtown instead of riding the bus. They would pass through Japan Town and then walk along the tracks, past warehouses and manufacturing centers whose walls curved to accommodate rail freight.
On Thursday, Turner, now chairman of the Salt Lake City Council, during an open house welcomed the coming juncture of two mass transit rail systems at the Salt Lake Intermodal Hub.
"Train service dictated what this area was all about," he said. "The west side was developed as a kind of a service center." Now that rail transit is coming together, he said, "this neighborhood is about to change. It will change dramatically."
On Monday, crews will start building a Utah Transit Authority TRAX line that will connect the current north-south terminus at the Arena Station with the transit hub at 300 South 600 West. The project is expected to take up to 18 months - and by then, UTA's Front Runner commuter rail service is expected to begin between Ogden and Salt Lake City.
The thousands of people who will pass through the station will amp up development of the Depot District, projected to be the state's most urban neighborhood. Turner and other city officials said the 19-block transit-oriented neighborhood between North Temple and 400 South, from 400 West to Interstate 15 could house up to 20,000 people who would live in rowhouses, townhomes and apartments next to - or atop - neighborhood shops and offices.
Turner said the development also could at last remove the barriers between downtown and the 30,000 people who live just west of I-15.
"It's just a beginning system," he said. "We've got a lot to do."
UTA spokesman Justin Jones said the entire six-block TRAX project, which wraps around The Gateway mall and includes improvements to city streets and utilities, will cost $45 million.
Construction will move south from 400 W. South Temple to 200 South, turn west to 600 West and then south to 300 South. UTA general manager John Inglish vowed the project won't hamper existing businesses the way TRAX construction on Main Street did in the late 1990s.
Traffic will move around The Gateway mall on streets narrowed to one lane each way. Once the utility and street work is done, rail construction will move to the middle of the streets.
An architectural rendering of the hub, which already houses the Greyhound station, shows a flashy multi-level building arranged around a curved plaza. Its design could change over time, depending on how the district develops, Jones said.
The entire project is expected to take another two-dozen years, and will eventually include a car rental office, bike rentals, a parking structure, taxi stand, cafe and other features, Jones said.
The project would seed an urban neighborhood in the city's one-time red light district.
Parks would take the place of backyards, and galleries, clubs, grocery stores, coffeehouses, restaurants and other retail would create the kind of neighborhoods cities such as Portland, Ore., have built along with their transit systems.
City officials have visited Portland many times for inspiration, Turner said. The Depot District, he said, will someday draw the same kind of attention.
"These old railroad yards are where we can build the city we want to be," he said. "Portland may be the model now, but soon we'll be the model."
[email protected]

Last edited by delts145; Jan 11, 2007 at 3:56 PM.
     
     
  #708  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 5:11 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
Thumbs up

This is not a Wasatch Specific development, but a lot of us are big cheerleaders for this kind of preservation. I thought it definately deserved a post.

Duo get to save theater — finally

By Suzanne Dean
For the Deseret Morning News



GUNNISON, Sanpete County — The day Lori Nay and Diana Spencer closed a deal to buy the 92-year-old Star Theater on Main Street in Gunnison, the marquee announced, "New Ownership" — a reflection of nearly two decades of their intentions to restore the historic building.
Back in the late 1980s, Spencer, now a retired Snow College professor, and Nay, a doctor's wife and Gunnison city councilwoman, had helped organize a group called Save Our Star (SOS), in order to purchase the ornate theater. But their efforts were unsuccessful, and it went to another buyer.
In 2004, a for-sale sign again went up in the box office of the Star, one of the most notable structures along U.S. 89. Within five weeks, Nay and Spencer incorporated a nonprofit organization, put up earnest money with 24 hours notice and came up with an $8,000 down payment — and the theater was theirs.
"How many times," Spencer says, "do the fates provide a second chance on frustrated dreams?"
Built in 1912, the structure was originally called the Casino Theater. (That was before the word "casino" conjured up images of Las Vegas gambling houses, Spencer says.) A later owner changed the name to the Star Theater.
Nay and Spencer renamed it the Casino Star Theater in recognition "of the theater's entire history as an entertainment center for the Gunnison Valley."
Around the turn of the century, theaters were the most elaborate buildings in many communities. The Casino Star was built in the same era as the Capitol Theatre in Salt Lake City, the Empress Theatre in Magna and Peery's Egyptian Theater in Ogden.
The Casino Star has the intricate decoration characteristic of beaux-arts architecture. The decorations tend to deteriorate, which is why few beaux-arts structures remain. Spencer, who has done research on the building, says that as far as she can determine, the Casino Star is the only beaux-arts theater west of the Mississippi that is still operating.
The original facade included columns, statues, cherubs and flowers. People entered through a huge arch lined with more than 350 terra cotta roses. Inside each rosette was a light bulb. Those bulbs lit up not only the theater but virtually the whole Gunnison Main Street, Nay says.

