HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2006, 1:07 AM
smasher000's Avatar
smasher000 smasher000 is offline
Im smasher000 xD
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver-Burnaby
Posts: 308
Plane makes emergency landing at Vancouver airport
Published: Sunday, December 03, 2006
VANCOUVER — An Air Canada flight from Tokyo to Vancouver has landed without incident after one of its engines went down.

Air Canada says emergency crews were on stand-by at Vancouver International Airport as a standard precaution.

All 170 passengers on Air Canada Flight 004, an Airbus A-340, are safe.

This is the third emergency landing at Vancouver’s airport in the last few days.

Last week, two planes had to turn back after experiencing problems during take-off.

Source: canada.com/vancouversun
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2006, 1:27 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Awesome.....we're the world's aircraft emergency room.
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2006, 4:25 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,698
Frontier to launch Vancouver to Denver service

It will be the first low-cost U.S. airline to serve Vancouver when it begins its new service in May

Bruce Constantineau, Vancouver Sun
Published: Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Frontier Airlines will become the first low-cost U.S. airline to serve Vancouver next year when it launches a year-round, daily non-stop service between Vancouver and Denver.

Vancouver International Airport officials hope the move encourages other major discount U.S. carriers such as Southwest Airlines and JetBlue Airways to follow suit.

Denver-based Frontier announced Tuesday it will begin its new Vancouver service on May 5 with a 132-passenger Airbus A319 aircraft, about a year after entering the Canadian market this year with a Calgary-Denver service that uses a 70-passenger Bombardier CRJ-700.

"We feel there's a tremendous cross-seasonal opportunity in Vancouver," Frontier official Joe Hodas said in an interview.

"We can leverage the huge Vancouver-Alaska cruise ship traffic and in the winter, there's still a great draw between Denver and Vancouver."

More than 80 per cent of the one million annual Vancouver-Alaska cruise passengers are Americans, so Frontier's summer schedule will focus on serving that market.

Hodas said the winter schedule will change for the convenience of Vancouver passengers who want to connect with Denver flights bound for Mexican destinations such as Cancun, Puerto Vallarta, Cabo San Lucas and Guadalajara.

"We will come in and offer lower fares and a better product in that market," he said, noting the A319 has 84 cm of leg room and a choice of 24 live TV channels or three pay-per-view movies in every seatback.

Hodas feels other low-cost U.S. carriers have not yet tested the Canadian market due to "barriers to entry" such as different regulatory and banking issues that come into effect when flying outside the U.S.

"With Vancouver being our second Canadian market, things should go a little easier because we learned our lessons the first time around," he said. "We think there's plenty of potential left for us [in other Canadian markets], but there's nothing imminent right now."

The Calgary service is operated through a partnership with Horizon Air, which is branded as Frontier Jet Express. Hodas said the new Vancouver service will be a "mainline" Frontier aircraft.

Frontier will offer introductory fares as low as $218 US, excluding fees and taxes, for a Vancouver-to-Denver round trip. United Airlines is the only airline currently offering a direct daily flight between Vancouver and Denver, although Air Canada has a codeshare agreement on that service.

Frontier Airlines, which began operations in 1994, serves 49 destinations with a fleet of 55 aircraft. The company posted a $14-million US loss last year on revenues of $994.3 million US.

Vancouver International Airport Authority chief financial officer Tony Gugliotta said Frontier's decision to fly to Vancouver is significant, and the airport will do whatever it can to attract other large discount U.S. carriers. He said he met with senior Southwest Airlines officials in Texas last year to discuss that airline's chances of coming to Vancouver.

"Right now, they feel they have enough expansion opportunities within the U.S.," he said. "But I think they have tentative plans to extend their routes to international destinations within three years. They are very interested in Canada and they are very interested in Vancouver. But there are no hard commitments about whether they'd come to Vancouver first."

Calgary-based airline industry analyst Rick Erickson doubts that Frontier's move to the Canadian market will blaze the trail for bigger U.S. discount airlines, noting Canada has only attracted a few "nibbles" from those carriers since an open skies deal with the U.S. came into effect in 1995.

"Our Canadian carriers are pretty aggressive in the U.S. marketplace on price so the low-cost guys don't really hold a terrific advantage," he said in an interview. "We also have higher taxes and fees in Canada because of the nature of our economy, and the U.S. carriers can find that difficult."

Erickson welcomed Frontier's expanded service in Canada but doubts it will provide a huge benefit to consumers.

[email protected]


© The Vancouver Sun 2006
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2006, 10:10 PM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,450
YVR plans to lower international landing fees

Bruce Constantineau, Vancouver Sun
Published: Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Vancouver airport will slash international landing fees next year to comply with new open-skies deals negotiated with the U.S. and U.K.

The move to equalize domestic and international landing fees will cost the airport about $8 million in revenues next year, as landing fees for international jets will drop 26 to 47 per cent, starting Jan. 1.

Vancouver airport authority chief financial officer Tony Gugliotta said the new open-skies deals forbid any price difference between international and domestic fees.

"Because of our strong financial position, we chose to do it this way, rather than increasing domestic fees to the international rate," he said in an interview. "Over time, we hope this will be positive for us by stimulating more traffic to Vancouver."

He said the landing fee for an international Boeing 747 will drop by 32 per cent next year, to $1,763 from $2,598.