Todays Theatre has lost much of the original beaux-arts detailing, which will now once again be restored. Below are pics of today and how theatre appeared in its glory days.

entrance today,

entrance as it appeared originally,


pic taken in 2005

Same vantage point before deterioration



As part of a potential $1 million restoration, the women hope to restore the arch, flowers and light bulbs. "When we light it up, the (Gunnison) prison won't have anything on us," Nay says.
Another unique feature was the artesian well in the basement. In what must have been one of the earliest versions of swamp cooling, bales of hay were stacked in the basement and drenched with water from the well. Huge fans forced air through the hay and blew it through ductwork upstairs into the theater auditorium.
During the winter, artesian well water was channeled into a boiler to create steam, which flowed into radiators to heat the building.
Nay and Spencer also found a tunnel leading out of the building and under Main Street. Inside the theater basement, to the side of the tunnel opening, was a room with rough concrete walls with old whiskey bottles here and there on the floor. "We think this was a little speakeasy," Spencer says.
The Casino Theater was built by Sims Duggins, an entrepreneur who moved from Provo to Gunnison in the early 1900s. At the time, sugar beets were the dominant cash crop from Payson to Centerfield (a town just south of Gunnison), and Duggins believed Gunnison was destined to become a wealthy, sugar-beet mecca.
In 1912, he built what Spencer describes as a "big box" as the first step in constructing the theater. Meanwhile, he turned to the Beaux-Arts School of Architectural Design in Paris to design the facade and hired a Pittsburgh company to build it. Components of the facade arrived by train and were installed in 1915.
Courtesy Lori NayThe facade of the historic Casino Star Theater, seen in 2006, is to be restored to its original grandeur. After Duggins died in 1928, his widow hired C.E. Huish, whose family owned theaters throughout Utah, to manage the theater. Huish installed a metallic false facade over the arch and lower part of the ornate facade, and the addition ended up preserving many of the original decorations over the years.
In 1940, the Cryill E. Anderson family of Gunnison bought the theater and in the 1950s put up the triangular marquee that is still on the building. They continued to operate it until 1973, although it became less profitable as the years passed, and it faced competition from TV movies, videos and DVDs.
The theater served the whole Gunnison Valley, including not only Gunnison and Centerfield but the tiny surrounding towns of Mayfield, Fayette and Axtell. People came there for political rallies, vaudeville performances, stage plays and movies.
From 1973 to 1987, there were two more owners, and the theater scaled back to showing movies on weekends only. In 1987, while the SOS group was still trying to buy the theater, Paul Mower, owner of the Huish Theater in Payson and a descendant of one-time Star Theater manager C.E. Huish, snatched up the facility. But it wasn't profitable, and by 2004, he was trying to sell it.
With the deal done, Spencer and Nay had to face up to the reality of what they'd purchased. "The lovely elm trees out back had roots in our cast iron pipes," Spencer said. The building was also stuffed with junk.
They closed the theater for five days in order to renovate the foyer and present a fresh, clean entry to the public. They called in high school volunteers to help. At one point, students pulled up worn, soiled carpeting in the lobby and Nay stepped on the concrete underneath. It was spongy.
She decided to drill into the concrete to find out what was underneath. "With the first vibration of the jackhammer, one-third of the lobby sank," Nay says. "I thought the building was coming down."
It turned out water and sewer mains from the street into the building were leaking. The women had to have the plumbing replaced and a new concrete sidewalk and lobby floor poured.
On Nov. 24, 2004, the theater reopened with the movie "Christmas With the Kranks." Since then, the Casino Star has been showing family movies six nights per week with two shows on Fridays and Saturdays. Proceeds from operating go toward restoration.
Nay and Spencer formed the Casino Star Foundation, dedicated to restoring the theater, and in September, the Internal Revenue Service granted the foundation tax-exempt status as a charitable organization. The foundation still has a long list of restoration work that needs to be done. The list ranges from removing the metallic false front and restoring the central arch to replumbing, rewiring and seismic upgrading.
"We know we have a treasure," Nay says. "Now the serious fund raising has to be done."

Last edited by delts145; Jan 11, 2007 at 1:08 PM.
     
     
  #709  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 6:41 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post





Pdxman, whether this was posted before with pics etc I don't know, but I'm glad you brought it up again. In reviewing the different projects of this particular development group, "this is a big upscale positive." I'm really liking the design elements,particularly the large Victorian Canopy. What count of Lifestyle Centers are we at now along the Wasatch? Man, I'm loosing track. Between this, Farmington/Bountiful/No. Salt Lake sector and Provo there are a lot that either already exist and are expanding big time,are under construction, current malls converting over to the lifestyle theme, and projects breaking ground within the next year.
Recently I visited a large new lifestyle center on the western perimeter of Metro L.A.,(Rancho Cucamonga). The concept was great, but the execution,"materials, building designs, etc. was very disapointing." Projects like this one above will assure the Wasatch Projects keep the competitive bar high.
Does anyone know exactly where in relationship to Lagoon this project will be? Man, this is going to give that area a big one-two punch.
Wow, what a terrible project. Look at all that parking...it ruins what could have been a nice urban design and instead we're left with a typical suburban mall, just without a ceiling. These developments are no different than malls and continue to be built around the damn car.
     
     
  #710  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 6:46 PM
jedikermit's Avatar
jedikermit jedikermit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
...we're left with a typical suburban mall, just without a ceiling. These developments are no different than malls and continue to be built around the damn car.
I've had the same feeling for some time. Without a residential component, I don't see much difference between this and a mall--sure it's brighter and prettier, but it doesn't improve how people interact with each other or the businesses.
__________________
Loving Salt Lake City. Despite everything, and because of everything.
     
     
  #711  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 2:18 AM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
Well, i can see your guys' disappointment with this but it does at least have a commuter rail stop, and in regards to it being a typical suburban mall--isn't farmington a typical suburb? The last time i went through there i didn't see anything urban about it. There are places for projects like these, and its the suburbs like farmington. The developer who is doing this will put out a good product...bridgeport village up here in portland is very nice, and it is THE premier place to shop in the state and one of the best in the western us so it should turn out just fine. I will agree that there is a bit much parking, maybe they could consolidate it into a parking garage and then build a sweet park or a plaza?
     
     
  #712  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 2:44 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,615
It's a typical suburb because they keep building crap like this. You're not going to become urban, or even walkable, when you build and build around the auto. Sorry, but suburban development -- even in the suburbs -- does us no good. Build this area with residential, take out a lot of the parking and you've got yourself a nice development. But right now there is no walkable aspect to this project.
     
     
  #713  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 2:57 AM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post


Jmonkey, I think this is probably the kind of ornamental iron work we would both like to see as embellishment on the new Sky Bridge.