Singapore Airlines vice-president Campbell Wilson said the lower fees will save airlines between a few hundred thousand dollars to nearly a million dollars a year. "Anything that can be done to reduce costs is very welcome. "Although it's a reasonably small component of total costs, airports are competing with each other, so anything that makes Vancouver that little bit more attractive certainly gets our attention."


The Association of Airline Representatives in Canada, which represents foreign airlines in Canada, said the Vancouver fee cuts stand in stark contrast to constant fee hikes at Pearson International Airport in Toronto.

Cathay Pacific Airways vice-president Philippe Lacamp said in a news release: "Both airports must pay rent to the federal government, and both airports have significant capital expansion plans, yet only Vancouver appears to view airlines as facilitators of growth rather than cash cows to be milked."

© The Vancouver Sun 2006
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2006, 10:23 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,568
Ouch.
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2006, 11:13 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
thats good news for YVR IMO.....makes it much more attractive than PEARSON INTERBLINGANAL......which asks for $10,000 for a 747 now.....
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2006, 11:56 PM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,484
Thanks for the good news. looks like vancouver might see a handful of new airlines by summer. so far only fly globe span and frontier.
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2006, 7:27 AM
crazyjoeda's Avatar
crazyjoeda crazyjoeda is offline
Mac User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
thats good news for YVR IMO.....makes it much more attractive than PEARSON INTERBLINGANAL......which asks for $10,000 for a 747 now.....

Toronto is more that 5x more expencive than Vancouver to land in???
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2006, 7:28 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
toronto is now #1 in the world to land in....hence the controversy over the taj - T1
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2006, 7:40 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
may i ask why in the world would toronto set fees so high?
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2006, 8:23 AM
Hourglass Hourglass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
may i ask why in the world would toronto set fees so high?
Depends who you talk to. A simplified explanation:

The airlines blame the GTAA for spending massive amounts of money building a gold-plated terminal -- which is then passed on to airlines in the form of landing fees.

GTAA blames the federal government for setting land rents on the airport too high, resulting in higher landing fees to cover these costs.

Bottom line: Pearson is by far Canada's #1 airport located in its most populous region and economic heartland (oilsands notwithstanding). Hence, they probably can get away with charging exorbitant landing fees, since where else are the airlines going to fly?

Good to see YVR lowering their fees. Wouldn't be surprised to see increased frequencies to Asia as well as a number of new airlines setting up shop. There was a rumor on airliners.net that China Southern was looking to start service between either YVR or YYZ and CAN. This could tip them over the fence towards YVR.
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2006, 5:37 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
"Bottom line: Pearson is by far Canada's #1 airport located in its most populous region and economic heartland (oilsands notwithstanding). Hence, they probably can get away with charging exorbitant landing fees, since where else are the airlines going to fly? "

Hamilton and Ottawa are already benefitting from this, but yeah....basically airlines have to hit toronto.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2006, 11:07 AM
Hourglass Hourglass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
"Bottom line: Pearson is by far Canada's #1 airport located in its most populous region and economic heartland (oilsands notwithstanding). Hence, they probably can get away with charging exorbitant landing fees, since where else are the airlines going to fly? "

Hamilton and Ottawa are already benefitting from this, but yeah....basically airlines have to hit toronto.
Interestingly, Hamilton airport is run by YVRAS, the airport management subsidiary of YVR.

I know they got hit when Westjet moved their eastern hub to YYZ, but from afar, it seems Hamilton could be doing more to attract traffic given their location and YYZ's high airport fees.

Incidentally, anyone have any recent pictures of YVR's international terminal expansion?
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2006, 3:11 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
I will tomorrow morning when I get back for christmas... I'll be sure to have the camera charged up.
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2006, 4:33 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,111
^^^ I wanna see the aquarium in the International wing.
     
     
  #356  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2006, 5:43 AM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,484
Rumor has it Harmony is getting 737's next summer. Not sure which versions but i would guess 700's and 800's. They will keep the 757's for the hawaii routes. but will likely only have 2 757's becuase one is having a lot of maintenance problems, (802 C-GMYD) and one of the other aircraft's lease is up in march.
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2006, 5:59 AM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Pearson is a monument to money well wasted. Esthetically it is beautiful, but functionaly speaking, its a nightmare. Half empty terminals, LA freeway style off ramps, monorail... no wonder they have to charge so much to land there.
     
     
  #358  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2007, 7:43 PM
westcoast604's Avatar
westcoast604 westcoast604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 503
^ That road network is absolutly ridiculous. Is there really a need for that many ramps, twists, and turns? Im sure a more simple design could have been prepared, but that is just like Toronto. Trying to impress, look big, and be over the top, in your face. It really looks stupid and is not practical.

     
     
  #359  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2007, 8:47 PM
crazyjoeda's Avatar
crazyjoeda crazyjoeda is offline
Mac User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 861
^ Its not really impressive. It looks like they hired an 8 year old to design the roads. There are many Airports bigger than Toronto and none of them have a ridiculace network of roads. I think a rail connection to an airport is more impressive, which Vancouver will have in 2years.
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2007, 11:08 PM
Nutterbug Nutterbug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,067
^ I take it this whole mess could have been avoided if they'd put everything into one terminal building. I believe they're now trying to concentrate everything into the new Terminal 1, no?

Instead of this messy knot of intertwining freeways, what would have been so bad about having fewer roads neatly aligned and providing all the necessary connections, crossing at a few intersections with traffic lights anyways?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.