I was driving right by there the other day. Glad to see the clock is back.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #714  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 3:02 AM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
Wow, what a terrible project. Look at all that parking...it ruins what could have been a nice urban design and instead we're left with a typical suburban mall, just without a ceiling. These developments are no different than malls and continue to be built around the damn car.
Good point. There is a sea of parking lots. they should of had it underground or somthing like that. Think of all the space they could of saved by doing that. It is a wast of space come to think of it with all that parking. But over all i like the project. Think it will be great for that area. Also i hope the hotel will be tall. kind of like the one being built in PG.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #715  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 3:09 AM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
It's a typical suburb because they keep building crap like this. You're not going to become urban, or even walkable, when you build and build around the auto. Sorry, but suburban development -- even in the suburbs -- does us no good. Build this area with residential, take out a lot of the parking and you've got yourself a nice development. But right now there is no walkable aspect to this project.
I'll agree. There is too much pavement. But places like farmington are so far away from being urban life on earth may end before that word can be used there. I say build a nice plaza or park instead. All in all its better than a dusty vacant lot or god forbid a wal-mart.
     
     
  #716  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:37 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,483
Of course, Farmington is a suburb. Few cities have the potential for true urban development. I can point to a half-dozen examples in Portland where they tried to urbanize a suburban community, and it looks like something in a horror movie. Parking garages and highrises need to be put in a nice urban grid, not in the winding avenues of suburbia.

I think for suburban development, Farmington Station looks great! I would be upset if it was being built in Downtown Ogden, Salt lake, or Provo.... but for Farmington it fits right in.
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
     
     
  #717  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:24 AM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by i-215 View Post
I can point to a half-dozen examples in Portland where they tried to urbanize a suburban community, and it looks like something in a horror movie.
Indeed there are many...portland surely is not immune from such atrocities. Most of them are TODs and most of the bad ones are on the east side. Anyways, my point is you can't do urban planning in the suburbs.
     
     
  #718  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 7:01 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by i-215 View Post
Of course, Farmington is a suburb. Few cities have the potential for true urban development. I can point to a half-dozen examples in Portland where they tried to urbanize a suburban community, and it looks like something in a horror movie. Parking garages and highrises need to be put in a nice urban grid, not in the winding avenues of suburbia.

I think for suburban development, Farmington Station looks great! I would be upset if it was being built in Downtown Ogden, Salt lake, or Provo.... but for Farmington it fits right in.
It only fits right because we don't adapt to change very well here in America. Just because it worked in the past does not mean it's going to work in the future. It's actually short-minded projects like this that's causing much of the problems we're seeing today.

I do love how people bitch about gas prices, commute time, the pollution in the air and the overall uglieness of suburbia, yet then they fully get behind projects like this, that at the time may seem "ok", but 20 years from now will be no different than a typical suburban strip mall.
     
     
  #719  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 7:45 AM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
I should not have posted this
     
     
  #720  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 1:49 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,553
C'mon now PDX, of course you should have posted this. The differing opinions are warranted, but it would help if someone actually would find out the fact's first regarding the residential schedule. Hey, be thankful that the discussion is civilized.

>The fact that this major project is located next to Lagoon and CENTERS AROUND COMMUTER RAIL is a huge positive in any book.

>This developer has proven itself to be a builder of top-quality projects. This is a CORE or HUB project. Both the fact that it is going to be a Quaility presentation and is centered around the commuter-rail, will generate multi-unit residential among many different demographic groups. In essence, this means that it will densify as it mature's. Even Manhattan started alot sparser and more rural than this.

>Has anyone asked Farmington or the developer what kind of residential is planned for this development? I agree that there definately should be a residential/condo component. What are the phase II plans, and what are the phase III plans? In any situation such as this, it is typical to have several short and long term plans incremented in several phases. This occurs especially from the city perspective. In all centers such as this on the West Coast, there has been major follow-up development of multi-story residential. BUT,and this is VERY IMPORTANT,(Even though these projects on the West Coast have followed suit with dense residential, most do not have the commuter rail component advantage). Still even without the commuter rail component, multi-unit residential in these projects have occured either simultaneously or on the heels of and surrounding the project. Perhaps, one of us would be willing to contact Farmington and or the developer and simply ask what the residential prospects are. Any volunteers?

Last edited by delts145; Jan 11, 2007 at 2:21 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:29 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.